Trump Disbands Cybersecurity Board Investigating Massive Chinese Phone System Hack
from the seems-bad,-bob dept
For all the hype and warnings about how TikTok is clearly a “national security threat” from China, the Trump administration has effectively kneecapped the investigation into one of the most serious cybersecurity breaches in US history — a genuine, proven threat to national security. In what Team Trump probably thinks is a move to “destroy the deep state,” they’ve actually disbanded the government review board tasked with getting to the bottom of this unprecedented hack of our phone system by China.
We’re still nowhere near understanding just how bad the Chinese hack of our phone system was. The incident that was only discovered last fall involved the Chinese hacking group Salt Typhoon, which used the US’s CALEA phone wiretapping system as a backdoor to gain incredible, unprecedented access to much of the US’s phone system “for months or longer.”
As details come out, the extent of the hackers’ access has become increasingly alarming. It is reasonable to call it the worst hack in US history.
Soon after it was discovered, Homeland Security tasked the Cyber Safety Review Board (CSRB) to lead an investigation into the hack to uncover what allowed it to happen and assess how bad it really was. The CSRB was established by Joe Biden to improve the government’s cybersecurity in the face of global cybersecurity attacks on our infrastructure and was made up of a mix of government and private sector cybersecurity experts.
And one of the first things Donald Trump did upon retaking the presidency was to dismantle the board, along with all other DHS Advisory Committees.

It’s one thing to say the new president should get to pick new members for these advisory boards, but it’s another thing altogether to just summarily dismiss the very board that is in the middle of investigating this hugely impactful hack of our telephone systems in a way that isn’t yet fully understood.
Just before the presidential switch, the Biden administration had announced sanctions against a Chinese front corporation that was connected to the hack. And while the details are still sparse, all indications are that this was a massive and damaging attack on critical US infrastructure.
And one of Trump’s moves is to disband the group of experts who was trying to get to the bottom of what happened.
Cybersecurity researcher Kevin Beaumont said on the social media platform Bluesky that the move would give Microsoft a “free pass,” referring to the CSRB’s critical report of the tech giant — and Beaumont’s former employer — over its handling of a prior Chinese hacker breach.
Jake Williams, faculty at IANS Research, went even further on the same website: “We should have been putting more resources into the CSRB, not dismantling it,”he wrote. “There’s zero doubt that killing the CSRB [would] hurt national security.”
While some have speculated that this move is an attempt to cover up the extent of the breach or even deliberately assist the Chinese, a more likely explanation is simple incompetence. Trump and his crew still don’t understand what the government actually does and are so obsessed with a fictional “deep state” out to get him, that this is just part of their process of firing as many people as possible, without regard to the important work they actually do.
Still, even as all the headlines remain fixated on TikTok and its supposed (and still totally unproven) national security threat, the new administration has dismantled the team of experts tasked with figuring out what happened with an actual Chinese hack on critical US infrastructure. That seems important.
But outside of specific cybersecurity news sites, the story has received basically no coverage at all. I’m at a bit of a loss as to how any of this makes America great again.
Filed Under: china, csrb, cybersecurity, donald trump, hack, national security, privacy, salt typhoon, wiretapping


Comments on “Trump Disbands Cybersecurity Board Investigating Massive Chinese Phone System Hack”
He’s getting rid of investigators to prepare for his intended selling of American secrets to Russia and other hostile terrorist countries.
Careful
At this point, one should understand that to use AT&T or Comcast or Frontier is at one’s own risk.
Re:
Any guesses as to how long before China launches our own nukes at us?
Re:
I do.
It rhymes with:
You are a special kind of stupid.
Re: They won’t need to
The Chinese won’t need to launch nukes. We are destroying ourselves from within.
This is a payoff to the telcos. Having to deal with the SS7 flaws is complicated, expensive. and impacts revenue. Better to shove this under the rug. Based on his nominees for critical positions, Trump doesn’t care about security.
Sigh… and while Trumps supporters will handwave this away and insist he is playing “5-D Chess” and you just dont understand how deeply brilliant he is;
The rest of the world knows he can’t even force a draw in Tic-Tac-Toe, and has been a joke in the business world since the it’s. (Seriously, a casino? How do you bankrupt a casino… just sad.)
Wait just six months that Trump & co understand the mistake they’ve made, and so, blame Biden administration to have let the hack happening.
It’s simple Mike, DEMOCRATS BAD, now that republicans have near full control again (god why..) america is saved.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
An advisory board isn’t going to solve the mystery of how the hack works. If the FBI and other 3-letter agencies haven’t ALREADY figured out the technical details of exactly how this hack worked, then they’re in BIG trouble. I’m confident that they have, but if not, then reallocating the advisory board salaries to hire some technical know-how would be of great benefit.
