Netflix To Buy Warner Bros For $82.7 Billion, But Trump FCC, DOJ Could Intervene For All The Wrong Reasons
from the do-not-pass-go,-do-not-collect-$200 dept
So Netflix has announced that it’s buying Warner Brothers Discovery (including HBO) for a whopping $82.7 billion. As we’ve well covered, it’s the latest in a long series of pointless Warner mergers stretching back to the 2001 AOL acquisition, which all resulted in oodles of chaos, price hikes, layoffs, and generally a steady erosion in product quality.
Netflix’s deal includes a $5.8 billion breakup fee and promises to maintain Warner Bros. current operations, “including theatrical releases.” The deal doesn’t include Warner Bros Discovery’s struggling linear networks business (CNN, TNT, HGTV and Discovery+) which Netflix wisely wanted nothing to do with. Those are scheduled to be spun out next year into their own sagging sub-company.
Netflix is, of course, making all manner of pre-merger promises about how the deal will be great for everyone, especially creatives:
“Netflix also made its pitch to filmmakers and creatives, writing that “by uniting Netflix’s member experience and global reach with Warner Bros.’ renowned franchises and extensive library, the Company will create greater value for talent — offering more opportunities to work with beloved intellectual property, tell new stories and connect with a wider audience than ever before.”
But as we’ve seen the last three or four times Warner Brothers has been acquired, pre-merger promises mean absolutely nothing. The massive debt created by these acquisitions inevitably results in panicked cost cutting, which usually involves mass layoffs, (even bigger) price hikes, and a general cannibalization of brand and product quality. It happens over and over again.
Of the suitors that could have bought Warner Brothers Discovery (Comcast/NBC and Larry Ellison/CBS/Paramount), Netflix is probably the “best” option. They are (for now) the least up Trump’s ass of the three bidders; and generally may retain more of the core Warner Brothers Discovery infrastructure and staff due to fewer existing redundancies.
That’s not to say the deal will be good, necessarily. If we lived in a non-corrupt country with functioning regulators, the government likely wouldn’t allow any additional consolidation in mainstream corporate media, as the results to date have been nothing but harmful for labor, consumers, and markets. These companies’ journalism arms, if you haven’t noticed, like to downplay or ignore this fact in coverage.
Play a little game with me at home: if you’re reading a story about this deal, stop and notice if the journalist and outlet, at any point, mentions the fact that the decades’ worth of past variants of Warner deals were utterly disastrous for labor, consumers, creativity, and healthy markets. Because that’s kind of important context if your job is informing the public of the truth!

The bungled AT&T acquisition of Warner and DirecTV alone resulted in a massive layoff spree including 50,000 people. But when the consolidated corporate press covers the latest merger, that’s not mentioned. Why is that choice made editorially, do you wager?
Meanwhile Netflix still has a hurdle to face: the weird zealots at the Trump DOJ and FCC. Paramount and/or the Trump administration has spent the last week seeding complaints in Republican-friendly media that the bidding process was unfair to Larry Ellison and CBS/Paramount, and that the Trump administration is concerned about the antitrust impact of a Netflix Warner Brothers combination.
The Trump administration couldn’t give any less of a shit about antitrust or consolidated corporate power; they just want leverage over Netflix and/or to make sure their friend Larry Ellison can acquire HBO and CNN. And they’re mad at Netflix because they put some gay people in shows about the military. The Ellisons may acquire the spun off TV assets, but they may also still want to leverage Trump to get much more.
So I would not be surprised that if in a few weeks or so you see Trump’s FCC lackey Brendan Carr launch some kind of fake inquiry into “irregularities in the bidding process,” where he talks a lot about Netflix’s consolidated power “not being in the public interest.” The goal will be twofold: to force ownership over to Ellison, or at least to (as we’ve seen with CBS mergers) force Netflix to kiss Donald’s ass.
The press (and the usual assortment of useful idiot pundits) will likely then help Trump pretend these inquiries are legitimate “populist” antitrust actions.
If you recall, the first Trump administration sued to stop the AT&T Time Warner deal. That was heralded as a rare example of the administration actually caring about consolidated corporate power by the press; but it turned out it was mostly because Rupert Murdoch had his own acquisition offer for CNN rejected and wanted to scuttle the deal.
