slander 's BestNetTech Comments

Latest Comments (278)

• On the post: UK Home Secretary Calls Tech Leaders 'Patronizing' For Refusing To Believe Her 'Safe Backdoors' Spiels

  

  slander ( profile ), 05 Oct, 2017 @ 06:44pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:

  You forgot to tip your fedora.

• On the post: What's The Evidence Mass Surveillance Works? Not Much

  

  slander ( profile ), 19 Nov, 2015 @ 07:26pm

  Re:

  "Siri, list me the names of terrorists in the Serengeti."
  
  "Did you want recipes for spaghetti?"

• On the post: The Revolution Will Be Babysteps: NFL/Yahoo Ink Deal For Exclusive Web-Stream Of Bad Football Game

  

  slander ( profile ), 05 Jun, 2015 @ 04:39am

  Er...

  For the first time in NFL history, anyone with an internet connection can tune in, exclusively on Yahoo, from anywhere to watch a live football game for free.

  
  
  Wait, so for the past couple of years that I've watched NBC Sunday Night Football, launched from the Yahoo portal, streaming live from NBC, I really haven't been? Wow.

• On the post: Washington State Says Its Anti-SLAPP Law Is Unconstitutional

  

  slander ( profile ), 29 May, 2015 @ 05:33pm

  Re:

  Er, I don't want anybody suing for me. If I want somebody sued, I'm gonna do it myself...

• On the post: That Time Hitler Used Copyright Law To Block Future Senator Alan Cranston From Publishing Mein Kampf

  

  slander ( profile ), 16 May, 2015 @ 02:24am

  Re: Re: Re: Re:

  Well, that was... unexpected.

• On the post: If You Don't Mind A Little Perjury, You Can Convict Two People For The Same Crime

  

  slander ( profile ), 02 Dec, 2014 @ 05:03pm

  Re: Re: Re:

  Well, I see the buttons marked Insightful, Funny and Report. Where is the Tumblrina button?

• On the post: LAPD Exposes Login To Data Harvesting Software During Interview With CNN

  

  slander ( profile ), 08 Jul, 2014 @ 07:14pm

  Re:

  No way... it can't be. Jesus Christ, that is just Babytown frolics.

• On the post: USPTO Cancels Trademark Registration For Washington Redskins

  

  slander ( profile ), 18 Jun, 2014 @ 07:44pm

  Re: Re: Marxism is alive and well in the U.S.S.A.

  My, what a completely trustworthy, unbiased source you have.

• On the post: That Time A Star Trek Captain And A Physicist Got Tricked Into Doing A Documentary On Geocentrism

  

  slander ( profile ), 12 Apr, 2014 @ 05:37am

  Re:

  Just kidding, Kate. It wasn't that bad.

  
  Yes, it was.

• On the post: TSA Courts Next Generation Of Groping Victims With Cartoons And Coloring Pages

  

  slander ( profile ), 24 Dec, 2013 @ 11:10am

  Re: Re: Police states learned marketing: leave the velvet glove on more.

  Nope. Just the same ol' OOTBW's daily anti-Google rant. Nothing to see here - move along.

• On the post: Justice Department Looking To Change The Law That Made It Impossible To Serve Megaupload

  

  slander ( profile ), 12 Apr, 2013 @ 07:42am

  Re: Re: Re: Megaupload was doing BUSINESS in the United States.

  The DOJ sees it as guilty until proven innocent.

  
  The DOJ sees it as guilty.

• On the post: Swedish Appeals Court Says Web Designer Is Responsible For Copyright Infringement On StudentBay

  

  slander ( profile ), 21 Dec, 2012 @ 10:58am

  Re: Re: Re: Re: @ AC: "saying all gun manufacturers are secondary liable"

  That isn't the real OOTB. I know this because he didn't blame Google for providing links to StudentBay.

• On the post: Ridiculous: SEC Boss Refused To Move Forward On Required Crowdfunding Rules To Protect Her 'Legacy'

  

  slander ( profile ), 04 Dec, 2012 @ 10:10pm

  Re: Re: "just going to be used for massive scamming."

  Me too, me too!

• On the post: German Court Holds Internet User Responsible For Passing On Unknown, Encrypted File

  

  slander ( profile ), 28 Nov, 2012 @ 03:03pm

  Re: Re: Re: The encryption itself is the "crime", see?

  If he'd stop using his head solely as a device that keeps his ears separated, he'd get fewer flags.

  
  
  There, much better...

• On the post: President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos

  

  slander ( profile ), 20 Nov, 2012 @ 02:46pm

  Re: Re: Re: If we're going to cite IP cases here

  Actually, my reaction was regarding the relevance to the subject at hand. Would it not be more appropriate to submit this as a separate story?

• On the post: President Obama Is Not Impressed With Your Right To Modify His Photos

  

  slander ( profile ), 20 Nov, 2012 @ 01:12pm

  Re: If we're going to cite IP cases here

  Whiskey Tango Foxtrot?

• On the post: Just In Time For The Holiday Season, Apple Loses iPhone Trademark In Mexico

  

  slander ( profile ), 03 Nov, 2012 @ 05:31am

  Oh, the iRony...

• On the post: John Mellencamp: Thou Shalt Not Permit The Internet To Derail Our Gravy Train

  

  slander ( profile ), 01 Nov, 2012 @ 02:09pm

  Re: Re: Relevant quote

  Heh, according to Twitter, I just did.

• On the post: Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  

  slander ( profile ), 10 Sep, 2012 @ 04:45pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  Just because I have so much love and respect for such a fine, upstanding gentleman as yourself:
  
  http://www.forbes.com/sites/benkerschberg/2011/05/05/federal-court-rebukes-fbi-for-lying-to-the-court-about-surveillance-records/
  
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaA6Myrvz4Y
  
  http://www.ticklethewire.com/2011/12/27/ex-u-s-atty-accuses-fbi-and-prosecutors-of-illegally-obtaining-documents-and-lying-about-it/
  
  Of course, I suppose it would be somewhat redundant to mention COINTELPRO, warrantless GPS tracking, and the phony terrorist bombing plots created out of whole cloth.

• On the post: Publishing Company Admits That Anonymous' UDID Data Leak Was Actually Taken From Their Database

  

  slander ( profile ), 10 Sep, 2012 @ 12:57pm

  Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: What do App developers need UDID's for?

  That's right, keep repeating it over and over again until people start to believe you.
  
  
  You know who else repeated things over and over again until people believed him, don't you?

Next >>