Is it not possible a member of her congressional staff took the photo as part of their official duties, resulting in it being a work of the federal government and copyright being unavailable?
To be fair, it wasn't his client's statement that he was categorically denying happened, it was the founder and messiah of his client. The reporter was claiming (correctly) that L. Ron Hubbard said you needed to put people in isolation. Gibson was merely denying the correctness of the teachings of the prophet ... shun the nonbeliever!!!!
I have so much negative association with the name Roca Labs, when I saw my Valium was made by Roche Labs, I instinctively dumped the bottle down the drain and beat up my neighbor. I intend to sue Roca over this incident.
How so? First, the fool that represents Roca Labs quotes the wrong law, NRS 197.010 only applies to members of the executive branch, and NRS 197.020 explicitly excludes state legislators from its definition of "public official". The correct statute would be NRS 218A.960 for state legislators like Jones, but even that wouldn't apply, because at the time, he wasn't a state legislator. Moreover, given that no value was discussed or even hinted at, and all indications are that this bill was widely supported in Nevada, you'd be hard-pressed to demonstrate that this offer controlled Jones' actions. Bribery analyses aren't stuck on formalities, they care about motivations and intentions, and here, you'd be hard-pressed to find corruption of either.
Saying someone "may" have committed bribery, or that it "appeared" bribery happened, and asking a public agency to look into it is not actionable, the only provable statements Roca Labs' attorney made in their letter to the state AG were about Randazza, not Jones, so Jones wouldn't have standing to sue anyway.
Is it not possible a member of her congressional staff took the photo as part of their official duties, resulting in it being a work of the federal government and copyright being unavailable?
Re: About his response to Levy's letter
IDK, I've always thought of those damn e-mails as "Specially Processed American Meats", maybe WWII Brits were just ahead of their time!
Hey Now
To be fair, it wasn't his client's statement that he was categorically denying happened, it was the founder and messiah of his client. The reporter was claiming (correctly) that L. Ron Hubbard said you needed to put people in isolation. Gibson was merely denying the correctness of the teachings of the prophet ... shun the nonbeliever!!!!
Re: Re: Snake oil scam
I have so much negative association with the name Roca Labs, when I saw my Valium was made by Roche Labs, I instinctively dumped the bottle down the drain and beat up my neighbor. I intend to sue Roca over this incident.
Re: Re: Re: Bribery
How so? First, the fool that represents Roca Labs quotes the wrong law, NRS 197.010 only applies to members of the executive branch, and NRS 197.020 explicitly excludes state legislators from its definition of "public official". The correct statute would be NRS 218A.960 for state legislators like Jones, but even that wouldn't apply, because at the time, he wasn't a state legislator. Moreover, given that no value was discussed or even hinted at, and all indications are that this bill was widely supported in Nevada, you'd be hard-pressed to demonstrate that this offer controlled Jones' actions. Bribery analyses aren't stuck on formalities, they care about motivations and intentions, and here, you'd be hard-pressed to find corruption of either.
Re: Bribery
Saying someone "may" have committed bribery, or that it "appeared" bribery happened, and asking a public agency to look into it is not actionable, the only provable statements Roca Labs' attorney made in their letter to the state AG were about Randazza, not Jones, so Jones wouldn't have standing to sue anyway.
Re: Re: Re:
He was not a legislator running for a second term at the time of the offer though.