"whether this is the insurance industry deciding to do the right thing on a rare occasion, or the companies have simply done the math that the vaccinations will cost less"
Glad I ditched my Nest thermostat within a year of purchase. For an internet connected, notification capable device not to have a low battery warning is tech malpractice. And they included the Magic Mouse charge location, so you can't charge it while it's in use. Dynamite.
So you're saying it's not too late to trademark "Chiefpeat" and cash in?
I would think the history of allowing 3rd parties to use the term, NOT in reference to the original Lakers run, would significantly weaken the standing. Does genericization only happen from unlicensed usage? If so that seems like quite the loophole for a trademark holder.
Unfortunately that's not what he said. I followed the links and it seems the editorial of his remark was more quote-worthy:
"Two to four ounces of marijuana is definitely worth our time to investigate," Garcia told the City Council. "I do feel other cities might be different, but in ours, I do believe this will have negative public safety impacts.”
Oh, good. I got concerned when I read “interference with the railways.” But turns out it's just interference from the railways. Great.
Also, at worst, the system triggered 130 unconstitutional searches when fully-legal items passed through its scanners.
This seems like a warrant to seize a department store because you think it may have surveillance cameras that could see outside. If you were so desperate for recordings, why don't you wait by the car with your warrant and take them when the owner shows up? Because this is easier an private citizens don't have the resources to stop you.
"The images Donald Trump shared implied that I have endorsed him."
I thought we were not supposed to repeat the lie when responding to the lie. So just start that there was not, nor will there be any endorsement, then roll into the misogyny burn.
It certainly seems like he should have been allowed to make a copy while he owned it, and he apparently chose to keep whatever copies he had when he forfeited it. But that certainly made the forfeited physical album less valuable, so he should be on the hook for however much value he represented that he was giving the government but didn't.
But you can't put the cats back in the bag, so I'm not really sure what the Crypto Bros hope to accomplish here, aside from informing the word that there are freed copies of their rapidly depreciating asset.
Oh also, the courts have to waste time and resources talking about all this BS. So yeah, everyone loses.
I dunno, seems pretty consistent with most of our intellectual property regime for the last 600-odd years.
"When it is difficult to _______, it is legal because only the rich can do it. As soon as it becomes easy enough for the masses to ________ it is made illegal!"
This makes everyone who passes through Wyoming subject to the particularities of its laws, even when drivers aren’t residents, aren’t expected to know the local laws, and would be — in the other 49 states — fully compliant with state regulations.
Not just that you have to follow Wyoming law while in Wyoming; you have to have known then AND followed it BEFORE entering the state. You are now governed by whatever state you are in AND Wyoming, if there's a chance you may at some future point enter the state.
The cynical voice in my head notes that these K-9 officers are being held to a higher standard than their human counterparts; being forced operate under the constraints of laws that they are not familiar with.
Personally, rather than prevent them from advertising things that aren't true again in the future, I'd prefer an injunction forcing them to provide the free services they're been advertising all along.
I think this is the basic plot of classic 1945 rom-com "Christmas in Connecticut" starring Barbara Stanwyck.
Glad I ditched my Nest thermostat within a year of purchase. For an internet connected, notification capable device not to have a low battery warning is tech malpractice. And they included the Magic Mouse charge location, so you can't charge it while it's in use. Dynamite.
Oh, Are we arresting people for obstruction now? Someone call Bobby Mueller!
Streisanded
And now I know Conservative Dad Beer exists, thanks a lot.
So you're saying it's not too late to trademark "Chiefpeat" and cash in? I would think the history of allowing 3rd parties to use the term, NOT in reference to the original Lakers run, would significantly weaken the standing. Does genericization only happen from unlicensed usage? If so that seems like quite the loophole for a trademark holder.
Unfortunately that's not what he said. I followed the links and it seems the editorial of his remark was more quote-worthy:
Oh, good. I got concerned when I read “interference with the railways.” But turns out it's just interference from the railways. Great. Also, at worst, the system triggered 130 unconstitutional searches when fully-legal items passed through its scanners.
This seems like a warrant to seize a department store because you think it may have surveillance cameras that could see outside. If you were so desperate for recordings, why don't you wait by the car with your warrant and take them when the owner shows up? Because this is easier an private citizens don't have the resources to stop you.
Are we not doing framing anymore?
Not-advertising fee
This certainly ranks up there with the bullshit math of lost sales that got us recordable media levies or link taxes.
Everyone loses.
It certainly seems like he should have been allowed to make a copy while he owned it, and he apparently chose to keep whatever copies he had when he forfeited it. But that certainly made the forfeited physical album less valuable, so he should be on the hook for however much value he represented that he was giving the government but didn't. But you can't put the cats back in the bag, so I'm not really sure what the Crypto Bros hope to accomplish here, aside from informing the word that there are freed copies of their rapidly depreciating asset. Oh also, the courts have to waste time and resources talking about all this BS. So yeah, everyone loses.
That's how we've always done it.
I dunno, seems pretty consistent with most of our intellectual property regime for the last 600-odd years.
Oh, that makes sense. I was wondering what parents gave their son the name of a Street Fighter II villain.
Sunscreen
The cynical voice in my head notes that these K-9 officers are being held to a higher standard than their human counterparts; being forced operate under the constraints of laws that they are not familiar with.
Personally, rather than prevent them from advertising things that aren't true again in the future, I'd prefer an injunction forcing them to provide the free services they're been advertising all along.