MAHA Draft Report: Pesticides, Processed Foods Unmentioned, But Conspiracy Theories Abound
from the tin-foil-report dept
We’ve already demonstrated over the course of plenty of posts that RFK Jr. is wildly incapable of running Health and Human Services. The fact that he was even nominated for a role in managing American health is absolutely bonkers, but that a Senate filled with supposed grown adults voted to confirm his appointment to HHS should, and I believe will, become a historical stain on the legacy of that particular institution. But while Kennedy has demonstrated he’s incapable of applying real medical science to his job, and indeed sometimes even a basic level of humanity, he’s also infecting HHS with his conspiracy theories.
Anti-vaxxers running ACIP, the panel that approves of vaccination schedules? Check! A committment to have HHS get to the bottom of all those chemtrails in the sky? Check! But if you want to really see the conspiracy theories run amok, you need only look at a drafted report from HHS entitled Make Our Children Healthy Again Strategy.
Does it have a strategy for reducing ultra-processed foods in the diets of children? Nope! How about pesticides? Nope! New regulations on industry to create a healthier ecosystem for children? Nope! But it does include some of Kennedy’s favorite conspiracy theories.
That includes attacking water fluoridation, casting doubt on the safety of childhood vaccines, pushing for more physical activity in children to reduce chronic diseases, getting rid of synthetic food dyes, and claiming that children are being overprescribed medications.
While the importance of water quality is raised in the report, it’s only in the context of fluoride and not of any other key contaminants, such as lead or PFAS. And although the draft strategy will prioritize “whole, minimally processed foods,” it offers no strategy for reducing the proportion of ultra-processed food (UPF) in Americans’ diets. The strategy merely aims to come up with a “government-wide definition” for UPF to guide future research and policies.
Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning. A very specific kind of lead poisoning, in fact, as in the it’s from the kind of lead that gets fired out of a firearm. It is just completely unaddressed, inconvenient to Kennedy’s narrative and thusly ignored. If we could solve that problem, combined with reducing motor vehicle deaths for children, you’d essentially cut the number of child deaths in half. Neither issue even gets a mention in the report.
Instead we’re out here battling flouride over the objections of dentists everywhere, food dyes (which, fine, whatever), and I guess potentially 5G and WiFi signals?
Amid the predictable MAHA topics and industry concessions, one short section stands out for its obvious link to conspiracy theories. The draft includes a brief section on electromagnetic radiation that says the health department, along with other unnamed federal agencies, will conduct studies to find “gaps in knowledge” regarding safety and efficacy.
While the section is vague, it brings to mind Kennedy’s long history of falsely claiming that electromagnetic radiation, in the form of Wi-Fi and 5G, causes a variety of health problems— including cancer, autism, a variety of mental and cognitive problems, post-traumatic stress, fatigue, and Type 2 diabetes.
Yes, it’s vague, but Kennedy has been much more explicit about this sort of thing prior to his profane appointment in government.
In a 2023 podcast with Joe Rogan, Kennedy made the unsupported claim that “Wi-Fi radiation opens up your blood-brain barrier, so all these toxins that are in your body can now go into your brain.”
In his Senate confirmation in January, Kennedy confirmed in an exchange with Senator Andrew Kim (D-NJ) that he still believes that and that 5G is equally harmful. He added that it “changes DNA” and does “other things.” He has previously stated that 5G is being used for mass surveillance.
You can bet that’s exactly what Kennedy is going to pursue from that vague section. This entire report reads like a list of his favorite unproven or debunked pet conspiracy theories. The exceptions, such as ultra-processed foods and pesticides, both of which were also big priorities of Kennedy prior to joining the government, are those that would annoy industry and commerce.
He’s not a crusader. If he was, it wouldn’t matter that big business didn’t like his report. I’m not even sure if he’s a true believer any longer. He might just be a conspiracy-addled and/or peddling charlatan setting himself up for more power or pay.
But he is dangerous, to be sure. And this report is nonsense and devoid of actual science.
Filed Under: 5g, chemtrails, conspiracy theories, fluoride, health and human services, maha, processed foods, rfk jr., wifi
BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to




Comments on “MAHA Draft Report: Pesticides, Processed Foods Unmentioned, But Conspiracy Theories Abound”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
MAHA Draft Report and Conspiracies
Timothy Geigner writes “Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning.” (meaning shooting deaths)
Possibly the reason it’s absent is because it’s a conspiracy theory from the professional anti-gun industry. Death by firearm is far from the leading cause of child death. In an attempt to justify their claim, they counted 17-19 year olds as “children” – the prime gang-banger age group. They’re still wrong overall, even with trying to cheat on the statistics.
Re:
I’m sure that will be a comfort to the families of the children killed in Sandy Hook, Uvalde, and every other school shooting since (and including) Columbine.
Re: Re:
“Comfort” is not a relevant concept in identifying causes of death.
Re: Re:
Shifting the goalposts, appeal to emotion.
