It's much easier for a foreigner to set up a new business here than a natural born citizen. Are we forgetting about the 7 year tax break they get where they have to pay absoultely zero taxes on their profits? Even if it's billions? Not to mention the government will even give them money to get started.
All I'm going to say, it there is a civil war coming, and the rich won't win. Blood will be shed, and it will be all their fault if laws like this continue to be passed.
If this law passes, it effectively makes anyone who access and uses the follow sites a Felon, under the law:
Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Myspace, Lifehacker, BestNetTech, YouTube, Sugarsync, Dropbox, AOL, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, (get it yet??)
Actually I do believe it is a reasonable law in this instance. Because someone values their privacy a doctor can refuse to see them?
What if before you could enter the supermarket, you had to answer whether or not you owned guns or masterbated recently. Sure, that sounds a bit ridiculous, but it is essentially the same thing. Doctors, anybody, should not be able to refuse service because people value privacy.
Kind of like the same reason everyone is railing on the TSA.. ya know?
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
This has nothing to do with it. How long before other professions ask if people are gun owners? It is nobody's business whether or not somebody owns a firearm. Nor have I seen it on any medical exams.
How can you call him a traitor by doing the right thing? When the government is wrong (and it often is) someone needs to beat them back. We as citizens of this country deserve to know whats going on with our affairs, both domestic and abroad. This guy should be given a medal of honor, not chastised.
This is just the way Google operates. They had a windmill (we all have our own windmills you know!), they wanted to know if Bing was copying thier results, well they are. And now Google can not only plan around bing, they can most likely figure something to make bing irrelevant as it was a year ago. Search is Google's baby, it's their money maker, and they need to protect that advertising revenue. So most likely, they will find a way to add something to Google while trying to lock bing out.
How not? Microsoft "watching" over your shoulder as you click a link on Google from a search, is like looking at a test's answer key before taking the test. Google is in every way right to call out Microsoft for copying their results. If Microsoft had kept it limited to BING results, on what people clicked, it would have been different.
Furthermore, that just means Microsoft is watching EVERY click you make, possibly even the encrypted one's. Thank god I don't use IE for important stuff.
This time, I'm sorry but your wrong. If you read into the research about exactly what Google Engineers did to catch Microsoft literally copying Google's results and claiming them as their own, you'd retract this article completely. If you like, I can explain it.
Lame. How about I get my cousin (FBI) to come search your house for no apparent reason, and view all of your logs, internet chats, and everything you've ever done. If not, you must be running a bit torrent site for profit.
BestNetTech has not posted any stories submitted by androidhelpersdotcom.
Uhhh this article is bunk.
It's much easier for a foreigner to set up a new business here than a natural born citizen. Are we forgetting about the 7 year tax break they get where they have to pay absoultely zero taxes on their profits? Even if it's billions? Not to mention the government will even give them money to get started.
All I'm going to say, it there is a civil war coming, and the rich won't win. Blood will be shed, and it will be all their fault if laws like this continue to be passed.
If this law passes, it effectively makes anyone who access and uses the follow sites a Felon, under the law:
Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Myspace, Lifehacker, BestNetTech, YouTube, Sugarsync, Dropbox, AOL, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, (get it yet??)
Re: Re:
Actually I do believe it is a reasonable law in this instance. Because someone values their privacy a doctor can refuse to see them?
What if before you could enter the supermarket, you had to answer whether or not you owned guns or masterbated recently. Sure, that sounds a bit ridiculous, but it is essentially the same thing. Doctors, anybody, should not be able to refuse service because people value privacy.
Kind of like the same reason everyone is railing on the TSA.. ya know?
Re: guns
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Ben Franklin
This has nothing to do with it. How long before other professions ask if people are gun owners? It is nobody's business whether or not somebody owns a firearm. Nor have I seen it on any medical exams.
Wow #1, you must really try to troll that hard.
Sony Boycott
Click my name for our SONY boycott.
#24
How can you call him a traitor by doing the right thing? When the government is wrong (and it often is) someone needs to beat them back. We as citizens of this country deserve to know whats going on with our affairs, both domestic and abroad. This guy should be given a medal of honor, not chastised.
Thankyou VPN!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Mike I usually almost ALWAYS AGREE with you but...
This is just the way Google operates. They had a windmill (we all have our own windmills you know!), they wanted to know if Bing was copying thier results, well they are. And now Google can not only plan around bing, they can most likely figure something to make bing irrelevant as it was a year ago. Search is Google's baby, it's their money maker, and they need to protect that advertising revenue. So most likely, they will find a way to add something to Google while trying to lock bing out.
Re: Re: Re: Mike I usually almost ALWAYS AGREE with you but...
Just wanted to add to this, if someone did this to Microsoft you can bet a years salary Microsoft would have filed suit already.
Re: Re: Mike I usually almost ALWAYS AGREE with you but...
How not? Microsoft "watching" over your shoulder as you click a link on Google from a search, is like looking at a test's answer key before taking the test. Google is in every way right to call out Microsoft for copying their results. If Microsoft had kept it limited to BING results, on what people clicked, it would have been different.
Furthermore, that just means Microsoft is watching EVERY click you make, possibly even the encrypted one's. Thank god I don't use IE for important stuff.
Mike I usually almost ALWAYS AGREE with you but...
This time, I'm sorry but your wrong. If you read into the research about exactly what Google Engineers did to catch Microsoft literally copying Google's results and claiming them as their own, you'd retract this article completely. If you like, I can explain it.
Re: Re: Re:
Lame. How about I get my cousin (FBI) to come search your house for no apparent reason, and view all of your logs, internet chats, and everything you've ever done. If not, you must be running a bit torrent site for profit.