Minneapolis Proved Something MAGA Can’t Accept: Most People Are Actually Virtuous
from the bring-a-covered-dish dept
There’s a line buried in Adam Serwer’s recent Atlantic piece on the Minneapolis resistance to ICE that deserves to be pulled out, examined, and posted on every lamppost in America:
The secret fear of the morally depraved is that virtue is actually common, and that they’re the ones who are alone.
Read that again. It explains so much.
Serwer continues:
In Minnesota, all of the ideological cornerstones of MAGA have been proved false at once. Minnesotans, not the armed thugs of ICE and the Border Patrol, are brave. Minnesotans have shown that their community is socially cohesive—because of its diversity and not in spite of it. Minnesotans have found and loved one another in a world atomized by social media, where empty men have tried to fill their lonely soul with lies about their own inherent superiority. Minnesotans have preserved everything worthwhile about “Western civilization,” while armed brutes try to tear it down by force.
For years now, a certain strain of American political thought has operated on the assumption that human beings are fundamentally selfish, that “community” is a sucker’s game, and that anyone who claims to care about their neighbors is either lying or being paid. It’s the philosophy that undergirds every policy designed to punish rather than help, every sneer at “the woke mind virus,” and every insistence that “facts don’t care about your feelings.”
And then Minneapolis happened.
When the Trump administration surged thousands of armed federal agents into Minnesota—ostensibly over a fraud case that Biden-era prosecutors had already been handling—they seem to have expected one of two things: either cowed compliance or the kind of violent resistance that would justify an even harder crackdown. What they got instead was something that appears to have genuinely baffled them: tens of thousands of ordinary people who simply refused to let their neighbors be dragged away.
Not activists. Not “paid operatives.” Just… people. Moms with minivans full of car seats making grocery deliveries. Dads doing dispatch shifts between work calls. Biologists and lawyers and nurses driving around in the freezing cold, honking at SUVs with out-of-state plates. As Serwer describes it:
Even among those involved in opposing ICE in Minnesota, people have a range of political views. The nonviolent nature of the movement, and the focus on caring for neighbors, has drawn in volunteers with many different perspectives on immigration, including people who might have been supportive if the Trump administration’s claims of a targeted effort to deport violent criminals had been sincere.
The thing that seems to have broken the MAGA brain is that even people who might have supported targeted enforcement of immigration law looked around at what was actually happening—the pregnant women dragged through snow, the doors kicked in, the indiscriminate terror, the senseless killings—and said “no.” Not because they’d been radicalized by some shadowy operation, but because they have eyes and consciences.
Ana Marie Cox, who spent a decade in the Minneapolis/St. Paul region before moving to Texas, wrote for The New Republic about what she calls the “carbon-steel fibers wound together by generations of consistent, need-blind aid”:
Bonds formed under the pressure of negative double-digit windchill are key to understanding what’s happening. It is impossible to get through a Minnesota winter without help, and only sometimes does that assistance come from your neighbors. The stories about people shoveling out or snowblowing an entire block’s driveways without being asked and with no compensation are true, but the real miracles (and just as common) are the times when strangers stop to help someone shovel out a car caught in a snowbank or bring out the kitty litter from their trunk put there just for this kind of emergency. I cannot tell you one story about that happening to me. I have at least three or four. The pun is irresistible: Minnesotans have always declared common cause against ice, they’ve just changed their focus to the ice that you can’t also use for hockey practice.
You can dismiss it as a joke until someone at a café gives you a spare scarf because you can’t find yours. People offer assistance without hesitation and without question; I don’t think I ever even heard someone dismiss thanks with, “Just pay it back someday.” Of course you will—everyone knows it. Some might find it remarkable that the generosity exists right alongside the stubborn interpersonal Midwestern microdistance that can take years to thaw. But the caution of their relationships speaks to the universality of the principle: You don’t help people out because you like them. You just do.
