FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge For Allegedly Obstructing The Arrest Of An Undocumented Immigrant
from the might-makes-far-right dept
Oh hooray. Another part of our new normal under Trump 2.0. Here’s the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel with the gory details:
Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan was charged April 25 with two felonies on allegations of trying to help an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest after he appeared in her courtroom.
According to a 13-page complaint, Dugan, 65, is accused of obstructing a U.S. agency and concealing an individual to prevent an arrest. The two charges carry a maximum penalty of six years in prison and a $350,000 fine, but sentences in cases involving nonviolent offenses typically are much shorter.
Arresting a judge is an extremely rare occurrence. If it does happen, it usually follows months of investigation and massive amounts of evidence of criminal activity. In this case, it took less than a week and mostly hinges on the statements of a single court deputy and the allegations of federal officers who were free to assume the worst about the few things they did manage to witness first-hand. On top of that, the arrest was made at the courthouse, as though the judge posed some sort of a flight risk if she wasn’t apprehended in public at her place of government employment.
All very shitty. And all too familiar. There’s some precedent for this. Guess when that happened.
A Massachusetts judge who allegedly gave a “reasonable impression” that she was allowing an immigrant to evade federal custody was “less than fully candid” when asked about the incident, according to an ethics complaint filed Monday.
The judge, Judge Shelley M. Richmond Joseph of Massachusetts, is accused of willful misconduct in the ethics complaint.
[…]
Joseph had once faced federal charges of conspiracy to obstruct justice over the April 2018 incident in the Newton, Massachusetts, courthouse.
Prosecutors had alleged that Joseph allowed Medina-Perez to go downstairs to the lockup, supposedly to retrieve property. The immigrant was then allowed to leave through a back door by a court officer. The charges were dropped in September 2022 after Joseph agreed to report herself to the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial Conduct.
[Strokes chin thoughtfully] What could be the details that connect these two anomalies? What indeed. Allegedly helping an immigrant avoid interloping federal officers looking to make their jobs easier by poaching people outside courtrooms following court appearances? Check. President Trump in office? Check.
As noted in the above report, the felony obstruction charges were dropped and replaced with an ethics complaint. We’ll have to wait and see how this one goes, but so far, Trump Administration officials are treating it like a law and order win. The head of the FBI, Kash Patel, tweeted, de-tweeted, and tweeted again about how proud he was his agency was right there to bring an obstructionist judge to heel. Attorney General Pam Bondi confirmed this report on xTwitter, pretending this was just good government business, rather than the KGB-esque removal of, shall we say, a competing viewpoint in the marketplace of mass deportation ideas.
There’s a 13-page charging document [PDF] written by FBI Special Agent Lindsay Schloemer that portrays this as some sort of criminal conspiracy, rather than just a sympathetic judge being unwilling to let federal agents use her court as some sort of temporary holding cell for immigration arrests. It’s all written in accordance with the FBI Charging Document Style Guide — something capable of portraying someone pointing someone to an alternate exit as the equivalent to being the driver in a bank robbery getaway car.
But before we dip into that a bit, I must highlight one of most hilarious “training and experience” assertions I’ve ever seen in a warrant affidavit:
I am a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) and have been so employed since 2014. I am currently assigned to the Milwaukee Field Office. As such, I am an investigative or law enforcement agent of the United States authorized under Title 18, United States Code, Section 3052, that is, an officer of the United States who is empowered by law to conduct investigations, to make arrests, and to collect evidence for various violations of federal law. I am also a Certified Public Accountant (“CPA”) and worked as a CPA for seven years before my employment with the FBI.
Nice. Useless in this specific situation, but one should always have a fall-back career. Apparently, arresting judges is the agent’s fall-back career, because Schloemer goes on to point out their white collar crime bona fides before getting around to justifying the arrest of a county judge just because federal agents (including a DEA agent because that’s what we’re doing these days) were forced to run an extra 50-100 feet to apprehend Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, whose main evasive effort was (and this is all in the charging document!) using an elevator that was further away than the one federal agents assumed made more sense to use. I am not kidding.
After leaving the Chief Judge’s vestibule and returning to the public hallway, DEA Agent A reported that Flores-Ruiz and his attorney were in the public hallway. DEA Agent B also observed Flores-Ruiz and his attorney in the hallway near Courtroom 615 and noted that Flores. Ruiz was looking around the hallway. From different vantage points, both agents observed Flores- Ruiz and his counsel walk briskly towards the elevator bank on the south end of the sixth floor. | am familiar with the layout of the sixth floor of the courthouse and know that the south elevators are not the closest elevators to Courtroom 615, and therefore it appears that Flores-Ruiz and his counsel elected not to use the closest elevator bank to Courtroom 615.
