Trump’s Anti-DEI Efforts Are Stupidly Erasing Aspects Of American History
from the a-different-kind-of-gay dept
Back before the plan to destroy our democracy got started in earnest, and back before the pandemic that dominated our lives for several years (whether we thought it should or not), was a time when we were having quaint, albeit silly, arguments about confederate monuments and whether they should be removed. My memory is good enough to recall that a great cry went out from a certain segment of the population, one which declared that the removal of these monuments, setup purposefully by the losing side of the (first, for now) Civil War to intimidate former slaves, was somehow the destruction of American history. “Don’t take that monument of General Lee,” went the argument. “Leave the statue that venerated the traitor up, because it’s part of the American legacy.”
It’s a very stupid argument at best. And likely purely disingenous if otherwise. I’m fairly certain that the lack of statues of Il Duce in Italy hasn’t somehow erased his name from the lexicon of Italians.
But if that argument is going to be made, at least make it consistently. Put another way, even those who are cheering on Trump’s literal whitewashing of American government and culture, represented by his attempt to obliterate all things DEI, surely think it ought not be done in a way that removes any historical references or happenings, right?
Well, because Team Trump has all the precision of a surgeon operating on an open heart with a backhoe, mistakes will be made. We’ve already seen instances where terms sometimes associated with DEI efforts are being queried in anti-DEI efforts, which ends up removing programs or content from government efforts that has zero to do with anything DEI. A medical program getting nixed because it referred to “point of care” as “POC,” which was confused with “people of color,” is a personal favorite of mine.
And now we are in fact seeing government references to our own history being erased as a result of that same sloppiness, in admittedly hilarious fashion.
References to a World War II Medal of Honor recipient, the Enola Gay aircraft that dropped an atomic bomb on Japan and the first women to pass Marine infantry training are among the tens of thousands of photos and online posts marked for deletion as the Defense Department works to purge diversity, equity and inclusion content, according to a database obtained by The Associated Press.
The database, which was confirmed by U.S. officials and published by AP, includes more than 26,000 images that have been flagged for removal across every military branch. But the eventual total could be much higher.
Now, I’m fairly certain that the Trump team doesn’t actually think the flying fortress that dropped the first nuclear bomb used in war was gay itself. Instead, this is a querried search looking for certain terms that someone who doesn’t have more than two brain cells to rub together assumed would always have a DEI context. But, for the sake of clarity, the Enola Gay was not itself gay. Nor was Enola Gay herself, by all accounts, given that she was the mother of the pilot who flew the plane.
But while America’s most infamous airplane is the headlines, there is a ton of other content that is being either erroneously removed, even where the content is historical in nature.
The vast majority of the Pentagon purge targets women and minorities, including notable milestones made in the military. And it also removes a large number of posts that mention various commemorative months — such as those for Black and Hispanic people and women.
Several photos of an Army Corps of Engineers dredging project in California were marked for deletion, apparently because a local engineer in the photo had the last name Gay. And a photo of Army Corps biologists was on the list, seemingly because it mentioned they were recording data about fish — including their weight, size, hatchery and gender.
Now, in the Trump administration’s defense, it has occasionally caught whiff that some historical content was being flagged to be removed and insisted it be retained. But that defense is quite weak when those mistakes are the result of an overly broad, maliciously constructed executive order from someone that demands both swift and severe action.
No one at the top appears to really care how this gets done, so long as it gets done. In fact, it appears the Defense Department doesn’t have the resources to deal with the mandated purge of so-called “DEI” content. As the AP report notes, a single defense civilian has been given the unenviable task of vetting more than 10,000 flagged articles and photos for the Marine Corps. On top of that, they’re also expected to handle removal of content from hundreds of social media accounts maintained by that single branch of the military.
Here’s the endgame, though, inadvertently explained by the content removal memo issued by the DoD.
On Feb. 26, the Pentagon ordered all the military services to spend countless hours poring over years of website postings, photos, news articles and videos to remove any mentions that “promote diversity, equity and inclusion.”