Re: Re: Re:
Why are you having a go at someone countering what appears to be Ehud Gavron’s latest sockpuppet?
Re:
If you have evidence stating otherwise, feel free to share it with the class instead of just going “nuh-uh!”.
Re:
We know you Republicans like to fuck 14 year olds, but anyone under 19 is a child still. Sorry pedo.
Re: Re:
The risk is still conditional on being a gang banger.
Re: Re:
You must live either in Alabama or Nebraska. Everywhere else in the US, the age of majority is 18.
Re:
That’s stupid, Rich. You’re stupid.
Re: Good job....
Your pedantry is impressive. If your only real complaint is that I used “child” instead of “non-adult”, I’ll take that as a compliment.
Given the strict definition of “child”, you’re technically right, which is the best kind of right.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
The complaint is that you’re intentionally conflating gang banger teenagers with every kid in America, in order to hide risk conditions.
Re: Re: Re:
The countercomplaint is that you haven’t provided a single shred of evidence to back up your (racist-ass) assertion. Prove your shit or leave—I don’t care which.
Re: Re: Re:2
Most gun violence in America is gang-related and done by young men. Deal.
Re: Re: Re:3
Got a source on that?
Re: Re: Re:4
Content enough with you pretending otherwise, in point of fact.
Re: Re: Re:5
So no. Gotcha.
Re: Re: Re:2
Try stepping out your bubble and living where the gun violence happens.
Re: Re: Re:3
So should I go to an elementary school or a CDC building?
Re: Re:
It’s worth being aware that when you people say “kids,” it includes 17-year-old killers.
Re: Re: Re:
Decent chance that a vast majority of the “kids” in question are actually late-teenaged killers.
Re: Re: Re:
So you’re claiming that most of the 17yo’s killed by guns are in fact killers themselves? Do you need an adult to explain to you how stupid that sounds?
Re: Re: Re:2
They are claiming that the kids and young adults in question are black, nonspecific brown or at least poor, so their deaths are good and proper and desirable.
see also: the entire “they are just criminals” talking points since the eighties, at least.
Re: Re: Re:3
Y’all have gang violence rolled into that statistic and you know it. If you think “black people” when you hear “gang banger,” that’s on you.
Re: Re: Re:4
FYI, we don’t think “black people” when we hear “gang banger”, we think “Trump’s favorite excuse”, so the racism here is on you for excusing it. Thanks for playing.
Re:
40k a year. Hope you die fucking your gun, you love it more than humans.
Re: Re:
Only MAGA should have guns.
Re: Re: Re:
Given the amount of accidental self-shootings by people who legally possess guns, that’s actually a sound comment.
Conspiracy drivel
As another anonymous poster said on Mike Brock’s most recent story, none of these are “theories”. They proposed we use the term “conspiracy fantasy”—which is decent, but puts them in the same category as the works of Tolkien, Le Guin, and others who put a hell of a lot of work into building coherent worlds. That hardly seems fair.
How about “conspiracy drivel”? “Supposition” and “assumption” could also work, if one wishes to be more neutral.
I considered “hypothesis”, but that has to be an educated guess, which this shit isn’t. “Conjecture” seems too kind, because in mathematics it similarly means something more than a wild-ass guess. “Speculation” has some meanings related to thought, meditation, and reasoning, which are not evident.
Re:
Supposition and assumption have a certain credibility to them, not because of their actual definitions but because they are polysyllabic (and this is not a high IQ, polysyllabic word-slinging crowd we’re dealing with).
How about ‘conspiracy figment’?
Re: Re:
That’s a good suggestion.
But, interestingly, it turns out that I didn’t actually know what that word meant till now. I thought it was just something like “portion”, but apparently it does mean “mental fabrication” specifically, thereby making a common suffix like “of your imagination” almost entirely redundant.
Well, so’s “figment”, and never mind “con-spir-a-cy”. The crowd we’re talking about are not really the direct target audience of this phrase (and wouldn’t be believing these things “theories” anyway). I do hope that if others stop using “theory” incorrectly, that crowd might catch on via osmosis. I don’t much care whether they can “sling” the replacement term.
Re:
Your pedantry is thoroughly unimpressive.
Re: Re:
That’s fine, but we really should stop calling things “theories” colloquially. It leads to real and harmful misunderstandings, like when people say evolution and human-caused climate change are “only theories”.
Re: Re: Re:
You might as well be arguing about the use of the words decimate, awful, or manufacture.
Re: Re: Re:2
The difference is that, as far as I know, the public is not being actively harmed by the misuse or misunderstanding of those words.
Re: Re: Re:3
How is the public being harmed by the misuse or misunderstanding of “conspiracy theory”? I have yet to meet someone who didn’t know exactly what “conspiracy theory” meant.
Re: Re: Re:4
I think the concern is that the word “Theory” is being dragged down to “wild crud I made up” which damages the ability to understand the usage in science.
Re: Re: Re:4
As stated above regarding climate change, it’s common to dismiss climate change as “only” a theory. Probably some do know what the word means, but the rhetoric wouldn’t be so common were it not fooling people.
