UK Orders Apple To Break Encryption Worldwide While World Is Distracted

from the the-death-of-privacy dept

In a stunning escalation that confirms our worst fears, the UK government has finally shown its true hand on encryption — and it’s even worse than we predicted. According to a bombshell report from Joseph Menn at the Washington Post, British officials have ordered Apple to create a backdoor that would allow them to access encrypted content from any Apple user worldwide.

This comes after years of the UK government’s steadily mounting assault on encryption, from the Investigatory Powers Act to the Online Safety Act. While officials repeatedly insisted they weren’t trying to break encryption entirely, those of us following closely saw this coming. Apple even warned it might have to exit the UK market if pushed too far.

Security officials in the United Kingdom have demanded that Apple create a back door allowing them to retrieve all the content any Apple user worldwide has uploaded to the cloud, people familiar with the matter told The Washington Post.

The British government’s undisclosed order, issued last month, requires blanket capability to view fully encrypted material, not merely assistance in cracking a specific account, and has no known precedent in major democracies.

Let’s be super clear here: The UK government is demanding that Apple fundamentally compromise the security architecture of its products for every user worldwide. This isn’t just about giving British authorities access to British users’ data — it’s about creating a master key that would unlock everyone’s encrypted data, everywhere.

This is literally breaking the fundamental tool that protects our privacy and security. Backdoored encryption is not encryption at all.

The technical reality is stark: You can’t create a backdoor that only works for “good guys.” Any vulnerability built into the system becomes a vulnerability for everyone — state actors, cybercriminals, and hostile nations alike. And right now, it’s worth recognizing that any government (including our own) can be seen as a “hostile nation” to many.

Even if Apple withdraws from the UK market entirely, as the Post reports they’re considering, it won’t satisfy the UK’s demands:

Rather than break the security promises it made to its users everywhere, Apple is likely to stop offering encrypted storage in the U.K., the people said. Yet that concession would not fulfill the U.K. demand for backdoor access to the service in other countries, including the United States.

This global reach is particularly concerning given the UK’s membership in the Five Eyes intelligence alliance. Any backdoor created for British authorities would inevitably become a tool for intelligence and law enforcement agencies across the US, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand — effectively creating a global surveillance capability without any democratic debate or oversight in those countries.

If the UK does this, it means that the FBI will be able to use it to read anyone’s data.

The UK government’s approach here is particularly insidious. While Apple can appeal the order, their appeal rights are bizarrely limited: They can only argue about the cost of implementing the backdoor, not the catastrophic privacy and security implications for billions of users worldwide. This reveals the UK government’s complete indifference to the fundamental right to privacy.

Even more alarming is the forced secrecy component.

One of the people briefed on the situation, a consultant advising the United States on encryption matters, said Apple would be barred from warning its users that its most advanced encryption no longer provided full security. The person deemed it shocking that the U.K. government was demanding Apple’s help to spy on non-British users without their governments’ knowledge. A former White House security adviser confirmed the existence of the British order.

This gag order component is particularly chilling — the UK isn’t just demanding the power to break encryption globally, they’re demanding the right to force Apple to actively deceive its users about the security of their data. After years of dismissing concerns about the Investigatory Powers Act as “exaggerated,” the UK government is now proving its critics right in the most dramatic way possible.

The implications here cannot be overstated. This would represent the single largest coordinated attack on private communications in the digital age. It’s not just about government surveillance — it’s about deliberately introducing vulnerabilities that would be exploitable by anyone who discovers them, from hostile nation-states to criminal organizations.

The timing of this demand is nothing short of breathtaking in its recklessness. We are quite literally in the midst of dealing with the catastrophic fallout from the Chinese Salt Typhoon hack — where state-sponsored hackers exploited a government-mandated backdoor in our telephone infrastructure to conduct widespread surveillance. This hack alone should have permanently ended any discussion of intentionally weakening encryption. It’s a real-world demonstration of exactly what security experts have been warning about for decades: backdoors will inevitably be discovered and exploited by bad actors.

The irony here is almost painful: The FBI itself has been actively encouraging Americans to use encrypted communications specifically because our telephone infrastructure remains compromised by Chinese hackers. Yet at this precise moment — when we’re witnessing firsthand the devastating consequences of compromised security — the UK government is demanding we create an even bigger, more dangerous, more consequential backdoor?

This is beyond dangerous. There is no reasonable rationale for this.

There’s a good chance that the UK is doing this right now knowing that the US is totally distracted by everything that Musk and Trump are doing to dismantle the US government. But given how much Trump seems to hate the FBI right now, it seems like even more of a reason for him to call this out as an attack on Americans and our privacy. Does he want the FBI reading his data as well?

Senator Ron Wyden, who has been a tireless champion of encryption, is reasonably angry about this and is calling on both Apple and Trump to “tell the UK to go to hell.”

Trump and Apple better tell the UK to go to hell with its demand to access Americans’ private, encrypted texts and files. Trump and American tech companies letting foreign governments secretly spy on Americans would be an unmitigated privacy and national security disaster.

Senator Ron Wyden (@wyden.senate.gov) 2025-02-07T17:15:45.189Z

As he says:

Trump and Apple better tell the UK to go to hell with its demand to access Americans’ private, encrypted texts and files. Trump and American tech companies letting foreign governments secretly spy on Americans would be an unmitigated privacy and national security disaster.

Wyden calling out Trump here actually makes a lot of sense. Given Trump’s current antagonistic relationship with federal law enforcement, he might be uniquely positioned to recognize this for what it is — a foreign government demanding the power to spy on Americans, including him personally. The FBI, which would inevitably gain access to this backdoor through Five Eyes sharing agreements, would have unprecedented access to everyone’s communications — a scenario that should alarm privacy advocates across the political spectrum.

