Kids Turn Podcast Comments Into Secret Chat Rooms, Because Of Course They Do

from the kids-will-find-a-way dept

As anyone who has read BestNetTech for any length of time knows full well, there’s been a years-long campaign to demonize kids and social media. Never mind that actual experts have said the data doesn’t support the claims of inherent harm, politicians around the globe are rushing to ban kids from social media as fast as they can.

But banning kids from social media has a fundamental problem: kids will find a way. They always do. And part of that is just because kids need those kinds of “third spaces” where they can communicate outside the prying eyes of parents or teachers. And if adults keep blocking off those spaces, kids are smart enough to figure out clever workarounds.

Six years ago, when schools blocked social media apps on their networks, students simply repurposed Google Docs—required for assignments—into an improvised social network which they could hide from teachers and parents by claiming they were working on homework:

Teens told me they use Google Docs to chat just about any time they need to put their phone away but know their friends will be on computers. Sometimes they’ll use the service’s live-chat function, which doesn’t open by default, and which many teachers don’t even know exists. Or they’ll take advantage of the fact that Google allows users to highlight certain phrases or words, then comment on them via a pop-up box on the right side: They’ll clone a teacher’s shared Google document, then chat in the comments, so it appears to the casual viewer that they’re just making notes on the lesson plan. If a teacher approaches to take a closer look, they can click the Resolve button, and the entire thread will disappear.

That was 2019. I’m sure things like that are still happening in Google Docs, but it’s apparently also happening in an even more absurd venue: podcast comments.

The latest “How To Do Everything” podcast from NPR featured someone who monitors comments for the TED Radio Hour. She noticed something strange: kids are flooding the comments of random old episodes, turning obscure three-year-old podcasts into makeshift chat rooms where adults won’t think to look.

Yeah, so one of my responsibilities on my team is to monitor our Spotify comments. And for the most part, we mostly get really like nice comments or people engaging with our content, giving constructive feedback or saying how much they liked it. But about 3 weeks ago, I noticed kind of a different floodgate situation. And the first instance was only about 20 comments….

20 comments on one episode that came out three years ago. Yeah. And all the comments kind of had the same like, “No, you’re so pretty. You’re so pretty.” And I was really trying to rack my brain about the content of this episode 3 years ago to be like, is there a discussion about beauty standards that they are trying to engage with?

Yeah. And then about a week later, they struck again, but this time hitting the comments hit into the 90s.

And then I kind of felt like, okay, this really needs to be something we’re flagging. And when I brought it up, it seemed like other teams had also been privately sitting on this very odd situation.

So the show’s hosts discuss this, and the sense is that they’re using these shows as a space to communicate:

GUEST: Yeah, I mean, we definitely can’t say exactly who these people are, why they’re doing this, but my sense is that they’re kids. One of the theories that some other folks have put forward is that maybe this is just a way to get around a classroom phone free situation. Like maybe they can have their laptops out but they can’t have Instagram open or Spotify is the only thing they’re allowed to have. I don’t actually know. It seems like a workaround for sure.

HOST: It’s brilliant because like what could be less worrying to a teacher or a parent might be catching, you know, a look at one of these kids’ phones that they’re listening to NPR’s TED Radio Hour with their friends.

GUEST: Oh my gosh. Yeah.

They ask for an example episode, and indeed, there’s an episode on “What Leadership Looks Like” from 2022 (there’s another one with the same title that might just be a rerun from 2024 which doesn’t have comments) and you can see comments from a few weeks ago that are clearly kids chatting.

So, it seems likely that the theory is at least close to correct, that kids are just seeking out places where they can speak freely that look okay to adults at the very same time adults are trying to ban the other spaces where parents think they’ll talk and don’t like it.

As the person from TED Radio Hour (unfortunately, her name is not clearly stated and I couldn’t figure out what it was…) notes:

I think my sense from digging into it a little bit and following the usernames was effectively they make a playlist that has just one podcast and that podcast becomes kind of the graffiti space I guess of this… popup conversation.

To me, this demonstrates some of the futility of trying to ban these spaces. As I mentioned above, kids need these kinds of “third spaces” that are not school and not home in which to communicate more freely with their friends. Because of a variety of moral panics, we’ve closed off many of the real world physical spaces where that could occur, so it was no surprise that many kids gravitated to digital spaces.

But now that adults are, again, seeking to close off those spaces, kids appear to be coming up with clever ways to sneak around those bans and keep talking.

Of course, the moral panic could always follow them here too. Maybe Australia will ban kids from Spotify comments next. Then Google Docs. Then whatever random corner of the internet kids discover after that. We can keep playing whac-a-mole until we’ve legislated away every possible space where teenagers might talk to each other without adult supervision. At least it’ll feel like we’re doing something.

Or—and here’s a thought—we could stop trying to eliminate every space where kids communicate and start teaching them how to navigate those spaces safely. We could recognize that kids need room to talk, to mess up, to figure things out away from constant surveillance. That would require trusting kids to learn, rather than treating every unsupervised conversation as a crisis waiting to happen. But judging by the current trajectory, we’re more likely to see legislation banning carrier pigeons first.

