BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to 
FTC Opens Up Bullshit Investigation Into Media Matters For Highlighting Ads Next To Nazi Content On ExTwitter
from the federal-trade-censorship dept
The timing here is incredible. The very same day that the FTC’s “public inquiry” into “big tech censorship” closes, that very same FTC opens an investigation not into “big tech,” but rather Media Matters. Yes, the very same Media Matters that Elon Musk has been trying to silence through the censorial abuse of the court systems in multiple countries because the non-profit dared to… write an article showing ads from big companies appearing next to neo-Nazi content on ExTwitter.
The Federal Trade Commission on Wednesday opened an investigation into Media Matters, a liberal advocacy organization that has published research on hateful and antisemitic content on X, according to two people familiar with the inquiry.
The regulator said in a letter sent to the organization that it was investigating the group, which is aligned with Democrats, over whether it illegally colluded with advertisers, according to the people. The letter, a copy of which was seen by The New York Times, required the organization to share copies of its budgets, documents showing the effects of “harmful” online content on advertisers, and communications with other watchdog groups.
So let me get this straight: the FTC just spent months soliciting comments about “big tech censorship,” and its immediate follow-up is to… investigate the speech of a nonprofit that criticized big tech, and is being punished already through a series of civil SLAPP suits in multiple countries designed to chill its speech? Nothing says “fighting censorship” like launching a federal investigation into a nonprofit’s journalism.
This isn’t speculation or hyperbole — courts have already called this exact playbook against the same organization over the identical issue exactly what it is: censorial retaliation. After Elon got mad, the suck-up attorneys general of Texas and Missouri both tried to launch fishing expedition investigations into Media Matters, but a court shut that shit down. And the judge didn’t mince many words in calling out what abusive nonsense this was:
Defendant’s investigation of Media Matters is “retaliatory action sufficient to deter a person of ordinary firmness in plaintiff’s position from speaking again[.]” … “[T]he threat of invoking legal sanctions” is sufficient to deter protected speech. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58, 67 (1963). So, too, is the “threat of administrative and judicial intrusion into newsgathering and editorial process” that arises from official process and its possible enforcement. … These potential punitive consequences, as well as possible judicial intervention to enforce the CID, make Plaintiffs’ claim of chilled expression objectively reasonable.
There is more. “The compelled production of a reporter’s resource materials can constitute a significant intrusion . . . [that] may substantially undercut the public policy in favor of the free flow of information to the public[.]”
Ferguson apparently read this judicial smackdown and thought, “hold my beer.”
To be fair, Ferguson did telegraph this move. When he was auditioning for the FTC chair job, he specifically promised to “investigate and prosecute collusion on… advertiser boycotts.” The irony is that this promise appears directly above his pledge to end “politically motivated investigations.”
You almost have to admire the efficiency here. Ferguson manages to launch a politically motivated investigation while simultaneously promising to end politically motivated investigations. He’s using government power to silence criticism while pretending to be crusading against censorship.
It is, of course, the way of MAGA, where every false accusation is actually a confession of what they intend to do.
Anyway, where are all those people who claimed that an angry email from a Biden administration official was the greatest censorship threat ever? You’d think an actual government investigation targeting a nonprofit’s journalism might merit at least a tweet. But apparently, censorship is only bad when it happens to people you like.
Filed Under: 1st amendment, advertising, andrew ferguson, censorship, collusion, elon musk, ftc, investigation
Companies: media matters, twitter, x
Comments on “FTC Opens Up Bullshit Investigation Into Media Matters For Highlighting Ads Next To Nazi Content On ExTwitter”
“It’s only a politically motivated investigation when Democrats do it.” — Republicans, probably
Re:
That’s not a surprise because Democrats try to make decisions in a political manner while Republicans just apply common sense. Like, let themselves be guided by their most primitive urges.
Not doing what your guts want and not hating on whom your gut wants requires tempering your impulses, and that is a form of policing.
Inquiring into injustices that would correspond with your first urges is always a politically motivated investigation.
The whole Constitution as a “why and how to get along” prescription is politically motivated.
A spontaneous lynch mob rarely is (while a Klan-organized one may well be). That does not make it a good thing.
Re:
“It’s fine when dems do it”
Stephen Too Stoned probably
Nothing actionable will come of this, even under the Trump admin. Like the Musk suits, the goal is to drain them of resources and try to get as many donors and internal communications made public as possible in the hopes of finding something they can use to ACORN the thing, because democrats are utterly spineless and will just go along with the right wing media’s misrepresentation of these things rather than stand with their allies and call bullsht, bullsht.
You swallowed the kool-aid
But it did not happen. That censorship was entirely imaginary, and by treating it as equivalent to the actual censorship happening now, you validate their past lies and support their bullshit-based whataboutism.
The correct description would be “But apparently, censorship is only bad when you halluscinate about it happening to people you like.”
And, now we know that what Media Matters did was the right thing. Keep it up!
And the really stupid thing here is Media Matters didn’t censor X…
Not in a First Admendment sense… – they couldn’t, because they’re not Government,
And it’s not like a politically motivated boycott is illegal, being a online nazi bar isn’t a protected category under federal law.
No, they have to shoehorn it into a bogus consumer protection restraintof trade argument.
The Trump FTC apprently fine with the boycotts of Target and Miller light..
But more importantly, because all Media Matters did was speak out..
They have no ability to actually block X from speaking….
Unlike Elon, who can actually block people from speakimg on X
So they put more speech on the table..
At best they might persuade people not to spend money there.
When reality itself is considered an enemy then telling the truth becomes a criminal act.
Elon might not like how they covered him but it seems like a case of journalism to me.