That they knew about it two years ago. If so, it probably would have been part of Snowden's revelations. And they probably would have managed to stop Snowden before he left the country.
I would believe they knew about it before it became public, but I have a hard time believing two years ago.
If the administration is already covering up surveillance info from Congress (with their "least untruthful" answers), not sure why we'd assume that Congress is anything like fully informed on remote executions. Which would make it awfully hard to say Congress has any hand in protecting people.
That would help with one part of the problem. The part I was looking at was the executives who run the large corporations. They aren't looking long-term because they can earn many times more than enough money to live on for the rest of their life (even living a quite-lavish lifestyle) in only a few years.
I just did an app store search for 'web browser', which returned 526 results. I'm sure some of those are false positives, but none of the first page of results were.
doesn't do much...
for equality and brotherhood either
Sounds like a case...
of Eminent Domain.
To the FL legislators...
Stand Your Ground
According to Steve Jobs...
"Innovation is saying no to 1,000 things.?
shelf space?
I have the compact OED; I'd love to have the full version, but it's just too big.
I wonder if they use Google Trends to research new words. That's gotta be the fastest way to check things out.
And yeah, The Professor and the Madman is great.
Let's hope the coda isn't:
Victory, thy name is Nike.
Hard to believe...
That they knew about it two years ago. If so, it probably would have been part of Snowden's revelations. And they probably would have managed to stop Snowden before he left the country.
I would believe they knew about it before it became public, but I have a hard time believing two years ago.
Come up with a plausible explanation?
How's that worked out for them, as Snowden's leaks keep coming out?
Re: The key quote is this one
This is what I wonder about, too. I remember once, working onsite at the DoJ, when microsoft.com was classified as a porn site for several days.
Re: Test killer drone on Snowden in 3..2.1
First test target was Anwar al-Awlaki (sp?)
And Congress?
If the administration is already covering up surveillance info from Congress (with their "least untruthful" answers), not sure why we'd assume that Congress is anything like fully informed on remote executions. Which would make it awfully hard to say Congress has any hand in protecting people.
FTFY
(ps: there anything that can be done to enable <strike> tag?)
Prenda...
Prenda is the "band that doesn't exist"?
Re:
Amen. And no anonymous (or, say, Senate Judiciary Committee account) check-ins.
boy, I'm glad...
That my FiOS DVR is in a closed cabinet, with an RF remote to control it.
apparently...
His prospagnosia affected his ability to recognize more than just faces.
Re: Re: one way to deal with such short-sightedness...
That would help with one part of the problem. The part I was looking at was the executives who run the large corporations. They aren't looking long-term because they can earn many times more than enough money to live on for the rest of their life (even living a quite-lavish lifestyle) in only a few years.
one way to deal with such short-sightedness...
Would just be to raise taxes on the rich (thinking here a cut-off of something like $1M/yr income) by a huge amount (like to 70-80%).
If you can't get rich in a year or two (because you're paying too much away in taxes), you need to take a longer-term view to business plans.
If you can make generational wealth in only a couple of years, why would you ever take a longer-term view?
And the rating is...
With the MPAA in charge of rating the movie, I wonder if they refuse to rate it less than R.
Re:
I just did an app store search for 'web browser', which returned 526 results. I'm sure some of those are false positives, but none of the first page of results were.