Keep your eyes peeled for regulatory shenanigans. Even if the Trump administration doesn’t abuse FCC and DOJ power to help Ellison, they’ll certainly abuse regulatory merger approval power to try and force Netflix to kiss their asses in new and problematic ways (see: CBS, Verizon). And Netflix, no stranger to throwing ethics under the bridge when convenient, will very likely be happy to oblige.
Filed Under: competition, consolidation, doj, larry ellison, media, mergers, video
Companies: netflix, warner bros. discovery
BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to




Comments on “Netflix To Buy Warner Bros For $82.7 Billion, But Trump FCC, DOJ Could Intervene For All The Wrong Reasons”
Who’s Wong?
Goodbye free HBO Max?
So, I and many others have a personal connection to this long, sordid history of WB mergers. One of the conditions of the AT&T deal with Tine Warner was that they would roll out fiber to a certain number of neighborhoods. They did just as many as required and then stopped and laid off the workers.
My neighborhood was one of them, and I also got HBO Max with my fiber at no extra cost.
Weirdly, even after AT&T’s exit, I still have never paid for HBO Max. I think it’s been like 6 years.
I suppose this is the end though since Netflix will probably shutter the app and roll HBO into their own. Oh well.
Re: Free HBO/Max...
I’m in the same boat, though as little as we use the service now that GoT is through, I’d be fine with pitching it should The New Owners decide to start charging for it. The content since Zaslav got his mitts on HBO has been less than compelling…
Re:
I don’t think they will shutter hbo max because it is already very popular and if people are already paying for both Netflix and HBO Max at $20 a month each they probably psychologically won’t pay $40 a month for those two combined. Also the sheer brand value of th HBO name is still there
For sure, Netflix will be on top of the Trump’s “busted exposed liar medias” list. And so what? Well, certainly nothing except unless MAGA whining about how unfair to them is the world.
Re:
I’m not so sure about that. U.S. taxpayers might end up subsidizing this harmful merger, if the companies sue the U.S. for illegal interference and get huge payouts (because of course Trump’s people will act illegally).
Re: Prediction confirmed
Trump has now stated that the Netflix bid is problematic, confirming the OP prediction. A number of Congressional and media folks have condemned teh Netflix bid for the right reasons, but are going to find themselves “useful idiots” in pushing the merger into the hands of Trump’s supporters – i.e., the Ellisons.
I wouldn’t necessarily argue with “no additional consolidation” at this point, but I think it’s also worth noting that the U.S. keeps letting these companies do the same types of deals over and over again.
It does seem problematic to have “media” corporations merging to the point that there are only about 5 big ones. But this view falls victim to a “framing effect” regarding the idea of a media company: we’re implicitly accepting the idea that a slightly larger number of “media companies” would be okay, even if each controls production and distribution. That is, that the same group of companies can run an oligopoly and an oligopsony.
At this point, media consolidation has become a kind of trading game, and saying “stop here” isn’t gonna do much. Much as we shouldn’t allow a networking company to build a network and sell a consumer internet service on top of it, we should be pushing back against the modern “media company” paradigm entirely. At the very least, if one company is allowed to own both “ends”, they need to be strictly regulated; for example, they could be required to license their productions to competitors on a non-discriminatory basis, under the same financial terms they pay their own distributor. And it’s kind of too late to apply this to only one company, which points to universal compulsory licensing as a possibility (at least till we can actually neuter copyright in a major way).
Elizabeth Warren has also come out against the deal, saying that it’ll lead to the usual consequences.
Have I missed something, or was she completely silent on the other massive media mergers in recent years?
DOJ
I wish DOJ would spend a fraction of this misguided energy chasing child predators and following up on the cybertips the tech companies dutifully report.
Not just theaters, but physical media is probably gone as well.
Why let people buy a DVD that they can play without a subscription, repeatedly, an unlimited number of times, and even at their friend’s house.
They’ll undoubtedly quit releasing any new DVDs or Blurays, and probably halt the production of older titles.