Trump Cuts Kill The Corporation For Public Broadcasting, Harming All Of Us

from the befuddled-and-distracted dept

The U.S. right wing has won a generational war against education and informed consensus with the closure of the Corporation For Public Broadcasting (CPB), which states it will being shuttering its doors after being unable to survive recent brutal funding cuts by Republicans.

After the White House falsely deemed NPR and PBS a “grift” last April, Republicans successfully pushed for a Senate vote that eliminated the CPB’s entire budget in July. That vote rescinded the $1.1 billion that Congress had allocated to CPB to fund public broadcasting during 2026 and 2027.

In a statement, the CPB said the cuts, which “excluded funding for CPB for the first time in more than five decades,” were impossible to survive:

“Public media has been one of the most trusted institutions in American life, providing educational opportunity, emergency alerts, civil discourse, and cultural connection to every corner of the country,” Harrison said. “We are deeply grateful to our partners across the system for their resilience, leadership, and unwavering dedication to serving the American people.”

Public donations in recently weeks, estimated to be around $20 million, weren’t enough to save the organization.

As we’ve noted previously, right wingers and authoritarians loathe public broadcasting because, in its ideal form, it untethers journalism from the often perverse financial incentives inherent in our consolidated, billionaire-owned, ad-engagement based corporate media. A media, if you hadn’t noticed, that is easily bullied, cowed, and manipulated by bad actors looking to normalize, downplay, or validate no limit of terrible bullshit (see: CBS, Washington Post, the New York Times, and countless others).

One of the real harms of the cuts will be to already struggling local U.S. broadcasting stations. While NPR doesn’t really take all that much money from the public anymore (roughly 1% of NPR’s annual budget comes from the government), the CPB distributed over 70 percent of its funding to about 1,500 public radio and TV stations.

Many of those news stations operated in places where quality, local news is difficult if not impossible to find. Local papers have usually either closed or been purchased by soulless hedge funds that are buying papers, stripping them for parts, and hollowing out and homogenizing their coverage. Or “local news” is dominated by right wing propaganda pseudo-journalism broadcasters like Sinclair Broadcasting.

U.S. “public broadcasting” was already a shadow of the true concept after years of being demonized and defunded by the right wing, so even calling hybrid organizations like NPR “public” is a misnomer. Still, the underlying concept remains an ideological enemy of authoritarian zealots and corporations alike, because they’re very aware that if implemented properly, public media can provide a challenge to their war on informed consensus (I’d recommend Penn State professor Victor Pickard’s writing on the subject).

U.S. media reforms (restored media consolidation limits, media literacy education, bolstered public media funding, creative new funding models for independent journalism) are desperately needed, but authoritarians (and affluent corporate ownership more broadly) positively adore an ignorant and befuddled electorate, easily distracted by propaganda, controversy, and shallow infotainment.

A confused, angry, misinformed and distracted electorate means less informed consensus, which means less organized resistance to their unrelenting pursuit of consolidated power and shitty, unpopular policies that only ultimately serve a small sliver of the the extraction class.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: cpb, npr, pbs

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump Cuts Kill The Corporation For Public Broadcasting, Harming All Of Us”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
58 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

The Final Ten Viewers Will Be Sad

In previous posts, it was claimed that government funding was small, and so government contributions to biased programming was okay. The programming was mostly funded by corporations anyhow. We now know why there was so much resistance to cuts: the government funding was not small, and the corporate donations were a fig leaf.

But at least you’re coming closer to the admission that the legacy media IS the enemy of the American people.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

NPR, CPB and PBS are different things you fuck nugget.

But all connected, you fuck nugget. NPR is National Public Radio, PBS is the Public Broadcasting Service (TV), and CPB is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which is the organization responsible for distributing Congressional funding to the other two entities.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Well, that’s $550M a year that was allocated to PBS. I don’t know if it’s “small” or “not small”, but it’s only 30% of what PBS needs to operate, which is, compared to WP ou NYT, very small.
As for the 1.5k public radio and TV stations that will not be funded (because Congress will never do it directly), it certainly not consumed by only 10 viewers.
For “legacy media”, Koby, you’ll have to define what you’re talking about because no one, including you, seems to understand what you’re saying.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

American says:

Re: Re: Re:

I’m an American.
You’re not, shitbreath. Don’t even pretend you are.
Trump and MAGA are against everything the United States of America was founded to stand for.
We fought against a king for this country.
We fought against slavers for this country.
We fought against fascists for this country.
We are fighting against you and your dementia-addled cult leader for the same reasons.

