FCC Boss Brendan Carr ‘Investigating’ Verizon For Not Being Racist Enough
from the weak-kneed-ignorant-bullies dept
Like many big companies, Verizon eagerly signed up for Trump 2.0 excited to get tax cuts, rubber stamped merger approvals, attacks on organized labor, and oodles of unaccountable subsidies.
But as is often the deal with authoritarian zealots (and force-wielding intergalactic warlords with deep-rooted mommy issues), the deal you think you struck can and will routinely get worse.
Last week Verizon found itself under attack by Trump’s unelected fake engineer manbaby Elon Musk, who publicly accused Verizon of killing air travelers before using his nonexistent authority to covertly elbow in on the company’s lucrative $2.4 billion contract with the FAA.
This week Verizon is finding itself at the receiving end of an “investigation” by FCC boss Brendan Carr over the company’s “diversity practices” (read: an already pretty flaky support for foundational civil rights). Carr clearly wants to leverage Verizon’s hopeful $20 billion merger with Frontier to bully the company into supporting the Trump administration’s ham-fisted assault on foundational civil rights:
“In order to aid the FCC’s resolution of these matters, please reach out to the agency personnel that have been working on Verizon’s pending transactions at the FCC,” Carr wrote. “They are the FCC personnel most familiar with Verizon’s operations due to their merger review activity.”
Carr is also “investigating” Comcast for its diversity initiatives, leveraging rumors that Comcast is hopeful to merger with T-Mobile or Charter during the second Trump administration. The Communications Act does have several references to avoiding discrimination; Carr is abusing the law to pretend that embracing diversity is itself a form of discrimination:
“Carr said in his letter to Comcast earlier this month that the commission would take “fresh action to ensure that every entity the FCC regulates complies with the civil rights protections enshrined in the Communications Act… including by shutting down any programs that promote invidious forms of DEI.”
Right wing propagandists hijacked the term DEI to use it as a bogeyman. Their hope is that the press and public will conflate their racist assault on civil rights with half-assed corporate inclusivity initiatives, in order to normalize racism and frame their bigoted removal on popular and hard-fought civil rights protections as an issue of “efficiency.”
Usually regulators will leverage telecom merger approvals in order to gain something actually beneficial to the public like expanded broadband deployments or some free perks for poor Americans. In Carr’s case, he’s weaponizing government to bully large companies into being more racist.
We’ll see if either Verizon or Comcast (historically close GOP allies) have the actual backbone to stand up to the baseless fake inquiries, or if tax cuts, merger approvals, and union busting are more important than basic human rights (knowing both companies well I have my suspicions).
This is, of course, the exact sort of radical abuse of government power big companies like Verizon (and the “free market Libertarian” think tanks they fund) have long accused progressive reformers of engaging in (often falsely). Here you have a government official actually engaging this kind of behavior while Verizon — and most of its proxy anti-government policy tendrils — sit like quiet little church mice.
The great irony here is Verizon and Comcast’s civil rights records were never particularly robust to begin with. Both companies have routinely been accused of discriminatory broadband deployments that overlook minority communities. And both have co-opted or hijacked civil rights groups as effective policy bludgeons to try and generate fake support for unpopular policy.
There’s no limit of consumer, cybersecurity, and other issues that plague U.S. telecom (U.S. telecoms just suffered the worst Chinese hack in U.S. history). That Carr’s top focus is dismantling foundational civil rights and recent FCC discrimination reforms is a bright, ugly spotlight on a historically pathetic lack of character.
Filed Under: bigotry, brendan carr, civil rights, dei, diversity, fcc, racism, redlining, telecom
Companies: comcast, verizon




Comments on “FCC Boss Brendan Carr ‘Investigating’ Verizon For Not Being Racist Enough”
The thing about capitulating to an abuser is that it doesn’t only happen once. It happens over and over.
When you give an abuser power, there is never a point where they stop using it to abuse you. The whole point of their getting and having power is getting to flex it.