Whatever. It really doesn’t matter. The allegations claim the judge diverted officers, ushered Flores-Ruiz out through the jury exit, and otherwise tried to impede this arrest. The chief judge also seemed a little concerned about the swarm of federal officers trying to poach exiting court attendees and expressed a desire to formalize where in the courthouse it was appropriate to make these arrests. In the end, the agents were momentarily inconvenienced.
Even if all of claims are factual, the FBI had several options to use, including the one that left it up to the DOJ to file an ethics complaint, rather than expedite a felony complaint against a judge — an action that’s just as inexcusable as it was back in 2018. But this administration is dead set on proving to everyone it will go after anyone and anything that even momentarily halts the progress of its fascist designs. And in doing so, it’s adding yet another black eye to US history, one it can only hope it remains in power long enough to retcon.
Filed Under: dea, doj, fbi, hannah dugan, ice, immigration, kash patel, milwaukee county, pam bondi, wisconsin
Three days left! Support our fundraiser by January 5th and




Comments on “FBI Arrests Wisconsin Judge For Allegedly Obstructing The Arrest Of An Undocumented Immigrant”
Fascist anti American clay Higgins has said he wants to arrest 100 more judges.
We are at the “they came for…” point already of the nazis.
Re:
We’re no where near the part where the henchmen trot out the “just following orders” defense.
Re: Re:
?
The hell are you talking about? That’s already happening.
I was before this country was so efficient, now it only need a 13-page complaint.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
I’m not sure what other investigation was needed here that would take months. The witnesses tended to be government employees who didn’t need to be tracked down or coerced to speak. Or are judges mostly above the law and shouldn’t be arrested unless it’s something massive?
Re: Re:
Finding evidence other than the “he said, she said” variety, obviously, you racist dipshit.
Re: Re: Re:
I don’t know what other evidence you expect to be possible. It’s not like they’re going to look for DNA or something in a case like this.
Re: Re: Re:2
AC’s response either flew way high over your head, or you are MAGAt scum. Which is it?
Re: Re:
At the very least, they should have gone to a grand jury first. Just to make sure they actually have something that can look like a case if you squint at it right.
Well, unless they were afraid of the judge fleeing the country. Which they weren’t.
Aparrently, there are two elevators in that public hall — one giving access to the street exit, and the other giving access to the parking garage (and there’s prominent signage indicating which was where).
Imagine the contempt for Law that this arrestee and his lawyer both displayed in this deplorable incident, first by appearing before a judge in court of their own volition, and secondly, when their business was done, having the chutzpah to head for the correct elevator!
Monsters like this are truly a threat — not only to Law and Order, but to The American Way itself! They must therefor be dealt with harshly, and shipped out of the country with all (un)due haste, without recourse to foppish remedies such as human dignity or due process.
Between County Court and where Flores-Ruiz has been apprehended (State Street – 10th Street junction), there is about 200 yards. But maybe FBI training is not what it used to be.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
The judge took actions designed to thwart the federal agents that the judge knew were there to arrest him. She has no obligation to cooperate with them. But she can’t actively aid someone in evading arrest. So color me less than outraged.
Re:
Making shit up, that’s what dumb fucks do all the time. You have no idea what you’re talking about, just fuck off.
Re:
[citation needed]
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
What do you want a citation for? The part where the judge was explicitly told “we want to arrest this guy” or the part where the judge tells the guy to leave through the jury door? Tell me, what do you think the judge’s intentions were? To give the guy a tour of the courthouse?
Re: Re: Re:
How about the part (agreed by both sides) that the agents admitted they didn’t have a proper judicial warrant — just an “administrative warrant”.
(An administrative warrant is just a fancy-looking piece of paper which the agents can fill out and sign themselves — no actual judge involved — in other words, not a real warrant that carries any weight in law.)
Re: Re: Re:2
Your comment makes no sense. We don’t need a citation for that part since everyone agrees. But as far as I can tell, ICE doesn’t need a judicial warrant to detain someone.
And yeah, the administrative warrant doesn’t do much legally. The one thing the administrative warrant does do, in this particular case, is put the judge on notice that they came to the courthouse intending to arrest this particular guy.
Re:
By… Pointing them out the normal door?
Re: Re:
You’re alleging they went out the normal door? That’s certainly not what the documents claim.
Re: Re: Re: You been advised that you are a fucking idiot
“Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz”
I have an administrate warrant for you. It says you are a fucking idiot. It has the same legal authority as theirs did.
Re: Re: Re:
Actually, the documents were very careful to not clearly state any such claim (which would be perjury), but merely imply such to an uninformed or superficial reader.