Cory Doctorow has referred to his “covered dish” dilemma in the past a few times, which goes like this:
“If there’s a disaster, do you go over to your neighbor’s house with: a) a covered dish or b) a shotgun? It’s game theory. If you believe your neighbor is coming over with a shotgun, you’d be an idiot to pick a); if she believes the same thing about you, you can bet she’s not going to choose a) either. The way to get to a) is to do a) even if you think your neighbor will pick b). Sometimes she’ll point her gun at you and tell you to get off her land, but if she was only holding the gun because she thought you’d have one, then she’ll put on the safety and you can have a potluck.”
It’s basically a question of, in times of trouble, will your neighbors seek to take advantage of you. Or will they look to work with you as a community to respond to the adversity you all face.
The MAGA world seems to view only the former as possible. They always show up with shotguns. Reality keeps showing that most people lean towards the latter, and show up with covered dishes.
Minneapolis is showing up with covered dishes. Thousands of them.
This is the part that the JD Vances of the world genuinely cannot comprehend. Vance has said it’s “totally reasonable” for Americans to want to live only near people they “have something in common with,” that social cohesion requires ethnic homogeneity. Minneapolis is proving the exact opposite: that diverse communities can be more cohesive, not less, precisely because they’ve had to build those bonds intentionally.
Serwer captures this beautifully:
If the Minnesota resistance has an overarching ideology, you could call it “neighborism”—a commitment to protecting the people around you, no matter who they are or where they came from. The contrast with the philosophy guiding the Trump administration couldn’t be more extreme.
What’s been particularly striking is how the resistance has explicitly rejected the kind of violent confrontation that the administration seems to have been hoping for. The “commuters”—the volunteers who patrol neighborhoods looking for ICE vehicles—have been trained to follow traffic laws, avoid physical confrontation, and simply bear witness. Their weapons are whistles, phones, and car horns. As one volunteer told Cox in her second piece on the resistance:
“I don’t mean to be flip about this, but they can’t shoot us all.”
There are more of us than there are them. There are more good people in the world than bad. There are more virtuous people who believe in community than angry insecure people who believe that everything is a zero sum game.
And for each act of cruelty, each selfish bit of nonsense from ICE or CBP or the administration, more Minnesotans realize they need to be involved.
The instances of physical violence only goose the number of people willing to be targets. Says Chris, “Every time they attack us, another round of volunteers comes in. We refuse to be cowed.”
And it’s somewhat working. The administration has already been forced to yank Gregory Bovino, the preening Border Patrol commander who seemed to relish his villain role, out of Minneapolis, though they replaced him with Tom Homan (who, to be clear, is basically as bad). But, still, it’s not a sign of strength to be switching leaders and clearly demoting the guy who’d been the face of this invasion. That’s a strategic retreat forced by people whose only armor is their willingness to show up.
The MAGA movement has spent years cultivating what Serwer identifies as a series of “mistaken assumptions”:
The first is the belief that diverse communities aren’t possible… A second MAGA assumption is that the left is insincere in its values, and that principles of inclusion and unity are superficial forms of virtue signaling. White liberals might put a sign in their front yard saying “In This House We Believe…” but they will abandon those immigrants at the first sensation of sustained pressure.
And, as Serwer correctly notes, part of the reason for this belief is that it has kinda been true… for the actual elite, who have spent the last year trying to pretend Trump isn’t doing what he clearly promised to do:
And in Trump’s defense, this has turned out to be true of many liberals in positions of power—university administrators, attorneys at white-shoe law firms, political leaders.
But it turns out that millions of ordinary Americans are not those people. They’re the ones delivering groceries to families too scared to leave their homes, the ones doing laundry for the volunteers doing deliveries, the ones who signed up for constitutional observer training (over 26,000 through just one organization, according to The New Yorker).
Cox captures what this invisible infrastructure looks like:
So much of the resistance is either carried out by women or coded as women’s work—unheralded, boring, unglamorous, and mostly undocumented. “You’re in the middle of resisting fascism, and someone still needs to do laundry,” Chris points out. A single father and a Parent-Teacher Association president, he stepped forward early on to do admin and dispatch, sometimes pulling four-, five-, six-hour shifts.
“I was eating nothing but takeout. I said something, and now I’ve got a full fridge.” The grocery deliveries to immigrant families are vital. What keeps those deliveries happening are the deliveries to the people making deliveries. It’s mutual aid all the way down.
