Trump Admin Freaks Out Over Report Amazon Planned To Be Transparent About Tariffs
from the so-much-pride dept
Okay, there’s a lot to unpack in this story, so hang with me here. For the past month or so, Americans and American businesses have been stuck in tariff hell. Blanket and additional tariffs issued via executive order by Trump have been in a seesaw pattern for a month now. This tariff program was a key campaign promise Trump had on offer and, since becoming President, has been something over which Trump has had an immense amount of pride. Tariffs are good, you see. A boon to the country. A major achievement of this administration. That they haven’t settled on when or how much will go into effect, nor for how long, is of no importance. Neither is the hilariously faulty math and premise that the constructed tariff rates were built upon. Tariffs are great and that’s all you need to know.
Earlier this week, Punchbowl News reported that Amazon planned to include line items on its online store across the board to denote to purchasers just how much of the cost of a product came from Trump’s tariffs. Now, it appears that this report was mostly wrong and that Amazon instead was discussing putting that in place only on its Amazon Haul store, which is a sub-store focused on imported goods from China to compete with the likes of Temu and Shein. And Amazon has since said it has scrapped the plan entirely as well (more on that in a second).
But the point is this: Trump freaked out about a massive online retailer showing American buyers the impact on pricing of the tariffs that Trump is totally proud of and that will bring America into its new golden age. Tariffs are good, you see, but the public knowing what they do is not.
Amazon issued such a specific and forceful on-the-record denial in part because it had drawn the ire of the Trump administration. In a press briefing early this morning, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked a question about the report, which the administration responded to as though Amazon had made a formal announcement about the policy.
“This is a hostile and political act by Amazon,” Leavitt said, before blaming the Biden administration for high inflation and claiming that Amazon had “partnered with a Chinese propaganda arm.”
The Washington Post also reported that Trump had called Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to complain about the report.
There is simply no way to square this circle other than to say that Trump knows it will piss off Americans if they see how much cost he is adding to them, rather than to foreign companies and countries as he’s claimed this will all work. So he wants to hide the thing he says is awesome and is proud of from the American people. And he’s willing to put his thumb on commercial interests to do so.
Why? Why is it a bad thing for retailers and manufacturers to inform the public of where the costs of their goods are coming from? If tariffs are so great, why does the public need to be shielded from understanding what they do? These sellers are going to be accused of price-gauging, particularly from anyone who believes Trump’s nonsense claim that anyone but Americans will be paying these tariffs. Why should they endure those accusations in favor of Trump’s game of hide-and-seek?
And why do these tech companies keep bending the knee to this President? They’ve been engaging in this placating routine since the inauguration, when many heads of companies showed up to prove that they could, in fact, manage to stand as Hail to the Chief plays while not having a spine.
CNBC’s Squawk Box, featuring Trump cheerleader Joe Kernan, made the point beautifully in reaction to all of this when Kernan essentially asked why government enforcement efforts against Amazon, such as antitrust litigation, haven’t evaporated now that the company has added boot-licking to its portfolio of services. CNBC makes the clip pretty much impossible to embed here, but at the tail end of it you have Kernan essentially asking aloud why Amazon is bowing to Trump when all this government action is hanging over its head still, with the Wired reporter responding that he doesn’t know, but that Trump keeps that stuff hanging to use as leverage.
Despots are never satisfied or appeased, as is often said.
So, let’s summarize. The Trump administration freaked out over a mostly-wrong report that Amazon was going to be transparent about pricing effects from tariffs, that Trump is very proud of, on its website, so it pressured the company to nix those plans both in the press and via personal phone calls from the President, only to have Amazon once more bend the knee to Trump despite seemingly getting nothing out of it in return.
Totally normal stuff happening around America these days.
Filed Under: costs, donald trump, fees, hidden fees, jeff bezos, tariffs, taxes
Companies: amazon


Comments on “Trump Admin Freaks Out Over Report Amazon Planned To Be Transparent About Tariffs”
Any business that’s not enamored of the taste of Trump’s taint would label these charges accurately as “Trumpflation charge.”
These issues could easily be avoided if Amazon would just stop listing prices altogether.
Re:
You mean, like telcoms already do? Surprise billing amount after purchase?
One could call it an “Obamacare surcharge”. It has been established that calling bullshit fees anything you want is fine, so why not blame what you want to hate on?
Re: Re:
Weird how Koby just up and “disappeared” right before you showed up to embarrass yourself all over the place.
Re: Re:
Sorry folks. Due to national security concerns we are unable to tell you how much anything costs. We’ll just contact your employer and have them deduct the amount plus a modest convenience fee from your paycheck. Due the national security implications we will be unable to itemize the deduction.
Re:
Random prices are also a solution. This the base product price + a random tariff between 20% and 200%.
So, how did the products you’ve bought really cost? Just wait the next month when the usher (wearing Amazon delivery outfit) is knocking at your door.
What’s worse is that company’s that aren’t affected or aren’t as affected by the tariffs as they might purport will see one more excuse to raise prices and blame an external cause, whether it’s tariffs, a fictional shoplifting epidemic, or whatever.
Both Amazon and Walmart have already verified they are eating the tariff costs. Ask yourself two things. Why would they do this, and why isn’t the press pointing this out? It’s not because they keep giant warehouses of products that they bought before the tariffs went into effect. That’s the line. That should go against your common sense if you know the anything about business and the cost of warehousing goods. They are doing it because Trump wants them to, because they are trying to delay the impact. It’s collusion, and the press is failing us again.
Re:
I actually don’t think it has to be something as nefarious as that. I’m betting on the fact that Walmart and Amazon believe they have the ability to out bleed the competition and exterminate a bunch of potential upstarts.
