You're welcome, Mike; I suggested this story on last weeks Funniest/Most Insightful Comments Of The Week At BestNetTech since the link https://www.bestnettech.com/submitstory/ does not work. Any news on this?
"a former Disney executive." need I say more?
And another surpreme example of entitlement of the copyright holders who do their best to destroy second-hand sales: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-08-01/pearson-hopes-blockchain-will-make-it-money-every-time-its-e-books-change-hands
One more thing: https://www.bestnettech.com/submitstory/ is no longer available since the website migration? I was about to post this: https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2022-08-01/blockade-australia-technology-bail-conditions-encrypted-apps/101277038
Yeah, I really do hope he won't be able to wiggle out of this one.
I'm anxiously awaiting Mike's post on Musk countersuing Twitter, especially how he managed to keep it confidential for the time being.
So, why don't you quote the definition and its source?
Tough shit then that Musk agreed to buy it as is, huh?
Which is immaterial to the lawsuit. Which you'd know had you actually read the article as people suggested you should.
and the reason he will win in any halfway reasonable courtroomAlright, already hedging your bet I see. Would have been fun to see you eat those words but of course you'll simply say that he wasn't in a halways reasonable courtroom.
Since you're so knowledgeable, please quote the paragraph from the contract/suit that mention API licenses.
Given: i truly believe space karen didn’t know what she was getting into. FTFY.
Bullshit.
Well, yeah, the schmucks here at BestNetTech aren't at least THAT dumb to needlessly waive their right to due diligence - but I'm sure you think that was some kind of 4D chess move, right? Also, funny that you insinuate none of us being a billionaire somehow means we're not having a pot to piss in. The logical fallacies are strong in you, congrats.
However, the way these things usually work is that Twitter is now seen as wounded and vulnerable.By whome? Has user volume changed significantly since the deal announcement or Musk's obvious shenanigans?
If Twitter knowingly fudged those numbers and didn’t come clean before the sale, that’s sounds like fraud.And what makes you think they did? Space Karen's totally unbiased claims? Really?
Calling others a fool while being too stupid yourself. Impressive.
There’s some thought that Elon has gone thru this episode to deliberately expose twitter’s problems.So, the entirely unprovoked waiving of his rights to due diligence was a genius move in his play of 4D chess? Got it!
People who anyone else could have hired. Why didn’t they?Because they aren't dumb enough to believe in Mars being a solution to anything (let alone achievable)?