Ken Paxton’s Anti-Trans Hotline Trolled To Death Following Ban On Drivers License Gender Changes
from the ya-got-bee-movie'd dept
If it can be accessed via the internet, it will be. That’s a fact too many entities learn far too late. Amazingly, this wholly expected outcome often comes as a surprise to entities with lots power, money, or expertise — the sort of people you’d think would have considered all possible outcomes before giving a new internet-facing project the green light.
Instead, the opposite is true, more often than not. Everyone from Pepsico to Taylor Swift to a variety of state governments have discovered belatedly that creating portals internet denizens can access might have been a bad idea.
Earlier this year, the state of Missouri pulled the plug on the snitch line it created for people to report “troubling practices” at clinics providing gender-affirming care or advice to residents. The attempt to convert hate speech to state action was immediately undermined by thousands of “reports” submitted by people who hated the state more than they hated their fellow human beings. The state tacitly admitted defeat by taking down the reporting form after it was flooded with spam, gibberish, complaints about the state’s anti-LGBTQ+ hate, and, of course, numerous copies of the complete “Bee Movie” script — the latter of which has become a go-to inbox filler for submission forms internet users object to.
Now, it’s time for Texas to get the “Bee Movie” treatment. Amongst the numerous hateful laws the state has passed in recent years is a new mandate forbidding residents from altering the gender listed on their drivers licenses, even if the previously-stated gender no longer accurately represents them.
That act of hatred wasn’t enough for Attorney General Ken Paxton, though. His office set up an internal email address (via The Barbed Wire: DLCourtorders@dps.texas.gov) to handle reports from DPS (Dept. of Public Safety) employees about any requests for gender changes by drivers, presumably so the AG could dream up some reason to further punish people requesting gender changes.
That didn’t go as planned, though. Someone tipped off the rest of the internet and the internet responded appropriately, according to documents obtained by Austin’s KUT News:
In response, the agency released more than 700 pages of emails.
It appears just one of the emails was an internal communication noting an employee had received a request to change the sex listed on a driver’s license. The rest, more than 80 messages, were from people critical of the policy change, including hundreds of pages of what look like spam.
[…]
The records show that in the days following the policy change, the Department of Public Safety was signed up for PETA’s newsletter and emails from the Krazy Coupon Lady. The address received emails from QueerMeNow, a gay pornography blog, and Lovehoney, a British company that sells adult toys and lingerie.
[…]
A half dozen emails were just copies of the Bee Movie script.
And there it is: the Bee Movie script — the ultimate proof that you’ve fucked around with the internet and found out. But there’s plenty of other fun stuff in there: a request to ship a 2024 Bentley from Columbus, Ohio to Huntsville, Alabama, lots of emails describing the policy and its enforcers as “evil” and “good little Nazis,” and this nod to another classic of a genre the Texas government and its AG are apparently intent on eradicating:
One email had the subject line, “All Cowboys Are Gay.”
The body read, “what I said.”
What’s not included in the reporting or the document dump is the current status of the email address Paxton’s office definitely would have preferred to have kept private. There’s probably only one way to find out and/or get cited in future reporting on the spectacular implosion of the AG’s internal “feed my bigotry” hotline.
Unfortunately, the quietly changed drivers license policy is still active and still negatively affecting people. In August, Texas Monthly detailed the story of a Houston man who found himself stymied by the new law while trying to get his license changed — something he was denied despite being in possession of a court order giving him permission to legally change his name and gender.
After transitioning to female a few years ago—and changing all legal documents accordingly—he said he’d realized he “would always be viewed as a second-class citizen.” So he detransitioned, and in March he obtained a court order from a district court in Travis County to change his license back. But after a new policy was quietly rolled out last week via an internal email, prompted by the office of the Attorney General Ken Paxton, the Texas Department of Public Safety will no longer accept a court order as a basis to change a person’s sex on their driver’s license. Razavi’s request was denied. “I am a biological male,” Razavi told Texas Monthly. “I’m six five with a beard and actual penis, but according to Ken Paxton, I am to remain legally a woman.”
