So, how did that work out for the Harkonen?
Is he sponsored by Tissot? Or is it the NBA draft that's sponsored? (I haven't seen any other player pictures)
He certainly is wearing enough watches to be promoting time pieces; now he (and they) need to make sure he shows up on time.
I think you forgot the /sarc
There are people out there who think very thing (except for the 'every' they hear 'most' or 'almost all')
MySpace: I'm not dead yet!
Time, Inc: You're not foolin' anybody.
Judge: I can't take him -- he says he isn't dead!
Time, Inc: Just wait a few and we'll make sure he's dead.
Attorney General Sessions promised to recuse himself from any investigation of Russian involvement with the Trump administration (and 2016 election).
...and he fires the person in charge of the investigation into Russian involvement in the Trump administration.
inconceivable! (but I don't think that means what I think it means because obviously "to recuse oneself" doesn't mean what I thought it meant)
It could be intentional. I certainly didn't recognize his name, but certainly recognized the bull. Bringing attention to his art (which is quite a stunning piece) by a stupid lawsuit does not diminish his art, so advertisement.
Now if they could just find the right fearless girl lawyer to oppose him...
President Nixon said "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice."That was spoken by Barry Goldwater in his 1964 Republican nomination acceptance speech. The full quote was:
I would remind you that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue!But I do agree that extremism is extremism, and should be avoided.
In the specs section it says 32gb. You're paying for the connectors.
Does Sheeran have the power to undo the suspension? To reset the strike?
I don't think so; he's going to have to invest time and energy arguing with Atlantic/Warner to undo it all and hope the 'bots don't do it again (I would _hope_ they are able to whitelist, but I'm not certain they care enough).
He may have some leverage; it all depends on his contract. I have my doubts.
PS3's could be clustered together to form a home-brew supercomputer. The US Air Force even built one. But more to the point, it could dual-boot. Not only did you get a nice toy to play games on, but you could even use it to practice your linux-fu. They advertised that. And then they just took it away, probably because those who used it for linux weren't buying any games.
I don't quite see how Automatic License Plate Reader data would be considered as part of
"The person, houses, papers, possessions, and electronic data and communications of every person shall be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures."
I think it is an invasion of privacy but not electronic data belonging to the individual.
And if you get paid for being against them, are you a pro con-pro/con debater?
There is also 'ESI Hospital' which, considering the research under discussion, would seem a more likely location.
My original thought, exactly. Then I considered how likely it is that anyone saved the Apple II code with enough provenance to be able to use it in court. I guess discovery would have found that out.
This just has all the earmarks of a cash grab -- which almost worked.
Antiquated though it is, I thought this was the reason for Notary Publics. Their seal provides at least some indication that the person who signed something is actually that person.
I'm unclear on who got stopped:
Deputy Moore then approached Mrs. Linze and asked for consent to search her vehicle.
and:
We hold that Mr. Linze’s interpretation of Rodriguez is correct.
(multiple places where the 'victim' is referred to as Mrs. Linze and multiple places where s/he is referred to a Mr. Linze)
Secret? I think you meant private. How do you send email to a secret email server? sendto:mikepence@secretserver.net? I don't think so.
Y2K was a deadline and people really behave differently when there are deadlines (just ask a student!)
HIPAA was a deadline and healthcare industries scrambled and fought to be ready when it went into effect.
HHS (or whomever is in charge of hospital regs) needs to define repercussions for hospitals not taking security (and backups) seriously. Not sure what the effect will be with the new administration, but it is certainly something that needs to get done now.
The future!
I, for one, would prefer to grant our future robot/AI overlords whatever rights they feel entitled to.