Re:
Once you pay the Danegeld, you never get rid of the Dane.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
No More Discrimination
All businesses must comply with Civil Rights. Right now is a great time to ensure that major telecom companies are treating everyone equally. No more double standards.
Re:
Racism is when you don’t fire qualified minorities to give their jobs to mediocre white dudes.
Re:
You may want to stop thinking in terms of equality and start thinking in terms of equity. Sometimes you have to treat people differently if you want to treat them fairly. And if your mind wasn’t totally cucked by the GOP and Russian propaganda, you’d know that this country has a long—and ongoing!—history of treating certain classes of people like second-class citizens (or worse).
Re: Re:
You’re making the assumption here that Koby’s “white genocide lite” narrative is in good faith.
Re:
Man.
So you will investigate every single cop who violated multiple civil rights and parts of the constitution. No?
You are just a whiny weakling upset that uneducated, underskilled, and laxy white males aren’t profitable for businesses? Yes.
Re:
Can you actually feel your brain dripping out your ears bro?
Re:
All businesses must comply with all relevant laws. Your point?
Please tell that to Brendan Carr because he’s currently busy making sure Net Neutrality never becones a thing in the US.
Nice promise. Here’s hoping you can keep it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I don’t. Equity is the idea that you can force identical outcomes. It doesn’t work, and has never been achieved.
This is the exact opposite of fairness. We can rearrange the groups such that are receiving this different treatment such that you will (rightfully!) become upset. Different treatment for different groups is the definition of discrimination.
Re:
And if everyone started on an equal footing, equality would be enough. But those who aren’t white males have a much harder time getting ahead.
So, until equality is actually in place, equity has to be the rule
Re:
It’s discrimination unless mediocre straight white men are getting jobs over qualified minorities.
Re:
Equity is about treating people fairly by identifying and attending to their individual needs rather than forcing uniformity. To wit…
Consider four people who want to ride a bicycle: One is a child, one requires a wheelchair to move around, one is unusually tall, and one is an “average” person. Equality is “give each of them the same bicycle” even if the child, the disabled person, and the tall person can’t use their bicycle because it was made for an “average” person. Equity is “give each of them a bicycle suited for their needs”, which means the child gets a child-sized bike, the disabled person gets a bike made for disabled people, the tall person gets a bike made for someone their size, and the “average” person gets the “average” bike. They’ve all been treated fairly because whoever was giving them the bikes accounted for their individual needs. Go ahead and tell me how that’s “discrimination” and how that’s “wrong” and how everyone should be treated the exact same way all the time even when that uniformity hurts/demeans individuals or entire classes of people.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
You may be able to say that someone is too short to ride a particular sized bicycle. But if you were to say that someone is too black to get a job, then I think that you’re a racist.
Characteristics such as skin color are not deficiencies that need special accommodation.
Re: Re: Re:
Then why haven’t you called Donald Trump a racist, considering he was one of the key proponents of the birther conspiracy fantasy concerning Barack Obama near-specifically because he was Black?
Tell that to racists like Donald “Black people deserve Black jobs” Trump. The special accomodation in hiring people of color would be actually considering their merits and hiring them even (and especially) when a mediocre white person who is less qualified applies for the same job. This country has a long history of people being refused jobs—or fired from jobs for which they were qualified and in which they were doing well—because of their skin color/ethnicity. The fantasy of a perfect meritocracy is exactly that: a fantasy. You might want to believe racism in the U.S. is over for whatever reason, but I can assure you that it isn’t—and with Donald “I was successfully sued for racist housing discrimination” Trump leading the country, it sure as shit won’t be over any time soon.
Re: Re: Re:2
You are being reduced to ad hominem attacks, and your argument cannot stand on its own. Thanks for playing.
If true, then there is no need for a DEI program. Merits is all we’re asking for. Finally, it sounds like we’re in agreement.
Re: Re: Re:3
A merit-only system is all that DEI is, you walnut.
So you agree we do need DEI programs.
Re: Re: Re:3
Add ad hominem to the long list of things you get completely wrong.