If they couldn’t do that by Wednesday, they were told to “temporarily remove from public display” all content published during the Biden administration’s four years in office.
It’s not just about erasing women, minorities, and LGBTQ+ people from the history of the military. It’s about erasing an entire administration’s contribution to this combined history.
It’s also absolutely insane to go through this exercise, if only for recruiting reasons. I can’t imagine that anyone in the Trump administration would be so ignorant to say that they want fewer recruits to the military among the protected classes. But a chill upon those recruits seems fairly inevitable, given the flat disrespect this move represents.
But, hey, just another day in Trumperica. I’m sure men wearing jackets adorned with confederate patches will show up any minute now to decry the erasure of our national history… right?
Filed Under: censorship, defense department, dei, donald trump, enola gay, pete hegseth, war on woke, woke
BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to




Comments on “Trump’s Anti-DEI Efforts Are Stupidly Erasing Aspects Of American History”
Another reminder: Trump, Musk, and their racist ilk are segregationist bigots who would love nothing more than to see any legal recognition of the principles inclusion, diversity, equity, and accessibility—e.g., the Civil Rights Act—rolled back in favor of exclusion (of anyone who isn’t like them), homogeneity (on multiple levels), inequity (that benefits white people), and…well, at best, they don’t care what happens to disabled people.
Re: Way too optimistic
If you think that the people parroting the “poisoning the nation’s blood” nazi rhetoric with regard to immigrants will stop at reimaging their idols’ eugenics programs, I have a border wall to sell you.
Re: Re:
I said that, at best, they don’t care. At worst, they do care what happens to disabled people…so long as what happens is “freeing the country from the burden of caring” by killing disabled people. Eugenicists like Musk and his billionaire ilk would murder disabled people if they could legally get away with it and we all know they would.
Re: Re: Re:
You didn’t get the memo? “At best” assumptions about Trump 2.0 depending on basic humanity or decency are not in concurrence with the evidence.
And even in Trump 1.0, the best to hope for realistically was not “they don’t care” but rather “they don’t dare”.
Re: Re: Re:
Arguably they’re already planning to do that and soon with the cuts to medicare/medicaid and food stamps in the upcoming budget, as either of those alone is going to result in a lot of dead at their hands with the majority falling into the ‘disabled’ category of people who need that assistance to live.
Re: Re: Re:2
— (Source)
Every generation needs their Freedom Fries.
Minor quibble with part of article
This line isn’t as self-explanatory as the author seems to believe:
My mother is a lesbian who didn’t come out until I was 19 (during her marriage to her second husband). When I was a child in the ’70s/’80s, a majority of lesbians over 30 did, in fact, have children.
That’s how life worked when lying to yourself and others was better than being a blacklisted social outcast.
Whether Enola Gay was a lesbian is irrelevant, but the evidence the author offers isn’t evidence of anything, particularly given the period in which she lived.
They specifically want to recruit fascists, racists and misogynists to the military, because the military will be Trump’s last resort for staying in power on January 6th, 2029; he needs them to be on his side.
Re:
Eh, unless I’ve missed something I don’t think he has anything to worry about the military even in it’s current state, as they’re either on his side or content with sitting on their asses as he guts the country and makes his kingship even more official.
My first thought was that I can absolutely imagine some of them wanting that. But them I remembered than the billionaires in this cabinet would definitely rather send minorities and the poors to fight instead of their own spawn.
Re:
It’s a real Catch Klanty-two.
All those '[Insert minority here] for Trump' signs sure aged well...
Nothing says ‘If you’re not straight, white, male and MAGAt then nothing you say or do matters’ like whitewashing history to remove any mention of accomplishments from anyone that doesn’t fit those categories.
Funnily enough the act of doing so shows how utterly pathetic they think the category of ‘straight white men’ really is in their minds, as it demonstrates that the only way they think ‘their side’ can look good is if there’s nothing to compare it to.
