Same in Switzerland. And yes, that is nothing a democracy should ever do. But then, fascism is en vogue again. In Switzerland as in Austria as in the USA.
We don't call Conservatives "Nazis", we call people that undermine democratic values like "anonymity" Nazis. Which of course is wrong in that context, as the accurate term would be "fascist".
Don't got to "plus five years", because that still opens the can of worms that is inheritance law.
Macauley already explained 1841(!) why this is a bad idea.
http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2014/07/24/macaulay-on-copyright/
I honestly don't get why people who buy games are so upset by Epic. So what if a game is exclusive to Epic or Steam or any other PC platform? You've just equated "PC" with "Windows" and that's exactly why I am upset. Epic only works on fucking Windows, and not on my PC which happens to run Linux. Bloody mainstream ignoramus.
This is all a misunderstanding. Because some republicans seem to think they're "Conservatives", like you know, in
"Conservativism: A political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change"
As it happens, it doesn't have anything to do with supporting radical then-new Nazi ideas of the 1930ies.
Also, you're absolutely allowed to change your views regarding slavery within the span of 150 years and still be a Conservative.
So uttering radical Nazi ideas does not make you a Conservative and blocking them is not an anti-Conservative bias, but just an anti-Nazi bias.
And here's a list of account holders that have themselves made an account by subverting someone within the french government:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_intelligence_agencies
Please note: the "french public" is not among them.
Actually, I even believe that not being part of the Schengen space helped Brexit. Because the rest of Europe suddenly realized they could travel everywhere. Not just foreigners were coming in, but they themselves could live and work wherever in Europe. Which produced a feeling of "belonging together", at least in the younger generation. Of course, Idiot lawmakers in the EU (and Switzerland too) are now threatening everything; because people start to see the EU as a vehicle of their own governments forcing unwanted laws down their throat. Can't get it past the people in your own country? Make the EU do it. Oh, and Switzerland will follow, sometimes even before it's law in the EU (https://www.parlament.ch/press-releases/Pages/mm-wbk-s-2019-02-12.aspx sorry, not in English, basically it wanted the same Article 11 as the EU, 7 days before the end of the EU deliberations. It's now postponed, but this will rear its ugly head again).
... maybe you're actually right. And they're squandering their own economy for some quick buck. (Because, again, for them the internet is mostly the G-MAFIA, and they don't even realize what they're doing).
Pfft, you don't need to stir up anti-US sentiment in Europe. While governments are largely pro-US, your own Trump made most of the population anti-US. The anti US sentiment took a short (and undeserved) break during the Obama-administration, but before that, Bush jr. made sure everyone hated the US by squandering all the sympathy people had for the US after 9/11 with fascist laws (mass surveillance) and the the invention of WMDs to start the Iraq War (in contrast to the US population, at that time 90% of the Europeans KNEW Bush was lying). And as the US continues to export bad laws (drug prohibition, draconian copyright laws, patents) intervenes in foreign peoples lives (Dotcom, Assange) and generally behaves as a bully, you don't have to "stir up" any anti US sentiments. Ironically, the EU is now starting to do the same shit as the US; and there is also a growing anti-EU sentiment within the EU...
I don't think you can educate the lawmakers. They at most use the top 10 services in the internet. For them, the G-MAFIA (Google. Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, IBM and Amazon) is the internet. Unless they block the EU completely over this, ideally even stop selling their products, these lawmakers will ignore everything else, foremost their own population. What's needed is quite simply a different set of lawmakers. There are elections in May...
Which means there are no border controls between Iceland and most other European countries (including Norway and Switzerland, which are also not part of the EU). Except Britain, of course.
The trouble with AIs is that a sufficiently evolved AI is indistinguishable from a human. Meaning it will have its own biases and believes. It won't be objective, at all. Which again makes it completely useless for exactly that which most of the people think it could be used.
1841, in front of the House of Commons, MP Thomas Babington Macaulay held the following speech:
http://www.thepublicdomain.org/2014/07/24/macaulay-on-copyright/
"And you will find that, in attempting to impose unreasonable restraints on the reprinting of the works of the dead, you have, to a great extent, annulled those restraints which now prevent men from pillaging and defrauding the living."
Of course, everything he warned from has already happened, because of these copyright-maximalist wankers.
The opposite, quite the opposite. The EU just passed a law that screws artists of half their earnings (article 16) on behalf of the publishers. In this context "piracy" is not "being taken down by law" but the law has be been taken down by pirates. The pirates being the publishers.
T-Mobile might portray itself as "different" in the USA, but it's still the incumbent in Germany, behaving no better than Verizon and AT&T.
Don't expect anything.
If "the behaviour of a narcissist who cannot get beyond his own selfish interest" would be a crime, your president would be in for a lifetime.
.. And that's why you need an extremely hard private data protection law. GDPR anyone? ;)
Re: Re: Playing chicken with the courts
This is actually not a matter for a (civil) court, but quite clearly fraud, so call the police and have them open a criminal investigation.