Hide BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to check out our fundraiser »

Netflix To Buy Warner Bros For $82.7 Billion, But Trump FCC, DOJ Could Intervene For All The Wrong Reasons

from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept

So Netflix has announced that it’s buying Warner Brothers Discovery (including HBO) for a whopping $82.7 billion. As we’ve well covered, it’s the latest in a long series of pointless Warner mergers stretching back to the 2001 AOL acquisition, which all resulted in oodles of chaos, price hikes, layoffs, and generally a steady erosion in product quality.

Netflix’s deal includes a $5.8 billion breakup fee and promises to maintain Warner Bros. current operations, “including theatrical releases.” The deal doesn’t include Warner Bros Discovery’s struggling linear networks business (CNN, TNT, HGTV and Discovery+) which Netflix wisely wanted nothing to do with. Those are scheduled to be spun out next year into their own sagging sub-company.

Netflix is, of course, making all manner of pre-merger promises about how the deal will be great for everyone, especially creatives:

“Netflix also made its pitch to filmmakers and creatives, writing that “by uniting Netflix’s member experience and global reach with Warner Bros.’ renowned franchises and extensive library, the Company will create greater value for talent — offering more opportunities to work with beloved intellectual property, tell new stories and connect with a wider audience than ever before.”

But as we’ve seen the last three or four times Warner Brothers has been acquired, pre-merger promises mean absolutely nothing. The massive debt created by these acquisitions inevitably results in panicked cost cutting, which usually involves mass layoffs, (even bigger) price hikes, and a general cannibalization of brand and product quality. It happens over and over again.

Of the suitors that could have bought Warner Brothers Discovery (Comcast/NBC and Larry Ellison/CBS/Paramount), Netflix is probably the “best” option. They are (for now) the least up Trump’s ass of the three bidders; and generally may retain more of the core Warner Brothers Discovery infrastructure and staff due to fewer existing redundancies.

That’s not to say the deal will be good, necessarily. If we lived in a non-corrupt country with functioning regulators, the government likely wouldn’t allow any additional consolidation in mainstream corporate media, as the results to date have been nothing but harmful for labor, consumers, and markets. These companies’ journalism arms, if you haven’t noticed, like to downplay or ignore this fact in coverage.

Play a little game with me at home: if you’re reading a story about this deal, stop and notice if the journalist and outlet, at any point, mentions the fact that the decades’ worth of past variants of Warner deals were utterly disastrous for labor, consumers, creativity, and healthy markets. Because that’s kind of important context if your job is informing the public of the truth!

The bungled AT&T acquisition of Warner and DirecTV alone resulted in a massive layoff spree including 50,000 people. But when the consolidated corporate press covers the latest merger, that’s not mentioned. Why is that choice made editorially, do you wager?

Meanwhile Netflix still has a hurdle to face: the weird zealots at the Trump DOJ and FCC. Paramount and/or the Trump administration has spent the last week seeding complaints in Republican-friendly media that the bidding process was unfair to Larry Ellison and CBS/Paramount, and that the Trump administration is concerned about the antitrust impact of a Netflix Warner Brothers combination.

The Trump administration couldn’t give any less of a shit about antitrust or consolidated corporate power; they just want leverage over Netflix and/or to make sure their friend Larry Ellison can acquire HBO and CNN. And they’re mad at Netflix because they put some gay people in shows about the military. The Ellisons may acquire the spun off TV assets, but they may also still want to leverage Trump to get much more.

So I would not be surprised that if in a few weeks or so you see Trump’s FCC lackey Brendan Carr launch some kind of fake inquiry into “irregularities in the bidding process,” where he talks a lot about Netflix’s consolidated power “not being in the public interest.” The goal will be twofold: to force ownership over to Ellison, or at least to (as we’ve seen with CBS mergers) force Netflix to kiss Donald’s ass.

The press (and the usual assortment of useful idiot pundits) will likely then help Trump pretend these inquiries are legitimate “populist” antitrust actions.

If you recall, the first Trump administration sued to stop the AT&T Time Warner deal. That was heralded as a rare example of the administration actually caring about consolidated corporate power by the press; but it turned out it was mostly because Rupert Murdoch had his own acquisition offer for CNN rejected and wanted to scuttle the deal.

Keep your eyes peeled for regulatory shenanigans. Even if the Trump administration doesn’t abuse FCC and DOJ power to help Ellison, they’ll certainly abuse regulatory merger approval power to try and force Netflix to kiss their asses in new and problematic ways (see: CBS, Verizon). And Netflix, no stranger to throwing ethics under the bridge when convenient, will very likely be happy to oblige.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: netflix, warner bros. discovery

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Netflix To Buy Warner Bros For $82.7 Billion, But Trump FCC, DOJ Could Intervene For All The Wrong Reasons”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
11 Comments
TJ Aich (profile) says:

Goodbye free HBO Max?

So, I and many others have a personal connection to this long, sordid history of WB mergers. One of the conditions of the AT&T deal with Tine Warner was that they would roll out fiber to a certain number of neighborhoods. They did just as many as required and then stopped and laid off the workers.

My neighborhood was one of them, and I also got HBO Max with my fiber at no extra cost.

Weirdly, even after AT&T’s exit, I still have never paid for HBO Max. I think it’s been like 6 years.

I suppose this is the end though since Netflix will probably shutter the app and roll HBO into their own. Oh well.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

For sure, Netflix will be on top of the Trump’s “busted exposed liar medias” list. And so what? Well, certainly nothing except [… whining]

I’m not so sure about that. U.S. taxpayers might end up subsidizing this harmful merger, if the companies sue the U.S. for illegal interference and get huge payouts (because of course Trump’s people will act illegally).

Alex Tolley says:

Re: Prediction confirmed

Trump has now stated that the Netflix bid is problematic, confirming the OP prediction. A number of Congressional and media folks have condemned teh Netflix bid for the right reasons, but are going to find themselves “useful idiots” in pushing the merger into the hands of Trump’s supporters – i.e., the Ellisons.

Anonymous Coward says:

If we lived in a non-corrupt country with functioning regulators, the government likely wouldn’t allow any additional consolidation in mainstream corporate media, as the results to date have been nothing but harmful for labor, consumers, and markets. […] Play a little game with me at home: if you’re reading a story about this deal, stop and notice if the journalist and outlet, at any point, mentions the fact that the decades’ worth of past variants of Warner deals were utterly disastrous for labor, consumers, creativity, and healthy markets. Because that’s kind of important context if your job is informing the public of the truth!

I wouldn’t necessarily argue with “no additional consolidation” at this point, but I think it’s also worth noting that the U.S. keeps letting these companies do the same types of deals over and over again.

It does seem problematic to have “media” corporations merging to the point that there are only about 5 big ones. But this view falls victim to a “framing effect” regarding the idea of a media company: we’re implicitly accepting the idea that a slightly larger number of “media companies” would be okay, even if each controls production and distribution. That is, that the same group of companies can run an oligopoly and an oligopsony.

At this point, media consolidation has become a kind of trading game, and saying “stop here” isn’t gonna do much. Much as we shouldn’t allow a networking company to build a network and sell a consumer internet service on top of it, we should be pushing back against the modern “media company” paradigm entirely. At the very least, if one company is allowed to own both “ends”, they need to be strictly regulated; for example, they could be required to license their productions to competitors on a non-discriminatory basis, under the same financial terms they pay their own distributor. And it’s kind of too late to apply this to only one company, which points to universal compulsory licensing as a possibility (at least till we can actually neuter copyright in a major way).

Leave a Reply to cornflahkes Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...