This is what happens when a court relies on "expert" testimony on just possibilities rather than conducting real objective tests on the actual ability of those officers to detect burning/burnt marijuana in a moving car.
That their abilities were not actually tested points to yet another junk science that will take years and years of actual science to wend its weary way through the courts to counter judges self-arrogance on their abilities of being science detectors
Hold on. Missing in all of this is what happened to the right IP. The one where the digit wasn't incorrectly made.
When was the mistake actually found? How long did it take? Was it followed up? At what stage in this mans life was there actual knowledge that a mistake had been made? Why wasn't that followed up with Nigel immediately?
There are a lot more questions for Nigel to ask, and for the police to answer
I'll believe their claims that "nobody wants unlimited data" when they release data on how much extra revenue they make by people exceeding (and paying a hefty markup) their data limits
If overage or excess on a plan was paid for as a pro-rata to the basic allowance within their plan then they might have a better case for saying "nobody wants unlimited data, they can pay for what they use"
Sigh All this fuss over these laws and what rights. But its perfectly simple.
All the government has to do is ask the UK to get Apple to create this software for them ( Investigatory Powers Bill 5353- Power to grant authorisations). Companies can be compelled to remove "electronic protections" that they have applied to their users messages and devices)
"oh look, You did it for the UK, how about us then?"
"A bar that sets a variable based on control position is bloody genius"
You forgot to add "on a computer", or did you mean the "bloody genius" people who designed this for use on a steam engine or valve radio or water tap or sextant or . . . . . ?
"Considering most states tie implied consent to drug/alcohol testing to the issuance of drivers licenses"
Quite by accident you've seem to have presented a solution to the problem. Set up a DUI checkpoint on the entrance/exit to the Police Station car park and "randomly" check drivers passing through. Warrantless breath and blood takings whenever you want. For the win!!!
The only issue I have here is that the retailer(Amazon in this case) returns results that do not actually contain results that are exactly what Im searching for - but not actually saying so. Wasting my time by having to search through the results before realising that.
That being said, that's a way to cause confusion as to why you would piss off your customers like that , not cause a actual confusion between products
Im not into programming but from reading the comments I've come to the understanding that patenting software is like Patenting a light switch design, but an API is like someone explaining how the switch is to be used
I was arrested for battery on my ex-wife, (and fortunately I dont smoke)
However at court I was able to show self defense and found not guilty .... but please explain how it follows that I " deserve[s] everything the cop did to him[me] and more."
This is how you train kids and their teachers to , instead of following procedure, say "fuck it, don't rush/bother, its just another stupid drill" when an actual, real, life-or-death emergency happens.
Is it cynical of me to wonder if they are doing this so that the 'I smell marijuana' will still provide a 'reasonable cause' for a search...and then an arrest on which they will hope to find other stuff
'Who cares if we only find an ounce or none at all. We can drop that charge 'cos we've got him now on other stuff anyway'
Whispers to myself: "Dont be black, dont be black, dont be black" Reads article: "Dammit"
Yet another Junk Science is accepted by the courts
This is what happens when a court relies on "expert" testimony on just possibilities rather than conducting real objective tests on the actual ability of those officers to detect burning/burnt marijuana in a moving car.
That their abilities were not actually tested points to yet another junk science that will take years and years of actual science to wend its weary way through the courts to counter judges self-arrogance on their abilities of being science detectors
Re: It might be reasonable for impairment behind the wheel.
It might be if alcohol was carried in paper bags - or of course marijuana in bottles & cans Otherwise - not so much. No.
Wrong IP? What happened to the right one?
Hold on. Missing in all of this is what happened to the right IP. The one where the digit wasn't incorrectly made.
When was the mistake actually found? How long did it take? Was it followed up? At what stage in this mans life was there actual knowledge that a mistake had been made? Why wasn't that followed up with Nigel immediately?
There are a lot more questions for Nigel to ask, and for the police to answer
Data limits
I'll believe their claims that "nobody wants unlimited data" when they release data on how much extra revenue they make by people exceeding (and paying a hefty markup) their data limits
If overage or excess on a plan was paid for as a pro-rata to the basic allowance within their plan then they might have a better case for saying "nobody wants unlimited data, they can pay for what they use"
Why not ask the UK instead?
Sigh
All this fuss over these laws and what rights. But its perfectly simple.
All the government has to do is ask the UK to get Apple to create this software for them ( Investigatory Powers Bill 5353- Power to grant authorisations). Companies can be compelled to remove "electronic protections" that they have applied to their users messages and devices)
"oh look, You did it for the UK, how about us then?"
Ho hum, job done. Time for a beer
Re: Corel should shut up and pay!
"A bar that sets a variable based on control position is bloody genius"
You forgot to add "on a computer", or did you mean the "bloody genius" people who designed this for use on a steam engine or valve radio or water tap or sextant or . . . . . ?
"Considering most states tie implied consent to drug/alcohol testing to the issuance of drivers licenses"
Quite by accident you've seem to have presented a solution to the problem. Set up a DUI checkpoint on the entrance/exit to the Police Station car park and "randomly" check drivers passing through. Warrantless breath and blood takings whenever you want. For the win!!!
Best Marketing viral ploy ever!
so ..... no MTM watches then?
The only issue I have here is that the retailer(Amazon in this case) returns results that do not actually contain results that are exactly what Im searching for - but not actually saying so. Wasting my time by having to search through the results before realising that.
That being said, that's a way to cause confusion as to why you would piss off your customers like that , not cause a actual confusion between products
api v software
Im not into programming but from reading the comments I've come to the understanding that patenting software is like Patenting a light switch design, but an API is like someone explaining how the switch is to be used
Or am I completely off base?
Re: I was with you right up until I read this line.
I was arrested for battery on my ex-wife, (and fortunately I dont smoke)
However at court I was able to show self defense and found not guilty .... but please explain how it follows that I " deserve[s] everything the cop did to him[me] and more."
-
I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.
-Isoroku Yamamoto
Shooter drill
This?
This is how you train kids and their teachers to , instead of following procedure, say "fuck it, don't rush/bother, its just another stupid drill" when an actual, real, life-or-death emergency happens.
Re: Confused
Because you don't have to be a fool to be a lawyer, just a fool of a client with billable hours.
Re: kenichi tanaka
kenichi tanaka: Hear that sound? That was the Irony in the article wizzing right past your head
Re: kenichi tanaka
'it's more designed to prevent morons from stopping and distracting police officers'
Did you even read the same article, its not about the law is designed to do, its about what now the law can be used for
'While the ruling is too broad,'
Ah so you did read the article, so what's your point? That the law is poorly thought out maybe?. Well that is what is being said.
Or is it that that's not how the intention of the law turned out?
Kinda the point of the article
Pot Kettle Black?
So when my country issues a court order that requires data from American servers does that mean the DOJ just gonna roll over and play nice?
Sigh! Yea I know, rhetorical question
reasonable cause
Is it cynical of me to wonder if they are doing this so that the 'I smell marijuana' will still provide a 'reasonable cause' for a search...and then an arrest on which they will hope to find other stuff
'Who cares if we only find an ounce or none at all. We can drop that charge 'cos we've got him now on other stuff anyway'
Cha-ching.
Re:
'sticking camera in the eyes then you are interfering'
So... is it the 'filming' causing problems, or is it the the 'sticking the camera in the eyes'?
Simple test, if the camera is switched off but then other actions would be called interfering, then its not the filming that's the problem