Kentucky Police Kill Innocent Man While Serving Warrant At Wrong Address
from the wrong-place,-wrong-time-still-means-'inside-your-own-home' dept
Is it too much to ask for cops to be better? When other government employees get the address wrong, it may mean mail delivery delays or incorrect property tax assessments. But when cops get it wrong, people end up dead.
If officers are unfamiliar with the area they’ll be serving warrants in, it would make sense to engage in a little surveillance ahead of time to ensure the deadly mistakes like these aren’t made. But they never do because the government always believes the innocent people caught off guard by truly unexpected invasions of their personal space are in the wrong for reacting in ways cops somehow still don’t expect them to react.
And yet, for the most part, officers and their employers are given a free pass for killing innocent people, so long as officers believed the person they gunned down was actually the criminal suspect they were seeking to apprehend.
Here’s yet more data showing cops can’t actually be trusted with the power they’ve been given, coming to us via (of all places) UK news agency, The Guardian.
Police in Kentucky recently shot a man to death in his home while they executed a search warrant that appears to have been intended for a different address.
Doug Harless, 63, lived in London, a southern Kentucky town of about 8,000 residents, and was killed by police officers at his home at 511 Vanzant Road on the night of 23 December. However, audio from local Laurel county emergency dispatchers – and obtained by Kentucky news stations – shows that the search warrant was intended for 489 Vanzant Road, as was repeated multiple times on a recording of the audio.
The owner of 489 Vanzant Road told news station WKYT that no one had lived at that address for months.
While the layout of the neighborhood is less than intuitive (the address 511 Vanzant doesn’t show up on Google Maps), that should have told officers to be especially careful when determining which residence housed the person they were seeking.

While 511 Vanzant doesn’t appear on the map, 489 Vanzant does. Whether or not Google Maps (or a competing product) was used to determine the approximate location of the residence is, ultimately, a non-factor here. As WKYT’s reporting shows, the addresses of both homes were clearly marked on the houses’ exteriors:


While officers repeated no less than six times they needed assistance at 489 Vanzant, the actual address (511) was staring them in the face the whole time. The only recording released of this incident comes from a nearby home’s security cameras. The camera also captured audio of the incident, which began at nearly midnight, presumably for the sole purpose of making things more dangerous for everyone involved. (Standard practice on arrest warrants is to serve them during daylight hours when most people are likely to be home. Additional justification is needed to serve warrants late at night or very early in the morning.)
The recording shows officers swarming the house, followed by a lot of cops yelling stuff… immediately followed by five police gunshots.
Immediately following this killing, the London Police released this statement, which is very much exemplary of cop-speak: the exonerative “view from nowhere” where things happened to non-cops, but not because any cop was directly responsible for the end result of these apparently inadvertent actions.
On December 23, 2024, Officers from the London Police Department were following up with an investigation which started in the city limits of London. This investigation led officers to attempt to execute a search warrant at a residence on Vanzant Road in Laurel County. While doing so, the occupant of the residence produced a firearm and pointed it at officers. The officer then responded with force, which resulted in the death of the occupant.
It’s better than saying “weapons were discharged” without specifying whose weapons and who fired them, but not by much. But “responded with force” is a cowardly way to say officers shot at the man and “resulted in death” is a very dainty way to say “officers killed the man.”
With the man dead and the only released recording showing only the outside of the (wrong) home being invaded, it’s the officers’ word against the dead man’s. And, tragically, he’s in no position to counter this narrative.
The man the cops killed was Douglas Harless, a 63-year-old resident of Lily, Kentucky. The police couldn’t even be bothered to name the person they’d killed in their press release, much less provide reporters with any information about the person they were actually going after, who obviously didn’t live at the house officers raided despite it clearly and obviously being the wrong address.
And, given the statement of the property owner in reference to 489 Vanzant (“no one [has] lived at that address for months”), there’s good reason to believe officers were relying on outdated information to locate and apprehend the suspect they were actually looking for. Whatever the case may be (and new facts will definitely be slow to arrive if this thing was botched as badly as it appears to be), this was sloppy work. But sloppy means wrist slaps for cops and the loss of life for people whose only “mistake” was being in their own homes when officers came knocking.
Filed Under: 4th amendment, kentucky, london police, police killing, wrong house
BestNetTech is off for the long weekend! We'll be back with our regular posts tomorrow.


Comments on “Kentucky Police Kill Innocent Man While Serving Warrant At Wrong Address”
Oops...
