The claim that "the media" is not describing how terrible Trump's response was is not correct. I've watched multiple CNN and MSNOW YouTube videos with anchors and guests excoriating him.
“Every time a noncitizen votes, it effectively cancels out a U.S. citizen’s vote.”
That's some braindead Republican voting math right there. If anything this guy's been cancelling out Democratic votes all this time. Wouldn't they want that?
But most officers in the military, from my understanding, are not intended to know what and what is not “manifestly unlawful,” and the default is to assume that if you are given an order, it is lawful...
Officers in particular absolutely should have a sense of what is and isn't lawful. There may be a significant grey area between clearly legal and clearly illegal (something that may not be resolved until after the fact and once lawyers have weighed in), but we're talking abut a president that had to be talked down from the suggestion that the military shoot peaceful protesters in the legs. Anybody who doesn't think that order would be "manifestly unlawful" shouldn't be in command or even in a position to follow it.
I'm genuinely surprised about Kelly's role in this. If you're smart enough to become a fighter pilot and an astronaut, you're smart enough to learn how actually S230 works from people who aren't financially vested in crippling it.
When DHS’s goons are a roving band of masked armed men, they’re tough as hell. And why not? They spend their days arresting schoolteachers and tear-gassing kids from a safe distance away. They’re pretty impervious to harm. That said, they also are little babies, because they don’t believe there should be any consequences for their actions, and even the smallest harm they suffer is an outrage, something they simply can’t comprehend.
The clearest sign of their cowardice is the fact that they're making absolutely no effort to get "the worst of the worst" by going to where those people are likely to be found. Because that might be scary! Those people might actually fight back! Instead they target the least dangerous people they can find and cosplay at being tough guys.
I'm reasonably sure if they accidentally put themselves in real danger they'd shit their pants and run away.
Trying to stop tens of millions of people's healthcare doubling in cost is not "no reason". You can make an argument about whether or not it was smart or effective, but saying it was for no reason is just dumb.
They’re a trillion-dollar, multinational company. Did anyone really think they engaged in social justice issues for reasons other than because it looks good for them to do so?
No, I thought they engaged in social justice issues (like strong digital privacy) because that's what customers want, and giving customers what they want is a good way to make more customers, which makes you more money.
It always comes back to money of course, but apparently they now believe the best path to that money is not through their customers.
The claim that "the media" is not describing how terrible Trump's response was is not correct. I've watched multiple CNN and MSNOW YouTube videos with anchors and guests excoriating him.
Your dumbass partisanship is showing. These documents are requested as part of a court case "the Dems" have nothing to do with.
Accepting a role she almost certainly knew was an illegal appointment was absolutely her fuck up.
The reality of his age and health could definitely get in his way.
I'm genuinely surprised about Kelly's role in this. If you're smart enough to become a fighter pilot and an astronaut, you're smart enough to learn how actually S230 works from people who aren't financially vested in crippling it.
Far from law enforcement's finest
No, that has never been true, it's just an excuse used by IP bullies.
Indeed, but it's believed and parroted by a bunch of bigots who are definitely not in any way affected by actual incidents of migrant crime.