To be pedantic:
Only people can get patents.As alluded to later on in this post, this statement is not accurate. For example, a corporation can "get" a patent. As stated later:
But the Patent Act requires inventors to be “individuals,” which means “a human being, a person” in Supreme Court precedent."Individuals" have to be the inventors of the invention to which a patent is being sought, but that is not the same thing as the one 'getting' or holding the patent. Therefore a corporation can file for and receive ("get") a patent on inventions made by its human employees, despite the fact the corporation is not an individual.
It’s been a wonderful example of the blistering stupidity of the “growth for growth’s sake” mindset, the perils of mindless consolidation, and our obsession with completely pointless megadeals that genuinely only benefit investors and higher level executives. Everybody else, from artists and employees to consumers, gets screwed in the form of layoffs, higher rates, or lower quality product.So, in other words, a typical for-profit corporation?
Do they know something we don't about an upcoming undead rising?
And when the world’s richest man does something pathetic it’s going to get covered by the media regardless of how certain people feel about him.When did this become about Bernard Arnault? I thought we were dissing Elon Musk?
Wow, I first misread that title as "The LSD Church ..." Silly me confusing a body full of scatter-brained hallucinating people with the LSD Church.
last year, we finally switched from our old, home-built platform to WordPress.And the site still works? Amazing! :D
If you stopped clicking on those "boner pills" links, maybe BestNetTech wouldn't get so much spam about them due to lack of traffic.
What would be amusing is if Twitter is evicted by REIT, which by extension would mean the sub-letter Dentsu would also get evicted, which would likley put Twitter in breach of contract to the sub-letters, Dentsu, and then getting sued by both REIT for unpaid past rent and Dentsu for breach of their lease agreement with Twitter...
Surely this poison pill would have come out in a pre-sale due diligence process that would make any (sane) potential buyer run for the hills and forget they ever considred making an offer?
When something is stolen, it’s not the responsibility of the owner to do something about it, except to call the police.The vehicle was on Hertz's own lot, such that they were able to issue a new lease contract, hand over the keys, and have that third party drive it off the lot. By definition the vehicle was not stolen.
Twitter doesn't care where the money comes from. Twitter doesn't have a sales contract with these questionable Saudi Arabian and Qatari investors, it has a contract with Musk and the acquisition company. If the US government bans certain Saudi Arabian and Qatari investors from investing in the aquisition company, that's a financing hole Musk has to fill, not a reason to back out of the acquisition..
They haven't dropped the paywall, they've changed it from a cash payment to a payment-in-kind, i.e., providing personal information to proceed through the paywall.
Maybe this is the one you are looking for? https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/standards.png
Employment at will means they could have fired her for any reason even if they didn’t like her shoes.No, no it doesn't. They cannot fire her for a discriminatory reason or for a reason that breaks a law or for a reason that breaks any contractual obligations they are under (I don't mean employment contract - otherwise they wouldn't be 'at will', I mean, for example, a consent decree where they have entered into a contract to not undertake certain activities).
The act makes it illegal for BigTech to geolock users. So you could get a scenario where a large social media geolocks Texas. Texans sue in Texas state court.If the compamny has no presence in Texas, and it prevents Texas-based users from accessing the site, then a Texas court would lack standing to hear such a case. The best that Texas could do would be to take it up with a federal court, but then, they'd lose diversity and no federal law would be being broken to pursue the case in Federal Court. This would be the exact same situation as Texas (I think it was) trying to sue another state over how that state operates its federal election process and the federal court tossing it because there was no diversity or federal law at issue.
That allows anti-cheat developers to detect a wider variety of cheating threats, as Murphy explained in an extensive FAQ.Would that make them Murphy's Laws?
Should we find better ways for people to keep their data safe and away from misuse? Absolutely. Is that answer to create a cumbersome, impossible to comply with, system of confusing laws that requires expensive lawyers to constantly give you non-committal answers on how to minimize your risk? It doesn’t seem like it. Is the answer to make sure that no one in the EU can actually make use of useful online services? Also doesn’t seem like it.While the nitty-gritty details of the law may be complex (like any law), the high-level requirement to comply with the law are pretty fucking simple: 1) only collect data you absolutely need to provide the service; 2) don't include libraries in your website that collect user data in breach of point 1, e.g., Google Analytics, directly sourced Facebook 'like' buttons, using Facebook as a login mechanism; 3) if you don't know what a random library you are including in your website does, don't fucking include it; 4) for data under point 1, ensure the method to collect it and the storage of it remains within the EU; 5) if you are willing to do more work, then expand 4 to include a country/foreign company that has the appropriate data sharing agreements in place (but easier to just stick under point 4); 6) if you do decide to collect extra data, then it is your choice to have to go through the extra rigmarole of appropriately obtaining informed consent; 7) if you undertake point 6, you are choosing to engage in ensuring whatever process you use to collect the data (e.g. Google Analytics) complies with 4, 5, and 6; 8) just don't do 5 and 6 if you aren't prepared to go through the extra liability and due diligence processes; 9) know how your website works; 10) if the purpose of your website is to monetize user data, fuck off; 11) if any of the above is 'too hard' you are in the wrong fucking business.
You mean like is in the article:
As a result, the Court orders Lindell and his previous counsel to pay some of the fees and costs Smartmatic has incurred defending itself and moving for sanctions,
- anal sex
- Bukkake
- Gang bangs
- That my stepsister really wants to bang me (unfortunately I don't have a stepsister)
- how to masturbate properly (myself and others)
- what women really like*
I found all those videos highly educational. (*) not really, no