cable broadband was regulated under title II until 2002, and dsl until 2005.
Title II doesn't hurt investment at all--without net neutrality ISPs would be incentivized NOT to upgrade their networkds in order to sell prioritization. Companies always follow the profit incentive. That's capitalism.
If you think net neutrality hurts network investment, you are either a telecom shill or an ill informed moron.
It would be more like giving them one of those plastic apples from centerpiece bowl.
What makes the internet so innovative and fun and revolutionary is its openness--without that openness, it's not really the internet at all. "Free" basics is a faux internet, designed to hook users of Facebook for future ad delivery, rather than let an upstart Indian social networking platform take hold.
Not only is Zuckerberg being disingenuous regarding his intentions, he's actively suppressing the lower class by enforcing India's caste system.
BestNetTech has not posted any stories submitted by markablejones.
Uh, duh. We've had net neutrality for 25 years.
cable broadband was regulated under title II until 2002, and dsl until 2005.
Title II doesn't hurt investment at all--without net neutrality ISPs would be incentivized NOT to upgrade their networkds in order to sell prioritization. Companies always follow the profit incentive. That's capitalism.
If you think net neutrality hurts network investment, you are either a telecom shill or an ill informed moron.
Re: Apple Analogy
It would be more like giving them one of those plastic apples from centerpiece bowl.
What makes the internet so innovative and fun and revolutionary is its openness--without that openness, it's not really the internet at all. "Free" basics is a faux internet, designed to hook users of Facebook for future ad delivery, rather than let an upstart Indian social networking platform take hold.
Not only is Zuckerberg being disingenuous regarding his intentions, he's actively suppressing the lower class by enforcing India's caste system.