That’s the ultimate irony. The law and ensuing DPS policy change are meant to do little more than allow bigots to force people to be identified as whatever gender the bigots decide they most resemble. Someone trying to get back to the limited existence Paxton considers to be “normal” can’t even make the bigots happy because the law says he’s no longer allowed align his state ID with his biological gender.
And that’s the thing about hate: it makes people stupid. That’s why this form of hate is most often described as “irrational.” That’s because it is. Nothing about it requires thought or introspection. All it requires from the hater is an equally irrational belief that someone else is undeserving of rights or respect. Intelligent people don’t spend a lot of time hating. The idiots that run large parts of this country, however, do little else with their time.
Filed Under: anti-lgbtq bias, bigotry, hate, ken paxton, texas


Comments on “Ken Paxton’s Anti-Trans Hotline Trolled To Death Following Ban On Drivers License Gender Changes”
Hmmm. Lets run with this. Until the state proves it’s capable of acting like a human being, it shouldn’t be considered one (or run by them).
Re:
Conservatives aren’t people, so…
Re: Re: Exactly
I want to know how many transgender mice live in Texas
Re:
It isn’t, it’s considered a person for legal purposes just like corporations are. Unless you don’t like the idea of being able to sue the state…
Full Metal Jacket
There are only two things that come from Texas. And they both taste delicious.
Or however that quote goes.
According to all known ethics codes, modern Republicans should not have held power. Their spines do not exist in Euclidean OR non-Euclidean space, and their brains are usually in the company of their enemies, committing treason.
Modern Republicans still hold power; they care not about ethics or even the Constitution.
Re:
As I said elsewhere, conservatives pride themselves on the vice of selfishness. They tend to treat power as a means to selfish ends: fame, fortune, sex, whatever gets them off. They don’t care who they hurt because “fuck you, got mine” is one of the foundational pillars of conservative ideology.
Conservatives spent 50 years chipping away at Roe v. Wade. They wanted it struck down for good. But when they finally got what they wanted, they were unprepared to legislate actual “pro-life” policies. Women are dying because hospitals refuse to give them life-saving abortions until it’s too late thanks to conservative-authored abortion bans. But you won’t find a conservative lawmaker willing to repeal those bans because they already got what they wanted and damn the collateral damage.
Plenty of Republicans call themselves “pro-life”. But when they refuse to do anything but offer “thoughts and prayers” after another school shooting or fix abortion bans that force hospitals into letting women die, they hardly live up to the tern. Just as every accusation from conservatives is a confession, every self-imposed label is a rejection thereof. Their hypocrisy is rooted in selfishness; Donald Trump, and the GOP’s fealty to that orange fossil, stands as proof.
Re: Re:
Correct.
But I was doing a riff on the Bee Movie Script.
Re: Re: Re:
Ah. Well. Nevertheless. 🙃
Re: Re:
Eloquently written. Hiding behind the flag and the bible, conservatives are some of the most sadistic, greedy, selfish, racist, misogynist thugs on this planet. They truly are horrible people, and if they’re allowed to continue, they WILL kill us all — as long as they get theirs next week, next month, next year.
And “all”, ironically, includes their own children and grandchildren — but they don’t care.
Re: Re: Re: Which flag?
Which flag would they be hiding behind? The star-spangled banner represents the country ruled by the U.S. Constitution. The Confederate flag? But not all Republicans are Southerners.
And then I realized that you mean the little flag below each message here that does a good job of providing a hiding place for those continuing to spout unsavory bile.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
tl;dr
Re: Re: Re:
Yes, we’re all well aware that literacy isn’t one of your strong suits.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Actually my suits are made of linen.
Re: Re: Re:3
Which handily explains why they’re not strong.
Re: Re: Re:4
They are about as strong as all of the ones Jhon smith was gonna hit us with.
Re: Re:
One of life’s greater mysteries: Why has the AMA not brought suit against every state legislature promulgating these bans for practicing medicine without a license??? Doctors and hospitals really should go on the offensive, instead of watching patients die.
There is a legal term known as ultra vires, wherein a company or corporation cannot be made to violate the reasons for their existence. Hospitals may be for-profit, but they incorporated for the purpose of serving the health needs of their community. Abortion bans directly conflict with the community health, and thus jeopardize a hospital’s reason for existing. From that, it’s conceivable that their corporate charter could come under scrutiny, with revocation a real possibility.
