Cops being cops aside...
If Marquis Jackson had not been abusive in his relationship, stolen his intimate partner's car, driven around her safe-house/friend's neighborhood (who she might have been banging don't know, have not seen her OF yet) for almost six hours starting at about 03:00am, honking the horn like a Canadian Trucker causing multiple 911 calls, sent threatening text messages to her, and then approached the deputies & tried to intimidate his about to be X-Twitter Gurlfriend, then he never would have been in the back of a police cruiser.
Alternatively;
If any other mutha-fucka mag-dumped into an occupied vehicle for gross-acorn-atak they would be in slam you in the azz, blak & wite striped, litter picking, ditch clarin, azz likin FLORDA MAN PRISON, just like that effing ZERO greenberet douche-copter should be behind that SIG 320 with the red dot on it. (& If you are gonna do a reload, do an effing reload SOLDIER! TOO SLOW GET BACK!! DO IT AGAIN WORM>)
But hey, I'm livin in the reeel world just like all y'all.
So it could have been worse, what if a person in protective custody was in the car, a ride along, a journo (one can hope), or a cadet? Wwhat if Winer Soldier had been responding to a domestic in a Houston Apartment, a 'break-in reported when it was actually the legal home-owner/tenant, & he shot them through the window without shouting orders first, with his partner doing the same?
At least Beth was somewhat-sane...
So Canada Effed around & found out something.
I wonder if the CBC et al. are successful in lobbying the "Competition Bureau" will Meta & Google find the off switches for their services in Canada?
Can't wait for the next exciting installment of Canada finds out...
So. I just placed my order for two sweet, overpriced coffee mugs, with an extra $9 donation.
A bargain at twice the price!
There is a comment field on their order form, so I told 'em
"Streisand Effect from Yahoo news & BestNetTech.com"
Dunno about the rest of us here, but I only publish my thoughts & feelings in two places on the interwebz, reddit & BestNetTech.
The only reason I added reddit to that elite cadre is the lack of nekked people pictured on BestNetTech.
Looks like I'm gonna miss those nekked people, at least for a while.
I've always wondered when the Segovia Accord would be initiated.
TBH, I've been keeping an eye on police unions around the country for evidence of Hydra infiltrators.
The only thing more surprising would be if the TSA had caught this one, but I guess she was not dealing in large enough amounts of cash?
Double Dang!
I was able to get pics of that sweet snizz in the 40's, but I'm not really looking forward to having to find stag films for my projector again.
Gonna have to do something, I mean think of the children, all we are training them to do is perpetrate identity theft, probbly of their parents to start with.
This is going to be a real kerfuffle.
I guess it is good polaroid film is available again, gonna have to get out that Big Swinger 3000...
It's only a matter of time before we appeal this to the supreme court & get this crap fixed!
I mean if we can't arrest the foreigners & kick'em out I guess it's just gonna be all "furtive movements!" & "STOP RESISTING!" while we tazze them soaked in gas, or choot'em!
Just 'cause statutory immunity didn't work means we'll have to use that other kind, qualified or sum such.
I think AricTheDumb was talking aboot this sort ideotic thing this one "Armed Scholar" on youtoobe is squacking aboot, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HsBY0Ppe3g
Very Special Agent Richard Beazit & the rest of the dog killers will be visiting him eventually.
A thousand Thanks to you, Naughty Autie!
From your recent posts I can see you don't comprehend what you read or at least do not pay attention.
Now we can all start ignoring you, very helpful! Keep up the good work!
Not quite sure what you are indicating by "vague threats", but here is an example for you and everyone else.
News outlet publishes graphic images of shooting victims age 6-12 from any school shooting.
Uber conservative state makes it illegal to publish said images because of the harm it may cause those that view the images, including their family, friends & loved ones. 3. Uber Conservative state get sued by FIRE, EFF, ACLU, et. al.
Case goes through the legal system
Upon appeal to SCOTUS Strict Scrutiny is determined to be the standard of legal analysis on specifically enumerated constitutional rights in the 1A case of dead kids, even though actual harm could be demonstrated.
This case is then potentially precedential for other cases of specifically enumerated rights, even though there is the potential for harm, although most of that harm is tied to actual criminal activity, like oh, I don't know, MURDER. and the gun control laws are then declared unconstitutional when Strict Scrutiny is applied to their analysis.
Celebrate that your 2A rights as an American Citizen have been restored in the more populous states.
