Trump’s Military Campaign Against American Cities Expands

from the the-war-on-cities dept

Donald Trump has declared war on American cities, and he’s sending in the troops to prove it. As Rolling Stone rightly notes regarding Trump seizing direct control of DC law enforcement by deploying the National Guard:

President Donald Trump has expanded his military campaign against the United States by deploying armed troops to yet another major metropolitan area, announcing on Monday that he is sending the National Guard into Washington, D.C., to “liberate” the city.

This isn’t some emergency response to rising crime. This is the culmination of years of MAGA fantasies about using federal force against cities that refuse to kiss Trump’s ass.

It’s no secret that there’s a noticeable “urban/rural divide” in America, which has mostly been led by ambitious politicians who seek to stoke nonsense fears in rural voters by lying to them about life in American cities. But the divide has certainly expanded from “city voters lean this way while rural voters lean that way” to “the federal government needs to invade American cities.”

The irony is thick. The idea that the federal government might use the US military against American citizens has long been a conspiracy theory of the QAnon/MAGA crowd. Now it’s happening, with the QAnon/MAGA folks doing it to cities they view as insufficiently loyal to their dear leader.

Remember the massive conspiracy theory around the Jade Helm exercises a decade ago? Early MAGA types (helped along by political shitposters like Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Texas Senator Ted Cruz) pretended it was an effort by Democrats to impose martial law by first “getting people used to seeing military forces on the streets.”

This ignored that the only ones who seem interested in actually putting the military in the streets have been similarly bad faith Republicans, like Senator Tom Cotton, who has been publicly advocating for US military forces to invade American cities for years, just because non-white people were protesting for their rights.

This latest military campaign, based entirely on lies about the state of crime in the cities, followed a similarly stupid campaign in LA, also based on lies. As Radley Balko points out in a recent post, the lies are just very, very sloppy. For example in the oft-repeated line (including in our comments by MAGA fans!) that DC has the 4th highest murder rate, nope, not even close:

Nope. The linked study is only a sampling of 23 cities. It does not purport to be a list of the 23 most dangerous or murderous or crime-ridden cities. It does not purport to be a comprehensive list of any kind. The point of the study was to compare year-over-year statistics among a diverse selection of cities around the country. D.C.’s homicide rate was the fourth highest out of these 23 cities. Not out of all U.S. cities.

This first bullet point also fails to contextualize the 27.3 per 100,000 figure for 2024. It was down from 39 in 2023. It’s down to about 22.7 this year. This matters, because Trump’s argument is that crime in the city is out of control due to poor leadership. That isn’t what’s happening.

Trump has also claimed that homicides in D.C. in 2023 were the “highest ever.” Not even close. The city’s murder rate topped 80 per 100,000 in 1991.

As of April, D.C.’s murder rate this year ranked not fourth highest, but 19th. It ranked behind red state cities like New Orleans, Cleveland, Chicago, Kansas City, St. Louis, Tulsa, Indianapolis, and Cincinnati.

The lack of an actual rise in violent crime to justify these moves doesn’t matter. And silly people arguing that Democrats need to accept Trump’s framing of this being about crime are being very, very short-sighted.

If it wasn’t lies about crime, Trump and friends would come up with other lies. It would be about immigration. Or culture. Or architecture. The reasons don’t matter. The truth doesn’t matter. This is entirely about the MAGA base wanting to invade and take over American cities because they hate the fact that those cities tend not to vote for them.

That’s it.

Two weeks ago the New Republic got a leaked DHS memo that made it clear that the Trump administration wasn’t reacting to any emergency, but has been deliberately planning to invade US cities.

It suggests that DHS is anticipating many more uses of the military in urban centers, noting that L.A.-style operations may be needed “for years to come.”

And Trump made it clear he’s itching to send troops to basically any city in a Democratic-leaning state that just (coincidentally!) has a Black mayor.

At a press conference Monday announcing that the federal government had seized “direct” control of D.C.’s police department and that the National Guard would soon occupy the city, Trump warned that if he and his officials decide they “need to,” he will deploy military forces to other Democratic cities, too. The president named a few, including Chicago, Oakland, and Baltimore.

