Hide BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to check out our fundraiser »

MAHA Draft Report: Pesticides, Processed Foods Unmentioned, But Conspiracy Theories Abound

from the tin-foil-report dept

We’ve already demonstrated over the course of plenty of posts that RFK Jr. is wildly incapable of running Health and Human Services. The fact that he was even nominated for a role in managing American health is absolutely bonkers, but that a Senate filled with supposed grown adults voted to confirm his appointment to HHS should, and I believe will, become a historical stain on the legacy of that particular institution. But while Kennedy has demonstrated he’s incapable of applying real medical science to his job, and indeed sometimes even a basic level of humanity, he’s also infecting HHS with his conspiracy theories.

Anti-vaxxers running ACIP, the panel that approves of vaccination schedules? Check! A committment to have HHS get to the bottom of all those chemtrails in the sky? Check! But if you want to really see the conspiracy theories run amok, you need only look at a drafted report from HHS entitled Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy.

Does it have a strategy for reducing ultra-processed foods in the diets of children? Nope! How about pesticides? Nope! New regulations on industry to create a healthier ecosystem for children? Nope! But it does include some of Kennedy’s favorite conspiracy theories.

That includes attacking water fluoridation, casting doubt on the safety of childhood vaccines, pushing for more physical activity in children to reduce chronic diseases, getting rid of synthetic food dyes, and claiming that children are being overprescribed medications.

While the importance of water quality is raised in the report, it’s only in the context of fluoride and not of any other key contaminants, such as lead or PFAS. And although the draft strategy will prioritize “whole, minimally processed foods,” it offers no strategy for reducing the proportion of ultra-processed food (UPF) in Americans’ diets. The strategy merely aims to come up with a “government-wide definition” for UPF to guide future research and policies.

Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning. A very specific kind of lead poisoning, in fact, as in the it’s from the kind of lead that gets fired out of a firearm. It is just completely unaddressed, inconvenient to Kennedy’s narrative and thusly ignored. If we could solve that problem, combined with reducing motor vehicle deaths for children, you’d essentially cut the number of child deaths in half. Neither issue even gets a mention in the report.

Instead we’re out here battling flouride over the objections of dentists everywhere, food dyes (which, fine, whatever), and I guess potentially 5G and WiFi signals?

Amid the predictable MAHA topics and industry concessions, one short section stands out for its obvious link to conspiracy theories. The draft includes a brief section on electromagnetic radiation that says the health department, along with other unnamed federal agencies, will conduct studies to find “gaps in knowledge” regarding safety and efficacy.

While the section is vague, it brings to mind Kennedy’s long history of falsely claiming that electromagnetic radiation, in the form of Wi-Fi and 5G, causes a variety of health problems— including cancer, autism, a variety of mental and cognitive problems, post-traumatic stress, fatigue, and Type 2 diabetes.

Yes, it’s vague, but Kennedy has been much more explicit about this sort of thing prior to his profane appointment in government.

In a 2023 podcast with Joe Rogan, Kennedy made the unsupported claim that “Wi-Fi radiation opens up your blood-brain barrier, so all these toxins that are in your body can now go into your brain.”

In his Senate confirmation in January, Kennedy confirmed in an exchange with Senator Andrew Kim (D-NJ) that he still believes that and that 5G is equally harmful. He added that it “changes DNA” and does “other things.” He has previously stated that 5G is being used for mass surveillance.

You can bet that’s exactly what Kennedy is going to pursue from that vague section. This entire report reads like a list of his favorite unproven or debunked pet conspiracy theories. The exceptions, such as ultra-processed foods and pesticides, both of which were also big priorities of Kennedy prior to joining the government, are those that would annoy industry and commerce.

He’s not a crusader. If he was, it wouldn’t matter that big business didn’t like his report. I’m not even sure if he’s a true believer any longer. He might just be a conspiracy-addled and/or peddling charlatan setting himself up for more power or pay.