I suspect that when the NY Rifle & Pistol Opinion V. Bruen is released, possibly as early as next Tuesday, many people are not going to be happy with it regardless of which direction & to what level the decision is made.
As an example the implications of American Hospital Association v. Becerra and how that decision may be applied to how the ATF can try and ban a shoelace for being a machinegun, or a chore boy pot scrubber can be a sound suppressor and has to be registered.
Finally, I agree with you that there is a difference between what is right & what is legal. Those differences are not always the clear bright lines we might want them to be, like Content Moderation decisions.
BTW, I think vague threats doesn't mean what you think it means, unless you thought there was a wood-chipper in your future or something like that?
What if?
I could imagine news orgs, perhaps because of an activist intent to promote a gun control narrative, publishing these news worthy images resulting in a large constitutional debate, where the publishing of these images was rightly shown to be First Amendment protected activity.
That could produce legal decisions that would directly oppose the intent of their publication as the Second Amendment, just as the First, covers constitutionally protected activity, activity that could end up receiving the same judicial protections as the First.
I could imagine an argument that the publication of the images causes harm, just as the illegal use of an otherwise legal object (firearms) can cause harm, however specifically enumerated Constitutional rights deserve the highest level of judicial protection and laws that infringe on either might start to all be held to the legal analysis of Strict Scrutiny as opposed to Intermediate Scrutiny. This would likely lead to numerous legal precedents at all levels that would specifically negate the activist position for publication of said images in the first place.
I say publish at your own peril news orgs, then we'll see who wins & who loses. The results will certainly be interesting & likely not be what one might expect.
(Parent of a dead kid writing here, so think before you respond as free speech is not without consequences, which all of us here should be familiar with)
“And exactly how is a two-year-old child supposed to be a terrorist?”
As a person that has made a two year old & known quite a few other two year old's, I can assure you that without exception they are all little terrorists, it is just that many of them grow out of it eventually.
Your mom knows where the spelling went.
Well, deep subject?
Cops being cops aside... If Marquis Jackson had not been abusive in his relationship, stolen his intimate partner's car, driven around her safe-house/friend's neighborhood (who she might have been banging don't know, have not seen her OF yet) for almost six hours starting at about 03:00am, honking the horn like a Canadian Trucker causing multiple 911 calls, sent threatening text messages to her, and then approached the deputies & tried to intimidate his about to be X-Twitter Gurlfriend, then he never would have been in the back of a police cruiser. Alternatively; If any other mutha-fucka mag-dumped into an occupied vehicle for gross-acorn-atak they would be in slam you in the azz, blak & wite striped, litter picking, ditch clarin, azz likin FLORDA MAN PRISON, just like that effing ZERO greenberet douche-copter should be behind that SIG 320 with the red dot on it. (& If you are gonna do a reload, do an effing reload SOLDIER! TOO SLOW GET BACK!! DO IT AGAIN WORM>) But hey, I'm livin in the reeel world just like all y'all. So it could have been worse, what if a person in protective custody was in the car, a ride along, a journo (one can hope), or a cadet? Wwhat if Winer Soldier had been responding to a domestic in a Houston Apartment, a 'break-in reported when it was actually the legal home-owner/tenant, & he shot them through the window without shouting orders first, with his partner doing the same? At least Beth was somewhat-sane...
FAFO
So Canada Effed around & found out something. I wonder if the CBC et al. are successful in lobbying the "Competition Bureau" will Meta & Google find the off switches for their services in Canada? Can't wait for the next exciting installment of Canada finds out...
Just placed my order...
So. I just placed my order for two sweet, overpriced coffee mugs, with an extra $9 donation. A bargain at twice the price! There is a comment field on their order form, so I told 'em "Streisand Effect from Yahoo news & BestNetTech.com"
and now there was only one...
Dunno about the rest of us here, but I only publish my thoughts & feelings in two places on the interwebz, reddit & BestNetTech. The only reason I added reddit to that elite cadre is the lack of nekked people pictured on BestNetTech. Looks like I'm gonna miss those nekked people, at least for a while.
Hey, Your comment Stinks!
Can ya do anything 'bout that, or do I gotta call my cousin at the state crime lab?
damn it
I've always wondered...
I've always wondered when the Segovia Accord would be initiated. TBH, I've been keeping an eye on police unions around the country for evidence of Hydra infiltrators. The only thing more surprising would be if the TSA had caught this one, but I guess she was not dealing in large enough amounts of cash?
