Pete Hegseth Has Turned State Violence Into TikTok Content

from the the-tiktok-doctrine dept

You know this is a spectacle, right? A show. That’s what it is. A performance for social media. With blood.

Pete Hegseth just ordered the twenty-first strike on a suspected drug boat. Three more bodies. Another video posted to X showing a vessel bursting into flames. “Three male narco-terrorists” dead, the military announces. No trial. No evidence presented. No due process. Just boats exploding on camera and bodies labeled terrorists because the Department of Defense says so.

This is governance as content creation. TikTok foreign policy. Snackable clips of military strikes designed for engagement metrics while everything that actually matters falls apart around us.

Blowing up drug-running boats in the Caribbean isn’t going to stop the flow of drugs into America. Everyone knows this. The drugs will keep coming—they always do, they always have. Different boats, different routes, same product reaching the same streets. This isn’t policy designed to solve problems. This is spectacle designed to produce feelings. The feeling that someone strong is doing strong things. The feeling that enemies are being punished. The feeling that something is being done even as nothing actually changes.

But it is illegal. Under United States law and international law. The rule of law is being killed alongside these men in these boats. Admiral Alvin Holsey—the four-star admiral overseeing these operations—resigned because the boats weren’t showing immediate hostile intent. Colombia says we’re killing their fishermen. Ecuador released survivors for lack of evidence. Congress hasn’t authorized any of this. The Constitution hasn’t been consulted. Just Hegseth ordering strikes and posting videos while the legal framework that makes civilization possible burns alongside the boats.

So they can post it on X. So they can show you what an amazing job they’re doing. While your prices rise. While the Epstein files document twenty thousand pages of connections that cannot be explained away. While the artificial intelligence market bubble exhausts its last breaths of irrational exuberance. While American citizens are illegally detained by masked federal agents and some have been shot. This is a show for social media.

Twenty-one strikes now. How many bodies for the algorithm? How many “narco-terrorists” killed without trial before someone asks to see evidence? How many boats exploding on camera before Congress remembers it’s supposed to authorize military action? The carrier arrives tomorrow. Fifteen thousand troops ready. And still no authorization. Still no debate. Just Trump saying he’s “sort of made up my mind” while Hegseth produces content.

This is what authoritarian governance looks like in the age of engagement metrics. The policy is the spectacle. The spectacle is the policy. You’re not supposed to ask whether it works. You’re supposed to watch the boats explode and feel like winning is happening. You’re supposed to see bodies labeled terrorists and feel safer. You’re supposed to consume the content and move on to the next post before you have time to ask: Where’s the evidence? Where’s the legal authority? Where’s Congress? What is this actually accomplishing besides producing clips for social media?

The boats keep exploding. The videos keep posting. The body count keeps rising. And while you watch the performance, Trump’s Epstein connections sit in those twenty thousand pages. While you debate whether the targets were really terrorists, American citizens are detained without warrants. While you argue about drugs, the Constitution collects dust and admirals resign in protest and the rule of law dies with every strike that produces another video for posting.

This is governance for the algorithm. Bodies for engagement. Military action as content strategy. Twenty-one strikes. The carrier arrives tomorrow. Eighty people dead in undeclared war. Congress silent. The Constitution ignored. Admirals resigning. The rule of law burning.

For fucking TikTok.

Mike Brock is a former tech exec who was on the leadership team at Block. Originally published at his Notes From the Circus.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: tiktok

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Pete Hegseth Has Turned State Violence Into TikTok Content”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
17 Comments
n00bdragon (profile) says:

Re:

Dismissals? More like murder trials. It’s one thing to commit some atrocities in the heat of the moment during an actual war (that’s still wrong btw, but a different level of wrong). It’s quite another to, apropos nothing, decide to seek out defenseless people who pose no threat to you expressly so that you can murder them for a real life frag reel. One is an moral failure. The other is a ghoulish monstrosity.

I hope when America comes to its senses the prosecutor seeks the death penalty for every single person in the chain of command who had the power to say “no”.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
AmySox (profile) says:

Venezuela and Colombia need to bring cases to the International Criminal Court, against both Trump and Hegseth. That way, if either of them ever sets foot in a country that honors the Statute of Rome, they can have the cuffs slapped on and be sent to The Hague for trial. At the very least, it’ll keep them out of the civilized world.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

US policy makers have thought of that. It’s called the “Invade The Hague Act”.

But before the US Army invades a NATO ally, before a country is even thinking of arresting a person that the US regime likes, there will have been threats of (economic) retaliation. We’ve seen that with the arrest warrant for Netanyahu.

Narcissus (profile) says:

Re:

I was thinking the same thing. I just checked and Colombia and Venezuela are original members of the ICC, so they could bring a case.

Venezuela could do it just to make everything awkward for everybody. Some countries stopped sharing info with the US because of these murders, but no country has gone much further than that. A conviction before the ICC would make it harder for them to look away.

Having said that, knowing how fast the ICC moves, the only one that might live to see a verdict could be Pete. Hopefully by then he’s already locked up by the US. (one can hope?)

Avantare (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I’m not looking forward to what happens between the USS Gerald R. Ford battle group and Venezuela. My focus will be how the ranking officers in the group handle the illegal order(s) to preform any armed operations against a sovereign nation. It is illegal as the officers’ oath does NOT reference the president in any way, shape, or form.

The oath:
“I, name here, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me, God.”

If any of the battle group fires even a single round of anything, they become a domestic enemy in my book.

Don’t get me started on domestic enemies in the US.

Anonymous Coward says:

Now they are talking about firing on land targets. In sovereign nations. And have already overflown other territories with military aircraft (Jesus Christ, what in God’s name are you going to do with a B-52?)

But it’s not just the spectacle they intend. It is bloody evidence – probably just extra, but evidence still. And if we ever come out the other side of this, we need to remember, and continually remind future lawmakers and administrations that this is evidence. There shall be no “moving on” or “letting it go”.

Anonymous Coward says:

Erratum

For “State Violence”, read “Extra-judicial Killings”.

Which is nothing new for the US, by the way. As anyone can attest who has been in the vicinity of a person suspected of belonging to Al Quaeda.

The difference is that the Obama administration made less of a show of it. (But then, Obama did not have much experience in the entertainment business.)

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...