Re:
Wait… hold up a sec… are you trying to tell me that you don’t think the FBI and other 3-letter agencies are part of the “deep state” and actually perform the duties they are supposed to do?
You’re flip-floping faster than Trump on TikTok.
Typical MAGA
Re:
Tell me you don’t understand how literally any of this works without telling me you don’t understand how literally any of this works.
You know, Koby, for being incredibly ignorant, you sure are confident in your own stupidly wrong ideas. It’s impressive.
Literally, the advisory board was made up of some of the world’s top experts on this very issue you dumbfuck.
Re: Re:
Looks like a comment I’d made (Hey, the CSRB has a page on Wikipedia, saying who is on it) got eaten.
One of the points I was making in that was: The private sector folks on the CSRB were CIOs, CTOs, and owners of security companies. They were able to marshal the resources of their companies … including all those technical resources Koby was bleating about.
All gone now. How big a technical staff budget does a now-nonexistent advisory board have?
Re: Re: Re:
And if I remember correctly, these people volunteered their time to the board at no cost.
Re:
The above tells me that you and the rest of the idiots had no clue what was going on or who was on that advisory board because the very act of informing yourself of those facts would have upset the warped fantasy world you live in. You don’t even seem to know or understand that the board was run by the DHS, a 3-letter agency which very mandate dictates that they should investigate, mitigate and stop hacks like this since it is a grave threat to the security of the US.
And there is no mystery how the “hack” works and how they gained access, you would of course know this if you actually consumed media that isn’t shit. The problem, which you also seems to be totally unaware of, is how detect and evict the hackers while also securing the network in the process.
But do keep offering up opinions on things you haven’t informed yourself of or have any understanding of, it really portrays you as a “very” intelligent person.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
Lol, they flagged your comment for having a different opinion. I don’t understand why the left is full of so much hatred. They really can’t stand people that won’t just obey and fall in line with the rest of their herd.
Re: Re:
No, Koby’s comment got flagged because he expressed an opinion that flies in the face of everything he has ever said previously. What part of that is so hard to understand?
Re: Re:
No,his comment is flagged because it’s completely wrong about everything. As usual.
Re: Re:
Sounds more like the right wing than the left.
Re:
Do you work to appear this ignorant of how the world works, or are you actually this dumb and we should take you at face value?
Brilliant!
This is how Trump will stop Chinese hacking on day 1. Disband anyone monitoring for/ investigating hacking. Voila! No more hacking! “We have no knowledge of any hacks and anyone saying otherwise will be sued.”
Re:
So basically a continuation of his covid policies. ‘If there are no reports of how many people are dying on a daily basis, then that means they aren’t dying.’
Re: Re:
Exactly. Normally, it’s the head in the sand approach. In the case, it’s the head in the ass approach.
This sounds like when Elon Musk first took over Twitter and just started getting rid of people and systems that he thought were unnecessary without actually realizing what anyone was doing or why something was in place.
Maybe just because some stable genial thing he did during his first rodeo 8 years ago could’ve facilitate this f&ck up?
Only bad and worse explanations
Ah yes, nothing like the person who started the screeching about how TikTok is a national security threat to the point that it should be banned only to turn around and disband the group in charge of investigating major national security threats to demonstrate a true dedication to keeping america safe.
If I wasn’t aware of just how much of a blithering idiot convicted felon Trump is I’d chalk this one up to someone in china yanking his leash and ordering him to drop it, but with his lack of intelligence I think I’d give even odds of that, him seeing a government agency he couldn’t easily flip to doing his bidding and deciding to shut it down as a result to ‘save money’, or having a vested interest in there not being a government group that investigates large-scale hacks that isn’t under his direct control.
Musk and Trump are personifications of the Chesterton Fence analogy.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I agree with Trump here. This is China we’re talking about and I wouldn’t trust anyone Biden put in place to investigate them. Bidens to compromised by China so these investigators were probably hand picked by China themselves. Fire them and put some competent people in there is the way to go about it
Re:
Then why didn’t he replace them with his own selections?
Ars Technica had it, I don’t consider them a “specific cybersecurity news site”
But their coverage included this whopper of a statement from DHS.
We must be in the Upside Down now
I feel like I’ve heard that somewhere else recently (last few years or so)…
no prize for guessing where.
Remember that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) refused to play along with Trump’s stolen election narrative. Clearly the entire organization must be purged.
Yes, I’m aware that’s a different part of DHS. No, I’m not confident Trump is aware they are different.