Republicans Like Nancy Mace Keep Shamelessly Taking Credit For Infrastructure Bill Improvements They Voted Against
from the lie-about-everything,-constantly dept
Back in 2021, Congress passed both the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the infrastructure bill. While getting the latter right has taken a lot of time (causing no limit of whining by election-season Republicans and some segments of the “abundance” set), ARPA has already funded a lot of amazing stuff, from local community centers and affordable housing to super cheap, locally-owned fiber broadband networks.
The bills were good and popular, generally. And by and large, Republicans voted against both of them. Yet Republicans will repeatedly take credit for the impact of both bills when talking to their constituents. I’ve lost track of the Republican reps, senators, and governors who have taken credit for ARPA improvements in local communities (especially broadband).
And this appears to show no sign of slowing down.
Representative Nancy Mace, for example, last June shamelessly took credit for South Carolina infrastructure bill transit improvements made possible by the infrastructure bill, despite not only having voted against the bill, but having called it a “socialist wish list” and a “fiasco.”
Having faced no accountability for lying about that, Mace last week again proceeded to take credit for all of the improvements made by a bill she voted against:
“Mace, a right-wing lawmaker who is now running for governor in South Carolina, told the conservative network NewsMax2 on Wednesday that she “helped secure the largest infrastructure grant in state history, in South Carolina history.”
One major reason Republicans get away with this kind of lying is we’ve let policymakers and corporations eviscerate local news at the hands of mindless consolidation and the extraction class. Neither the hedge-fund hollowed husk of your local paper or right-wing fake broadcast news machines like Sinclair broadcasting are going to clearly tell the South Carolina public that Mace is lying.
“They can just go online to get the truth,” I hear someone say, ignoring that 54 percent of U.S. adults operate at or below a 6th grade reading level, and the internet has been actively been filled with badly automated bullshit and propaganda at a scale never before seen in human history.
The national media generally finds infrastructure boring because it doesn’t get clicks. And when they do press lawmakers like Mace on these kinds of lies, like CNN tried to do, politicians like Mace will just lie some more without any press follow up.
For example, at a recent South Carolina town hall, Mace again not only lied and insisted she was directly responsible for getting the $195 million infrastructure bill money needed for traffic improvements, the media was somehow covering up her involvement:
“One of the things the press will not tell you: I am one of the leading members of Congress who’s gotten resources for our state,” Mace said. “In fact, our office assisted in getting the largest infrastructure grant in South Carolina history, at $195 million earlier this year. The press won’t tell you that.”
When someone from CNN tried to press Mace on that lie, she lied some more, insisting that she deserves credit because she later injected herself into the spending process:
“We fight over how we spend the money, how we appropriate it, but once the appropriations happen, I’m gonna make sure that South Carolina, that we get our fair share, because that money’s getting spent and our tax dollars in South Carolina is equal to anybody else’s in California, New York, Tennessee.”
Except when MAGA Republicans get involved in infrastructure bill spending fights, they routinely make things worse. Case in point: Republicans are effectively rewriting the part of the infrastructure bill that doles out $42.5 billion in broadband grants to not only eliminate affordability and equality requirements, but to try and slather Elon Musk with undeserved taxpayer subsidies, making the resulting broadband more expensive and shittier.
So no, voting against a bill, undermining the bill at every opportunity, then later injecting yourself into the process (in a way that, at best, probably didn’t actually help anybody) doesn’t really qualify as helping your constituents, unfortunately. With a lot of the infrastructure bill funding still slowly winding its way to the states, you’re going to see a lot more extremist MAGA lawmakers taking credit for policies they not only voted against, but repeatedly tried to undermine.
This isn’t helped by Dem lawmakers that lack the messaging competency to take loud (and annoyingly repetitive) credit for the successful policies they push. I study broadband access for a living, see first hand the direct good ARPA is doing for access, but between woeful Dem messaging and a broken press, I’m hard pressed to find voters who actually know why a local project happened and how it got funded.
That creates a vacuum for opportunistic liars like Mace to stumble into without much serious effort.
