Hide Three days left! Support our fundraiser by January 5th and get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin »

FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge For Allegedly Obstructing The Arrest Of An Undocumented Immigrant

from the might-makes-far-right dept

Oh hooray. Another part of our new normal under Trump 2.0. Here’s the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel with the gory details:

Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was charged April 25 with two felonies on allegations of trying to help an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest after he appeared in her courtroom.

According to a 13-page complaint, Dugan, 65, is accused of obstructing a U.S. agency and concealing an individual to prevent an arrest. The two charges carry a maximum penalty of six years in prison and a $350,000 fine, but sentences in cases involving nonviolent offenses typically are much shorter.

Arresting a judge is an extremely rare occurrence. If it does happen, it usually follows months of investigation and massive amounts of evidence of criminal activity. In this case, it took less than a week and mostly hinges on the statements of a single court deputy and the allegations of federal officers who were free to assume the worst about the few things they did manage to witness first-hand. On top of that, the arrest was made at the courthouse, as though the judge posed some sort of a flight risk if she wasn’t apprehended in public at her place of government employment.

All very shitty. And all too familiar. There’s some precedent for this. Guess when that happened.

A Massachusetts judge who allegedly gave a “reasonable impression” that she was allowing an immigrant to evade federal custody was “less than fully candid” when asked about the incident, according to an ethics complaint filed Monday.

The judge, Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph of Massachusetts, is accused of willful misconduct in the ethics complaint.

[…]

Joseph had once faced federal charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice over the April 2018 incident in the Newton, Massachusetts, courthouse.

Prosecutors had alleged that Joseph allowed Medina-Perez to go downstairs to the lockup, supposedly to retrieve property. The immigrant was then allowed to leave through a back door by a court officer. The charges were dropped in September 2022 after Joseph agreed to report herself to the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct.

[Strokes chin thoughtfully] What could be the details that connect these two anomalies? What indeed. Allegedly helping an immigrant avoid interloping federal officers looking to make their jobs easier by poaching people outside courtrooms following court appearances? Check. President Trump in office? Check.

As noted in the above report, the felony obstruction charges were dropped and replaced with an ethics complaint. We’ll have to wait and see how this one goes, but so far, Trump Administration officials are treating it like a law and order win. The head of the FBI, Kash Patel, tweeted, de-tweeted, and tweeted again about how proud he was his agency was right there to bring an obstructionist judge to heel. Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed this report on xTwitter, pretending this was just good government business, rather than the KGB-esque removal of, shall we say, a competing viewpoint in the marketplace of mass deportation ideas.

There’s a 13-page charging document [PDF] written by FBI Special Agent Lindsay Schloemer that portrays this as some sort of criminal conspiracy, rather than just a sympathetic judge being unwilling to let federal agents use her court as some sort of temporary holding cell for immigration arrests. It’s all written in accordance with the FBI Charging Document Style Guide — something capable of portraying someone pointing someone to an alternate exit as the equivalent to being the driver in a bank robbery getaway car.

But before we dip into that a bit, I must highlight one of most hilarious “training and experience” assertions I’ve ever seen in a warrant affidavit:

I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and have been so employed since 2014. I am currently assigned to the Milwaukee Field Office. As such, I am an investigative or law enforcement agent of the United States authorized under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3052, that is, an officer of the United States who is empowered by law to conduct investigations, to make arrests, and to collect evidence for various violations of federal law. I am also a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) and worked as a CPA for seven years before my employment with the FBI.

Nice. Useless in this specific situation, but one should always have a fall-back career. Apparently, arresting judges is the agent’s fall-back career, because Schloemer goes on to point out their white collar crime bona fides before getting around to justifying the arrest of a county judge just because federal agents (including a DEA agent because that’s what we’re doing these days) were forced to run an extra 50-100 feet to apprehend Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, whose main evasive effort was (and this is all in the charging document!) using an elevator that was further away than the one federal agents assumed made more sense to use. I am not kidding.

After leaving the Chief Judge’s vestibule and returning to the public hallway, DEA Agent A reported that Flores-Ruiz and his attorney were in the public hallway. DEA Agent B also observed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney in the hallway near Courtroom 615 and noted that Flores. Ruiz was looking around the hallway. From different vantage points, both agents observed Flores- Ruiz and his counsel walk briskly towards the elevator bank on the south end of the sixth floor. | am familiar with the layout of the sixth floor of the courthouse and know that the south elevators are not the closest elevators to Courtroom 615, and therefore it appears that Flores-Ruiz and his counsel elected not to use the closest elevator bank to Courtroom 615.

Whatever. It really doesn’t matter. The allegations claim the judge diverted officers, ushered Flores-Ruiz out through the jury exit, and otherwise tried to impede this arrest. The chief judge also seemed a little concerned about the swarm of federal officers trying to poach exiting court attendees and expressed a desire to formalize where in the courthouse it was appropriate to make these arrests. In the end, the agents were momentarily inconvenienced.