Someone even volunteered to do the other volunteers’ day jobs, the work-work—formatting spreadsheets, answering emails. She volunteered to sit at a desk; she has young kids and doesn’t want to leave them alone. So she offered what she could: clerical skills.
The MAGA bros, full of hate and seething, have been running around X insisting this must all be organized and planned. They talk nonsense about “op sec” and “supply lines” when it’s really just all communities looking out for one another.
There’s a temptation to view all of this through the lens of political tribalism—Team Blue vs. Team Red, libs vs. MAGAs. But that framing misses something important. Pastor Miguel, who leads Iglesia Cristiana La Via in Burnsville and has been organizing food drives for families in hiding, told Serwer:
“One of the things that I believe, and I know most of the Latino community agrees, is that we want the bad people out. We want the criminals out,” Pastor Miguel, who immigrated from Mexico 30 years ago, told me. “All of us came here looking for a better life for us and for our children. So when we have criminals, rapists—when we have people who have done horrible things in our streets, in our communities—we are afraid of them. We don’t want them here.”
He’s not some open-borders absolutist. He’s someone who looked at what ICE was actually doing—picking up people with pending asylum cases, targeting workers with valid permits, terrorizing entire neighborhoods—and recognized it as something other than law enforcement. Then one of his friends, a man he believed had legal status, was picked up by federal agents.
This is what the administration either didn’t anticipate or didn’t care about: that once you deploy armed agents to conduct indiscriminate sweeps through American neighborhoods, you’re making everyone feel hunted. And when everyone feels hunted, everyone has a reason to resist.
Consider Stephen Miller’s ridiculously racist stated belief that “migrants and their descendants recreate the conditions, and terrors, of their broken homelands.” Serwer’s response is devastating:
In Minnesota, the opposite was happening. The “conditions and terrors” of immigrants’ “broken homelands” weren’t being re-created by immigrants. They were being re-created by people like Miller. The immigrants simply have the experience to recognize them.
This gets at something crucial: the people organizing mutual aid networks, running food deliveries, and patrolling for ICE vehicles aren’t doing it because they’ve been brainwashed by some progressive ideology. Many of them are doing it because they or their families have seen this before. They know what occupation looks like. They know what arbitrary state violence looks like. And they know that the only thing that stops it is ordinary people refusing to look away.
If you want to support what’s happening in Minnesota, the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits has compiled resources for organizations doing this work. But Cox makes an important point: maybe you should also look around your own neighborhood. Because ICE is almost certainly already there, even if it hasn’t made the news yet.
This is not a bad time to take groceries to a free fridge in your city. Or maybe: Find a chore to do for a neighbor now, before they need it. Or maybe: Get trained on Naloxone administration. Volunteer to walk dogs. Start a tool library. Learn some names.
Start building those connections. In Doctorow’s terms, bring the covered dish now, so that your neighbors know you won’t bring a shotgun later.
The resistance in Minneapolis wasn’t conjured out of nothing when the federal agents arrived. It was built over decades by people helping each other get through brutal winters, showing up for each other after police killings, and developing the organizational infrastructure that could be activated when the moment demanded it.
Serwer ends his piece with this:
No matter how many more armed men Trump sends to impose his will on the people of Minnesota, all he can do is accentuate their valor. No application of armed violence can make the men with guns as heroic as the people who choose to stand in their path with empty hands in defense of their neighbors. These agents, and the president who sent them, are no one’s heroes, no one’s saviors—just men with guns who have to hide their faces to shoot a mom in the face, and a nurse in the back.
The morally depraved fear that virtue is common. Minneapolis is proving they were right to be afraid. People bringing covered dishes instead of shotguns is terrifying to them. But it’s how civilization actually works—something the MAGA true believers may never understand.
Filed Under: community, gregory bovino, jd vance, maga, minneapolis, neighbors, tom homan, virtue


Comments on “Minneapolis Proved Something MAGA Can’t Accept: Most People Are Actually Virtuous”
"virtuous" is a big word
It is more like “decent”. As opposed to the current government which is characterized by people who are not just indecent but outright obscene. And form the means of governing in their image.
