Ltlw0lf's Favorite BestNetTech Posts of the Week
This week’s posts ran the gamut from the evils of DMCA/ACTA/TPP, to computer security issues, to the government’s effort to pass draconian treaties which are most likely binding even when the government says they aren’t, to cheap computers that will revolutionize the world. There is always a lot of good stuff on BestNetTech to talk about.
One of my most favorite posts this week would have to have been the article about how Hollywood would like to see us space-shift DVDs by forcing us to take the DVD to a store to convert into a file for use in our non-DVD capable devices. They appear to be hoping that by offering this capability, they will head off the consumer groups out there who are trying to get the Librarian of Congress to allow ripping of DVDs as an exception to the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provision.
It also outlines something that many of us here say regularly in the comments; that the gatekeepers are so used to holding all the cards, abusing their producers and customers alike with one-sided contracts, DRM, and onerous regulations and they really don’t want to change. And neither do their customers, who will continue ripping the DVDs themselves, violating the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA because it is easier and more effective than any legitimate alternative Hollywood has provided. And of course, we are talking about space-shifting, which was a legally protected activity until DMCA made it illegal only if the material was encrypted to protect copyright.
The gatekeepers won’t be successful in this effort until they can control
software distribution all over the world and outlaw computers which can be
modified by the user, and I just can’t see this happening in a post-SOPA world,
no matter how much the gatekeepers would like to believe that the SOPA backlash
was a one-off event caused by “misinformation” and “undemocratic” processes.
Something that most of those who participated in the anti-SOPA demonstrations
felt pretty much summed up the actions of those behind SOPA with the backroom
deals, the laws for sale, regulatory capture, and the efforts to discredit those
behind the anti-SOPA demonstrations as lapdogs for Google.
And of course, we have the EFF fighting against companies sending out automated bogus DMCA takedowns for things they have no legal right taking down. Hopefully someone will bring some sanity to this problem – but I am not holding my breath. I used to think DMCA was an army where SOPA was a nuclear holocaust. But now it looks like the DMCA is an army with nuclear bombs – placing them somewhat indiscriminately and with no concern of legality or collateral effects. At some point, like everything else, it will backfire on the gatekeepers, as we have seen recently where two gatekeepers sue each other over the public domain or over trademarks. Someone is going to issue a takedown for another gatekeeper, and the nuclear armageddon will begin. Especially with automation, where companies really aren’t checking the results to assure that the results are correct but which does not appear to be happening in these cases (every engineer/scientist learns early on in their career to check the results.)
Moving on, this week saw a couple posts on computer security issues. We had the post on how the University of Michigan hacked the online voting system that was placed online specifically for the public to test the functionality and security of the system. We have to commend OSDV and Washington D.C. for doing the right thing and putting the system online to be tested. And the University of Michigan (and the others) who tested the system to its fullest and made the results available. This effort will make the system more secure, if they take what they learn and fix the problems and don’t introduce new ones. We know that many of the problems discovered here also exist in the closed source voting systems, and this is precisely why those closed source systems are so hard to trust.
On a lighter note, we have the post
on the Raspberry Pi, and how it could be a big problem for oppressive regimes.
So many people were excited about the product that they crashed the server.
Having cheap and small devices which run open source operating systems and
applications can make things far more difficult for countries and gatekeepers who
want to control how everyone uses their computers. Having less devices to worry
about securing, and tailoring the 20W $25 PCs to replace the 650W $500 Desktop PC
will have a better effect on the environment. Now if they can get the computer
to fit into an Altoids tin, that would be awesome.
And finally, something I found to be surprising, is that teaching styles of teachers are much more of a distraction then computers in the classroom. I didn’t have a laptop with me in school until I was in my senior year in college, and that was only on a special occasion. However, it makes sense, as I find I am most efficient when I allow myself a couple short opportunities to visit BestNetTech. Though if my boss is reading, I am multi-tasking and I am blocked waiting for the tasks to finish.
Re: Re: Information Service ... "MonkeyFracasJr" another ODD commenter.
Re: Re: Re:
Re: Re: Video Games...
Video Games...
Think about all the video games that haven't entered the public domain after 28 years. It is doubtful that any video game company would have renewed their copyright after 28 years, and most video games from 1989 and earlier would now be in the public domain.
NES Roms would all be in the public domain, as would many MAME Roms, SEGA Master System Roms, Atari 2600 Roms, and a slew of other ones.
Yeah, there is a huge market for all those pre-1989 games out there right now that we have to lock everything up for 70 years (of course, the real reason is so that current vendors of games can "maximize" their profits by not having to compete with retro games.)
Re: I appreciate how Microsoft handled the Windows 10 rollout
Re: Re: Re: Re:
Re: Re:
Re:
Re:
Re: Re: PACER charging at all is wrong....should be covered by filing fees
> "My first reaction to the letter was 'FFS.' HBO should get a life or stick something where the sun doesn't shine," Wilcox said.
A sentiment shared by nearly everyone else not paid by HBO or in the pocket of the "un-intelectual monopoly"/intellectual property ("we gots to collect it all") business.
It is a remarkable picture for the artwork of a 13-year old, and maybe this is an education for artists everywhere about how HBO and the "un-intelectual monopoly" business value their contributions to society. If you are making them money, you are a cow which shortly will be slaughtered for their taste/waste. If you aren't making them money, you are the dirt they walk on.
