"And got them to pay up, because the alternative of being a constant target, was worse." I pretty much never find myself in sharp disagreements with these pages, but this is pretty bad. These pathetic excuses for Americans caved, they could have fought, those that did won. From universities, to media, to law firms, those that fought have largely won. The stain of their shameful capitulation should haunt them forever. I'd recommend Marc Elias/Democracy Docket for the better take.
The Dims have always been bad at messaging, they don't even try most of the time. Take the 'pro-choice' position, why would any of them ever call it that, it should always be 'forced birth' and include how that means forcing a 10 year old to have a baby, along with the number of pregnant women who have died when they couldn't get a medically necessary abortion.
Admitting error--proof you're no Donald Trump. It really isn't a reach to assume those who spew a constant barrage of accusations and outrage 'untethered to the facts' are lying, it is what the default position needs to be if you want to be right far more than wrong.
It's not just the lunatics have taken over the asylum, the dunces have taken over the academies. And ignorance has become the measure of 'merit'. Cautionary tales gave become blueprints, Christianity has become a driver of cruelty. These sure are interesting times.
These are the works of Christian Nationalists, or 'White Christian Nationalists', except that's a qualifier that does virtually zero work.
At the core of these mfers efforts is a basic denial of facts combined with profound racism. And a large percentage of the country is ready and willing to participate.
At least they're still bothering to torture the law, facts, and basic rational thinking. How long before they won't feel the need to make even that minimal effort?
What's the use of talking about facts and reason when the country just elected a bunch of aholes who are almost completely impervious to facts and reason, and were obviously so? Why does the law matter when you have far more Kacsmaryks and Cannons? What about when SCOTUS itself doesn't care about facts and the law? The boding is getting terrifying.
If they used conspiracy laws against law enforcement the way they do drug dealers, a big percentage of judges, DAs/US Attorneys and cops would be in prison.
What good are standards or codes of ethics if they're not enforced? Why aren't there standards that involve multiple examples of ignoring really basic law and facts? Of course, we have a SCOTUS that would fail these routinely, and corrupt pols who are impervious to facts, and about a third of the country in a cult. Bad boding all around.
Are you actually trying to claim that a mallet isn't a hammer? Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe that mallets, and gavels, are used to hammer on things. To me, and dictionaries [usage] and etymology and uh .... that kinda makes it a hammer.
"And got them to pay up, because the alternative of being a constant target, was worse." I pretty much never find myself in sharp disagreements with these pages, but this is pretty bad. These pathetic excuses for Americans caved, they could have fought, those that did won. From universities, to media, to law firms, those that fought have largely won. The stain of their shameful capitulation should haunt them forever. I'd recommend Marc Elias/Democracy Docket for the better take.
It really should be ceaselessly noted you have to be an ignorant moronic gullible fool to believe any of these mfers.
It should be noted that Trump STILL has about a 40% approval rating.
Dems always too dim to do effective messaging
The Dims have always been bad at messaging, they don't even try most of the time. Take the 'pro-choice' position, why would any of them ever call it that, it should always be 'forced birth' and include how that means forcing a 10 year old to have a baby, along with the number of pregnant women who have died when they couldn't get a medically necessary abortion.
I keep getting reminded of A Tale of Two Cities. How did that start... It was the headiest of times, it was the headlessiest of times?
What's more deranged, having Trump Derangement Syndrome or not having Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Admitting error--proof you're no Donald Trump. It really isn't a reach to assume those who spew a constant barrage of accusations and outrage 'untethered to the facts' are lying, it is what the default position needs to be if you want to be right far more than wrong.
" 4.1 billion robocalls so far this year, or around 135 million each day" You're off by an order of magnitude, it's more like 14 million
What's even more frightening is what happens when ICE gets the $ billions in new budget, what kinds of aholes are gonna be lining up to join?
"released them from the constraints of empirical reality"
That's a fantastic summation
It's not just the lunatics have taken over the asylum, the dunces have taken over the academies. And ignorance has become the measure of 'merit'. Cautionary tales gave become blueprints, Christianity has become a driver of cruelty. These sure are interesting times.
These are the works of Christian Nationalists, or 'White Christian Nationalists', except that's a qualifier that does virtually zero work. At the core of these mfers efforts is a basic denial of facts combined with profound racism. And a large percentage of the country is ready and willing to participate.
This is like playing air guitar and it being out of tune.
At least they're still bothering to torture the law, facts, and basic rational thinking. How long before they won't feel the need to make even that minimal effort?
What's the use of talking about facts and reason when the country just elected a bunch of aholes who are almost completely impervious to facts and reason, and were obviously so? Why does the law matter when you have far more Kacsmaryks and Cannons? What about when SCOTUS itself doesn't care about facts and the law? The boding is getting terrifying.
4K TVs
If they used conspiracy laws against law enforcement the way they do drug dealers, a big percentage of judges, DAs/US Attorneys and cops would be in prison.
What good are standards or codes of ethics if they're not enforced? Why aren't there standards that involve multiple examples of ignoring really basic law and facts? Of course, we have a SCOTUS that would fail these routinely, and corrupt pols who are impervious to facts, and about a third of the country in a cult. Bad boding all around.
Are you actually trying to claim that a mallet isn't a hammer? Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe that mallets, and gavels, are used to hammer on things. To me, and dictionaries [usage] and etymology and uh .... that kinda makes it a hammer.
Does the 1st A. even apply to worms?
Does the 1st A. even apply to worms?