Which is why you get chants of “shame, shame, shame” on those who are without shame or morals.
Re:
Is it not a virtue to care for your neighbor? Is it not a virtue to treat immigrants as people—to, say, treat a stranger as you would treat your neighbor? Is it not a virtue to help those who need help when you can offer such help?
Re: Re:
“Virtue” seems kind of like the opposite of “sin” to me. As if suggesting that people are doing it to conform to external standards or ideals, perhaps to feel good about themselves, rather than just because it’s decent. And “virtuous” could be taken to suggest “abnormally” good behavior, rather than just being an ordinary decent person.
The word’s not wrong per se, but it might be better for society that such things be treated as normal, rather than being called out with special praise.
Re: Re: Re:
Let’s say this is true and “virtue signalling” comes down to people doing good things for the sake of clout. The problem I have with that criticism: They’re still doing good things. Sure, maybe their virtue ends when things get tough—and that’s a fair criticism. But if people do good things for clout and they keep doing them even when their clout-chasing fails, I’d say that’s a win for virtue. I mean, would you rather have the kind of vice signalling you see from Trump supporters and the Trump regime itself?
Re: Re: Re:2
Sure. But if most people are doing good things, and we only praise a few who are most visible, it might give people the counter-factual impression that such behavior is rare.
I’m not questioning the motives of people doing good deeds, just the way we portray them. That is, calling these participants out as especially virtuous could be a disservice to Minnesotans in general. I don’t get the impression that they were intending to signal anything.
Re: Re: Re:3
By the same token, ignoring those participants and acting like what they’re doing is either morally neutral or not worth talking about will do a great disservice to those people while also giving the impression that such actions are, in fact, not worth doing.
Everyone who does a good deed virtue signals in some way. The motive for their actions is irrelevant; the deed itself is the signal, and it is an example to others. The people participating in these protests and legal observance actions are setting an example for other Minnesotans and other Americans in general. If some of them happen to be doing it for the sake of clout, so be it.
And once more with feeling: I’d much rather see people virtue signaling and doing good deeds even if their motive is self-serving than see people vice signaling and doing evil deeds because they believe their vices are virtues and their evil is good.
Re: Re: Re:4
It’s a fair point. I suppose we need to be careful either way. Some people are too quick to use words like “heroic”, which I think is often overused. “Virtuous” isn’t quite at the same level, but I still lean toward David’s view. This was some people doing the decent thing, as usual, because they thought it was right. Treating their neighbors as they’d want to be treated; I think there was some guy 2000 years ago suggesting it, but never mind that.
Re: Re: Re:4
People insist on pretending that “acting with virtue” is also “virtue signaling” because a depressing number of people don’t believe people can actually be motivated by good causes.
People in Minneapolis have acted with virtue, sing it from the rooftops!
Bad people will frame it as “virtue signaling,” as is their right… Which only informs us that such a person is lacking in virtue.
Re: Re:
My home country experienced 5 years of Nazi occupation. I’m sure that most soldiers in the Wehrmacht were decent, upstanding citizens when they were in their home community back in Germany. And as upstanding citizens they did their patriottic duty when they were drafted, and invaded a neighbouring country that was no threat to them. Part of their patriottic duty was arresting Jews, and shooting hostages as reprisal for sabotage actions by guerillas.
Very, very few Germans did the right thing.
“Decent” is not the same as “virtuous”.
Re: Re: Re: Splitting hairs?
I find it doubtful that many wehrmacht soldiers were directly involved in arresting jews and shooting hostages. Those actions were typically reserved for the Gestapo and the SS. Note: I’m not saying it never happened anywhere, I’m sure it did, but I’m sure it was not policy to involve the Wehrmacht.
While this might seem like splitting hairs, I do think it makes an important point, which is connected to the article. The Wehrmach consisted, as you say, out of regular people. Regular people that, despite maybe being not a fan of their government, could be convinced (or pressured) to fight in defence of their homeland. And, maybe, not enquiring too deeply if ugly stuff happens in their name. What most of them could probably not be convinced of, is that the defence of the Vaterland required them arresting women and children and shooting/hanging innocent civilians.