Filed Under: american rescue plan act, arpa, governor race, infrastructure bill, Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, nancy mace, south carolina


Comments on “Republicans Like Nancy Mace Keep Shamelessly Taking Credit For Infrastructure Bill Improvements They Voted Against”
Remind me the South Park episode “Chef Goes Nanners” where the KKK sides with the opposite group to make it fail.
Nancy Mace wanted Reps to look stupid to ensure Dems proposition would get popular.
Re:
Are you suggesting that this is what actually happened?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Walk And Chew Bubblegum
Complex spending bills are complex. It is possible to be in favor of certain portions of the bill, and to have been influential in adding those items to it, while simultaneously opposing other parts for being wasteful or overly burdensome. Few things in life are either all good, or all bad.
Re:
That’s not what Nancy Mace did and you know it.
Re:
She voted against it, so she doesn’t get to honestly take credit for it.
Re:
BEEP BEEP BEEP
Re: Re:
Kobe, you better run dude. That pedophile detector just alerted the FBI about you, they might give you a job now.
Re:
You don’t get credit for things you vote against, asshead.
Re:
There’s complex, and there’s lying. Telling people that you “helped secure the largest infrastructure grant in state history”, when you did the exact opposite of helping, is lying.
I don’t know about you, but I don’t think politicians should get participation trophies.
Re:
No.
You do not and cannot take credit for things you expressly voted against.
Re:
How sad and pathetic can you get when your best defense to “X didn’t do a thing” is “maybe the thing wasn’t all bad”?
Re:
There’s no nuance here. Y’all are just baby-raping liars.
Re:
There is a 95% certainty that the comment I have responded to was written by an AI.
Re:
That’s nice, except republicans like Mace were voting against it on party lines to try and ensure nothing got done that will benefit Americans because that is bad for the Republican party, rather than because of any specific thing they objected to because it was bad for their constutuents and had to go.
There was no way Nancy was ever going to vote yes, they voted against things that gave them everything they wanted just to cause gridlock. You don’t then get to turn around and call something that happened because you failed to stop it a win.
Re: Re:
If they could, Republicans would be calling every mass casualty shooting a “win” for gun enthusiasts, since their policies prevent the enactment of gun control laws that could help prevent many such shootings.
Re:
DING!
Things the GOP don’t understand.
Re: "Walk and Chew Bubblegum"
In your analogy, walking is voting against Democrat-proposed infrastructure funds and chewing gum is officially endorsing inherently fraudulent “crisis pregnancy centers” that put the lives of abortion-seeking women in greater danger.
Re:
Except heretofore, you’ve denied complexity in complex issues when your response was to hand-wave away any nuance or details and just proclaim that whatever Trump and friends were doing was perfectly fine because everything is simple and straightforward. So its complex when your heroes get caught doing straightforward fraud, but it’s simple when they just want to steamroll everyone and the law. Yep, you’re in a cult.
Re: Re:
Things are complex when Koby wants obfuscate facts. Things are simple when he wants to throw shit.
Re: Re:
It’s even worse because Koby actually criticized the lack of immediate expenditures from the infrastructure bill as if it had been so simple to just spend the money as soon as the bill was passed (by Democrats).
Re: Re: Re:
Makes sense when you understand that everything Koby says is just reactionary bullshit designed to distract from the fact that he and his fuck kids.
“They can just go online to get the truth,” I hear someone say, ignoring that 54 percent of U.S. adults operate at or below a 6th grade reading level, and the internet has been actively been filled with badly automated bullshit and propaganda at a scale never before seen in human history.
Also, who fact-checks everything? Not many people fact-check, certainly not true believers of the narrative, and definitely not the anti-fact-checking crowd.
'I failed to burn down your house, that means I'm responsible for you having one!'
I’d call ‘I tried and failed to kill [insert bill here], which means I was involved in the bill and therefore deserve to claim credit for the good it did’ a shamelessly dishonest tactic but that would require republicans to be capable of experiencing the emotion that is ‘shame’, so instead I’ll just call it a classic republican move.