Don’t worry, just keep sarcastic clapping and holding up silent auction signs. Obviously that’s all that needs to be done. The system will work.
Re:
“We require decorum!” yell Democrats as the country burns around them.
Re: Re:
Unfortunately, the counterspeech principle makes a better ideal than a reality, primarily because some people or groups in society possess far more power than do others.*
*Source
No, they do. Perhaps they would consider the specific example of the Enola Gay an unfortunate mistake caught up in the shuffle. That isn’t because it is “historical” though, but because it is sufficiently white, straight, wealthy and Christian.
They explicitly 100% wish to eliminate any and all “historical references and happenings” which are not those things.
That's so Gay, Enola
I don’t think they care if they erase history. It may even serve them if they just wipe out as much history as possible.
If you remove the statues of the racists, people will FORGET. Instead of destroying history, make it a learning tool. Change the PLAQUES on these statues to better reflect who these people actually WERE and what they actually DID.
History repeats itself because people didn’t pay proper attention the first time.
We have Trump because Nixon didn’t go to prison. Are we going to keep making these mistakes forever?
Re:
The German government got rid of public-facing Nazi imagery in the aftermath of World War II, and people in Germany haven’t forgotten about the Nazis and what they did. For what reason, then, do we need statues that venerate the Confederacy to stand in public when we could either (A) put them in museums where they belong or (B) destroy them?
This shit didn’t start with Nixon. It started because we didn’t let Sherman finish the damn job. Every traitor in the Confederacy should’ve been tried, convicted, and at least jailed after the War to Preserve Slavery.
Re:
So you believe if we had more Confederate statues and pretended that was okay, the Confederacy wouldn’t be rising again?
That’s actually one of the stupidest things I’ve ever read on this site. And that’s saying something, given that Koby posts here.
Re:
Confederate statues were 0% about remembering history and 100% about threatening minorities.
A warning that the area is under the control of anti-american terrorists and that no human is safe there.
Re:
Yet it’s only recently that Germany began facing a resurgence of the Far Right, whereas Israel has been carrying out pogroms against the Palestinian people living in Gaza and the West Bank for decades. So it’s not those whose ancestors carried out the violence who are at most risk of forgetting and thus need the ‘reminders’ of statues and plaques, is it?
“Now, I’m fairly certain that the Trump team doesn’t actually think the flying fortress that dropped the first nuclear bomb used in war was gay itself.”
The Enola Gay was a B29 Superfortress, not a B17 Flying FOrtress.
This is a Tienanmen Square moment for the US…
Re:
Which one, there are just so many and many more to come.
Hanlon’s razor tells us never to blame malice for what can adequately be explained by stupidity. But we’re living in an age of malicious stupidity.
The carelessness and absurdity are the point. It’s what Orwell wrote about: the Party claims two plus two is five, and what the fuck is anybody going to do about it? It’s a show of power.
They don’t care about accuracy, or strategy, or even efficacy. If it triggers the libs, then they’ve done what they set out to do.
At the time of Enola Gay, “gay” meant happy, merry, as in have a gay ole time.
Maybe we need a new word for “gay”. I suggest “trump”.
Watch them.
People live in the times into which they are born. And being born in America in the early and middle 1800s meant being born not into the “United States” as much as it meant being born into Virginia or Ohio or Georgia or New York or whatever state; most people’s primary loyalty and identity was still at the time not that of being Americans but of being from the state where you grew up, whether North and South. Robert E. Lee did not fight to preserve slavery. He fought to protect his home from an invading army, which is true for most soldiers of the Confederacy (as opposed to southern politicians). Slavery, though, was just the symptom of the disease; racism was the disease. And the North was just as racist as the South, if not more so. Racism is still the most virulent disease in America. The North may have been fighting to end slavery, but not because they cared about Black people. What they cared about most was keeping Black people out of the North. Either way: Robert E. Lee was no traitor. If you want to see an actual traitor, look no further than the current POTUS.
Research Paper
I am writing a research paper on how to stop this. When I am finished I will try to get it published and spread it over the internet.