There was literally no way for Flores-Ruiz to exit except through the public hallway — where at least two agents in that hall saw Florez-Ruiz and his lawyer leaving. One of the agents even rode down with them on the elevator.
The agents testimony was an exercise in how to spin innocent facts (mostly by blatant slanting and careful exclusion of immediately relevant facts) to make it look like the judge was doing something hinky.
But all the judge did was tell them “Hold on. You don’t have a valid warrant. And you don’t have a valid reason to be in my courtroom. You have no right to disrupt the court’s business. See the courthouse administrator about how to handle this.”
This is nothing but an attempt to make a fight out of thin air, as a way to intimidate the courts so they won’t get in the way by upholding trivialities like the Law, the Constitution, or Due Process.
Re: Re: Re:2
I’m not sure what you mean by “such claim”. The part I quoted is literally from the documents, and I didn’t say much else in that comment.
Probably true; I assume every elevator is in a public hallway. But the judge stopped the guy from exiting from the normal door and sent him to another area so he’d enter that public hallway from somewhere unexpected. Why did she do that? I claim that it’s because she hoped the agents would be watching the courtroom door and he’d be able to slip away. (And it almost worked; only the one agent managed to get on the elevator with him. The guy got outside and started running.) I don’t believe there is any other plausible reason why she did that.
They weren’t IN her courtroom in the first place! She literally had to leave her courtroom in order to talk to them!
Also, you generally don’t need a reason to be present. The accused has a right to a public trial, and that includes most pretrial hearings being open to the public. They couldn’t arrest the guy in the courtroom since that would have been directly disruptive to the court proceedings, but they had every right to be in attendance.
Re: Re:
Actually, the judge did no such thing. The signs above the elevators did that, so maybe we should arrest whoever made the decision to have those signs in place next.
Re:
She took action to defend rule of law against lawless criminals.
Re: Re:
Allegedly
Re:
Is that honestly the best you useful idiots can come up with?
I sincerely hope they dock your vodka ration.
Re:
Except that the agents had already admitted that they didn’t have a valid judicial warrant.
They additionally admitted that they no legal matter before the court requiring them to be in her courtroom.
Re: Re:
The judge had no obligation to help the agents enforce an admitted extrajudicial action, and did have an obligation to prevent these ‘agents’ from disrupting the activity of the court.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
The agents weren’t trying to arrest the guy during the hearing or something. They were waiting. They were not disrupting the activity of the court.
Re: Re: Re:2 A great way to convince people not to show up to court in the first place
Setting the precedent that defendants who willingly show up to court can be arrested as soon as they leave the door doesn’t qualify as disrupting the activities of the court to you?
Re: Re: 'But I wanna!' does not a legal justification make
So to the extent that there was any ‘obstruction’ it was the equivalent of the judge telling them ‘No you do not get to camp out in my courtroom until you see a minority you want to haul off’.
Re: Re:
Are you claiming that every ICE arrest needs a judicial warrant? I’m admittedly having trouble locating the law which says they do or do not. But Newsweek says: “Under current U.S. law, an ICE agent can arrest an undocumented person found in public spaces without a judicial warrant.” https://www.newsweek.com/ice-warrant-explainer-trump-deportation-raid-questions-2025400
Re: Re: Re:
Two wrongs do not make a right. Fuck off, MAGAt.
Re:
Son, people here can see the stupid shit you are writing.
Re: judge did what was proper
Historically, we as a people have decided that we want people to show up for court, whether as witnesses, parties, or otherwise. As a result, we have frequently held that service of process cannot be effected against someone coming or going to court.
What the judge did is, essentially, uphold a couple hundred years of tradition and common law whose justification is still sound today. Sane people may commend her, and magats will of course celebrate the arrest.
Re: Re:
Bull. I have personally served someone process who had shown up for court, in the hallway outside the courtroom. In Wisconsin. (My boss at the process serving company explicitly told me to serve him there. OK, maybe you don’t trust my boss, but his attorney was present and didn’t tell me I couldn’t do that.)
Re: Re: Re:
(and by “his attorney” I meant the attorney for the guy I served. Not my boss’s attorney. Sorry if that was ambiguous.)
Re: Re: Re: immunity to service on travel to/from court
I have personally had service on a client quashed on that same fact pattern.
Re: Re: Re:2
In Wisconsin?
Re: Re: Re:3
Doesn’t matter, federal law covers all states.
Re: Re: Re:4
Are you saying there’s a federal law prohibiting serving someone in a courthouse? I doubt that. You got a cite?
