Ctrl-Alt-Speech: Stuck In The Middleware With Youth
from the ctrl-alt-speech dept
Ctrl-Alt-Speech is a weekly podcast about the latest news in online speech, from Mike Masnick and Everything in Moderation‘s Ben Whitelaw.
Subscribe now on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Pocket Casts, YouTube, or your podcast app of choice — or go straight to the RSS feed.
In this week’s roundup of the latest news in online speech, content moderation and internet regulation, Ben is joined by Vaishnavi J, former head of youth policy at Meta and founder and principal of Vyanams Strategies, a product advisory firm that helps companies, civil society, and governments build safer age appropriate experiences. Prior to founding Vys, she led video policy at Twitter, built its safety team in APAC and was Google’s child safety polciy lead in APAC. Together Ben and Vaishnavi discuss:
- House overhauls KOSA in a new kids online safety package (The Verge)
- A nationwide internet age verification plan is sweeping Congress (The Verge)
- Grindr supports app store age-verification bill despite censorship concerns (Pink News)
- A summary of the technology sector’s response to the UK’s new online safety rules (Ofcom)
- Age Assurance Implementation Handbook (Vyanams)
- Interoperable Age Assurance (Age Verification Providers Association)
- EU’s non-binding resolution around revamping child safety rules (European Parliament)
- ‘We’ll be watching’: Social media companies warned about complying with ban as teens flock to alternative apps (Crikey)
- The Salesforce of safety: Software vendors as infrastructural/professional nodes in the field of online trust and safety (Sage, Platforms & Society)
- It’s their job to keep AI from destroying everything (The Verge)
Filed Under: age verification, ai, artificial intelligence, child safety, content moderation, social media
Three days left! Support our fundraiser by January 5th and




Comments on “Ctrl-Alt-Speech: Stuck In The Middleware With Youth”
The so-called child safety thing from the E.U. Parliament about content on platforms is a mix of ignorance, racism, and probably a bit of malice.
It’s racist because it’s pretty clear they’re doing it to scream and yell about CHINESE companies, even though it doesn’t make sense and it’s only harmful to the Internet. Some actually appear to be based in Singapore.
It’s ignorant because they fail to comprehend how platforms work. It’s unreasonable for them to wave their magic wands, and they have limited insight into the practices of a third party vendor (as do these people, frankly, as they’re arguing largely over hypotheticals at times, if someone is misusing someone’s likeness, the original country should look into it).
It’s malicious, because they should know these things very well, but they deliberately ignore it.
They also shake the rattle about knives on a marketplace, and perhaps, that is not ideal, but do they really think removing a few listings is a magic fix for violence?
The age verification crud is the same old nonsense.
For anything else they might say, if they’re rattling the “think of the children”, there’s a good chance it’s ill-conceived.