Give good clients what they need.
Give bad clients what they ask for.
Is it safe to comment on this article, or should I expect to be disappeared in the wee hours?
My fault - I wasn't very clear.
I meant, why would Redbox not just ignore them? People will, of course, see films they like, but it seems to me that a business such as Redbox (or Netflix in another case) is just cutting its overall margin for the sake of promoting an antagonistic supplier's material.
Why not just ignore WB and let their new films sink into unviewed obscurity?
I would like to beat the holiday rush here and formally request that the tax department forget me.
I understand that failure to delete any information relating to me entitles me to 1%of the country's revenue; I'll accept gold as payment in order to prevent any further infractions that may occur via the issuance of a cheque.
How do you arrive at "No longer just for dictators of third world nations"?
Who else is making that statement?
Trust him. He knows what he's doing.
(also obligatory)
Unfortuantely, that's normal.
If this ever does come into existence, just establish that the character is a former U.S. president - that way, war crimes / crimes against humanity simply don't apply.
Next week's headlines?!
Just wait until lawyers work out the details of retroactive infringement; then we'll see some real fireworks!
The fix is quite simple, but will never be implemented.
Just provide each registered candidate with a campaign budget for the election (to come from the federal elections department, whatever the US version is called). No external funding permitted.
If candidates want to pool their money for a party campaign, fine, but no external funds.
Then, and this is the really hard part, make any bribery(offering, soliciting, accepting) a really SERIOUS criminal offence, on the order of a 10-year minimum prison sentence and all personal assets seized.
No more problem.
Do we really need interference from government (or worse, collectives of governments)?
Let's just ignore them and go back to 1998 rules.
Politicians, keep yer mitts off my innernet!
Exactly. More than 2 centuries of voting has resulted in what?
More corruption after each election until the current state of affairs was reached.
Why does anyone think that voting again will change this?
If Canada Border Services Agency (formerly Canada Customs) or the RCMP (formerly a respectable police force) wish to view the contents of my laptop and bypass the password to do so, will they be guilty of a criminal offense under this new act?
Will I be able to launch a civil suit for damages caused by this wanton act of DRM circumvention?
Sorry, my sarc tag didn't make it through.
Mike, you wouldn't let anyone tell you what displays you can and can't put up inside the house you own, so how dare you tell the Copyright Alliance what displays they can set up in the House they own?
Getting laws passed through bribery should be a capital offense (for both parties).
"a denial of due process guaranteed by the Constitution" carries no penalty when conducted by a government official.
The only evidence a politician needs is evidence to show that the cheque cleared.
Once that's in place, anything you can imagine will sail through to become law.
"While bookstores close, Apple has been busy opening more than 300 stores."
I've yet to see a single book on sale in an Apple store. Am I missing something?