You are not American. Not until and unless you renounce MAGA and start standing with the rest of us, and fight on the right side of history.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

You are not American. Not until and unless you renounce MAGA and start standing with the rest of us,

About half the country voted for Trump, significantly more than voted for Harris. They are all absolutely American. Really, more American than you, since you seem to think that means “has to agree with me”, which is a very un-American thought.

…and fight on the right side of history.

You lost, badly. People did not like your ideas. Your prospects do not look good in 2028. You are objectively on the wrong side of history.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

About half the country voted for Trump

No. No, it did not.

The estimated population of the United States on the day of the 2024 election was, per census.gov’s “population clock”, was about 340 million people. Estimates for the amount of people who are legally eligible to vote (regardless of whether they’re registered) sit at about 240 million, so already, we’ve cut the numbers down to approximately 70% of the country.

The number of people who voted in the 2024 election is approximately 156 million. That was good enough for an approximate 64% turnout of voting-age Americans at the ballot box⁠—which is also about 46% of the total American population, which means there’s no way “half the country” even voted in the election.

Kamala Harris won approximately 75 million votes⁠—48.3% of the total votes cast and about 21% of the total U.S. population. Donald Trump won about 77 million votes⁠—49.8% of the total votes cast and about 23% of the total U.S. population. Not only did half the country not vote for Donald Trump, he didn’t even get half the people who voted to vote for him. (And he still got fewer popular votes than Joe Biden did in 2020.)

The next time you want to say “half the country voted for Trump”, remember this: Not even a full quarter of the U.S. population voted for Donald Trump, and the only reason he won in both 2016 and 2024 is because the U.S. president election is all about the Electoral College, which is systemically designed to favor conservatives.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re:

On top of your confusion about which organizations we’re talking about, if your definition of “the American people” is right wing propagandists and their suckers like you, then yeah, they are your enemy. That you would admit such a thing is just further acknowledgement of your descent into fascism. Someone reporting the truth is a danger to liars like you.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Sure, public funding of non-biased news reporting and educational programming is “evil socialism” and public funding of billionaire corporations that bribe and corrupt public officials and subvert our democracy is just great capitalism!

By your example, Starlink can do a bake sale if it wants more money instead of wasting tax payer money on propping up Musk’s wealth and failure to deliver reliable Internet access.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Basically all the CPB did was shovel money from the fed to NPR and PBS, which yes, is absolutely a bad thing. The government should not be funding a media org. (no matter if they’re biased or not, but spoiler, they’re really biased) Without that money CPB serves no point.

After the White House falsely deemed NPR and PBS a “grift” last April,

Narrator: They were, in fact, a “grift”.*

MJJC says:

Re: Why shouldn't the government fund a media org?

The linked article to work by Victor Pickard points to clear benefits of public media organizations. And an informed public is a classic public goods externality: companies cannot directly reap the benefits of an informed public, so they will under-provide it. Even if you have complaints about the existing public media, there is a straightforward justification for it even within a simple neoclassical economics framework.

Bias is also inescapable. You don’t provide any rationale for why we should view you as the ultimate arbitor of bias. Every outlet has some significant portion of readers who perceive it as biased; we can easily conclude that it is not possible to have a news organization that everyone will believe is provably unbiased. So claiming bias is a red herring: one cannot argue that the public is more poorly informed by an absence of public media simply because you perceive it as biased when absolutely all media sources will be perceived by someone as biased. If you want to maintain that it was a grift, and that there are not significant public benefits to publicly-supported media, you need to provide more than snark.

Opinions about bias are like assholes – everyone has one. There is nothing special about yours (or mine). That’s why we have to do more than make broad assertions in order to have reasoned discussion.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Bias is also inescapable.

That is literally WHY the gov shouldn’t fund it. MSNBC and FoxNews are both biased, but there’s a market for that. If there wasn’t, they would go away. Public funding means an org can just become crazy biased (in this case, leftist) propaganda without any limiting factor. As a private org, they have to justify themselves.

You also have no right to other people’s money to fund your pet projects.

NPR/PBS claim to primarily run off private donations, if you like them so much donate to them.

Congrats, you answered your own question.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Andrew says:

Trump Cuts Kill The Corporation For Public Broadcasting, Harming All Of Us

The CPB should respond to the organizational cuts from the government by offering the last 20 years of its digital archive to all the affiliate/local stations for free, indefinitely, until they can a new Congressional assembly to reinstate their funding and then reincorporate.