Even if all of claims are factual, the FBI had several options to use, including the one that left it up to the DOJ to file an ethics complaint, rather than expedite a felony complaint against a judge — an action that’s just as inexcusable as it was back in 2018. But this administration is dead set on proving to everyone it will go after anyone and anything that even momentarily halts the progress of its fascist designs. And in doing so, it’s adding yet another black eye to US history, one it can only hope it remains in power long enough to retcon.

Filed Under: , , , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge For Allegedly Obstructing The Arrest Of An Undocumented Immigrant”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
49 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
BernardoVerda (profile) says:

Aparrently, there are two elevators in that public hall — one giving access to the street exit, and the other giving access to the parking garage (and there’s prominent signage indicating which was where).

Imagine the contempt for Law that this arrestee and his lawyer both displayed in this deplorable incident, first by appearing before a judge in court of their own volition, and secondly, when their business was done, having the chutzpah to head for the correct elevator!

Monsters like this are truly a threat — not only to Law and Order, but to The American Way itself! They must therefor be dealt with harshly, and shipped out of the country with all (un)due haste, without recourse to foppish remedies such as human dignity or due process.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

What do you want a citation for? The part where the judge was explicitly told “we want to arrest this guy” or the part where the judge tells the guy to leave through the jury door? Tell me, what do you think the judge’s intentions were? To give the guy a tour of the courthouse?

BernardoVerda (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

How about the part (agreed by both sides) that the agents admitted they didn’t have a proper judicial warrant — just an “administrative warrant”.

(An administrative warrant is just a fancy-looking piece of paper which the agents can fill out and sign themselves — no actual judge involved — in other words, not a real warrant that carries any weight in law.)

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Your comment makes no sense. We don’t need a citation for that part since everyone agrees. But as far as I can tell, ICE doesn’t need a judicial warrant to detain someone.

And yeah, the administrative warrant doesn’t do much legally. The one thing the administrative warrant does do, in this particular case, is put the judge on notice that they came to the courthouse intending to arrest this particular guy.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

You’re alleging they went out the normal door? That’s certainly not what the documents claim.

Defense counsel and Flores-Ruiz then walked toward each other and toward the public courtroom exit. The courtroom deputy then saw Judge DUGAN get up and heard Judge DUGAN say something like “Wait, come with me.”

Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge DUGAN then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the jury door which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re: You been advised that you are a fucking idiot

“Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz”

I have an administrate warrant for you. It says you are a fucking idiot. It has the same legal authority as theirs did.

BernardoVerda (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Actually, the documents were very careful to not clearly state any such claim (which would be perjury), but merely imply such to an uninformed or superficial reader.

There was literally no way for Flores-Ruiz to exit except through the public hallway — where at least two agents in that hall saw Florez-Ruiz and his lawyer leaving. One of the agents even rode down with them on the elevator.

The agents testimony was an exercise in how to spin innocent facts (mostly by blatant slanting and careful exclusion of immediately relevant facts) to make it look like the judge was doing something hinky.

But all the judge did was tell them “Hold on. You don’t have a valid warrant. And you don’t have a valid reason to be in my courtroom. You have no right to disrupt the court’s business. See the courthouse administrator about how to handle this.”

This is nothing but an attempt to make a fight out of thin air, as a way to intimidate the courts so they won’t get in the way by upholding trivialities like the Law, the Constitution, or Due Process.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:2

Actually, the documents were very careful to not clearly state any such claim

I’m not sure what you mean by “such claim”. The part I quoted is literally from the documents, and I didn’t say much else in that comment.

There was literally no way for Flores-Ruiz to exit except through the public hallway

Probably true; I assume every elevator is in a public hallway. But the judge stopped the guy from exiting from the normal door and sent him to another area so he’d enter that public hallway from somewhere unexpected. Why did she do that? I claim that it’s because she hoped the agents would be watching the courtroom door and he’d be able to slip away. (And it almost worked; only the one agent managed to get on the elevator with him. The guy got outside and started running.) I don’t believe there is any other plausible reason why she did that.

“And you don’t have a valid reason to be in my courtroom.”

They weren’t IN her courtroom in the first place! She literally had to leave her courtroom in order to talk to them!

Also, you generally don’t need a reason to be present. The accused has a right to a public trial, and that includes most pretrial hearings being open to the public. They couldn’t arrest the guy in the courtroom since that would have been directly disruptive to the court proceedings, but they had every right to be in attendance.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Are you claiming that every ICE arrest needs a judicial warrant? I’m admittedly having trouble locating the law which says they do or do not. But Newsweek says: “Under current U.S. law, an ICE agent can arrest an undocumented person found in public spaces without a judicial warrant.” https://www.newsweek.com/ice-warrant-explainer-trump-deportation-raid-questions-2025400

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Tanner Andrews (profile) says:

Re: judge did what was proper

But she can’t actively aid someone in evading arrest.

Historically, we as a people have decided that we want people to show up for court, whether as witnesses, parties, or otherwise. As a result, we have frequently held that service of process cannot be effected against someone coming or going to court.

What the judge did is, essentially, uphold a couple hundred years of tradition and common law whose justification is still sound today. Sane people may commend her, and magats will of course celebrate the arrest.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Bull. I have personally served someone process who had shown up for court, in the hallway outside the courtroom. In Wisconsin. (My boss at the process serving company explicitly told me to serve him there. OK, maybe you don’t trust my boss, but his attorney was present and didn’t tell me I couldn’t do that.)

