Maybe this is because the Blue states have sanctuary cities and policies against the police cooperating with ICE? If ICE is notified before an illegal alien being released, it is much easier to capture the illegal alien when being released from jail than trying to find them after.
There is no expectation of your privacy in public. In theory, the source material may be very good. When you get a visa, you get photos taken. When you enter, you get your photos taken in good light. If you crossed the border illegally at night, the source material may not be available. If you were arrested, the source material is good.
In mistaken matches, they should have agents who know to look at the picture and compare. But maybe the agent's synapse died from loneliness.
Someone should have told them that the guy robbed a donut shop on his way to the house.
I'd love to see the next case where the police try to argue exigent circumstances.
I have always wondered about the legality of these types of upgrade 'requirements' or even just the bricking of devices. I have not wondered enough to research this yet.
If I buy a widget and then they stop supporting it, essentially bricking it, or require an agreement to additional terms, essentially bricking the widget, can I get a refund on the widget?
Now, to expand on this question: You buy a TV or car, you disagree with the selling of your data, and most of the advertised features are disabled. Could this be considered an unfair and deceptive business practice?
How would the prompter know if there was a violation or fair use made of the material? Does it give a full bibliography and the source material for comparison?
How much of a summarization is fair use? It could be based on the use-case.
This ruling didn't address this, but it raised a question for me. As a moderator, he designed avatars, designed a logo, and wrote CSS code and Reddit continued to use them. As an employee, even unpaid, this would be considered works for hire and belong to Reddit. However, copyright is not preempted by the CDA. A license to use his copywritten material may be revoked, unless he was considered an agent/employee (paid or otherwise) of Reddit.
I don't know, I would say approximately 570,419 mph, +/- 67,000 mph, +/- 1,000 mph. That is relative to Sagittarius A*, but given time I could build a model to get a better approximation.
Why did you stop me?
Many settlement agreements contain a provision for confidientiality. I'd love for them to amend the amended complaint talk about them not publishing the confidentiality agreement.
This increase or at least in California, is due to the fact that the police will not arrest and hold the criminals. If the police actually arrested and the city/county actually prosecuted these people many would think twice as there will be risk associated with these crimes.
They will get a watered down bill to pass. This bill will include a provision that preempts any law that requires Apple to do anything that Apple does not want. Just like the I-CAN-SPAM Act.
Placing a virus on your own computer cannot subject you to the CFAA. If you tell them not to connect anything to your phone/computer, and they do it, is it really a violation? You are not taking the action to trigger the virus. You told them not to do it.
It would be an interesting case.
There is a difference between SerpApi and Google
Google, if I remember correctly, has recognized and respected robots.txt since the last century. SerpApi does not.
Could it be because of Sanctuary cities?
Maybe this is because the Blue states have sanctuary cities and policies against the police cooperating with ICE? If ICE is notified before an illegal alien being released, it is much easier to capture the illegal alien when being released from jail than trying to find them after.
The 4th amendment does not apply
There is no expectation of your privacy in public. In theory, the source material may be very good. When you get a visa, you get photos taken. When you enter, you get your photos taken in good light. If you crossed the border illegally at night, the source material may not be available. If you were arrested, the source material is good. In mistaken matches, they should have agents who know to look at the picture and compare. But maybe the agent's synapse died from loneliness.
How dare you.
The police are acting in good faith during a hard job. We all know that they are all making furtive movements and behaving suspiciously.
Donuts
Someone should have told them that the guy robbed a donut shop on his way to the house. I'd love to see the next case where the police try to argue exigent circumstances.
Wondering the legality
I have always wondered about the legality of these types of upgrade 'requirements' or even just the bricking of devices. I have not wondered enough to research this yet. If I buy a widget and then they stop supporting it, essentially bricking it, or require an agreement to additional terms, essentially bricking the widget, can I get a refund on the widget? Now, to expand on this question: You buy a TV or car, you disagree with the selling of your data, and most of the advertised features are disabled. Could this be considered an unfair and deceptive business practice?
It worked for a while
I don't consider it a success when they were sent "eleven decks up is familiar with their prime directive" to be "refit them for their next voyage."
Blaming the prompter makes no sense
How would the prompter know if there was a violation or fair use made of the material? Does it give a full bibliography and the source material for comparison? How much of a summarization is fair use? It could be based on the use-case.
It must be allowed
They must allow the police to break the law and wiretap, it's for officer safety.
Moderator is an employee?
This ruling didn't address this, but it raised a question for me. As a moderator, he designed avatars, designed a logo, and wrote CSS code and Reddit continued to use them. As an employee, even unpaid, this would be considered works for hire and belong to Reddit. However, copyright is not preempted by the CDA. A license to use his copywritten material may be revoked, unless he was considered an agent/employee (paid or otherwise) of Reddit.
Do you know fast you were going?
I don't know, I would say approximately 570,419 mph, +/- 67,000 mph, +/- 1,000 mph. That is relative to Sagittarius A*, but given time I could build a model to get a better approximation. Why did you stop me?
He might have did it to himself, but its not over.
Many settlement agreements contain a provision for confidientiality. I'd love for them to amend the amended complaint talk about them not publishing the confidentiality agreement.
Full of shit.
Since he didn't claim he was full of shit, its not libel.
Arrest people
This increase or at least in California, is due to the fact that the police will not arrest and hold the criminals. If the police actually arrested and the city/county actually prosecuted these people many would think twice as there will be risk associated with these crimes.
There is no conflict.
They will get a watered down bill to pass. This bill will include a provision that preempts any law that requires Apple to do anything that Apple does not want. Just like the I-CAN-SPAM Act.
Another avenue
Instead of that, why not argue that it was a taking by eminent domain? I had seen that successful in another case?
They have parts?
I thought all that was in it was a power supply, meters, and a variable capacitors and pots. There is software in it?
You are David Sosa?
You are Busted!
CFAA maybe?
Placing a virus on your own computer cannot subject you to the CFAA. If you tell them not to connect anything to your phone/computer, and they do it, is it really a violation? You are not taking the action to trigger the virus. You told them not to do it. It would be an interesting case.
5000 people
They identified 5,000 people who are too dumb to vote.