More cowboy non-professionalism from the bully cops whose first resort is firepower. I hope there is an estate that can sue the police, the town, and take some compensation for this complete egregious error. There’s no excuse for this kind of ignorant force. The police union, of course, will blame this on the dead man. The police department has no agency for anything — and we have only the shooter’s word for it that a gun was ‘produced and pointed’ at the cops. Maybe the gun was produced after they guy was shot – and produced for justification for a scared, bullying cop’s mistake. The cops certainly have reason to set up an excuse, and collude on a lie – they are all guilty of a murder.
Re:
It wouldn’t matter. Drawing a gun on intruders into your house at midnight is entirely justified. If he shot a cop stone dead (and somehow miraculously survived/avoided being summarily executed) there wouldn’t be a charge they could try him for.
The cops did wrong. They played home invasion on the wrong house. Every single one of them should be in jail pending charges for burglary and felony murder.
Re: Re: You mean should have shot
With a few body bags to show for their mistakes among their own, maybe they bother to make sure they have things right first. I would have shot through the door.
Re: Re: Re:
Let me be clear. I don’t want anyone to get shot, not even the cops. But the police play a very dangerous game by doing this. They have no legal footing to stand on and the only reason they can’t face justice is because the people who would seek it are dead (how convenient for them).
The solution isn’t for cops to get killed. The solution is for cops to stop LARPing a home invasion and killing anyone who (entirely justifiably) mistakes them for a burglar.
Re: Re:
No – they should be forced to watch their entire families tortured to death, starting with the children. The penalty for ANY form of misconduct by a cop must be savage, cruel and absolutely brutal and sadistic, because they’re too stupid to understand anything less.
Re: Re: Re:
ok bro
Re: Re: Re:
Fuck you.
You skipped some important info
The police had a warrant to go after an individual who ALLEGEDLY stole a WEED EATER from a local JUDGE. That is why the police responded the way they did and they shot an INNOCENT MAN over a stolen weed eater that belonged to a judge.
Re:
That makes it so much worse. Everyone involved in this should be fired and charged. A stolen weed eater doesn’t warrant a midnight warrant service with firearms. A knock and talk should suffice.
Re: Re:
You crack me up. Going for funniest post of the week
Re: Re: Re:
I think I may have won both funniest and insightful with the same comment many years ago…
Re:
Alright, this all sounds like Kentucky.
Re: Making the Judge cuplable as well
because they were likely acting on his vendetta
Re:
The key word being “allegedly”. As MrWilson pointed out, this offense warranted no more than a knock and talk with the alleged perpetrator.
Re: Re: IT wasn't allegedly stolen weed eater
This is even worse — The person who stole the weed eater was arrested about 3 hrs prior and was in jail. So the stint out at midnight was looking for the weed eater the guy in jail (Hobart Buttery) had confessed to stealing… There is no end to how bad this is messed up ! Bottom line Police shot down (and killed) an innocent man (an innocent man who had no criminal history and a great reputation in the community– 63 yrs old)
Re:
Dear god.
That cop should have been tried for manslaughter he is no better than anyone else
Re: Who Signed?
The No knock warrant? OR is that NOT needed in Kentuck.
It Marvels me, the number of men and NONE SAW THE ADDRESS. NONE SAID it was wrong. NONE ASKED WTF ARE WE DOING UP AT MIDNIGHT FOR A WEED EATER?
Conclusion
No one teaches Cops anything except Paranoia. They are supposed to learn from the Agency they are working for, there is NO POLICE ACADEMY. NO 6 Month course, Probably Nothing.
They are NOT taught the laws, regulations or anything ELSE they would be working to handle. Let alone Telling the LEAD person They are NOT at the correct location.
ANd,
Judge sent them out for a Friends weed eater. Someone called and told them where it was. No one was at that address, it was abandoned.
Re:
ABSOLUTELY!!!
I am afraid you are being overoptimistic.
“sloppy” means Qualified Immunity, and that means not even a wrist slap. QI only is set aside for a lack of reasonableness, not a lack of carefulness. And once a police officer gets a free pass from the court, the department will consider the matter sufficiently covered and will not even make internal admonishments or discipline or training or whatever.
I was watching one of those YT compilation videos of cops getting owned by people…
Cops walk up, ring doorbell, knock on door, hear a dog, look in window talk about how they hadn’t even moved any of their stuff.
As they are drilling out the lock on the door, the owner asks them what the fsck they are doing breaking into her home. They claim she knows she is being evicted because they were there recently and served the papers. She goes off on them, leaves her job & heads home.