Again, if this were actually about crime, then Republicans might look at how the mayors in those cities have been very successfully reducing crime, often by refocusing the problem.

Baltimore, for example, has seen its murder rate drop at an astounding rate, hitting its lowest level in many, many years, and it’s in large part due to Mayor Brandon Scott realizing that you don’t stop crime by increasing policing, but by treating crime as a type of public health crisis that you fix by treating the actual symptoms, including poverty, racism, and historical violence (some of which is perpetrated by law enforcement).

Baltimore’s success in lowering violent crime rates not through increased law enforcement, but through better community support should be a lesson for anyone who actually wants to reduce crime.

Indeed, Balko’s piece also notes that if you look at the cities in the study Trump cited with the biggest increase in murder rates, more than half are in red states with Republican mayors:

Seven of the 23 cities in the study cited by the White House actually showed an increase in homicides last year. Four of those — including the top two (Indianapolis and Lexington) are in red states. The city with the largest increase — Lexington — has a Republican mayor. Send the National Guard to Lexington!

But MAGA folks don’t give a shit about crime in reality. It’s just a convenient excuse for them to exert control and power over those they see as refusing to kowtow to their unprecedented power grab.

Donald Trump has declared war on US cities because the people there don’t kiss his ass enough, and he’s sending in the troops, effectively saying that the military invasions will continue until the loyalty improves.

Filed Under: , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Trump’s Military Campaign Against American Cities Expands”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
72 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

When you have an idea for an effective form of protest that doesn’t involve violence⁠—and I’m asking about generalized ideas, not specific protests/plans/whatever⁠—you let me know. Otherwise, every time you whine about “ineffective” protests, all anyone should infer from such posts is that you believe liberals should start killing MAGA assholes en masse to really “make a difference”.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:

Well here’s someone right there who’s openly said, “Just kill all the republicans!” and I don’t see your hypocritical ass whining about it being wrong.

Like all liberals, you’re just looking to score ass-pats from your fellows and if it ever came to “fight or die” you’d throw right in with the fascists.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

here’s someone right there who’s openly said, “Just kill all the republicans!” and I don’t see your hypocritical ass whining about it being wrong

I’ve made my stances on political violence, violence in defense of self or others, and violence in general well-known to you and to others. Does every American Muslim have to condemn every act of violence or terrorism committed by a Muslim anywhere else in the world every time such an act occurs?

I understand the sentiment that the OP of this thread expressed. I don’t agree with or condone it, though. And even if I do condemn it, you’ll hit right back with “oh, so you just want people to die, then, you fucking Nazi collaborator” or some other bad-faith argument. Heads you win, tails I lose⁠—and I’m not playing that rigged game with you. So let me lay this out for you in case you haven’t gotten the message I’ve been trying to send you:

I don’t condone or endorse acts of violence meant to generate a politically driven outcome (e.g., assassinating a politician). I don’t condone or endorse acts of violence against anyone who isn’t a direct and imminent threat to the safety and security of yourself or others. In cases of violence in defense of self or others, such violence should be proportional to the amount of safety needed to escape a violent situation; if lethal violence is the only level of violence that will end the situation, so be it. Like magic in the Discworld series, violence causes far more problems than it solves, so the best way to use violence is to use as little of it as necessary in as few situations as humanly possible.

I don’t practice violence. But I am prepared to inflict it if I ever deem it necessary. Don’t mistake my positions on violence for suicidal pacifism, for I’ve never preached that sort of bullshit and I’ll never tell anyone not to fight for their life if they have to do that. Also: If you do have to fight for your life, don’t fight like a boxer or a martial artist as if you’re in a ring or an MMA octagon⁠—fight like a cornered animal and tear through whatever’s in front of you by any means necessary.

Now, are you quite finished with these bullshit attempts to goad me into endorsing or condoning acts of violence against U.S. politicians, their supporters, and the U.S. military, or are you going to keep laying down this awful bait for however the fuck long you plan on keeping up your weird-as-hell obsession with me and my stance on violence?

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:5

I love the confused absurdity of this comment that just so obviously proves, again, that conservative trolls are desperately trying to twist the language of concepts they don’t understand and it just comes out as word salad.

