Hide BestNetTech is off for the holidays! We'll be back soon, and until then don't forget to check out our fundraiser »

Musk’s Takeover Of The Government’s Computer Systems Needs To Be Understood As A Cyberattack, Or Worse

from the we've-been-pwned dept

People sometimes think that cybersecurity is just about defending computer systems from remote adversaries. But it’s broader than that; cybersecurity has always been about protecting computer systems more generally from any sort of misuse, no matter how the adversary might access them.

So that Elon Musk and his minions have managed to walk right into government offices to take over computer systems where they had no legitimate authorization or entitlement needs to be understood as a cyberattack by a rogue actor. And every ounce of outrage we ever would have had if any other rogue actor had taken over critical government infrastructure needs to be mustered here, because it is just as outrageous, and as dangerous, if not more so on both fronts, because this time the threat to America’s security came from within.

These systems Musk and his “team” have accessed are among the most sensitive and critical to the running of the United States of America. In the case of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) they manage human resources. But there’s also reports that the Muskovites have taken over those computer services in the Treasury Department and Governments Services Administration (GSA), which spends the country’s multi-trillion dollar budget to pay America’s bills, and USAID, which handles a lot of highly classified information affecting our nation’s standing in the world. Yet here is Musk, a man who regularly chats with Vladimir Putin, with access to it all, if not also outright control.

Even if it’s true that he and his team of random bros currently cannot actually stop payments of the government’s bills themselves (and it’s unclear whether they are indeed so limited given how Musk appears to claim that they are not), they now have access to the most sensitive details of the entirety of America’s government workforce, including those in foreign service, including in countries that Putin has his eye on.

They know their names. They know their addresses. They know their backgrounds, careers, their spouses and dependents. They know absolutely every single detail about these people that would be captured in an HR system. And because OPM is involved with managing security clearances, they know plenty more private details about our nation’s public servants captured in the process of doing their background checks.

And over at the other departments, like those that handle things like making payments to things like Social Security recipients, they know all every recipient’s social security numbers too, if not even more information about everyone that the government pays.

Meanwhile, we know little to nothing about his team. Even some names are unknown, let alone the full range of their affiliations, which we usually ask about before giving anyone access to the country’s most sensitive information. They have had zero vetting and in many cases no known security clearance (and, in the case of Musk, there were limits to his, which was already in jeopardy). It is also not clear whether Musk or his minions even have known jobs in the government themselves, for which such vetting would ordinarily have been required before entrusting them with access to such systems. Without those jobs they have no plausible claim to having the appropriate authority needed to have access to these systems, or even the buildings. (No, it’s not something that becomes ok just because the President says its ok. There are laws that limit his ability to make delegations like this, and for just this sort of reason: to make sure the public remains protected from arbitrary exercises of executive power that may not be in the country’s interests.)

They are a bunch of strangers who have essentially busted into government offices and strong-armed the career staff there into giving them access to all these systems with all this critical function and data. Systems that it has heretofore been the priority of the United States government to protect because of their sensitivity and how vulnerable the nation would be if an adversary could access them.

And yet here we are, where that very thing we’ve feared, passed law to punish, and spent countless dollars trying to prevent — a cyberattack — has just happened.

The response needs to be more than just a shrug. The nation’s infrastructure has just been attacked by the prototypical example of a rogue actor, acting lawlessly, with openly declared hostile intent aiming to disrupt the operation of the nation’s government as the people, expressed through acts of Congress, wanted their government to operate.

What has happened needs to be understood that way, in these gravest of terms, in order to provoke the appropriate response from any still-legitimate organs of American government, which must be as swift and powerful as any time when America’s homeland security has been attacked.

It is bitterly ironic that Congress and the courts spent all that effort gnashing and wailing and tearing up the Constitution over the potential threat posed to America’s national security interests by TikTok, when we were just going to simply hand over the keys to the kingdom the very next week to the guy who owns Twitter.

Filed Under: , , , , , , ,

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Musk’s Takeover Of The Government’s Computer Systems Needs To Be Understood As A Cyberattack, Or Worse”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
75 Comments

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

https://www.thebulwark.com/p/follow-the-money-trump-musk-market-reaction-tariffs-canada-mexico-nyse-dow-sp500-treasury

To quote JVL (from last night)…

“Does this sound to you like a situation that could potentially end with Musk attempting to disintermediate the ACH system and route all electronic transfers—including all transfers made by the federal government—through his private company?”

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

This, at least, was authorized.

Would you mind telling us about Elon Musk’s formal role in the United States federal government, such as his actual job title and what federal government power he actually wields? Last time I checked, being the “co-president” or doing things authorized by Trump doesn’t actually give Musk any actual power in the government.

And by the by: If Jeff Bezos had done something like this during the Biden administration, you would’ve been up in arms and ready to fight, so why is it that when a racist South African billionaire grabs control of part of the United States federal government without any oversight or actual authority, you think that’s fine and dandy?

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Matthew M Bennett says:

Re: Re:

Would you mind telling us about Elon Musk’s formal role in the United States federal government,

He’s an outside contractor (those are a thing) for $0 with the highest level security clearance (cuz again, Trump can just hand those out) doing work as contracted by the administrative branch.

Reeeeeetaaaardd.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re: Re: Re:

Two things.

  1. Without any actual formal role in the government, Elon Musk is still a private citizen running an NGO⁠—and I doubt you’d be all happy-happy-joy-joy about this situation if it were Jeff Bezos or George Soros doing this during the Biden administration as a means of going after right-wingers.
  2. Ableist slurs have no power here.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re: Re:

It’s naïve to think “actual power” has anything to do with a “formal role”. Look up “realpolitik”; all that matters is what people can do, and can get away with, not what some documents say they should do.