On a separate point: People often compare the Pretti shooting with things that happen in authoritarian states. While for sure authoritarian states shoot protesters, see recently Iran, this kind of open execution is very rare. Most authoritarians are smart enough to know not to give protesters a focus point for protests. As, again, Iran found out when they killed a girl for not properly wearing her headscarf.
Somebody being disappeared is much scarier and gives no clear cause for people to organize behind. The government can always claim they had nothing to do with it or that the person is still under interrogation.
All the above makes the Trump regime just as bad as other authoritarian regimes, but also much stupider.
Re: Now I comprehend the ridiculous "owning the libs"
Adam Serwer explained something to me in this article. He doesn’t come out and say it, but it contains an explanation for the desire to “own the libs”.
Since MAGA believes that the liberals are faking virtue, the criticisms of the liberals are enraging. Especially, of course, because the criticisms are valid.
Re: Re:
The right fake christian values continually, with hate trumping christian love ever chance it gets so they assume those they hate do exactly the same to make them feel better about the shitty world they have built.
Re:
They’re keeping it 3+ syllables to throw off the MAGA lurkers.
Substitute “economics” for “ethnic homergeneity” and you got yourself a Marxist. That explains a lot about the Trump and his coalition of tech bros.
Re:
I’m genuinely curious, what is it about the Trump administration that reminds you of Marx’s writing?
Trump's Kent state moment
Tin soldiers and Trump are coming, we’re finally on our own…
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Defending criminals that commit identity fraud in order to stay in our country is not virtuous.
Re: The maga sheep has spoken
Nice strawman. Too bad that isn’t what is being defended against.
Re:
“Identity fraud”, like having a pending application for citizenship? Sounds like the worst of the worst indeed.
Nothing worse than the kind of scum that pretends to be good, honest, hardworking citizens while in reality they are nothing but good, honest, hardworking non-citizens.
Re:
Neither is defending ICE, DHS, and the racists in charge of creating and enforcing the Trump regime’s immigration policy.
Re:
Even if they were only abducting those without proper paperwork, how is their existence worse than executing people in the streets? You want armed, unaccountable men roving the country because someone’s abuela overstayed their visa? Go look at any country that this happens in and tell us an outcome that isn’t widespread violence.
The president is a convicted felon who tried to overthrow the government and continually and publicly asks for bribes, and when that fails outright extortion from individuals, businesses, and organizations. Your appeal to some sort of legal backing makes no sense. It’s clear all you want is state sanctioned violence and the only way that will happens is if you support a murderous amoral moron(an illegal criminal in the parlance of fuckwits).
Re:
Defending criminals who violate constitutional and human rights, and under the color of law, all in the name of enforcing immigration laws in an inefficient, unnecessary, and intentionally brutal manner is not virtuous.
They’re still disappearing people here on patrols.
They want us to be cowed. We will not be.
It takes a lot of effort to get the entirety of the human species to be unanimously against you like ICE/MAGA has achieved.
Re:
To wit: They got Bruce Springsteen to make an anti-ICE song that he made sure can’t be misinterpreted or hijacked like “Born in the USA”.
Re: Re:
It’s essentially impossible to “misintrepret” that song. It’s an obvious indictment of the America-Vietnam war as racist (“go and kill the yellow man”) and devastating to both sides, and of the U.S. treatment of veterans.
So, what you call “misinterpretation” was, in fact, a lack of any effort to interpret or even listen to the words. Someone who doesn’t listen to the words can hijack any song at all. The only way to stop it would be to make a song so bad or annoying that nobody wants to listen to it (but Weird Al tried that with “Albuquerque”, and people ended up liking it anyway).
Re:
What unanimity? The UN doesn’t care, Democratic politicians don’t care.
I’ll believe anyone cares when crimes against humanity are levied at members of the Trump administration.
Until someone acts to prosecute them (which notably Obama failed with Bush and Biden failed with Trump) it’s obvious this is just how the establishment expects government to function.