This is a claim made in gross bad faith.
Re: Re: Re:3
“we’re”
Lets add that to log, long list of words you use but don;t know the meaning too bro.
Re: Re: Re:3
My calling Donald Trump a racist is rooted in actual facts about his life and his presidency. He was successfully sued for racial discrimination; that’s on the books. He was one of the leading forces behind the birther conspiracy fantasy, which primarily (if not entirely) came about because Barack Obama was Black; that’s on the books, too. He has also repeatedly used the phrase “Black jobs” as if there are certain jobs that only Black people are qualified to perform; plenty of video of him saying that phrase exists. Show me where I attacked Trump for anything he hasn’t personally said or done—or for anything that can’t be reasonably inferred by the things he’s said and done.
If that were the case, Donald Trump wouldn’t have fired a Black four-star general from his position as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and replaced him with a less qualified white man whose only real qualification for the position seems to be “kissing Trump’s ass enough”. I doubt that race/ethnicity was the primary reason behind that firing, but considering how Trump’s documented history of racism and his attempts to purge “DEI people” from the federal government…well, you can see where that train of thought is headed, and I doubt you’ll have a serious counterargument for it beyond “nuh-uh to your uh-huh”.
Re: Re: Re:3
Likely because they’re increasingly dropping the belief that the things you say are in good faith. What’s astonishing to me is that it took them this long.
Re: Re: Re:4
This right here.
Re: Re: Re:4
At least it’s a cis person you’re degendering here. Please correct yourself before you commit the harm Stephen did against a trans person.
Re: Re: Re:3
Every accusation a confession.
Indeed.
Re: Re: Re:
Poor treatment of non-white people by white people is in fact a deficiency that needs special accommodation.
Re: Re: Re:
“Characteristics such as skin color are not deficiencies that need special accommodation.”
Then why do you keep defending that very practice?
Re:
Gosh, Koby, have you been sleeping under a rock theses last centuries?
White males prefer to hire white males, as many studies has proven. So, management schools, executive boards and offices get filled with white males. How is it not discriminatory?
The whole DEI is to prove (as many countries in the World are continuing the apply with real success) that everybody, independent of color, gender and origins are able to do the same work with the same efficiency.
Now, sure, ask Reps if a woman can be President, they’ll laugh at you because “no women has never been President”. Now, look other countries and tell me if gender is automatically making good or bad president/chancellor/minister.
Re: Re:
Not all white males. I’m a white man who had three people waiting for interview for the same job, one another white man, one a black woman, and one an Indian man, and I ended up hiring the Indian man over the black woman and the white man just because he proved to be the best at the job despite having the least experience.
Re:
You don’t think in general, that’s the problem. You’re just here to parrot Heritage Foundation talking points that are often only tangentially relaated to the topic then bolt away from anyone who asks you to defend them after accusing them of Ad Hom attacks. You can’t defend them, doing so would require you to think about what you claim to believe and god knows, introspection is the enemy of conservatism, hence the attacks on the social sciences and education in general.
Re:
The NFL does exactly what you’re arguing can’t be done, and as a result has one of the highest performing sporting events in the world.
Re: Re:
NFL is 53% black. Is USA 53% black or do we need to fire 80% of them and hire more whites?
'Won't someone think of the ones who are born with all the advantages?!'
“Carr said in his letter to Comcast earlier this month that the commission would take “fresh action to ensure that every entity the FCC regulates complies with the civil rights protections enshrined in the Communications Act… including by shutting down any programs that promote invidious forms of DEI.”
Funny how republicans only seem to care about ‘protecting’ civil rights when it comes to those poor persecuted white men…
Re:
Anti-DEI is just a jobs program for underqualified white guys who have trouble competing against women and brown people.
Heaven forfend
As if T-Mobile under Mike Sievert isn’t bad enough, them merging with Comcast would be even worse. Glad I ditched them for an MVNO a couple years ago.
I hope this isn’t an inappropriate place to mention this but the “bigotry” tag is misspelled which may mess with search results.