Buying commentary segments from the CPB is usually the highest cost for any affiliate station anyway. If that disappeared, the 20% cut they all are currently trying to make up will simply disappear.

murgatroyd (profile) says:

Re:

That’s not what CPB does. They provide funding to public broadcasting stations; they don’t produce programming, and they don’t run any public broadcasting stations.

Stations use money from CPB to keep the lights on and to purchase programming from NPR, PBS, and other providers such as American Public Media (APM) and Public Radio Exchange (PRX).

Some relevant links: About CPB, Public Media Organizations.

Pixelation says:

Well, if Trump can be believed about how much money the US government will get from the tariffs, we now have the largest tax hike in US history and the MAGAs are cheering from the rooftops. If you are a supporter of Trump, ask yourself how are gas prices? How are food prices? Guess what? If the tariffs are allowed to remain, those things are going up. Hooray. At least the ultra wealthy get a huge tax break on the backs of hard working Americans.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

FlyingCircus says:

Public broadcasting had gotten to be a single, partisan viewpoint in the last 15 years – and I say that as a Democrat and ex government employee. It leaned so far left that every time I drive my old car, I promise myself to reset the presets on the radio.

Drop the BS that public broadcasting somehow picks up news in under-served markets. There is more media coverage now than ever.

It suffered from terrible programming as far back as the 1990’s, and the hard partisan tilts in the 2000’s were probably a deliberate decision to bring in left siding donors.

There is plenty of media.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Approximately half of everybody disagrees. Their opinion matters, too.

People who reject actual reality in favor of an emotional support reality where lies are truths and truths are lies can be ignored. I’m sorry if you prefer comforting and bias-confirming lies to harsh and bias-destroying truths, but that’s a “you” problem and you’d do well to stop making it an “everyone else” problem.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Their opinion matters, too.

No, nobody’s opinion matters. Facts matter. That’s the whole fucking point. Facts don’t care about your “opinions” and “opinions” that are just counter-factual wishful thinking aren’t opinions at all. They’re lies or make-believe.

An opinion is something like: Pistachio is the best flavor of ice cream.

It is not an opinion to say: Trump won the 2020 election but it was stolen.

That’s just a counterfactual claim with insufficient support. Saying, “well, it’s just my opinion that…” doesn’t actually make it an opinion.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:5

That’s just your opinion.

And it’s based on the entire MAGA movement, up to and including Trump, overwhelmingly preferring lies and half-truths that comfort their biases and celebrate their ignorance over truths that disturb their biases and condemn their ignorance. If they really cared about facts, they wouldn’t have held an insurrection to prevent the certification of the results of a free and fair election.

MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

It’s not opinions that matter when voting, but decisions. They may be influenced by opinions, but people are able to vote against or in spite of their opinions. I didn’t care for Harris. I’d like an actual, viable leftist candidate for president, but I decided that it was far better to vote for Harris than Trump.

Also, lol, no, calling your opinion a “fact” doesn’t make it more important.

I didn’t call my opinions fact. That you call facts opinions means everything is subjective and nothing actually matters. If you go down that road then oblivious flower spectrums highlight the inherent amalgamation of French pastry sandals in superfluous desert eddies.

You just sound dumb af.

By the inverse principle of trolls, that’s high praise. Thanks!

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

What?

To the commenters claiming that NPR/PBS are dominated by “leftist” bias, you clearly have no idea what leftism is about. Instead you are admitting that you wish to be lied to and coddled. You literally are scared of reality. And you can’t handle generally boring, centrist views.

It’s pretty pathetic.

JoeDetroit (profile) says:

Leftist media

I’ve followed some leftist media in the past. NPR is no where close to leftist. They bend over backwards trying to please the right wing.

When I am traveling in a rural area, far from the big markets, I like to explore the dial & listen to the crazy ass shit that gets spewed out into the airways. I learned the Jan 6 was perpetrated by Antifa! They have the video evidence proving it! But they can’t share it because “The Deep State” keeps removing it from the Internet. Another time they were playing old recordings of Alex Jones. Long ago learned that the Smurfs are demonic & are teaching our children to accept demons when the time comes.

All that & more. From what I could tell, when you get out there in the sticks, there are wildly batshit crazy right wing radio stations & it’s challenging to find any honest news. There is no way these stations are making money btw, they are getting funding from somewhere.

Many of these area actually covered by NPR. It’s quite obvious why President Asshole & the rest of the assholes want do get rid of public media. They do not want these people to hear any accurate news.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...