It’s like reading a hacking scene written by a Hollywood writer. “I’ll create a GUI interface using visual basic and see if I can track an IP address… That sounds like nerd speak to me. Print the script and start filming!”

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:6

Right-wing trolls who try to weaponize the language of inclusion always make their shit too obvious. They want so badly to use that language to hurt the people who use it against them in even the kindest of ways (e.g., “hey, that was kind of shitty what you said back there about [minority demographic], maybe don’t say that any more?”) because they feel like being asked to not be an asshole is the same thing as being oppressed by the government at gunpoint. It’d be hilarious if it weren’t so pitiful.

…eh, what the hell, I’ll laugh anyway. AAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

The new Poe’s Law is the indistinguishability between purported left wing violence advocates and right wing trolls wanting to justify pre-emptive violence against the left.

It’s not that you’re right or wrong about whether violence is necessary to resolve the issue, but just that you’re giving Trump fuel for his claims that he needs to deploy the military to murder civilians in advance of a potential threat.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Two things, one short and one (very) long.

  1. I believe in violence in defense of self or others; don’t mistake my hesitance to endorse political violence for an unwavering belief in suicidal pacifism.
  2. Every time you (or someone like you, but it may as well be you every time for all I give a damn) complains about “ineffective” protests against Trump, I ask you what you think are “effective” ways to protest⁠—and every time, you talk like I’m a fed trying to get you to give up every last detail of your Super Sekrit Master Plan as well as your Social Security number and the names of everyone you’ve ever talked politics with. Alls I’ve ever asked for is generalized ideas, not a down-to-the-second rundown of specific plans or any information that identifies you. Shit, man, I’d be fine with you talking about literally any form of organizing⁠—for both protesting and helping marginalized/vulnerable people outside of protests⁠—but you shut that line of discussion down so often with “nice try, copper” or some other excuse that I’m left to think your only idea for “protesting” Trump is “let’s do a mass murder of MAGA shitheads”. If you have ideas for effective protests of the Trump administration/regime/garbage fire, let’s hear ’em; if not…well, I don’t speak for everyone here, but I’d bet they’re as annoyed with and tired of your whole “YoU cAn’T dAnCe YoUr WaY oUt Of ThIs OnE!!1!” schtick as I am and would very much like you to stop whining about that shit like it happened yesterday and either start talking about what kinds of action (other than violence) would be effective actions or go away forever. And look, I get it: Most Dems are ineffective pissants and well-meaning liberals can have the best of intentions and still do stupid ineffective bullshit. But we’ve all seen you do nothing but shittalk an interpretive dance “protest” that happened months ago. So if you don’t have any actual suggestions here, I suggest shutting the fuck up when grown folks are talking, you sweet summer fetus.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

You can just cut the crap and say you’d fall in line and keep quiet like the good Germans.

I see that you’re once again mistaking my “violence should be the absolute last resort” stance for suicidal pacifism. But there’s also another issue with your bullshit besides your willingness to declare me someone who thinks everyone should die before doing anything to fight against fascism⁠—and no, it’s not your refusal to endorse or suggest generalized ideas for non-violent resistance.

It’s your inability to express what you’re fighting for.

Oh, we all get that you want to fight fascism (and in that context, “fight” almost definitely means “use actual physical violence against”). And hey, I’m more than happy to stand beside people who want to stop fascism⁠—because it can, should, and will be stopped. That said, in all your zeal to start (literally) busting heads, you’re forgetting the most important question that always comes after defeating fascism: What happens next?

Therein lies the root issue with your desire for violence: It’s really not any better than fascism because once fascists take power, their entire modus operandi is to inflict violence⁠—physical and psychological⁠—against the populace which it controls. They don’t have a plan for their success beyond “placate our fears by hurting Repugnant Cultural Others”. The Trump administration is hurting its own supporters in the process, which fascists will always treat as an “acceptable loss” in their war against the Others (and their threat to order). The ideology of fascism is hate and pain; it doesn’t care about making a better world. And neither do people who pin all their hopes on a violent revolution⁠—at least, not in the sense that they have plans beyond “kill ’em all and let God sort ’em out”.

