As for the second point, the whole "we're not listening to your calls with your mother" line is a total strawman.
This is all 1s and 0s, remember? You don't have to demolish a car manufacturing plant, after all -- you're just wiping some VMs and reincorporating elsewhere. Lease new machines. Call it "lavabutt" on the new corporate docs, in Andorra. Sign on to the Privacy Seppuku pledge, as lavabutt, again. Off you go
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/01/28/1645252/how-proxied-torrents-could-end-isp-subpoenas
While still theory at this point, my bet is with some very clever developers. The Comcasts and Warner Bros. of the world have yet to out-manoeuvre them.
http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/01/28/1645252/how-proxied-torrents-could-end-isp-subpoenas
While still theory at this point, my bet is with some very clever developers. The Comcasts and Warner Bros. of the world have yet to out-manoeuvre them.
Apologies, but I cannot agree with your thesis.
Google's business is the long-tail: fractions of fractions of a penny transactions spread over untold number of sites. equals billions of dollars every fiscal quarter.
Is Mike's thesis more grounded? Hard to say but to me it appears sounder.
You refuse to discuss publicly and openly your personal beliefs about copyright and piracy
Thank you, +1.
I've always suspected this, from the outside looking in.
Just makes the bosses anti-piracy lobbying even more hypocritical than I've always seen it as.
You immediately jump to the conclusion that every user wants their results filled with crappy pirate sites.
For content searches, the searches that Google will be demoting actually might be the ones that the consumer does want
...it is a bit difficult to see how a provision such as this raises such ire here...
Is that you Mr. Godwin? Indeed a pleasure to meet someone who's so right so often.
+1 for the frightening similarities. thank you sir.
btw, 1976: the ramones in camden, nj :). amazing show, even remember the drive home it was so thrilling!
2012: sadness at the corruption of the american experiment by mpaa/riaa.
Also unfortunately he did enough early in his career (before Entertainment industry funding) to help the elderly / medicare / and farms. because of that Seniors and farm owners love him and will always vote for him... no matter what he does to "those computer thing-a-ma-jigs" He's been in office since 1974... and until either the seniors expire or he does, it doesn't look good for replacing him anytime soon.
...how others can jump in...
...the results top Google because those are the sites people visit...
Everything old is new again, as Prof. Adrian Johns once wrote:
http://amzn.to/wnTnRu
"Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates":
goes through, in painfully dry academic prose, the exact same, repeated time and again, pattern as we are now witnessing with the Hollywood movie industry vs. its new competition.
Things are certainly moving fast:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0112/71672.html
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid won't whip Democratic votes for an online anti-piracy bill, according to sources familiar with his plans.
?I hear your concerns and will ensure that critical changes are made.?
?I will not vote for PIPA in its current form.?
?I will work to make important changes.?
?I will vote against the bill as currently written.?
...is the history against "piracy", and there's nothing new about it.
Incumbents have been fighting competition for centuries with laws. This book is very thorough, if not rather academically dry:
http://amzn.to/y8UKL5
Entitled "Piracy: The Intellectual Property Wars from Gutenberg to Gates" by University of Chicago professor Adrian Johns.
As a fellow Vermonter, that's a lllooooonnggggg wait, about 5 more years.
IMHO, more useful to call his offices, both in Burlington and DC, to present your message that removing DNS blocking does not mollify your (our) opposition to this legislation (1st amendment concerns, 4th amendment concerns, private right of action concerns, etc).
In fact, Burlington was a great call, really friendly and asked specific questions in response to my message for Senator Leahy. He's on edge about this thing now, after all how many Hollywood studios are based here in VT, and another call is worth it's weight in gold! Go.
That said, the fact that he's "heard from a number of Vermonters on this important issue"
Oversight This, Examine That
A huge exercise in bs: nowhere does the legislation mention unscrewing the backbone taps or reducing the flow.
I see lots of chatter regarding oversight, advocates, protection blah blah blah.
As Ed Snowden rightly pointed out, Section 215 authority is on it's way out, but that doesn't sweat the NSA. It's collection prowess happens under Section 702, which will *not* be curtailed under this legislation, just supervised.