This is, without hyperbole, a five-alarm fire for digital privacy and security. The UK government is attempting to fundamentally reshape global digital security through a secretive demand, hoping the world is too distracted to notice or resist. They’re not just asking for a key to their own citizens’ data — they’re demanding the power to unlock everyone’s digital life, everywhere, while forcing Apple to lie about it.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. This isn’t just about privacy — it’s about the future of secure communication itself. Don’t let this slip by in the chaos of the moment. The UK government is betting on our distraction and apathy. Let’s prove them wrong.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,
Companies: apple

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “UK Orders Apple To Break Encryption Worldwide While World Is Distracted”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
82 Comments
This comment has been deemed funny by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

Greetings.

Attached is a copy of a letter we received recently.

Regarding the backdoor demand, our response is as follows:

Some asshole is using your department’s letterhead to write stupid letters.

Respectfully yours,

… Apple (hopefully)

cc: editor, The Guardian
cc: editor, New York Times

Anonymous Coward says:

I personally doesn’t trust Apple with any of my data (mostly because security has never been their main goal, even if they’re doing a much better job than some other big companies) but I really hope Apple will give the finger to UK just to prevent any other country in the world to think about it twice.

Ron Wyden’s argument about foreign country inference is a bit hypocrite given the well known NSA/FBI/CIA and Five Eyes history with backdoors tough.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I personally doesn’t trust Apple with any of my data (mostly because security has never been their main goal, even if they’re doing a much better job than some other big companies)…

They’re not. Apple’s idea of security is to shut down Bluetooth interconnectivity between iOS and other devices because that’s something they can actually do instead of patching the gaping holes in iOS security.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

What a charming, but incredibly naive, sentiment. (Do you REALLY think that when two entities both equipped with enormous power and wealth get into a pissing match that it’s going to rain fresh, clear, sparkling water on the rest of us?)

That would be nice. But a far more likely outcome is that they’ll make a public show of this while arriving at a private agreement that allows both to do what they want…because the executives, board, and investors of Apple are NOT going to allow Apple products and services to exit that market. Will. Not. Happen.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

“…effectively creating a global surveillance capability without any democratic debate or oversight in those countries.”

oooooooooo – the fascists just had a global orgasm!!

I think somebody around here has been paying attention after all. Yes. This is the dream. It was once called One World Government.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew N. "The GOAT" Bennett (profile) says:

Unironically, why should anyone in the US (or any other part of the world) care about what the UK is up to or is demanding? They’re a failed empire that impotently shakes their rattle and cries until they get put in their place by actually competent states.

I think we should just move all jobs and industries out of the UK and glass them. They have been a net negative on the world since their inception.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

Except in the very worst secured places, no, they aren’t. Generally, what is stored is a salted hash (see here for an explanation: https://www.okta.com/blog/2019/03/what-are-salted-passwords-and-password-hashing/). This is so that, even if a password database is stolen, it is difficult to impossible to tell if two users have the same password (the salts ensure the hashes are different), and the hashes are extremely difficult (read: infeasible with current methods and hardware) to reverse.

Anonymous Coward says:

It is necessary to see the fact that the famous cypherpunk, privacy advocate, the world’s first cryptographer David Chaum, who has cryptographic patents and works protecting privacy by destroying the digital footprints of the developing digital world, the xx.network project and cmixx technology, which are currently functional, eliminate these problems.

Anonymous Coward says:

The question for me is jurisdiction. I have to assume the UK has just decided they have global jurisdiction and that the UK is actually the entire world, because it’s about the only thing that makes sense outside of just wanting to outright spy on, well, Everyone. The thing though is that when Europol demands access to EU user data, that’s within their jurisdiction. The UK legally doesn’t have anything to do with what’s happening over in, I don’t know. Kyrgyzstan. Neither do the other Five Eyes countries – so what’s the end goal besides data hoarding, exactly?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:4

There’s no changing the minds of people like Graham, or the plaintiffs in the suit who’re trying to push for the idea that Section 230 allows killing kids (or whichever wrong and deeply exaggerated idea is the topic to be). There’s simply too much grief and especially money involved in directing that grief. All you can Really do is contribute to help the organizations fighting back against this, like the ACLU and the EFF. Or become a lawyer yourself, I suppose.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:7

I wish it didn’t have to be at risk all the time, I regret learning about internet regulation in the first place.

It’s hard to have much fun when you feel like the whole thing could be shut down any day and you’ll lose contact with all the friends you’ve made, since I’d presume no messenger services like discord or the like would be safe either.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re: Re:8

You’d have to ask a lawyer about the actual outcome of Section 230 to get a good answer, honestly. Personally I do have the half-finished thought that it’s probably going to lead to an increasing rise in decentralized or otherwise federated platforms, mostly because a) people will still want to talk to each other and b) I just very much doubt they’d slither back to platforms like Instagram, or Twitter. Sure, the liability aspect’d still be there, but like with piracy sites, it’s also harder to stamp down on compared to centralized sites.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

NSA says:

do not fool yourselves about apple.

apple gladly signed and obeyed the PRISM agreement between them and the NSA. so have google, and microsoft, and everyone else the NSA asked.

apple works hand. in. hand. with all the NSA requets. always have until now, always will keep doing.

any device from apple or runing android, anything related to microsoft, or google, the NSA has access to. you won’t be told, they will then push the data to anyone that needs it : FBI, CIA… anyone.

do you have any idea how much the NSA and the other letter agencies are laughing at your commentaries ?

have you not learned ANYTHING from what Snowden told you about PRISM, the NSA and all those americain-based companies ?

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...