What you’re fighting against doesn’t matter nearly as much as what you’re fighting for. That’s part of the reason Democrats have lost a lot in recent elections, by the by: “I’m not Trump” isn’t enough, on its own, to truly motivate the Dem base. (Neither is the whole Diet Republican schtick.) Zohran Mamdani managed a massive upset in the NYC mayoral primary precisely because he laid out not only what he is fighting against, but what he is fighting for and how he plans to make it happen if he becomes mayor. He has an actual ideology and actual ideas for the future beyond “hey, I’m not a Republican”, and that’s a big part of why he trounced other Democrats in that primary (and is currently the leader of the mayoral race in the polls). The question you have to ask yourself, then, is one that an infamous video game cutscene once asked: “What am I fighting for?”

You haven’t once expressed any notion that you’ve answered that question. Nothing you’ve said in all your time whining about interpretive dance “protests” and street protests and letter writing and everything else you deem ineffective⁠—especially compared to physical violence⁠—has made your stance on the issue clear. So what are you fighting for? What kind of world do you want after the fascists are gone? Because once they’re out of power, there will exist a space where fascism must be replaced; if you’re not absolutely sure about what you want replacing it, and if you can’t convince others to agree with you and fight for what you’re fighting for, the possibility that fascists drop right back into that space and take over again is relatively high⁠—especially if they’re smarter about hiding their bullshit.

That’s part of the reason I keep asking you about non-violent forms of opposition and protest and organizing, by the way. As you work with actual people towards a unified notion of what a post-fascist future looks like, you’ll be able to bring more people to your side and help you work towards that future, and more hands helping you (and everyone else) is never a bad thing. But if your only idea is “kill ’em all”, you probably won’t find too many people willing to wage a civil war with you. Destroying what you hate doesn’t get the job done; saving what you love will.

So go ahead and call me names and imply I’m a suicidal pacifist and all your usual bullshit. It won’t hide the fact that all you’ve got is a dream to see the streets run red with the blood of MAGA adherents and not much else beyond that. And for all your whining about ineffectual protests (that happened months ago and didn’t even make any real headlines or get any real news coverage), you’re ineffectual for the opposite reason: You lack the courage to look past the conflict and imagine a resolution that isn’t merely “we killed the fascists and everyone lived happily ever after”. I’ll ask you once again to sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up when grown folks are talking⁠—at least, until you’re ready to let go of the childish (and often conservative) belief that violence solves more problems than it causes and pick up the belief that what comes after the fight matters as much as, if not more than, the fight itself.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

The Locals Are Cheering

Earlier this week, left wing pundit Joe Scarborough on MSNBC mentioned that his fellow reporters and friends are privately praising the DC crackdown, while publicly voicing opposition. Likely out of fear for their jobs.

For years, these same journalists have been posting stories about the prevalence of crime. Many residents have stopped reporting crime after being demoralized by the lack of police action. This is now a battle between the everyday folks seeing crime as too high, versus the ivory tower intelligencia telling them not to trust their own lying eyes.

Crime is too high, and the regular folks demand action.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

For starters, Scarborough isn’t left-wing; he’s independent.

Secondly, even if they all agree that something needs to be done, the way Trump is doing it isn’t it. You don’t fix homelessness and crime by throwing federal troops at the problem until the “unwelcome” are gone.

And thirdly, the available crime data indicate the crime is at a record-low. So no, you chronic liar, crime isn’t “too high”. That’s just the excuse Trump is using to implement his fascist tactics.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

You don’t fix homelessness and crime by throwing federal troops at the problem until the “unwelcome” are gone.

You do if you’re a knuckle-dragging fascist.

For the life of me, I don’t understand why anyone here still tries to engage Koby as if he participates in good faith. He’s just here to play word games in an attempt to disconcert the good-faith commenters and readers.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re:

It’s funny how those “crime is up” vibes always apply to cities with large populations of non-white demographics. For all their talk of being brave warriors with warrior spirits who will bravely fight the good fight and all that useless macho horseshit, they sure seem more than happy to admit they’re afraid of going out in public in the same cities they swear they’ll protect/liberate.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Strawb (profile) says:

Re:

This is precisely why Democrat and corporate media approval numbers are at multi-decade lows. Middle America no longer trusts the system.

