The UK Wants A Trade Deal With India That Would Boost The Already Healthy Profits Of Big Pharma, And Cause Millions Of People To Sicken
from the devastating-impact dept
Although trade deals are nominally about, well, trade, BestNetTech readers know that they have become an important way to force through changes in areas like copyright and patents without any meaningful democratic scrutiny. That’s because trade deals are negotiated in secret, and then presented as done and dusted once talks have been concluded. The argument typically rolled out is that it was “necessary” to make various concessions in the area of copyright and/or patents in order to obtain a deal, and that now the final text has been agreed, nothing can be done about it.
That’s certainly how things developed in the case of three major trade agreements covered by BestNetTech in recent years — ACTA, TTIP and TPP — and looks to be true of a new UK-India trade deal under discussion. Being able to negotiate trade agreements independently, rather than as part of the EU, was supposed to one of the big benefits of Brexit, but it hasn’t worked out that way. Although plenty of trade deals have been signed between the UK and other nations, they are almost without exception “rollover” deals: that is, they merely continue the trade terms that were already in place when the UK was part of the EU. The really important new trade deals that Brexiters promised — with the US and China — show no signs of materializing, for various political reasons. That leaves India as the only major market where the UK has some hope of agreeing a new deal.
Sadly, the UK is trying to use these negotiations to force through some really bad changes to India’s patent laws. As usual, we only know this thanks to the leak of the relevant chapter of the UK-India Free Trade Agreement. A letter from health and development NGOs to the UK’s International Trade Secretary spells out the harmful ideas revealed there, including:
A greenlight for ‘evergreening’ patents for medically inconsequential changes, allowing pharmaceutical corporations to extend their monopolies and keep prices artificially high for years beyond the end of the original 20-year patent term.
Closing down the opportunity to block unjustified patents before they are granted, meaning more products will be awarded unjustified patent monopolies.
New monopoly protections on the clinical data used to prove a medicine is safe and effective, delaying the advancement of medical science by blocking others from using this evidence to produce generic medicines.
As the letter emphasizes, these proposals would undermine the public health safeguards that India has implemented in its patent laws. They would also have a devastating impact on the health of millions of people in developing economies, for whom India’s low-cost versions of key drugs are literally a matter of life or death:
India’s long standing ability to produce quality-assured, affordable medicines for HIV, TB, viral hepatitis, malaria and other diseases, medicines that save millions of lives globally every year, relies upon its carefully drafted intellectual property laws and medical regulatory processes which balance the monopoly rights of manufacturers with everybody’s right to health.
It’s disappointing to see the UK use its much ballyhooed “Brexit freedom” to push for a trade deal that would boost the already healthy profits of its own pharma industry, whilst causing millions of people around the world to sicken and suffer unnecessarily.
Follow me @glynmoody on Twitter or Mastodon.
Filed Under: acta, big pharma, brexit, china, evergreening, india, intellectual monopolies, patents, tpp, ttip, uk, us




Comments on “The UK Wants A Trade Deal With India That Would Boost The Already Healthy Profits Of Big Pharma, And Cause Millions Of People To Sicken”
The is what Brexit was for.
Brexit was pushed by wealthy people with the intent of creating these types of deals. Every promise made by the Brexiteers was a lie.
Re:
No surprise here then! Typical desired action from UK conservative government!! Nothing more importantto them than making the rich, richer, the poor, poorer and, in this case the sick, more sick!
Profit and racism, the UK specialty
They care nothing for POC, never have, never will.
But, they do are about protecting their profits, the profits of UK corps, and will do so even if it causes exponential harm to those affected.
Pure Britainia, pure Brexit
Re:
And not only that.
They’d screw over the poor as well.
Following the USA
They’re just doing what their masters, the fascist USA, has taught them.
Re:
Its almost like the US/UK were somehow related and woven from the same cloth.
There’s a campaign going on here in my country to help a baby with ALS or something (the thing Hawks had) get some life-saving medicine that would cost over 2 million USD or something like that for a limited time treatment (meaning the baby won’t be using her entire life). I can’t say it is serious or some scam but there are some famous, trustworthy people retweeting it so take the value with a grain of salt.
In any case the fact that I wouldn’t be surprised (chocked yes, surprised no) by the value if it’s true says a lot about the current humanity situation. Even if you consider R&D costs I think I can safely say that NOTHING justifies most drug prices and this is particularly true for costs in the US. Nothing.
Re:
*shocked but chocked might be a proper word as well?
Re:
Capitalists will find a justification regardless. The Line must be pleased at all costs—including the sacrifice of human lives, if necessary.
Re:
Nothing justifies those prices?
Those TV commercials won’t pay for themselves you know. That marketing budget has to come from somewhere.
Re: Re:
Which is a funny thing to say in a way given the subject of the article, since most of the commercials you refer to are expressly illegal outside of the US. You cannot legally advertise prescription drugs to the general public, even in the UK with its current government.
Re: Re: Re:
Yeah, last I checked, the U.S. is one of only two countries that allow such commercials. (I forget what the other one is.)
“We did not develop this medicine for Indians, we developed it for western patients who can afford it.” – Bayer Chief CEO Marijn Dekkers
Re:
India: “And that’s why we have a strong generic drugs manufacturing industry.”
“the UK use its much ballyhooed “Brexit freedom””
I’m yet to hear an actual freedom it provides that wasn’t already available under the EU. There may be something, but unless it’s freedom for certain classes to rob the rest of the population blind, I’ve not heard it.
Re:
Always has been.
The damn shitcampaign was bankrolled and promoted by the rich fucks for exactly that purpose.
And one of them had the audacity to escape to Singapore after it happened.
Don’t EVER buy Dyson products; you’re supporting a cimpany whose founder actually bankrolled and promoted Brexit.
Monopoly protections
I think that’s just as likely to be used for