If nothing else, telling a trained and experienced doctor that he or she must violate his/her Hippocratic Oath is so unethical, immoral and unjust that the punishment ought to be post-natal abortion.
Re: Re:
Well, everyone knows conservatives are pro-birth rather than pro-life. In fact, I know a Georgian woman who was refused ‘abortion’ of her molar pregnancy from three different providers, so she came here to the UK, where she had to pay for the non-viable genetic material to be removed as well as for treatment of the resultant choriocarcinoma, but was grateful that her life was saved by her finally getting the medical care she had paid for. If she had remained in Georgia, she might not now be alive. That’s how ‘pro-life’ conservatives are.
Ummm
Nothing here says the State Congress Created the law/regulation.
So the State AG is trying to Backdoor the Whole State, with an Internal EMAIL??
More info please.
Re: Really wonder
Why the LAST part of passing a Law, Isnt letting the People Vote for it.
At least then they would only pass then at certain time of the year.
And What are the abilities of the People Ruled over, being able to Fire/replace a representitive? EASILY.
Re:
It was Paxton issuing a new opinion that state agencies aren’t bound by court-ordered gender marker changes since they weren’t technically parties to the suit that resulted in the order. It’s one of the most infuriating examples of “potentially technically correct” I’ve seen in a while.
Re: Re:
Watch the judge come back and modify the order to name each and every state agency as being required to follow the order. Technically speaking, they’re all paid out of the same treasurer, so they’re all subject to whatever a court orders, named as such or not. But no, Paxton has to get cute and fuck around. He’ll find out soon enough, trust me.
Title and text contradict each other
The title says this is about gender changes, which made me wonder when and why licenses in these states started including data about gender; but the text says “a request to change the sex listed on a driver’s license”, suggesting they never did. Of course, that only raises the question about why governments should be tracking people’s genitalia. Probably they shouldn’t be including either field.
Re:
Driver’s licenses have always included the gender, because it’s only been the past 35 years or so that licenses also sported the individual’s photo. Prior to that, naming the gender helped ID a person. An simple example might be a bouncer at a bar. Numerous examples abound.
Moreover, a gender change might not be enough to warrant changing the photo, for all practical purposes the before and after images are too close to tell the difference. Thus the need to change the actual wording of the gender to match, not the photo, but the person standing in front of you wanting to be properly identified.
Re: Re:
My license says “sex”, not “gender”. That was derived from my birth certificate, which also says “sex” and was literally based on a doctor looking between my legs. I don’t think any government agency has ever asked whether I consider myself to have a gender. But if we’re talking about “35 years ago”, the modern concept bascially didn’t exist; it was always interpreted to be a synonym for sex.
In your example, what was a bouncer supposed to do if a document said “gender: F” and its holder claimed to consider themself feminine, but had a beard and a deep voice (those being, specifically, secondary sexual characteristics)? It was already theoretically illegal to discriminate on sex or gender at the time, as it still is.
But sure, it's the trans people who are the perverts...
All it requires from the hater is an equally irrational belief that someone else is undeserving of rights or respect.
For general bigotry sure, but this particular brand of bigotry also requires a downright perverse obsession with the genitals of complete strangers, frequently including the genitals of children because these deviant weirdos apparently just cannot stop themselves from fixating on what’s between the legs of strangers, even or especially when those strangers are underage.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
WTF? That One Guy is based all along?
Re: Re:
He didn’t say that, he didn’t imply that, and you’re a bad-faith asshole who has no problem with lying to “win” an argument in which you’re already out of your depth by showing up to it. You can go dry off now; kids aren’t allowed in the pool during adult swim time.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
I wasn’t arguing anything. Go take your blood pressure medication, old geezer.
Re: Re: Re:2
You’re arguing that a poster who is clearly not saying anything anti-trans is saying something anti-trans by quoting the subject line of their comment out of context. You are a troll, a nuisance, and someone who argues from bad faith positions with bad faith techniques. Get lost, kid.
