Hide BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to check out our fundraiser »

College Kids Are Easily Bypassing Stupid University TikTok Bans

from the congratulations-you-accomplished-absolutely-nothing dept

We’ve noted a few times how the political push to ban TikTok is a dumb performance largely designed to distract people from our failure to pass even a basic internet privacy law or regulate data brokers. We’ve also noted how college bans of TikTok are a dumb extension of that dumb performance, and don’t accomplish anything of meaningful significance.

When the college bans first emerged we noted they’d be trivial to bypass, given the bans only apply to the actual college network. They obviously don’t apply to personal student use over cellular networks. And, not surprisingly, students are finding it extremely easy to bypass the bans, either by simply turning off Wi-Fi when they want to access the social network, or using a VPN:

“The student body, quietly, in unison, added Wi-Fi toggling to their daily routine. “Everyone was so nonchalant about it,” Pablo says. “They really just did not care.”

“There wasn’t a whole lot of pushback, aside from a lot of grumbling and groans,” says Ana Renfroe, a sophomore at Texas A&M. Some of her professors are still showing TikToks in class. They’ll just ask students to download the videos at home she explains, or will upload them to another platform like Instagram Reels.”

The folks who spent several years hyperventilating about how TikTok was some unique threat to the public (on an internet where countless international companies, ISPs, app makers, and data brokers over-collect and fail to secure consumer data) are, of course, nowhere to be found.

Their superficial “solution” for a problem they overstated (often for xenophobic or anticompetitive reasons) didn’t actually do anything useful, but it provided the superficial illusion of solution-oriented thinking, which is good enough for the kind of facts-optional partisan media echo chambers the most vocal TikTok critics often inhabit.

Here in reality, folks like The Knight First Amendment Institute have continued to challenge the college bans, noting they imperil research into an important modern information-exchange platform. But we still haven’t passed a privacy law or regulated data brokers as part of any sort of coherent plan to rein in all bad actors on privacy, not just the Chinese-owned ones Mark Zuckerberg doesn’t want eating his lunch.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: tiktok

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “College Kids Are Easily Bypassing Stupid University TikTok Bans”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
44 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

How wrong can you get, banning TikTok is like banning use of a library for research because you do you like the librarian. It is ban that has no relationship to the content on the platform, but a lot to do with distracting people like you from the real problems in US politics.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

“Accessing tiktok for important research information is like a business traveler saying he needs to get reimbursed for a meal at a strip club.”

No it’s not.
Those are not anything alike at all.

Based upon your personal experience, what type of meals do they serve at the strip club?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Not to mention the security studies on tiktok’s use and infrastructure.

Unfortunately, for Koby and the rest of the Republican Party, they’re more than happy to leave global networks exposed to Russian, Chinese, Israeli, Iranian and other malicious actors invading critical infrastructure via various security exploits and backdoors, so…

Anonymous Coward says:

simply turning off Wi-Fi when they want to access the social network

It’s not clear from this article or the linked The Verge article what this actually means. Taken literally, it would appear to mean the computer has no internet connection, which clearly wouldn’t let it access TikTok. The linked article suggests that people are tethering to their phones instead of using campus Wi-Fi but it isn’t clear.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Insanity is...

But we still haven’t passed a privacy law or regulated data brokers

So the laws that other people want to make that restrict freedom are dumb and easily worked around, but the laws that you want that restrict freedom are super intelligent and will definitely work as intended.

Oh, BestNetTech, bless your little hearts.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:3

I should be shocked at you lot declaring yourselves criminals, but in today’s political environment, the shamelessness and arrogance of the Republicans means that this should become more common.

I’m sadly not sorry you’re happy to be a criminal because you can’t seem to critically think. And the Dems don’t seem to actually want to pass laws to help the voterbase.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

You do understand that one of the uses for your data is to create an economic profile which is then used to tailor prices for things you buy online at a price-point they deem you are willing to pay above MSRP.

Plus the fact that they can combine your online information from most of the sites you visit with other information gathered from mobile carriers, credit card companies, shops, grocery stores, drug stores and such to map out your life with a pretty good accuracy. This information is used to steer your buying habits online and offline by tailoring ads or direct mailings, but it is also used to assess your credit score. If your data indicates “financially risky behavior” (which can be whatever they want) your score might be downgraded without you even realizing it.

You are essentially giving away ALL the bargaining power you have with companies because they can get a complete profile of you, your habits and your behavior.

Your argument basically comes down to being happy living in a virtual glasshouse were anyone with a passing interest can just look in and see what you are doing. Anyone not finding that creepy might either be an oblivious idiot or an exhibitionist.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Why not both?

Anyway, I’ve got Google’s “follow me” tracing enabled, and every month it offers to tell me where I’ve been, which I generally ignore. I keep hoping to be shown ads tailored to my preferences, but sadly, that never seems to happen. All I get are slowly petering-out contrails showing the last thing I searched for or bought online. I live in Manhattan; ludicrous price differences for the same product are a feature of brick-and-mortar stores here, and I’m pretty sure I can search for products at enough sites such that little personalized pricing games aren’t going to work. My wife can do that for sure.

In any case, none of that matters. I will never agree to deprive someone of their freedom to use available information to guide their actions no matter how much you fearmonger about what evil they might do.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: re privacy law

“So the laws that other people want to make that restrict freedom are dumb and easily worked around, but the laws that you want that restrict freedom are super intelligent and will definitely work as intended.”

How does privacy law restrict freedom?
Whose freedom do privacy laws restrict?
What, exactly, are these fine individuals attempting to do that privacy laws would stop them from doing?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:5

The only direct observers of my interactions with a web site are me and the site, therefore they are not in public view but are more usually assumed to be private.

Do you expect real world shops, banks etc. to keep your transactions more or less private, or would their selling of that data to the highest bidder be an objectionable invasion of your privacy?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Thievery takes away an object from the victim so that the thief has it and the victim does not. Information is non-rivalrous; someone discovering information about you does not take any object away from you.

When you interact with someone or something, they should have the freedom to discern whatever they can about you by observation. Depriving them of that right is depriving them of freedom, and of the ability to live in a truthful world. Given the tenor of commenters here, I suppose I should not be surprised that that’s a concept you find appealing.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

someone discovering information about you does not take any object away from you.

Don’t be too sure about that, when the information being taken can be used by someone to decide whether to rent you a place to live, or give you a job. Note even ‘innocent’ information can impact such decision, things like the music you listen to, or books you read can be used against you.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:4

Yes. The government must not coerce private companies into blacklisting those who support murderous Communists abroad, but those private companies are free to find out whether people they want to hire have done so, and choose not to hire them. I would note that your people react the same way to those who support Viktor Orbán, or are gender critical.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

“When you interact with someone or something, they should have the freedom to discern whatever they can about you by observation. Depriving them of that right is depriving them of freedom, and of the ability to live in a truthful world.”

This reads like a bunch of bullshit, I think I would avoid any interaction with the likes of you – thusly not infringing upon your sacred rights.

ability to live in a truthful world .. just what in the
you can’t be serious

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Assuming that your opponents are not serious may work as demagoguery, but it will not deter your opponents from trying to stop you. I am, in fact, completely serious.

In order to interact effectively with the world, we must be able to dispassionately observe it and draw conclusions based on what we see. Privacy advocates want to deny people the ability to observe and act upon reality, and therefore want people to exist in a world of lies, presumably where those advocates get to say what is real and what is not according to their whims.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...