Re: Re: Simplest Answer Ever
Except Getty has been caught on more than one occasion claiming (and attempting to enforce) copyright on images it doesn't own or are in the public domain. Sadly, I think this may actually be what they want to do. They know that there are folks out there now using search engines to search for their copyright material on Getty, and shutting down this avenue reduces their headaches. They are complaining that robots.txt, a simple, industry standard, and used by every web admin out there is just too darn difficult for them to understand. Photographers that cannot understand robots.txt should hire a good company to run their online business for them. I wonder if their automated scanners searching for copies of pictures they stole (yes, unlike their whines about infringing copyrights, when they take something that doesn't belong to them and sell it, and turn around and use DMCA to force the original photographer's works offline, that is stealing,) respects the robots.txt on the websites they crawl...I doubt it.
Re: Fuck you, pay us
Cheaper in the short term does not mean cheaper in the long term, changing it from a larger, single payment to a 'smaller' but repeated payment is likely to bring in quite a bit more money. I have basically ignored the advice to register myself mainly because most of my vanity domain sites are run by a single, trusted, individual, and mostly because I am paying for all my websites. There are no corporate backing on my websites, and I make no money off of them, so why should I pay the government yet another fee to deal with something I doubt I'll ever see. Besides, my ISP has a registered DMCA agent. But if they are now making it a 3 year thing, why don't they just get together with ICAN and throw that as an additional requirement on the fee I already pay for the domain name registration?
Re:
Thats not how Holywood accounting works, milk will cost even more when they own the cow, because they have to pay for its feeding, and that makes it more expensive to sell milk compared to buying it from a cow owner to sell on.
I know this is Poe, but I'll run right into it anyway.
Hollywood accounting is a fabrication made up by Hollywood, and it is entirely within the sphere of their control. If it wasn't profitable for them to use Hollywood Accounting, it would go away in a heartbeat. AT&T can decide, once it owns the cow, how much it is going to cost. They will, of course, continue to use Hollywood Accounting because they believe their customers and content providers aren't smart enough to figure out what they are doing, even though cord-cutting and independent production of high-quality (hollywood-level) material is proof that their customers and content providers are far smarter than they think they are.
Besides, what you said makes absolutely no sense, except to a Hollywood Accountant, since in the real world, the price you pay for milk includes the cost of the feed. The rest of the world has awaken to the stupidity. It's only a matter of time before the courts and Congress wake up and see this for the fraud it is.
Re: Re:
I have business class in my area. It's $10 more per month than consumer-grade (if you're not also getting cable TV and, well, of course I'm not getting that garbage) and WONDERFUL service.
Hope you don't move. In my area, my cable provides the cheapest business class level at $181 a month (I pay $110 a month for the top tier consumer class, unbundled.) For the cheapest business class, you get a dynamic IP address, no QoS, and about 1/5th to 1/25th of the bandwidth. I get 250mBps on a good day, typically about 50 mBps and the lowest tier commercial plan gives you 10x2 (yes, lower than broadband levels set by FCC.) But at least they give you 5 more email addresses for free, and you get the same amount of cloud storage (5GB) that the consumer class gives you.
For the same level I currently have now, via business internet plan, it's $270/month.
I know, because my cable company has been complaining for the last two years that I should be paying for business internet (despite not having a business,) because I "have servers" (I don't) and require the network to have some quality of service levels (like not be down more than an hour a month, according to my network monitor, they are over 2 hours down at the moment.) Of course, for that $270, you still don't get QoS or a static IP...that costs even more.
Re:
How do they have a TM in 49 States? If it's Federal, you would think it would cover all 50, and if not, they only operate in 24 States anyway.
Maybe someone challenged the mark in New Jersey?
Re: Taco Tuesday
I know Taco Tuesday. Here in California I have to ask who is Taco John? Stupid, Stupid, Stupid!
That is because we don't have Taco John's here (I doubt they would do well here either, there is an authentic taco shop on every corner which makes better and less expensive food.) I've been to one in the Midwest, and if you want more expensive and less authentic Mexican food than Taco Bell, you go to Taco John's.
And apparently Taco John's doesn't believe in California, since just about every restaurant has Taco Tuesdays and I haven't heard a single one of them getting a letter. We should be safe.
Re: Except for one thing
I would only note that I have spoken at great length with the former head of the RIAA, and with the relevant exec at the MPAA, and their position REMAINS that making a copy of a CD, even on an obsolete form such as a cassette, and making a copy of a movie, even on such an obsolete form as a VHS tape, is actually a violation of copyright!
Except that, according to the legal statement they seem to like putting on those CDs, they sold me a license, not the physical medium. Sure, the legal statement also says that it is illegal to make unauthorized copies of the medium, but seems like they are playing both sides of the fence here.
The MPAA guy told me he scolded his own mother for making a copy of an album to play in her car!
And yet when her car gets broken into and all of her CDs are stolen, or when they melt due to heat, he makes no attempt to replace them without repaying the license fee.
I just love how two-faced they are...everything in the name of greed. Which is why I tend to avoid their little aluminum and plastic coffee coasters.
Re:
One thing not mentioned in the BestNetTech piece (but in the original) is that the parent's house is in a different county (Shiawassee) than the son's house where the pot was found (Saginaw).
Actually, according to both the attached lawsuit documents and the original report, neither house is located in Saginaw county.
But I totally echo all your other points, this looks stinky.
Re: Re: ripple effect?
In theory fraudulent transactions can be removed from one's credit history, though I have never tried it.
From personal experience, they can, but usually it takes quite a bit of work and some money. The earlier you catch it, the easier it is to take care of. If you have enough money or a lawyer on retainer, it is a lot easier, but at first you need to know the problem exists and it doesn't look like a lot of people caught it. What really hurts is when the company who fraudulently claims you owed them money goes out of business or is bought out by several successors of interest before you catch it, in which case, good luck.