Re: Re:
That’s going to be a pretty hard lift for the US government right now, given that Donald Trump is the US government right now. Once he’s out of office, though, all bets should be off and that motherfucker—as well as all his corrupt cronies, from Miller to Noem to Vance—should be tried at the Hague at a bare minimum.
Things to Thank the current regime for
– Learning about how awesome our country used to be e.g. USAID was holding of starvation for a larger number people in Kenya.
– Learning about how much of the US population has basic decency.
But none of that is worth the smallest fraction of even one of the lives deliberately and pointlessly lost at their hands.
That is exactly why they have decried “virtue signalling” for the last 10+ years.
The almost certainly is in your neighborhood link goes to a ESRI login (which I don’t have). Can you point me to a reliable source for ICE activity that is openly accessible? Rumor has it that ICE is staying in hotels a few blocks from me. I’d be very interested to know if that is true.
Great article, as always, btw
That was a hell of an article. Well written. I will forward this one on.
'... no. No it's the protestors that are wrong.'
The MAGA bros, full of hate and seething, have been running around X insisting this must all be organized and planned. They talk nonsense about “op sec” and “supply lines” when it’s really just all communities looking out for one another.
Republicans in general and MAGAts in particular refuse to admit that people are showing up to protests because they actually care about what’s going on for two reasons I’d say.
First and foremost, they would never do something like that, the very idea of doing something nice for someone else just to be nice and/or help them is utterly foreign to them and since they are the pinnacle of morality and sensibility they know that no-one else would be so absurd as to act like that without a profit-based motive.
Second but equally as important is that if they acknowledge and admit that people are protesting and helping out for genuine reasons they would then have to face the potential that people have good reasons for protesting and helping those around them that are protesting. That maybe they’re currently supporting the villains of the story when they cheer on the US gestapo’s ethnic cleansing and that the ‘paid protestors’ are in fact the good people who have valid reasons to be out there freezing their asses off making their objections clear.
Re:
Third is that every accusation is a confession and Trump has to pay people to fill out his rallies so they insist anti-Trump protests must be doing the same thing.
Re: Re:
I don’t remember which nazi it’s a quote from, but ‘it’s not sufficient to accuse the opposition, you must accuse the opposition of doing what you are already doing‘.
Re: Re: Re:
The original seems to be from a description of Nazi tactics circa 1939 rather than a direct quote. And there have been multiple misattributions since.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/karl-marx-enemy-quote
I’m a little miffed because CBP did nearly the same things to a woman in Chicago but because she’s brown (and barely survived) media didn’t cover it. She’s since been completely exonerated by federal courts, to the point the prosecution was dismissed. And we all protested, to the tune of thousands. The overwhelming majority of people arrested in Chicago had charges dropped:
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/evidence-contradicts-trump-immigration-officials-accounts-violent-encounters-2026-01-27/
I have nothing but love and respect for my Minnesota comrades.
I just wish liberal commentators took “innocent brown person was shot 5 times by CBP” more seriously in the first place.
not that federal Dems have any remote interests in acting on recent events, but in a sane world, this would’ve ended in Chicago months ago, when ICE/CBP lied about EVERY SINGLE CASE but media instead perpetuated the idea that Chicago is uniquely lawless.
Not saying this outlet in particular, just the overall response — brown US citizen shot in Chicago doesn’t register, but white woman in Minneapolis does.
Whenever it takes to this shit, ultimately. I just don’t like seeing the suffering of my community ignored.
The Manual FM 4 3-24
The problem with the latest batch of alleged leaders in duh WH is they didn’t learn the last time
Reference during Portland protests 5y ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onmsFzEtK7U
Where to get The Manuel video via reddit
https://www.reddit.com/r/BeauOfTheFifthColumn/comments/hw7rhw/lets_talk_about_what_it_looks_like_when_they_dont/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button
And a link to the Manual
https://archive.org/details/Fm324COUNTERINSURGENCYto the Manual
Thank You for your attention to this matter
The Manual FM 4 3-24
The problem with the latest batch of alleged leaders in duh WH is they didn’t learn the last time Reference during Portland protests 5y ago
link
Where to get The Manuel video via reddit
link
And a link to the Manual if you want to read more than this particular section
link
Thank You for your attention to this matter