Filed Under: , , , , , ,
Companies: npr, spotify

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Kids Turn Podcast Comments Into Secret Chat Rooms, Because Of Course They Do”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
22 Comments
Anonymous Coward says:

The telephone phreaks are back, just with less work in order to communicate.

Third spaces – remember when they first started closing all the local schools, and started bussing everyone, even in smaller towns? i think this was a big start to the erosion of places for kids. Then with the always-organized activities and play-date orientated interactions. Plus the moral panics about how everything is unsafe for kids. And this is largely after the extracrime days of the 80s.

Of course they chat on the internet! Or phone. And now we want to take every internet place away.

They do this because this is the fucked-up society we keep building. It’s less about the opportunities of tech, and more about these being the only opportunities.

And of course they do it in class. Used to do it on paper, or whispering. Nothing has changed but the medium. And all the other venues for contact which have been taken away.

Eric says:

PODCAST Act

This just in, Richard Blumenthal, the tech-forward Senator from CT has introduced legislation due to the ongoing dangers of kids communicating via PODCAST episode comment sections: The PODCAST Act — Preventing Online Dangers to Children And Strengthening Transparency

Podcasters have pushed back with the following statement: “Huh???”

Arianity (profile) says:

Or—and here’s a thought—we could stop trying to eliminate every space where kids communicate and start teaching them how to navigate those spaces safely.

They’re not either/or. Teaching them how to navigate those spaces is not something you can do overnight. We could also reopen those lost third spaces, as well.

That said, as far as spaces go, these are… pretty good? No algorithm/incentive to keep people doomscrolling, no NSFW content ala Twitter, somewhat opaque to random predatory adults (at least the Google Sheets), etc. They’re basically chat rooms.

But banning kids from social media has a fundamental problem: kids will find a way. They always do.

They don’t, though. If it didn’t matter, there’d be no reason to waste time complaining about it. Make something harder to do, and less people will do it. Incentives matter. (And this goes both ways, making it easier to access healthy/safe third spaces is a good thing we should work on)

Sidenote:

We can keep playing whac-a-mole until we’ve legislated away every possible space where teenagers might talk to each other without adult supervision.

Stuff like Google Docs are logged with administrator access.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Teaching them how to navigate those spaces is not something you can do overnight.

But the word “teaching” exposes the flaw in this thinking. If there’s some adult hovering over their shoulder, or a fear that it might be monitored on a friend’s side (and maybe retroactively, which never used to be possible), that’s not gonna be “safe” in the sense they need. I think they need somewhere where they can figure things out for themselves; that is, where they’d learn rather than be taught.

“Predatory adults” was also the fear in the 1980s, and was just as overblown back then. There was a well-publicised rapist-and-murderer on the loose in my area for years, and we’d still go outside without parental supervision. We were just told not to get in a car with a stranger, or to take food from them. The internet is much safer; if people don’t expose personal information to strangers, or arrange meetings, there’s basically no risk. (And that’s what young internet users were told circa 2000.)

Arianity (profile) says:

Re: Re:

I think they need somewhere where they can figure things out for themselves; that is, where they’d learn rather than be taught.

I think it’s pretty normal to do both? It tends to be a process, one that is ongoing as they mature and learn about the world. You introduce them to more things as they grow older. And there are different situations- an unmonitored google doc gives them space to chat with peers without being the same risk profile as e.g. public tweets.

We do the same thing with things like being outdoors. A teenager is going to have more freedom to roam than a 5 year old, but you onramp them over time to bigger things as you can trust them more to not do things like run into traffic chasing a ball.

“Predatory adults” was also the fear in the 1980s, and was just as overblown back then.

It does get massively overblown, but at the same time it is a real thing that happens. So if you can mitigate it without taking away the entire thing, that’s a pretty nice win.

if people don’t expose personal information to strangers, or arrange meetings, there’s basically no risk

I mean, yeah, but the problem is kids sometimes don’t know better, and do that. And it’s not really their fault; they’re kids. They’re going to make mistakes, be vulnerable, etc.

The internet is much safer;

Eh, yes and no. It is harder for someone to physically interact, but it does make anonymity and contacting kids much easier. And that’s especially true if you care about things like CSAM. I wouldn’t call it “basically no risk” when there are confirmed cases.

In terms of specific trade offs, you can definitely argue it’s not worth it, and in many cases helicopter parents have gone too far in the other direction. But it’s not nothing.

D.G. Jagielski says:

I've noticed it too

So my channel is pretty small (@UltimatePerfection, you can check it out) and I’ve noticed kids attempting this on my videos that have low amount of views. I’ve deleted them, because I don’t want that kind of attention or to have a talk with Chris Hansen (huge respect for that guy, especially with regards to the Roblox thing) because someone misinterpreted the situation.

Not saying this to brag or anything, just pointing out this is as much the case with podcasts as well as with small, obscure channels.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...