Walmart has 9 billion in cash in hand, and probably one of the most efficient logistics organizations in commercial retail. If anyone can minimize the impact by maximizing volume, margin, etc. on imports they can. They have also been diversifying their supply chain to more advantageous countries, and their purchasing power brings them to the front of the line icing out competitors for the increases in production in these new locations.
Amazon, on the other hand, has an incredible 100 billion in cash, and their line of products is significantly small than their full catalog. Most vendors will be forced to eat the tariff costs, which the can’t afford, or pass it along…and now lack the ability to clearly show why their.
Both probably have immensely pressure to continue to grow given their P/E ratios.
I’m not saying I’m sure, but I’m saying simple capitalist greed seems more straightforward.
Re: Re:
Which is actually equally as nefarious, numbnuts.
Re: Re: Re:
No one said it wasn’t nefarious,fuckwit. They just provided the more reasonable explanation, which would still be true even if they also did it for other, Trumpcollusiion, reasons. Gotta utilize the synergies.
Re: Re: Re:2
AC never claimed you said it wasn’t nefarious, and you have the cheek to call them a fuckwit, Mx. Pot.
Re: Re:
Yeah, this isn’t new behavior by Amazon and Walmart; it’s the same strategy that got them where they are today. It’s bigger than any one president, even a tinpot dictator.
Re: Re: Re:
Remember when Amazon “caved” and decided to collect local sales taxes? It set the expectation that their competitors would do the same, but it’s not such an easy thing to do accurately (particularly in the USA). In other words, Amazon gained a competitive advantage while being able to claim they were “forced” by the government.
Re: Re: Re:
Presidents come and presidents go, but earnings is what keeps them up at night, that’s fo sho. Hemorrhaging a bit now to lock in market growth? Absolutely worth the blood.
Re:
It’ll drive them into the red and make them depend on government bailouts or presents. More extortion material for Trump.
Re: I don't believe them.
I don’t believe them. Both businesses run on very thin margins. I suspect that their real plan is to slowly ramp their prices, taking advantage of the stock that they already have in the US to buffer their costs.
A slow ramp is unlikely to attract the attention of many buyers.
Re: Re:
But, when these tariffs go away and wholesale costs drop by 20% (for example), they’ll be sure to publicise their amazing 10% price drops.
Can we enter that in the hum-dinger zinger of the year award?
Weaponization of the Government Committee, anyone?
Thought so. I think the current form of U.S. government is best characterized as a hypocracy.
I seem to remember that polls about public deference for jobs in more recent presidencies landed Congress members somewhere near used car dealers and telemarketers.
Where are we now?
Re:
Go home David you’re drunk… and stupid.
Re: Re:
Do you just do this every time someone named David posts, or what?
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, no “or what” about it. This AC just hates people called David, which makes me think they must be Goliath.
Huh?
The Trump admin tells Amazon it can’t break out real gov’t bimposwd costs amd must show only the top-line price. But Airlines, Telcos and others are allowed to make up fake gov’t fees amd added costs to deliberately obsure what it costs them to provide the basic service?
Re:
Fake fees on top are fine. Real costs inside aren’t. That would be transparency. A 300+ lbs emperor wearing no clothes wants no transparency.
Shouldn’t be too hard to knock up a firefox/chrome extension to check the API for base price and calculate/display the tariff fee…
When this was reported on the BBC World Service yesterday, the presenter said that even though the allegations had been denied by Amazon, Jeff Bezos had been accused of being hand in glove with Beijing, which is the first time I’ve ever heard Donald Trump nicknamed after the capital city of China.
<
blockquote>They’ve been engaging in this placating routine since the inauguration, when many heads of companies showed up to prove that they could, in fact, manage to stand as Hail to the Chief plays while not having a spine.
Can we temporarily change the name of that piece of music to Hail to the Thief? I personally believe it’s never been more apt.
Price-gauging
“These sellers are going to be accused of price-gauging …”
To clarify:
Price-gauging is what I do with the stores/sellers.
Price-gouging is what the stores/sellers do to me.
Anyone wanna bet that the 300lb prolapse currently infesting the Oval would have been fine with it, if the line item read: “Biden’s Tariffs”? lol
Re:
No need to bet, the current WH liar-to-the-press basically did exactly that.
“This is a hostile and political act by Amazon,” Leavitt said, before blaming the Biden administration for high inflation and claiming that Amazon had “partnered with a Chinese propaganda arm.”
MAGAt 'logic'
Just to make sure I have everything straight…
Tariffs are amazing for the country and everyone supports them but accurately listing tariffs is vile chinese propaganda and an attack on the country, despite the fact that, and I cannot emphasize this enough, everyone supports tariffs for the sake of making the US economy great despite the fact that so far they’ve just been responsible for cratering it multiple times.
Re:
Reality is the enemy of conservatives!
Re:
Why don’t you just say yes?
So if Amazon’s competitors list an imported item for sale at retail price with a separate line item for the additional tariff charge while Amazon only shows the full price after tariffs, then the competition’s retail prices will always be lower than Amazon’s if they break out the tariff fees, right?
Baby seat @ Amazon: $1000 retail
Baby seat @ competitor: $400 retail + $600 tariff fees
We can't have that!
The amount of tax should never be displayed on an invoice. That would be un-American.
Oh, wait, every transaction that occurs anywhere in the US all day, every day displays the amount of sales tax.
It would be odd to NOT show the amount of this tax.
Any volunteers?
Any CEO that displays tariff prices will be the first prisoner sent to New Alcatraz,