But he is dangerous, to be sure. And this report is nonsense and devoid of actual science.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “MAHA Draft Report: Pesticides, Processed Foods Unmentioned, But Conspiracy Theories Abound”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
62 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

RIchZ (profile) says:

MAHA Draft Report and Conspiracies

Timothy Geigner writes “Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning.” (meaning shooting deaths)

Possibly the reason it’s absent is because it’s a conspiracy theory from the professional anti-gun industry. Death by firearm is far from the leading cause of child death. In an attempt to justify their claim, they counted 17-19 year olds as “children” – the prime gang-banger age group. They’re still wrong overall, even with trying to cheat on the statistics.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

Timothy Geigner writes “Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning.” (meaning shooting deaths). Possibly the reason it’s absent is because it’s a conspiracy theory from the professional anti-gun industry.

If you have evidence stating otherwise, feel free to share it with the class instead of just going “nuh-uh!”.

Anonymous Coward says:

Conspiracy drivel

Conspiracy Theories Abound

As another anonymous poster said on Mike Brock’s most recent story, none of these are “theories”. They proposed we use the term “conspiracy fantasy”—which is decent, but puts them in the same category as the works of Tolkien, Le Guin, and others who put a hell of a lot of work into building coherent worlds. That hardly seems fair.

How about “conspiracy drivel”? “Supposition” and “assumption” could also work, if one wishes to be more neutral.

I considered “hypothesis”, but that has to be an educated guess, which this shit isn’t. “Conjecture” seems too kind, because in mathematics it similarly means something more than a wild-ass guess. “Speculation” has some meanings related to thought, meditation, and reasoning, which are not evident.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

How about ‘conspiracy figment’?

That’s a good suggestion.

But, interestingly, it turns out that I didn’t actually know what that word meant till now. I thought it was just something like “portion”, but apparently it does mean “mental fabrication” specifically, thereby making a common suffix like “of your imagination” almost entirely redundant.

but because they are polysyllabic (and this is not a high IQ, polysyllabic word-slinging crowd we’re dealing with).

Well, so’s “figment”, and never mind “con-spir-a-cy”. The crowd we’re talking about are not really the direct target audience of this phrase (and wouldn’t be believing these things “theories” anyway). I do hope that if others stop using “theory” incorrectly, that crowd might catch on via osmosis. I don’t much care whether they can “sling” the replacement term.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:4

As stated above regarding climate change, it’s common to dismiss climate change as “only” a theory. Probably some do know what the word means, but the rhetoric wouldn’t be so common were it not fooling people.

On the other side, there are also people thinking conspiracy theories are inherently false, which is ridiculous. There’s a valid conspiracy theory for the 9/11 attacks, and quite possibly for what’s doing on in the U.S. federal government right now.

Anonymous Coward says:

3 things

Firstly:
I mean, pesticides are a money maker if you want to prevent rats, so… 🤷 (just my two cents)
Same case for ultra processed foods.

And also:
Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning. A very specific kind of lead poisoning, in fact, as in the it’s from the kind of lead that gets fired out of a firearm. It is just completely unaddressed, inconvenient to Kennedy’s narrative and thusly ignored. If we could solve that problem, combined with reducing motor vehicle deaths for children, you’d essentially cut the number of child deaths in half. Neither issue even gets a mention in the report.

My guess is he left it out, since solving that problem means getting rid of the second amendment. (at least to some, I know there’s gun control laws, I’m just pointing out a common problem)

Lastly:
Instead we’re out here battling flouride over the objections of dentists everywhere, food dyes (which, fine, whatever), and I guess potentially 5G and WiFi signals?

I don’t know if trump will agree with RFK on this, assumingly? 🤷
Then again, I could be wrong.

Grant Gould says:

Gov't-wide UPF definition? Good luck

Every attempt to put down a concrete definition of “ultra-processed” ends up quickly in absurd outcomes, special pleading, and inconsistency. Just reading the existing definitions will make your head spin (Extrusion is ultra-processing, but pasta is not ultra-processed? Fermentation is ultra-processing but wine isn’t ultra-processed? Bad labor standards being a form of ultra-processing?). And these definitions aren’t bad because they are made by idiots, they are made because they are at best trying to staple down a fog (or at worst put “my grandparents would have thought it was weird or foreign” into science words).

The notion that the US federal government is going to arrive at a single uniform definition of ultra-processing when the entire rest of the universe hasn’t, and in the absence of any predictive theory of the underlying physics or chemistry, is hilariously dumb.

Leave a Reply to Anonymous Coward Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...