The cop & the locksmith leave the area of the front door and look up at the address on the garage. The locksmith states they are fscked, its the wrong fscking address.
The house they wanted was several doors down.
The cops try to portray the homeowner as unreasonable upset for their bodycams, well we didn’t go in and touch your dogs lady trying to dodge her asking them what the fsck they thought they were doing drilling her door out partially & now she can not access her home at all, they then decide that they will replace the lock free of charge.
At least 2 of the cops on scene were the ones who went out & served the eviction notice on the correct home some times before & decided since both places they could hear dogs barking so they were totally the same place.
o_O
Its almost like if they know they can do anything & not face even strong language they don’t need to door the bare minimum to do the job, like look at the piece of paper & the numbers on the house to make sure they match.
I’m sure they would have claimed officer safety if the homeowner had been home & tried to defend themselves from intruders breaking into their home (that they weren’t being evicted from).
And I bet everyone reading this could write a version of the final ‘report’ of this incident today that would be indistinguishable from the actual one filed after whatever investigation actually happens.
Which also reports in America, FYI.
One might consider that to the home invader with a license to kill, not leaving witnesses would be preferable.
Oopsiedoodle, you’re dead! (Not sorry, this is not an admission of guilt or remorse) Is not a legal defense.
Lock them up for 25 to life.
It's remarkable that the same people
who think you should have a gun for home protection, or to prevent government overreach if the government should for example, send cops to your door without justification, also are totally cool with cops shooting random people if they feel like it.
Upgraded?
It’s a newspaper known for typos in their own fscking name! (it’s known as the Grauniad round here for reasons!)
The Guardian is not an organisation like Associated Press or Reuters.
Re:
…said the Guardian Media Group to no one ever.
This could happen to any one of us at any given time, and like this man, nothing will happen to the police department or the officer. I don’t think only the officer is to blame, but I feel like the dispatcher and anyone else involved with the address of his home should be held liable. This was an innocent man in his home at night. If someone comes beating down my door in the middle of the night, I am going to get up with my gun and defend my home. If the Police Department and dispatch and anyone else involved with the address information were held liable and punishable they would be more careful and precise. This man lost his life for no reason! Someone should be held liable for this man’s death. Someone should be punished the same as anyone else would be punished for killing someone! Then maybe just maybe they would be more careful and more precise!
If they had such a hard time finding the right address, maybe they should have called A-CAB.
Where my cop apologists at?
Y’all mighty quiet all of a sudden 🤫
Standard arrest times
In more than fifty years of seeing people get arrested on an arrest warrant, including out of the same house in which I was living, the standard practice in Texas has always been to make arrests about midnight or about 6 a.m. for the very reason that those are the times that people are most likely to be home and not alert. The use of no-knock warrants and resulting gunplay has gotten so bad in Texas that the State legislature took some baby steps toward addressing the issue, such as slightly restricting the number of magistrates that can issue no-knock warrants and requiring that law enforcement agents wear something that clearly identifies them as such, albeit little more than a cosplay outfit. In the past law officers could bust through the door in plain clothes or with any uniforms covered by coveralls in cold weather. Any armed citizen that responded as they would to any other home invader would be killed or sent to prison.
Home
I’m so glad I live in the UK, a bit less free speech (not that it’s limited me) but many fewer mindless killings of innocents.
But, but, remember–this is now fat trump’s Amerika, and will remain so for the rest of his life. And remember fat trump’s solemn promise of “indemnity and immunity” for any and all of our overpaid, uniformed playground bullies. This type of misbehaviour is to be expected and, indeed, rewarded (promotions, raises, six-month paid vacations during “investigations”) for the playground bullies who, like fat trump himself, are incapable of ever doing anything wrong, or even questionable as such. This is fat trump’s Amerika; you’re only lucky to live in it, until you’re taken off to fat trump camp. And besides that, this is Kentucky, the State that gave us Moscow Mitch, Rand Paul, Rep. Thomas Massie (remember his Christmas card depicting his entire family, including small children, cradling their precious assault rifles?), and continues to give us prime quality Tobacco every year. Kentucky: the State neither side wanted during the Civil War. Kentucky: the State that makes us appreciate Alabama, Mississippi and Missouri; etc., etc.
Murder
Maybe the cops should have ordered a pizza or door dash to help them find the right address.. Doug Harles if he had a gun had every right to! Charge the whole lot of the thugs! End qualified immunity! No one gets away with murder!
Home
Huh? It’s actually the exact opposite. People are more likely to be at home at night, when they’re sleeping. Daylight hours are when people do things like go to work, shop, see friends, etc.