Isn't this exactly what the people behind 9/11 wanted?
At least it's just a fraud lawsuit and not someone claiming to have a patent on two-factor authentication with "internet" crudely scrawled on it.
At least in my jurisdiction, you can vote "none of the above" by submitting an unmarked ballot. This is for people that only care about a handful of issues and only want to vote for the ones they care for. (For example, yesterday I only voted for President, Congressman, and on a handful of state laws; I didn't vote for any local state positions.)
The solution is to return the mouse/keyboard and get Logitech instead.
I'd be okay with a "strikes" system if it also extended the metaphor to include "balls".
If I recall correctly TSR went through some legal trouble in the '70s about hobbits in D&D; they ended up changing the name to halflings.
Again the marketplace is not the end-all be-all for Windows 8!
Go blather on about Apple actually locking out non-app-store sources in OSX, or even the mess that is trying to distribute closed-sourced software for Linux. Oh wait, Linux is beloved because it's open source and Apple is beloved because it's Apple.
Yeah, I was going to the comments to say just this!
I'd really like software that does this, but sends the images to me instead of a third party. That'd be cool.
I wonder if there's any money to be made in patent troll trolling: Offer to represent companies free of charge against patent trolls, hear the case in court, and convince the court to award massive fines... against the patent trolls with the money going to the defendant. Then the troll trollers take the money received as payment for the free defense.
My senator was the one who placed that "super-secret" hold on that patent reform bill months ago. After he did that I was determined to vote him out, and I will vote against him when he's up for re-election... in four more years...
Indirect democracy isn't.
> Lee explains that this is an oddity/antiquity of UK law, in which private parties are actually allowed to bring criminal charges against other private parties, rather than (as in the US) needing the government to decide to bring charges.
I actually think this is a positive. Imagine what we could do if we the people could bring perjury charges against the *IAAs for all the false DMCA takedowns they send.
I know, but what I was saying is that prior art doesn't invalidate first to file patents, only first to invent.
Video games do not cause violence. Violence stems from the factor that has always been in human civilization... Rock and Roll! ( ;) )
I say at lest for digitally-edited music, the project file from whatever DAW was used is a good choice.
> And, in the process, the company may end up setting off some antitrust alarm bells.
I only hope this happens because then a "well Apple does it" response may trigger actions against Apple as well.
The best argument I've seen for outlawing this is that a Facebook account often contains information that it's illegal for an employer to ask of interviewees such as age, martial status, or religion.
"Oh yeah, according to your private Facebook posts about your divorce, we see you're not a 'family man' so we can't hire you."
What about state labels? At least that would let us know the difference between "I wish I was a constituatnt of X so I could vote against them" and "I wish X was up for re-election so I could vote against them".
The worst part is finding QR codes in the wild that look nice but don't scan.
Google just needs to kick their fiber into high gear. Perhaps a kickstarter-style system where town residents pledge X ammount of dollars towards their city, and when they raise enough money to install a fiber system there, do so.