On the other side, there are also people thinking conspiracy theories are inherently false, which is ridiculous. There’s a valid conspiracy theory for the 9/11 attacks, and quite possibly for what’s doing on in the U.S. federal government right now.
Re: Re: Re:4
Your pedantry is thoroughly unimpressive.
Re:
It’s conspiracy diarrhea. Complete shit that falls apart.
Re:
Conspiracy delusions?
Re: Re:
“A fixed false belief that is resistant to reason or confrontation with actual fact”—excellent. Better than “fiction” which came to my mind.
Something like “supposition” does have a neutrality to it, which is sometimes appropriate; but not in relation to Kennedy’s bullshit.
Re:
You’re all being entirely too nice about this. “Conspiracy lies” is really the only term that fits. They know chemtrails and all the rest is BS, so don’t legitimize it with anything but “lies”.
Re: Re:
We really have no way of knowing that. I have no trouble believing that many of them truly accept the conspiracy theories they spout, in which case they’re not lies.
Well, I’m curious what Jeffrey Epstein says about all of this.
Re:
“gargle-gargle…..” Is my guess.
3 things
Firstly:
I mean, pesticides are a money maker if you want to prevent rats, so… 🤷 (just my two cents)
Same case for ultra processed foods.
And also:
Also notably absent is any mention of the leading cause of death in children, which is lead poisoning. A very specific kind of lead poisoning, in fact, as in the it’s from the kind of lead that gets fired out of a firearm. It is just completely unaddressed, inconvenient to Kennedy’s narrative and thusly ignored. If we could solve that problem, combined with reducing motor vehicle deaths for children, you’d essentially cut the number of child deaths in half. Neither issue even gets a mention in the report.
My guess is he left it out, since solving that problem means getting rid of the second amendment. (at least to some, I know there’s gun control laws, I’m just pointing out a common problem)
Lastly:
Instead we’re out here battling flouride over the objections of dentists everywhere, food dyes (which, fine, whatever), and I guess potentially 5G and WiFi signals?
I don’t know if trump will agree with RFK on this, assumingly? 🤷
Then again, I could be wrong.
I’m fairly sure RFK will make sure the govt distribute free tinfoil hats to the population so they can protect themselves against those evil airwaves.
Re:
I somewhat doubt it, but then again, you never know. 🤷
Re:
meta conspiracy theory: Those government issued tinfoil hats are reading your brian waves and using your subconscious for nefarious purposes[0]
[0] Already, I admit I kind of gave up here. insert your own favorite “sounds sufficiently crazy and prohibited by physics” drivel here.
Re: Re:
No no. Tin isn’t dense enough to block signals. You need lead for that. That’s why THEY always talk about tin-foil hats, because it becomes a meme that doesn’t work but makes you think it will.
/conspiracy
Re: Re: Re:
That’s OK because there’s no such thing as tin foil since not long after the Second World War. We now use aluminum foil, which is thick enough to block signals. So maybe the conspiracy nuts are actually onto something with this one.
Re: Re: Re:
Then how come the tin foil (aluminum) siding on my house causes my signal to drop from three bars to one?
Lots of WiFi at Kennedy's home
RFK must have WiFi galore wherever he goes because it is clear that HIS blood-brain-barrier is welcoming all the BS and toxins in his body.
Make Kennedy Brain Toxins Great Again!
Alone this might have been a smidgen of sanity
Re:
It’s good for children to go to those mines they sure do yearn for!
Well he’s right about that (just ask the NSA and telco)… but I think he was probably referring to something stupider (and that I’ve no had the misfortune of hearing about). So it’s probably entirely by accident.
Gov't-wide UPF definition? Good luck
Every attempt to put down a concrete definition of “ultra-processed” ends up quickly in absurd outcomes, special pleading, and inconsistency. Just reading the existing definitions will make your head spin (Extrusion is ultra-processing, but pasta is not ultra-processed? Fermentation is ultra-processing but wine isn’t ultra-processed? Bad labor standards being a form of ultra-processing?). And these definitions aren’t bad because they are made by idiots, they are made because they are at best trying to staple down a fog (or at worst put “my grandparents would have thought it was weird or foreign” into science words).
The notion that the US federal government is going to arrive at a single uniform definition of ultra-processing when the entire rest of the universe hasn’t, and in the absence of any predictive theory of the underlying physics or chemistry, is hilariously dumb.
RFQuixote Jr
Yes yes yes Sancho we’ll look into these ‘real’ problems you speak of, but only once we’ve slain all these ferocious giants!
Fighting delusions while ignoring demonstrable threats
Thanks in large part to RFK Jr the government’s ‘health plan’ is now the equivalent of spending your entire house’s budget on anti-monster-under-the-bed planning while inviting in and then ignoring the serial killer now hanging out in your kitchen.
how about "conspiracy distraction"?
Let’s go with “conspiracy distraction” since that describes their purpose: to distract from actual real-world problems.