nah, "u" couldn't but if u say got a bunch of people(or u know names) and all submitted the same broad patent over and over "one of u" could hit the jackpot
i have hidden my genes in a box in my backyard where the feds wont find it so i can infringe all i want
people in power respect the promises they make in order to gain power now?
the bill of rights should be looked at like campaign promises from current politics "oh hey, if u let us the founding fathers(bunch of rich white guys) start a new government we promise to not be evil like the king we literally fought a war to get away from a few years ago, while fixing all ur problems by spreading magic legal dust EVERYWHERE"
maybe if someone stuck to their promise ONCE, the internet would take this sort of thing srsly.
give me one example where people voted up the jokes like "moot best person ever" from times, and they followed through, and not called up their lawyers to fix the mess?
nothing
srsly this guys name is "(A)" what meaning could that be besides the "modern" anarchist sign?
--monkyyy the (fellow?)anarchist
expect government has proven time and again that it is a slippery slope; the fact that governments grow always, until they are destroyed or collapse under their own weight, has quite a few data points but as far as i know has no exceptions
the other 5 product were, handguns, lgb flags, condoms, kkk hoodie and singed copys of the commie manifesto
qu-qu-qu-quadera post
anyway, as an anarchist this is kinda my inter point, giving a small set of people the right to screw over whoever they feel like, is exactly what it sounds like no matter what if's and but's u write into the "social contract" the state loves writing hypocritical laws and there is no way to stop them from doing so but not letting anyone get the "only legit" use of force on others
government has proven it self as a slippery slope, who says we need a new one
--monkyyy the anarchist
i was thinking the same, sadily im not crazy ;__;, life would be easyer if i was
there should be no "balance" copyright law has shown itself as a slippery slope making any "for the public good" nil
ideas shouldnt be owned, even more so in the age of the internet
i believe the current record is 2 and 1/3 by 3 pixels(subpixel redering) but could be 3 and 2/3 by 4
i dont think they will ever do so, its a strain on the eyes
"Now, that would normally run afoul of gift giving guidelines... but they worked around that by spending the first 15 minutes "educating members and staff on important issues" (take a guess what those might be)."
wait so u can get around bribery laws, as long as u tell them what u want them to do?
but the only things that get done ARE the "bipartisan" but the public doesnt like it, almost as a rule
personally the politicians i disagree w/ most are "bipartisan", they start wars, bail out banks, try to censor the internet, increase spying, cause inflation etc.
--monkyyy the anarchist
nature gave me the right, much like free speech,
its something that is easy to do but hard to stop and it only hurts idiots
if u trolls want to complain to nature about making the wrong choice in this matter, mind bringing up how over eating makes me fat is stupid
strange, as an anarchist the noise of directed ads fail miserably and i wish they actually would get better at telling me what i want to hear, but they dont seem to get the hint "hey liberal ads i hate ur methods" and "hey very very conservative ads i think ur all corrupt hipocrates"