The party of law and order yet again encourages people to break the law
Ah yes, what possible reason could a judge have for not wanting federal agents to use their courtroom as an easy way to score arrests on people that willingly showed up to court, incentivizing those people to instead pull a republican and just start ignoring the law and legal orders…
Judge Hannah Dugan was trying to prevent obstruction of justice
It will be an uphill battle to get this past a Grand Jury and probable motion to dismiss. DOJ accuses Judge Hannah Dugan of:
18 U.S. Code § 1505 – Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees
Presumably this part:
“Whoever corruptly … endeavors to … impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States …”
Heavy lifting:
18 U.S. Code § 1071 – Concealing person from arrest
Presumably, this part:
“Whoever harbors or conceals any person for whose arrest a warrant or process has been issued under the provisions of any law of the United States, so as to prevent his discovery and arrest, after notice or knowledge of the fact that a warrant or process has been issued for the apprehension of such person”
Heavy lifting:
They could have gotten a judicial warrant and arrested the suspected undocumented migrant, Mr. Flores-Ruiz, inside Judge Hannah Dugan’s courtroom, but instead they staked out her courtroom with only an administrative warrant and waited for him to come out a door into a semi-public hallway. The judge noticed, told them to check with the head judge if their conduct was authorized because it looked like it was going to obstruct the justice of the state courthouse, as he faces some criminal charges which look like they will now never be adjudicated, and he exited a different door to the same semi-public hallway. They saw him, rode down in the same elevator car as him, and arrested him outside the courthouse.
They they come back, arrest her, perp-walk her, castigate her in the media in violation of DOJ policy, and she is released on her own recognizance to await a possible indictment from a grand jury to which she could have an arraignment (pled guilty or not guilty) by May 15. That’s not normal when it comes down to a matter of legal interpretation between a trained lawyer/jurist and some CPA who works for the FBI operating on notes left by 6 ICE/CBP/FBI/DEA undercover agents without legal training. A normal DOJ would have given her the opportunity as a legal professional and officer of the court to self-surrender, instead of tactics to inspire fear of our own government.
As to a future motion to dismiss:
Since the defendant, Mr. Flores-Ruiz, had constitutional right to due process, and an immediate ICE arrest would nullify any outcome of the scheduled hearing in Judge Dugan’s courtroom that he voluntarily participated in, letting him walk into an ICE ambush that she had became aware of would seem to violate his rights under the U.S. Constitution, effectively obstructing the justice that he was entitled to, and with this mindset Judge Dugan would not have any corrupt intent evidenced by showing the defendant an alternative exit that the one ICE anticipated thus she cannot have corruptly obstructed justice while preventing ICE from obstructing justice. And if that is the case, the charge that showing the defendant to an alternate exit is somehow harboring or concealing him from arrest is equally void, since if the government wanted to make her courtroom the site of the arrest they could have secured a judicial warrant and have the supremacy clause of the Constitution on their side and arrested him INSIDE the courtroom — instead they wanted to play dress-up secret police and arrest him at the exit to her courtroom.
That’s a long way to case dismissed, I think.
But that’s an adversarial argument, not something that happens before the magistrate judge at either the complaint stage nor the 4 minute hearing where the judge was released on her own recognizance.
Re:
The grand jury is going to be the interesting part. In theory they could be selective about what they tell the grand jury and get an indictment without telling any lies.
But there is plenty of room for them to mess up that part of due process. Including skipping it entirely because the government doesn’t like due process.
Oh, Are we arresting people for obstruction now? Someone call Bobby Mueller!
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
If she knew a warrant existed and led through subject of the warrant into an area where he could not otherwise have gained entrance, she’s guilty of a crime.
The question of whether she committed a crime is really an easy one. The harder question is whether it should be prosecuted. I think it should be prosecuted because it sends the message that one cannot assist someone with a warrant escape service of that warrant. Her actions in removing the person were not related to her judicial duties–completely unrelated.
“If she knew a warrant existed and led through subject of the warrant into an area where he could not otherwise have gained entrance, she’s guilty of a crime.“
There wasn’t a warrant
It was a semi public area they had a right to be in
Not remotely
Re:
Was it? According to the charging document, the jury door “leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse” and “only deputies, juries, court staff, and in-custody defendants being escorted by deputies used the back jury door. Defense attorneys and defendants who were not in custody never used the jury door.”
Re: Re:
Rethignican sycophants can lie and claim anything they want in their nonsense reports. Doesn’t make it a fact.
Anyone left doing anything at the behest of the King and his thugs is immediately untrustworthy. Every fascist POS in this admin has already had a loooong track record of outright provable lies and falsehoods they have spewed. That makes everything they do a reasonable lie and distortion of reality.
And that tracks with 100% of every single thing they have done within the last 100 days.