Hell, the U.S. title of “President” was intentionally chosen to be humble, on the basis that this person would merely preside over those with actual power. Things change. If presidents start delegating authority to the wealthiest U.S. citizen, that could become an official role, as with the “Office of the First Lady”.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Mamba (profile) says:

Re:

She.
Did.
Not.

Her email server was hosted publicly which means it was the people sending her emails that violated the law. Not her.

This also has been a long term practice, including many Republican appointed SoS and staff.

http://oversightdemocrats.house.gov/news/press-releases/state-ig-confirms-longstanding-and-widespread-personal-email-use-by-secretaries

Further, Bush had an email server that was hosted by the RNC who lost some 22 million emails.

In last Trump admin many of his cabinet use private emails.

You don’t give a flying fuck about emails.

JMT (profile) says:

Re:

Be quiet, you lost the election…

The noisiest sore losers on the planet did not agree to “be quiet” after Trump lost. Democracy does not begin and end at elections. Nobody should ever stop participating because their preferred candidate lost.

…elections have consequences.

All the more reason for to make as much noise as possible when those consequences turn out to be a quiet coup taking place.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

I think it’s safe to assume the Russians and Chinese followed immediately on his coattails, too. I can’t imagine his little gang of incel hackers plugging shit in willy-nilly and fucking around are taking appropriate security measures to ensure they’re the last threat actor to breach the US gov’s systems. Some guy in China probably just ssh’d into someone’s laptop with a default password and came along for the ride.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
David says:

Re:

I am not convinced that Musk isn’t Russia and China’s latest attempt of taking over the U.S.

For every puppet, there is a puppeteer. The drugs that Musk openly admits taking are not government-issued and controlled. At least not by the U.S. government.

A much easier side door access to the U.S. crown jewels.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Stephen T. Stone (profile) says:

Re:

DOGE could only be viewed as an intruder or stranger by someone who

…thinks that a non-government organization getting its hands on sensitive (and even classified) U.S. information for reasons known only to the private citizen billionaire who leads that NGO, and with only the say-so of the president to give him any kind of authority to do that, seems legally sketchy at best.

This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.

Anonymous Coward says:

To the people who love to attack every negative comment with “shut up doomposter”, can you tell me what the hell do we do this time because at the moment the only possible solution to this problem is to submit ourselves to a fate of being bullet sponges.

The people (republicans) who could do something want this to happen, the few democrats trying are being ignored.

This comment has been deemed insightful by the community.
Elfin (profile) says:

I have a security clearance, you do not.

The President cannot authorize clearances. It guess through a board with months of background checks. Hell, the FBI talked to be friends in highschool.

Stop with the Magic Wand thinking. It’s fucking illegal.

And instead of working with private, legally protected data, for a change, all I was doing at the time was ordinance testing.

Between the two jobs of high energy molecules, and personal days, the latter is much, Much more sensitive.

Somewhere on this planet is a tree that replaces all of the oxygen you waste. You should find that tree, and apologize.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

The President cannot authorize clearances.

Are you sure about that? Based on what Wikipedia says, maybe the President can’t directly grant clearances regarding nuclear weapons; the Department of Energy grants those, per the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (but who do you think appoints the director of that executive-branch agency?). In other areas, it looks like it’s mostly executive orders dictating the policies.

It guess through a board with months of background checks.

Normally, sure. Because the presidents of the past decided it would be that way, and wrote it into executive orders. For those orders to be legal, they’d presumably have to be delegating powers that the President already has.

By the way, here’s an American Bar Association page about declassification, stating:

legal guidelines support his contention that a president has broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected.
If the President couldn’t grant a clearance, that would be an easy way around the requirement. As would a pardon, since this is all federal law anyway, and nobody really disputes the authority of a president to pardon someone (other than themself) for a federal crime.

Anonymous Coward says:

Re:

The President cannot authorize clearances

Actually, he already did that on Day 1 (aka Dictator Day).

President Donald Trump is granting temporary, six-month security clearances to incoming White House officials who have not completed the vetting process

https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/politics/trump-temporary-security-clearances/index.html

And thanks to Trump v. United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), the granting of such clearances would be an official act, the President has absolute immunity if such grantabwere illegal.

More so, Musk amd his minions are “special employees” of the White House, so there’s no need to worry about having DOJ or some other agency involvment.

beartraphead (profile) says:

Good article! Some additional framing...

While this is indeed a cyberattack, I don’t think that definition fully covers it. We need to view this as cyberterrorism, more appropriately – which tends toward disrupting critical infrastructure (not just sensitive information theft) and is designed to cripple countries & bring nation states to their knees.

Musk is shutting down services in order to cause a nationwide outage and financial losses for states, businesses, and individuals.

Offices like USAID being attacked and bricked off make this an act of GLOBAL cyberterrorism by one man with a vendetta against his apartheid-ending nemesis, the United States. Ending crucial programs that keep people healthy and housed will result in bodily harm and loss of life.

We’ve seen exfiltration of massive troves of private data (stealing PII, financial records, health information). With this information, he can continue to hold the US hostage and extort the country.

I’m extremely worried that the CIA appears to be sleeping on this.

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a BestNetTech Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

BestNetTech community members with BestNetTech Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the BestNetTech Insider Shop »

Follow BestNetTech

BestNetTech Daily Newsletter

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get all our posts in your inbox with the BestNetTech Daily Newsletter!

We don’t spam. Read our privacy policy for more info.

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
BestNetTech needs your support! Get the first BestNetTech Commemorative Coin with donations of $100
BestNetTech Deals
BestNetTech Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the BestNetTech Insider Discord channel...
Loading...