What legal distinction should exist between and citizen and a noncitizen?
The Bill of Rights does not make any such distinction on its face. There are mentions of the ``rights of the people'' which should be protected.
It was understood at the time that people referred to white land-owning males, but that was not generally in the text. It has since been argued that the definion of ``people'' should be expanded to include women and persons who were not white or who did not own land. Citizenship has not historically been included implicitly as a barrier to personhood.
US 1st Amendment provides prohibitions to congress and refers to the ``right of the people to peaceably assembly and to petition''.
US 2nd Amendment provides for the ``right of the people'' to have weapons.
US 3rd Amendment does require land ownership, in that the consent of the owner is required or else the government may not quarter soldiers in their houses.
US 4th Amendment refers to the ``right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures''. Nothing in there distinguishes rented houses from owned houses.
US 5th Amendment contains implicit ownership requirement in ``nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation'', though that is not a land ownership requirement in that personalty may also be taken for public use.
None of the others have citizenship requirements, either.
(yes, preview w/o javascript is still broken in the [not-so-]new BestNetTech platform)
They have not yet closed it. However, conditions there are reportedly not at all stiflingly hot. News reports say that night-time temperatures are below 40 degrees, but inmates are not furnished with warm clothing.
America should have learned, and established clear-cut laws against hate speech. But we didn’t.
Who gets to decide what is ``hate speech''? I am fairly sure I would not trust the present congress. I sure as taxes would not trust our state legislature. City-by-city and county-by-county regulation is impractical.
Can you give me a clear definition of what should be banned? Because right now saying ``Thaw ICE'' would qualify as hate speech or domestic terrorism according to the present administration.
That we have not (yet) set up an Auschwitz-Birkenau, replete with crematoria
How certain are we of that?
Well, at least at ``alligator alcatraz'', they have not set up crematoria. Largely because there is no place to put them. On the other hand, it seems to be a grossly unsanitary concentration camp, and most likely they will eventually need to dispose of the victims' bodies, so it may be coming soon.
Your milage may vary with the next airplane which needs to make an emergency landing in So Fla. The old name for the facility was the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport.
The agent had internal bleeding. Was very definitely hit.
Yes, by an invisible vehicle that was able to get around Good's vehicle as it was turning away from the ICE goon. Those invisible vehicles are a great new technology for hitting people.
And you’re blocking comments, MM.
Worse, the ``blocking'' is failing miserably. Someone should file a bug report.
running off to likely crank out more disgusting CSAM garbage on ExTwitter
Such effort is no longer necessary. There is a bot available through Twitter which can generate the material for you.
I have read that some countries are taking exception. They are either regulating or contemplating regulation of Twitter or of the bot, but so far as I know it is still in service.
And not just hit hard, but hit hard by an invisible vehicle that was able to get around the visible vehicle that avoided him entirely by steering in the opposite direction.
Those invisible vehicles are the worst!
Landlords cannot do any “unannounced inspections”: they indeed are constrained to either being invited or giving due notice because of concrete reasons for any inspection
This is not the law in every state, though it may be the law in the state of the earlier commenter (David). A person in doubt as to his rights in his state may wish to review his state's LL/Tenant act and/or consult an attorney who does that sort of thing.
Why would any non-NAZI pedophile continue to post there?
Because it is a friendly and welcoming platform for pedophiles who are not nazis. I do not think that their generative AI limits itself, either, but should generate material for all sorts of pedophiles.
Disclaimer: I am not on Twitter and have not interacted with their AI, so am basing comment on various reports here in BestNetTech.
Now, I can already predict some of the replies to this. “What do you expect Schumer to do? [...]"
I expect very little. Unfortunately, backbone implants are not covered by the congressional health plan. And senate rules do not allow him to accept private donations for this purpose.
Our courts cannot become so paralyzed by the fear of what Trump and his supporters might do that the courts stop upholding the rights of people like Kilmar Abregio Garcia.
If not paralyzed, they are at least acting as though they were immersed in well-chilled molasses. If a non-govt atty did even a small part of what the govt has done in violation of court orders, I would expect to see him instructed to bring his toothbrush to court.
That would not be unreasonable, either.
This chilled molasses syndrome is pretty darn close to paralyzed by fear and unable to act.
FIFA should have given this man a peace prize rather than giving it to Trump
Have you seen the prize? It look sokmewhat scary in the pictures. This may be appropriate given the levels of corruption all around.
Also, a bank has been promoting the soccer world cup, and the pictures of the trophy make it look like a used butt plug. Not sure that a prize from FIFA is something to be proud of.
Look at all the failed attempts to create conservative counterparts to things like Twitter
Well, Trump Social has not gone bankrupt yet, despite reportedly not having as much revenue as hoped for. Credit some people's interest in government pronouncements.
Also, Trump Social chunks are smaller than those in the Federal Register.
I think that this is firmly in the “for worse” column. I can use Google Maps and a phone call or browsing a restaurant’s menu on a website to accomplish much the same thing
If it takes a little bit of AI for the search engine to answer the question of what restaurants have empanadas, that seems like a good use of it. Phoning a bunch of restaurants not only chews up their employee time if anyone answers, but it also chews up more of my time.
Yes, if the menus are on line in some sort of usable form, rather than as images, I could probably go through them. That still takes more time than having some sort of robot answer the question.
I am not looking for creativity here. I am trying to find lunch. It seems that some sort of primitive AI might actually help in this endeavor. Compare cooking lunch, which I would prefer not to leave to the AI.
Larry and David Ellison are very obviously trying to buy up the dying remnants of U.S. corporate media (plus TikTok) in the hopes of creating yet another Fox-esque right wing propaganda mill. But again, there’s no real evidence there’s an actual audience here.
I th8ink there is an audience there. Not only is Faux News still around, but it has company in the forms of all those entities willing to sign the Pentagon Power Pledge to be allowed in parts of the building.
Stock buyers may want to look into Reynolds, because the tinfoil hat industry is sure to benefit from all this ``news'' reporting.
"To that end, the data controller must consider in particular all technical measures available in the current state of technical knowledge that are apt to block the copying and reproduction of online content.”
Consider, if you will, a web browser. Its job is to obtain a copy of the online content and reproduce it on your screen.
Democrats need to hammer this home in the coming elections. This is the most important thing to voters
It would help if they replaced the people in charge.
Right now the party is led by gutless wonders and the sort of crazy people who expect that, if do the same thing over again you will have different results.
The electorate may be ready for change, but that is not what the Dems are currently selling. Indeed, they fight it. Look at how they came out in NY to oppose a democratic socialist candidate who actually won their primary.
Discovery would have been interesting. If someone who was sued by Trump were to answer instead of moving to dismiss, they could move on to discovery as to Trump business dealings and how they were affected by the claimed defamation.
Do it in state court if possible, that way you might get a useful offer-of-judgment rule.
I don’t see anything in the Constitution of Texas that requires the Attorney General to be an actual licensed attorney
There may not be anything affecting his office holding.
None the less, sanctions for filing bogus claims may be appropirate if only as a warning to other Texas attorneys that they should be more careful in the future.
bill of rights makes not much distinction at all
not yet closed
They have not yet closed it. However, conditions there are reportedly not at all stiflingly hot. News reports say that night-time temperatures are below 40 degrees, but inmates are not furnished with warm clothing.
details required
be patient
new technology
federalism
labor-saving device
new method of incurring injury
your milage may vary
that is where their friends are
low expectations
not so sure about that
not exactly a prestigious award
another example
one of the few actual uses
there is an audience
this may present a challenge
backbones on sale in aisle six
fun fun fun until daddy takes the t-bird away
a caution to the others