Re: Re: Re:3
Personally I consider their comment both a win on my part as they couldn’t come up with anything to actually refute anything I said and an own-goal on their part as they exposed yet against how pathetically dishonest they are by cherry-picking a quote and trying to present it out of context despite the source comment literally being right above.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
I am not sure how both of you got it into your brains but I am not arguing with you. You have drummed up a fake argument inside both of your heads that you have somehow “won” by using third grade level insults. Big oof. You’re not winning Insightful that way, That One Guy.
I’ll have you know I’m a heckin’ valid LGBTQ ally and I fully back using state force against parents who object to their kids being told they were born in the wrong body. Why are you fighting me on this, bigot?
Re: Re: Re:5
You quoted part of the subject line of That One Guy’s OP comment for this thread, then called him “based” for implying that trans people are perverts (which you obviously meant in a derogatory fashion). You tried to change the context of his words into something they weren’t, thus implying that he was saying something he wasn’t. That’s how we know you acted in bad faith.
And now you’re just being ridiculous because you’ve been called out on your obvious bad-faith bullshit. Seriously, do you have a humiliation fetish, or are you too stupid to even be humiliated by how ridiculous it is for you to take the name of a known troll who hasn’t even posted in months and be worse at trolling (in mulitple contexts) than the troll you’re trying to pretend to be?
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
tl;dr
Re: Re: Re:4
We’re all aware that you can’t read more than six words at a time without your brain melting. You don’t have to keep telling us.
Re: Re: Re:
Do you not recall how adept the sex pest is at cherry-picking information from even short sentences and re-presenting it to suit his twisted narrative?
“a Houston man”
What man?
If you want to oppose Paxton’s bigotry, you’re not going to succeed by playing into it and calling a trans woman a man.
Re:
The man who transitioned, then detransitioned. If you’re going to bitch about misgendering, you should make sure you’re not doing it first.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
I wish I could have babies too, Loretta.
Shame we can’t even agree that every man (or woman) has the right to have (or not have) babies based on their own choices.
(And let’s not even get started on the People’s Front of Judea!)
Re:
Ok… I would have thought people would get the point/joke but apparently people HATE the life of brian.
I counterprotested some anti abortion (and other weird things) people. I walked past them and they were so unbelievably rude that I got a sign and stood on the opposite corner.
Two people said I sucked,
Two Hundred people gave me a thumbs up or a cheer.
Uh… Is this even legal? I didn’t know it was okay for the government to just ignore the courts like this. I can’t imagine it is because if it was then it’d make the courts completely pointless in a huge number of cases…
Re: 'Or you'll do WHAT?'
It’s ‘legal’ until and unless a judge directly orders them to follow the law and has the spine and ability to actually enforce their order, which means for all intents and purposes the state can safely ignore any legal rulings they don’t like so long as they’re willing to drop the facade and call the court’s bluff.
Re: Re:
That… Doesn’t seem right. Kind of takes the “order” out of court order…
Re: Re: Re: 'For violating a court order here's a $5,000 fine!' 'Oh noes, my pocket change...'
It shouldn’t be right, but sadly it seems to be how it works in practice these days. If you’ve got enough money and/or power legal rulings become more suggestions than orders since more often than not the only penalties judges are willing or able to hand out are financial ones, if that.
Re:
Might not be legal but happens all the time. Same thing in Ohio with birth certificates. They just ignore the court.
Honest Question.
How important is it, having sex listed on a driver’s license? Do we actually need it on there at all? What is that really doing, that’s not accomplished by the photo and other information?
step 1 get a court order to change your gender
step 2 texas DPS refuses to change it due to paxton sdecree
step 3 hold the top dps officals and paxton in contempt and lock them up
And you are the only one that sees it that way.
I’m again going to ask you to see a psychiatrist.
"Conservatives"
I submit that it’s well past time to cease calling these people “conservatives”, when the majority of their agenda is radical and they seek to conserve NOTHING.
Re:
Sure they do, they’re seeking to ‘conserve’ the status quo where straight white men are the only ones who have any rights or power and everyone else knows their place and keeps their mouths shut and heads down.
Re: Re:
And the Jews move to and Stay in Israel.
These Ruspublicans want anyone who isn’t White and Treasonous out of the US, and those who are and female to be their property.
And if you so happen to disagree, they WILL shoot you.
Huh, I remember I sent them an email calling them nazis and just got an autoresponse saying it only accepted messages originating internally.