School admin freaking out right now over Lil Pickle? Just wait 'til Big Pickle shows up!
Well dang...
Double Dang! I was able to get pics of that sweet snizz in the 40's, but I'm not really looking forward to having to find stag films for my projector again. Gonna have to do something, I mean think of the children, all we are training them to do is perpetrate identity theft, probbly of their parents to start with. This is going to be a real kerfuffle. I guess it is good polaroid film is available again, gonna have to get out that Big Swinger 3000...
I think you mean Ya'll Queda
shesh!, I really hope they get this straightened out!
It's only a matter of time before we appeal this to the supreme court & get this crap fixed! I mean if we can't arrest the foreigners & kick'em out I guess it's just gonna be all "furtive movements!" & "STOP RESISTING!" while we tazze them soaked in gas, or choot'em! Just 'cause statutory immunity didn't work means we'll have to use that other kind, qualified or sum such.
...just finishing up this affidavit for a search warrant...
not idiots exactly...
Hey, just because OSU asked Mom previously if they could TM "The", and they asked Dad after she said no... well, maybe they are idiots.
Glad I'm not the ATF Director now!
I think AricTheDumb was talking aboot this sort ideotic thing this one "Armed Scholar" on youtoobe is squacking aboot, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HsBY0Ppe3g Very Special Agent Richard Beazit & the rest of the dog killers will be visiting him eventually.
Mille Grazie!!!
A thousand Thanks to you, Naughty Autie! From your recent posts I can see you don't comprehend what you read or at least do not pay attention. Now we can all start ignoring you, very helpful! Keep up the good work!
An Imagined Scenario
Not quite sure what you are indicating by "vague threats", but here is an example for you and everyone else.
- News outlet publishes graphic images of shooting victims age 6-12 from any school shooting.
- Uber conservative state makes it illegal to publish said images because of the harm it may cause those that view the images, including their family, friends & loved ones. 3. Uber Conservative state get sued by FIRE, EFF, ACLU, et. al.
- Case goes through the legal system
- Upon appeal to SCOTUS Strict Scrutiny is determined to be the standard of legal analysis on specifically enumerated constitutional rights in the 1A case of dead kids, even though actual harm could be demonstrated.
- This case is then potentially precedential for other cases of specifically enumerated rights, even though there is the potential for harm, although most of that harm is tied to actual criminal activity, like oh, I don't know, MURDER. and the gun control laws are then declared unconstitutional when Strict Scrutiny is applied to their analysis.
- Celebrate that your 2A rights as an American Citizen have been restored in the more populous states.
I suspect that when the NY Rifle & Pistol Opinion V. Bruen is released, possibly as early as next Tuesday, many people are not going to be happy with it regardless of which direction & to what level the decision is made. As an example the implications of American Hospital Association v. Becerra and how that decision may be applied to how the ATF can try and ban a shoelace for being a machinegun, or a chore boy pot scrubber can be a sound suppressor and has to be registered. Finally, I agree with you that there is a difference between what is right & what is legal. Those differences are not always the clear bright lines we might want them to be, like Content Moderation decisions.There could un-intended consequences...
What if? I could imagine news orgs, perhaps because of an activist intent to promote a gun control narrative, publishing these news worthy images resulting in a large constitutional debate, where the publishing of these images was rightly shown to be First Amendment protected activity. That could produce legal decisions that would directly oppose the intent of their publication as the Second Amendment, just as the First, covers constitutionally protected activity, activity that could end up receiving the same judicial protections as the First. I could imagine an argument that the publication of the images causes harm, just as the illegal use of an otherwise legal object (firearms) can cause harm, however specifically enumerated Constitutional rights deserve the highest level of judicial protection and laws that infringe on either might start to all be held to the legal analysis of Strict Scrutiny as opposed to Intermediate Scrutiny. This would likely lead to numerous legal precedents at all levels that would specifically negate the activist position for publication of said images in the first place. I say publish at your own peril news orgs, then we'll see who wins & who loses. The results will certainly be interesting & likely not be what one might expect. (Parent of a dead kid writing here, so think before you respond as free speech is not without consequences, which all of us here should be familiar with)
...it is a foregone conclusion...
...that the defendant will be held in contempt until they "Remember" their iPhone 7 passcode.
As a Subject Matter Expert
“And exactly how is a two-year-old child supposed to be a terrorist?” As a person that has made a two year old & known quite a few other two year old's, I can assure you that without exception they are all little terrorists, it is just that many of them grow out of it eventually.