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
That One Guy (profile) says:

The party of law and order yet again encourages people to break the law

Ah yes, what possible reason could a judge have for not wanting federal agents to use their courtroom as an easy way to score arrests on people that willingly showed up to court, incentivizing those people to instead pull a republican and just start ignoring the law and legal orders…

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
RP says:

Judge Hannah Dugan was trying to prevent obstruction of justice

It will be an uphill battle to get this past a Grand Jury and probable motion to dismiss. DOJ accuses Judge Hannah Dugan of:

18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

Presumably this part:

“Whoever corruptly … endeavors to … impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States …”

Heavy lifting:

  • Prove that keeping ICE from scaring people away from their due process in a State Courthouse is some sort of corrupt intent
  • Prove that ICE serving an administrative warrant (not from an Article III court) in a State Courthouse is “due and proper” when the published handbook says it is not
  • Prove serving an administrative warrant is in furtherance of a pending proceeding

18 U.S. Code § 1071 – Concealing person from arrest

Presumably, this part:

“Whoever harbors or conceals any person for whose arrest a warrant or process has been issued under the provisions of any law of the United States, so as to prevent his discovery and arrest, after notice or knowledge of the fact that a warrant or process has been issued for the apprehension of such person”

Heavy lifting:

  • How is directing a person not to exit directly into waiting ICE agents a form of concealment? or harboring when the complaint is that the judge showed the guy to an exit?
  • Discovery was not impeded, arrest in public spaces was not impeded since the judge took no action in public spaces.

They could have gotten a judicial warrant and arrested the suspected undocumented migrant, Mr. Flores-Ruiz, inside Judge Hannah Dugan’s courtroom, but instead they staked out her courtroom with only an administrative warrant and waited for him to come out a door into a semi-public hallway. The judge noticed, told them to check with the head judge if their conduct was authorized because it looked like it was going to obstruct the justice of the state courthouse, as he faces some criminal charges which look like they will now never be adjudicated, and he exited a different door to the same semi-public hallway. They saw him, rode down in the same elevator car as him, and arrested him outside the courthouse.

They they come back, arrest her, perp-walk her, castigate her in the media in violation of DOJ policy, and she is released on her own recognizance to await a possible indictment from a grand jury to which she could have an arraignment (pled guilty or not guilty) by May 15. That’s not normal when it comes down to a matter of legal interpretation between a trained lawyer/jurist and some CPA who works for the FBI operating on notes left by 6 ICE/CBP/FBI/DEA undercover agents without legal training. A normal DOJ would have given her the opportunity as a legal professional and officer of the court to self-surrender, instead of tactics to inspire fear of our own government.

As to a future motion to dismiss:

Since the defendant, Mr. Flores-Ruiz, had constitutional right to due process, and an immediate ICE arrest would nullify any outcome of the scheduled hearing in Judge Dugan’s courtroom that he voluntarily participated in, letting him walk into an ICE ambush that she had became aware of would seem to violate his rights under the U.S. Constitution, effectively obstructing the justice that he was entitled to, and with this mindset Judge Dugan would not have any corrupt intent evidenced by showing the defendant an alternative exit that the one ICE anticipated thus she cannot have corruptly obstructed justice while preventing ICE from obstructing justice. And if that is the case, the charge that showing the defendant to an alternate exit is somehow harboring or concealing him from arrest is equally void, since if the government wanted to make her courtroom the site of the arrest they could have secured a judicial warrant and have the supremacy clause of the Constitution on their side and arrested him INSIDE the courtroom — instead they wanted to play dress-up secret police and arrest him at the exit to her courtroom.

That’s a long way to case dismissed, I think.

But that’s an adversarial argument, not something that happens before the magistrate judge at either the complaint stage nor the 4 minute hearing where the judge was released on her own recognizance.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

someoneinnorthms (profile) says:

If she knew a warrant existed and led through subject of the warrant into an area where he could not otherwise have gained entrance, she’s guilty of a crime.

The question of whether she committed a crime is really an easy one. The harder question is whether it should be prosecuted. I think it should be prosecuted because it sends the message that one cannot assist someone with a warrant escape service of that warrant. Her actions in removing the person were not related to her judicial duties–completely unrelated.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

“If she knew a warrant existed and led through subject of the warrant into an area where he could not otherwise have gained entrance, she’s guilty of a crime.“

There wasn’t a warrant
It was a semi public area they had a right to be in
Not remotely

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

It was a semi public area they had a right to be in

Was it? According to the charging document, the jury door “leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse” and “only deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by deputies used the back jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the jury door.”

buttwipinglord (profile) says:

Re: Re:

Rethignican sycophants can lie and claim anything they want in their nonsense reports. Doesn’t make it a fact.

Anyone left doing anything at the behest of the King and his thugs is immediately untrustworthy. Every fascist POS in this admin has already had a loooong track record of outright provable lies and falsehoods they have spewed. That makes everything they do a reasonable lie and distortion of reality.

And that tracks with 100% of every single thing they have done within the last 100 days.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...