Coach George 's BestNetTech Comments

Latest Comments (51)

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 21 Nov, 2010 @ 02:48pm

  Re: Re: Re: The REAL danger

  WE, US Citizens.
  The Electoral college aside, one person one vote, regardless of wealth.
  We, the US Citizens are however Too LAZY to give a DAMM and the politicians know this. WE, the US Citizens, have given control to the politicians. If We, the US Citizens, cared enough WE, the US Citizens, can take it back.
  
  I hope my point is clear now.
  Nuff Said

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 21 Nov, 2010 @ 02:43pm

  Re: Re: Re: The REAL danger

  What I claimed is that WE, US Citizens, do not control the terrorists. WE, US Citizens DO control our GOVT. We just are too easily swayed by distraction.

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 21 Nov, 2010 @ 02:36pm

  Re: Re: Re: The REAL danger

  The reality is WE Elect Congressmen and Women as well as Senators and the President, At least those of us who VOTE!

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 19 Nov, 2010 @ 07:48pm

  Re: Shouldn't fair-play have been part of the constitution?

  Except Nancy Pelosi. I think her image from the scan would do real damage on many levels.

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 19 Nov, 2010 @ 07:44pm

  Re:

  While I agree, 99.9% of the American public are not going to perpetrate a terrorist act yet we are subjected to the search.
  
  They make the laws, they should follow them.
  Nuff Said

• On the post: Why Congress Isn't So Concerned With TSA Nude Scans & Gropes: They Get To Skip Them

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 19 Nov, 2010 @ 07:41pm

  Re: The REAL danger

  Seriously??
  Wake up and realize that congress is full of Idiots, however Terrorists are Killers.
  Whether or not you want to accept it, WE control Congress. No one controls the terrorists.
  
  Get Real!

• On the post: Georgia Voters Agree To Allow Human DRM: Non-Competes Made Enforceable

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 16 Nov, 2010 @ 07:23pm

  Re:

  I have never met a non compete I signed. If you insist on a non compete, you don't want me badly enough.

• On the post: Major League Baseball Claims Dodgers Still Own Trademark On Brooklyn Logo, Despite Leaving Town 53 Years Ago

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 07 Nov, 2010 @ 09:44am

  Re: Re:

  NFL Giants official name "New York Football Giants, Inc"

• On the post: Google Sues The US Government For Only Considering Microsoft Solutions

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 01 Nov, 2010 @ 11:59am

  Re: Us Government deals

  This happens with a majority of companies, govt. or organizations that offer RFQ's. It is very common for the current or preferred vendor to write the spec's. This isn't just a Federal Govt. occurrence.

• On the post: Who 'Owns' A Twitter Account: Employer Or Employee?

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 27 Oct, 2010 @ 06:53am

  Re: Reasonable solution

  Remember, the Employer owns the Employee or so they think....

• On the post: Who 'Owns' A Twitter Account: Employer Or Employee?

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 27 Oct, 2010 @ 06:51am

  Who 'Owns' A Twitter Account: Employer Or Employee?

  Employee, if they opened the account however the Employer owns the employee so......

• On the post: Google Told To Reveal IP Addresses Of Mean YouTube Commenters

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 18 Oct, 2010 @ 03:22pm

  Do it from an open wifi

  Bottom line,
  If you care that much to comment on stupid videos and blogs to the point of calling the poster or blogger names, find an open or public wi-fi connection and send the comment from there. Stay away from the library, office or home.

• On the post: Wait, So The RIAA Is Offended That Google Won't Do Work For Free?

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 14 Oct, 2010 @ 10:12am

  Re: Simple explaination

  Sounds like my wedding vows

• On the post: Hulu: We Know That Hulu Plus Sucks, But It's Not Our Fault

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 30 Aug, 2010 @ 01:47pm

  Why Pay??

  88% of the paid content is free.
  The paid content still has commercials.
  Why Pay??

• On the post: Feds Won't Bring Charges Against School District Officials In Webcam Spying

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 18 Aug, 2010 @ 06:15am

  Re:

  "Cars have cameras today, if you are backing up your car and you get somebody undressing that would be criminal? "
  If this was the case, you could assist the prosecution of the person getting undressed. The cameras are mounted low in the rear of vehicles. If you caught someone naked on it, they would be outside in public behind your car. I do not believe the focal length of the lens is such that you could see anything more than a few feet away clearly.

• On the post: Feds Won't Bring Charges Against School District Officials In Webcam Spying

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 18 Aug, 2010 @ 05:54am

  Re:

  Unless I missed something, I didn't see any reference to "taking naked pictures of someone else's kids".
  I would think that if this happened, we would see references to child porn etc.

• On the post: Feds Won't Bring Charges Against School District Officials In Webcam Spying

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 18 Aug, 2010 @ 05:51am

  Re:

  Why???
  The School district has the money.

• On the post: Dear Jeff Zucker, Whether You Like It Or Not, Content Will Stay Free

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 04 Aug, 2010 @ 10:25am

  Re:

  "Hulu works, because I use it."
  So, by extension, if you didn't use Hulu it wouldn't work??
  I thought you were Anonymous Coward and not Arrogant Coward.
  
  "The problem is that the advertisers don't think they should pay as much for ad space on the internet, so it's not as appealing to the industry."
  This will change as:
  1-More people watch shows on the net.
  A-This is still far off
  2-Younger executives move into positions of power.
  
  "I got rid of Cable TV a long time ago, total waste of money. I watch shows on Hulu now, and since they are there, there is no need to download them or watch them on illegal sites. I am sure a lot of people feel this way."
  1-This works for the tech savvy only.
  2-Joe and Josephine 6 pack are still going to get cable.
  
  "There is a fine line between greed, profit and usefulness. Right now, the industry is greedy, the market is setting the price, so the fight continues."
  Agreed.

• On the post: Dear Jeff Zucker, Whether You Like It Or Not, Content Will Stay Free

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 04 Aug, 2010 @ 10:17am

  Re:

  I suspect models, such as Hulu, are testing to see how many commercials they can cram in before people stop watching. Once this is done, the pay for view model will begin along with commercials. They don't care about getting everyone, just a majority.
  
  If the price is reasonable and there aren't any commercials, I might bite.

• On the post: Telcos Close To 'Deal' On Net Neutrality That Gives Them Everything They Want

  

  Coach George ( profile ), 04 Aug, 2010 @ 08:27am

  Re: Just goes to show..

  "with part of the deal being a back-scratcher promise to dump a bunch of money into the campaign coffers of Democrats this upcoming election season:"
  If you don't like it, vote the B#$T^&Ds out next election cycle.
  This is how a Democracy works.

Next >>