Hmm, interesting…

So when “the system” says crime is down, you’re skeptical, but when “the system” says Democrat approval numbers are also down, you instantly believe it.

One would almost think you were biased, Koward.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Then where, oh where, is the objective and credible proof that crime numbers aren’t at historic lows? And by the by, Brave Sir Koby (Who Will Now Bravely Run Away): The word of a convicted felon whose mental acuity is questionable at best, or the word of his ass-kissing cronies who have every reason to lie for them (and for him), are not credible sources for the evidence you claim to have but will inexplicably never share with us.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Koby (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Objective crime statistics will never be compiled, when area police are cooking the books, and the citizens stopped reporting out of frustration. The credible source is the experience of middle America. When the people are cheering on the crackdown, then it’s a political question. Those that listen the most will win best.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:3

The credible source is the experience of middle America.

Middle America doesn’t live 24/7 in Washington, D.C.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence; you have yet to provide any credible evidence that the statistics you question have been falsified in favor of Democrats, communists, trans people, or whatever bogeyman you and your right-wing handlers have come up with week. Either provide us the evidence or fuck off, but stop with this “Middle America is the real and true voice of America” bullshit. You might be so afraid of big cities that you cry yourself to sleep at night thinking about how scary places like Los Angeles or New York City are because of their diverse populations, but the people who live in those cities have voices that are equally as valid as those from “Middle America”, no matter how much you wish that the voices (and lives) of queer people, people of color, women, and non-Christians didn’t matter.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
MrWilson (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

It’s not just that it’s wrong, it’s biased.

The irony of this statement coming from you will never stop being sad and hilarious at the same time. We should find a way to harness this as an energy source so we can power civilization until the heat death of the universe.

That One Guy (profile) says:

'The few. The proud. The not-anyone-in-the-US-military anymore.'

And I’m sure having military forces on the street and direct federal control of the city’s police will not at all be used as intimidation when it comes to any politicians that might get ‘uppity’ and challenge the Dear Leader’s decrees…

As much blame as Trump deserves for this never forget or allow them to forget that all this military occupation of domestic cities that the regime has openly stated they want to ‘liberate’ from their democratically elected representatives would amount to nothing if the military simply refused to follow along.

At this point the modern US military has shown without question that the only thing that differentiates them from german soldiers from the WW2 era is the uniforms and language of their orders.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Hunter Bidens art dealer says:

Lol

So now Baltimore is safe too? Lol. Joe Scarborough, like the author also a TDS victim who viciously despises Trump, said the hypocrisy by liberals and Democrats is interesting .

“I actually heard from a reporter when this happened, going, ‘Well, you know, if he doesn’t overreach, this could actually be a good thing for quality of life,’ etc, because in DC right now, I had this happen to my family and I had that, and they go down the list. And then I saw him tweet something completely different.”

Scarborough, who said he’s lived in DC for more than three decades, added that crime isn’t as bad as it was two or three years ago, but it still was not a safe city.

“It’s certainly not as safe as the nation’s capital should be.”

Anonymous Coward says:

https://bsky.app/profile/marisakabas.bsky.social/post/3lwjq7swly225

Oh look, they’re not even afraid to hide it anymore.

Guess we’d better have another day or two of people standing around for a few hours. It’ll work this time. For sure.

Because as well all know thanks to our intellectual superiors here, any kind of physical resistance is morally wrong and makes you worse than them.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

any kind of physical resistance is morally wrong

You’re mistaking my hesitance to condone political violence (i.e., assassinations) for a denouncement of violence as a form of defense of self or others (which I have never done). And the only reason you’re doing that is so you can keep trying to goad me into accepting your notion that violence is the only answer. I’m not going to endorse political violence, you can’t make me, and even if you could make me, passive aggressiveness and garbage insults won’t help you get the job done.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

There’s so much hypocritical irony in people who advocate for others to risk their lives while it’s quite apparent they’re too busy trolling forums with such advocacy instead out there living up to their own self-proclaimed ideals. If they have time to type, they have time to bash the fash. But somehow others are at fault for the lack of action on that front…

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...