Verizon Asks Trump Admin To Destroy All Popular Phone Unlocking Requirements
from the this-is-why-we-can't-have-nice-things dept
If you’ve been around a while you might recall that Verizon used to be utterly obnoxious when it came to absolutely everything about using your mobile phone. Once upon a time, the company banned you from even using third-party apps (including basics like GPS), forcing you to use extremely shitty Verizon apps. It also used to be absolutely horrendous when it came to unlocking phones, switching carriers, and using the device of your choice on the Verizon network.
Two things changed all that. One, back in 2008 when the company acquired spectrum that came with requirements that users be allowed to use the devices of their choice. And two, as part of merger conditions affixed to its 2021 acquisition of Tracfone. Thanks to those two events Verizon was dragged, kicking and screaming, into a new era of openness that was of huge benefit to the public.
Now, with the Trump administration openly destroying whatever’s left of U.S. federal corporate oversight and consumer protection standards, Verizon sees an opportunity. As Jon Brodkin at Ars Technica notes, Verizon’s attempting to get the Trump administration to kill all unlocking requirements, in a bid to drag everyone back to the dark ages of cellphone use.
Verizon being Verizon, they can’t help but lie about it in a petition to the Trump FCC, claiming that they simply must be allowed to unfairly lock down mobile devices, because doing anything else harms competition and helps criminals:
“The Unlocking Rule applies only to particular providers—mainly Verizon—and distorts the marketplace in a critical US industry,” the Verizon petition said. “The rule has resulted in unintended consequences that harm consumers, competition, and Verizon, while propping up international criminal organizations that profit from fraud, including device trafficking of subsidized devices from the United States. These bad actors target and harm American consumers and US carriers like Verizon for their own profit, by diverting unlocked trafficked devices to consumers in foreign countries.”
Verizon, which quickly folded to Trump administration demands that it wasn’t sexist or racist enough in exchange for Frontier merger approval, has a long history of being completely full of shit on issues relating to consumer rights. And they’re particularly full of shit here.
Historical requirements on this front make it easier for you to bring any device you’d like to the Verizon network (assuming it doesn’t harm network security). Without them, Verizon could revert to only letting you use phones Verizon chooses and sells, jacking up the price for devices. Taking it further, we could easily return to the era where Verizon only lets you use apps approved or sold by Verizon.
These openness requirements are somewhat scattershot across carriers, which is why the Biden FCC had been proposing a uniform rule that would have required that all wireless providers unlock devices within 60 days of purchase.
Not only is that effort dead now thanks to Trump’s election, but Verizon’s pushing to eliminate all such requirements, driving progress violently backward. Verizon’s hoping that such rollbacks can be part of FCC boss Brendan Carr’s “Delete, Delete, Delete” deregulatory bonanza, in which he’s destroying longstanding consumer protection standards under the pretense of government efficiency.
Verizon even name drops Elon Musk’s DOGE efforts in their petition, insisting that longstanding and popular consumer protection standards on wireless devices are “the perfect example of the type of rule that the Commission should eliminate as part of the Department of Government Efficiency’s Deregulatory Initiative.”
Even if the rules aren’t destroyed by the Trump FCC, numerous recent Trump court rulings and executive orders make it all but impossible for regulators to enforce most consumer protection rules. But Verizon, ever a fan of crushing consumer protection standards and competition, wants to make doubly sure.
Filed Under: 5g, consumers, fcc, jailbreaking, locked phones, merger conditions, open access, telecom, unlock rule, wireless
Companies: verizon
BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to




Comments on “Verizon Asks Trump Admin To Destroy All Popular Phone Unlocking Requirements”
Whats kind of “criminal” are we talking about here?
The “150-year old guy still defrauding social security”, the “1 tattoo on each finger chief gang member”, or the “pro-Palestine protesting terrorist student”?
Verizon, you need more precision because Trump has very strict criminal categories.
Want a sane telecommunication?
Leave the USA and move to Poland. We have proper, cheap, fast internet and communication here.
Re:
My corner of the US is still significantly more friendly to queers like me than is Poland.
If liberal Americans were to stay emigrating to Poland in any appreciable numbers, we’d be on your news feeds as a Marxist invading force.
I’ve made my peace with the fact that I’m stuck fighting in this shit hole.
Re: Re:
That’s just anti-Polish propaganda orchestrated by Russians. Do not believe it. We’re very welcoming. Plus, it’s better to move to Poland before Poland moves to you, right?
Re: Re: Re:
No, it was orchestrated by your previous government and pretty much most of the population outside cities. Some of us have been paying attention for 10-20 years or more.
Not that i would say Poland is awful or anything. People are bad anywhere. And Poland did move away from the far right just as many other countries were moving in that direction, so that is surely a distinguished move.
And true, Russia will say anything about anyone at any given moment. It is a cesspit. It is unfortunate there for the people who aren’t awful.
And really, we who can should provide resistance in our own shithole country, especially given its size, and outsize influence.
Re: Re: Re:2
Wrong. What you heard about Poland is not what was going on in Poland. Everyone here despises PiS, that’s why they’ve lost. Also, you can either stay in USA, risking imprisonment or death, or move to a better country. The choice is yours.
Either way, eventually everyone will live in Poland.
Re: Re: Re:2
I know some Russian people who aren’t awful because they’re not there anymore. They decided they’d had enough when Poo-Tin launched his full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2014, which is the war Trump ignorantly accused Ukraine of starting.
Is Verizon’s entire raison d’etre making AT&T look slightly less shit?
Damn that sucks! In Canada we got rid of phones being locked years ago, but I remember the dark ages before that, it was a HUGE pain in the ass!
I feel for you guys that this was so close to being a reality for you guys across the board, just to have it yanked away by these greedy SOBs!
Re:
Kind of. New phones sold in Canada can’t be carrier-locked, but they can be bootloader-locked, which is also pretty bad. Also, be careful of ordering anything from non-Canadian suppliers, and watch out for non-Canadian second-hand phones that do sometimes end up in local stores.
When they say it “harms competition” they don’t mean it creates a less competitive market for the consumer,, they mean it harms -their- ability to compete in open the market, by kneecapping a customer’s ability to switch to a competitor.
Remind your MAGA friends: This is what they voted for. They’re getting exactly what they deserve. (Unfortunately, so are the rest of us.) Do not let them off of the hook. Every time this Administration does something unhinged, remind the folks who voted for Trump that this is their fault. Remind them repeatedly. Shame them over and over. Never let them forget that this is all their fault.
Re:
Wait until they’re whining about it…
That way you ask them “But I thought you wanted to have your face eaten by leopards…?”
If you go to a country that requires you to use their Sim cards hackers over there could unlock your phone
The dmca has no jurisdiction in north korea, Iran, China or Cuba where you are required to use their Sim cards if you bring your phone in to the country.
Re:
That sounds perfectly safe!
Thanks again, as always, for your legal wisdom and expertise.