terop 's BestNetTech Comments

Latest Comments (4053) comment rss

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 19 Jun, 2025 @ 10:54pm

    If no one is wrong, then contradictory perspectives would both be right, which means truth doesn’t matter
    this can be resolved by attaching context to the perspective. Then both can be simultaniously true, even if they're logically contradictory. The context resolves the contradictions.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 19 Jun, 2025 @ 10:46pm

    You can’t use some random person’s uninformed opinion in lieu of an expert’s learned perspective.
    of course you can. you just need to be a rule expert like myself, who can follow thousands of rules simultaniously and finding logical inconsistencies from the rules. If you only follow the experts, you never get the information what is actually happening in the marketplace. Experts have idealistic view of the situation, and the ground level information is also needed.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 19 Jun, 2025 @ 05:02pm

    what copyright cases actually established as precedent.
    I don't care if the case is a precedent or not. If some poor soul is subjected to the ruling, then the same could happen to anyone, and thus it is the law as established by the courts. My pattern is such that I listen to all players in the marketplace. This gives me the widest possible exposition to the rules that govern our world. Closing out some players (like RIAA) from the analysis is not my way. I instead use the information to my advantage, even if I don't agree with anyone's position.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 19 Jun, 2025 @ 02:53pm

    Except it doesn’t if the Copyright Office is wrong.
    Noone in marketplace is wrong. They just have different view to the same problem. Authors cannot get their products to the market. Publishers don't have money for extensive sales activity. Customers cannot find the product that solves their problems. And copyright office cannot make pirates stop pirating.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 19 Jun, 2025 @ 02:50pm

    you seem to conjure your understanding of copyright out of nothing,
    Now you're saying my experiences as an author are "nothing". Can't I base my copyright bullshit on my own experiences dealing with publishers? Things like companies insisting on exclusive licenses so that authors are forbidden from publishing the same material via other channels? And then publishers stopping selling the product after a month of sales activity?

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 18 Jun, 2025 @ 04:35pm

    That says all you need to say and undermines any claims you’ve made.
    There's nothing that can undermine all my claims. Basically my info is based on international treaties and established copyright cases as reported by news media.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 18 Jun, 2025 @ 04:33pm

    You have contributed only confusion and bluster and bullshit.
    that's only because you didn't read the full story. in short, copyright office opinion matters more than opinion of fair use pirates.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 18 Jun, 2025 @ 02:46pm

    There are other software vendors that ship non-crashing software. So your basic claim like that isn’t helpful.
    rust developers are claiming on the internet that status of the software industry is not handling security issues carefully enough and memory corruptions etc. So there are people on the internet that are claiming that your bullshit explodes to your face.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 18 Jun, 2025 @ 02:39pm

    The fish themselves aren’t capable of consciously helping with climate change.
    We can just delegate our copyright issues to the fish. What better confirms our software legality than getting our copyright bullshit from the sea.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 17 Jun, 2025 @ 06:53pm

    The topic may be relevant to your software. Your software, however, isn’t relevant to the topic for anyone else except you.
    Everyone else who creates software will need to follow the same copyright office rules... that makes it interesting to everyone.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 17 Jun, 2025 @ 02:02pm

    This has nothing to do with your software.
    Lets look at it this way: 1) copyright office published some paperwork 2) the paperwork contains info about how AI should be handled by software authors 3) the conclusion is that training is violation of copyright 4) thus every software developer worth their salt will examine their copyright bullshit and modify it to match the changing legal environment But my software has the following aspects: a) I publish some computer source code/binaries b) it has AI included in it c) thus copyright office paperwork is relevant to the AI aspects of the software d) it turns out that AI training area is composed of a black box that is bound to explode after copyright office opinion marks it as copyright infringement d) thus there's some changes needed in the software, and consiquences will be passed to usa copyright office e) but either case, the copyright office paperwork is relevant to my software QED.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 17 Jun, 2025 @ 01:50pm

    Stronger claims require stronger evidences.
    My stronger claim is that "I actually have working software" instead of pile of bits that crashes all the time. As you know from software vendor histories, this is better than what software market as a whole can implement.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 17 Jun, 2025 @ 03:07am

    please stop advertising your on software as anything better than others’.
    Nope. Then I would be lying.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 16 Jun, 2025 @ 08:32pm

    When the authors decided nothing then they don’t make a TOS so your point is entirely moot.
    sadly for you, when the solution is that some copyright infringement cannot be detected reliably by software algorithms, the only solution that makes the software legal is a section in TOS that declares it illegal area for the user. Thus it is a legal requirement that TOS contains this section. Authors do not need to make explicit decision to include it, since the law forces their hand.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 16 Jun, 2025 @ 08:22pm

    The most pathetic aspect of this fantasy is that you’re not important enough that any machine would want to come back to assassinate you.
    I'm not important enough? I think you are gravely mistaken. Without my work, there wouldn't exist over 150 million symbian phones in the auropean market. And my 3d engine is used/downloaded by 650 lucky people.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 16 Jun, 2025 @ 06:52pm

    It is important that my software…
    Nope. Nobody cares about your software.
    This is where you're going against established practices and common sense. Software is the magic enabler that solves every problem in today's society, and I just happen to have the newest and most bleeding edge software available on the planet. But given that you did not even try to analyze what the software is doing, your analysis cannot be trusted and you're always painting yourself to a corner.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 15 Jun, 2025 @ 04:31pm

    Sounds like you should find a different website that caters to your interests.
    The other websites don't have similar kind of copyright problems than what BestNetTech has. So I wouldn't fit well to their reader groups. It is important that my software had significant problems with the copyright area. First it was attempting to clone youtube's main content catalog format, but failing to gain traction among users. Then the software allowed users to download content from the internet, and even displaying "Downloading.." as a progress indication, indicating to older people that something illegal is happening. Then it built it's 3d model catalog as a combination of own software code, but using 3d models from sketchfab without displaying copyright or authorship information next to the model. Once that was fixed, it used artificial intelligence which is known to have copyright problems. Stuff like this is breaking every software project on the planet. Including mine. I've been researching for solutions to most of the problems mentioned above, but not all the solutions found have been taken into usage, given that the solutions are regularly causing issues that end users are unable to solve.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 13 Jun, 2025 @ 07:34pm

    You’re a paranoid conspiracy theorist at this point.
    So this is the best reason you can think of, why my technology is not worth exploring. Sounds like you're running out of reasons and have to invent some bullshit that doesn't make sense.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 13 Jun, 2025 @ 01:56pm

    any intent for Mike to extort or even ask you for advertising dollars.
    This is only because I've explicitly stated that I've received $6 from my 10 year software project/don't have extra money to pay for the advericements. But since the $6 is coming from 10 years of work, those dollars should be more valuable currency than your ordinary dollars where you spend less time obtaining them.

  • On the post: The U.S. Copyright Office’s Draft Report On AI Training Errs On Fair Use

    terop ( profile ), 13 Jun, 2025 @ 01:46pm

    you’re using the Star Wars quote out of context for your own benefit, which is something a Sith would do.
    You simply don't understand it. I'm an expert at examining colours, since I was responsible of making sure phone screens had exactly correctly coloured pixels. Try count how many pixels I've examined to arrive at correct software to display accurate pixel colours. It's even so bad, that an adverticement that didn't use rgba colour palette caused significant problems/headache.

Next >>