Blumenthal Thinks If Only The FTC Can Enforce KOSA It Won’t Be Abused; He’s Wrong
from the stop-regulating-what-you-don't-understand dept
It’s pretty amazing to me just how wrong one Senator can be about the internet for years and years and years. But we’ve been writing about Senator Richard Blumenthal and never, ever letting his own confusion about the internet get in the way of him boldly making foolish claims about the internet since before he was even Senator Blumenthal. Back in 2008, when he was simply clueless Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, we had to try to explain to him the internet and Section 230, and sometimes I feel like his ongoing vendetta against the internet stems from looking so foolish all the way back then.
I mean, the defining moment of Blumenthal’s demands to regulate the internet remains his “will you commit to ending Finsta” demand, which only cemented just how clueless many of our elected officials are about the internet.
But, really, Blumenthal’s defining moment of internet ignorance should be his role in passing FOSTA, legislation that has been roundly recognized as (1) not even remotely doing what Blumenthal promised us it would do and (2) instead harming many people while simultaneously shutting down speech of marginalized groups.
No one should trust Senator Blumenthal around literally anything having to do with regulating the internet. He is a danger to the public.
And, of course, he’s still pushing his follow up to FOSTA, called KOSA (the Kids Online Safety Act). As with FOSTA, those who don’t understand the internet are doomed to get people killed. KOSA has all sorts of problems, in that its “duty of care” provisions will force websites to remove information that politically motivated enforcers will claim is “harmful.” Republicans have actually been quite upfront about this, publicly saying they support Blumenthal’s KOSA because they want to use it to drive LGBTQ content offline. Senator Marsha Blackburn, Blumenthal’s partner in crime on KOSA, has directly said that KOSA is needed to “protect minor children from the transgender in our culture.”
Yet Blumenthal still refuses to back down. While he agreed to some changes in the law to try to limit its scope to six designated areas of content, it’s not difficult to figure out how culture war enforcers could twist those areas to silence speech such as LGBTQ speech as “harmful” to children. We’re already seeing how Republican legislatures are doing exactly that.
The latest is that, in a paywalled article in Politico (thanks to a few of you who sent it over), Blumenthal (who denied there were any problems with the bill last year) says he’s open to changing the enforcement mechanism in the bill, potentially removing the provision that allows any state AG to enforce the law which would open it up to culture warrior AGs) and limiting it to just the FTC or possibly some other federal agency.
In the piece, Blumenthal admits that “as a former AG” himself, he would prefer to keep the AG enforcement mechanism in the bill, but he’s open to some other enforcement authority if it will get the bill over the finish line.
But, of course, this implies that the FTC is somehow not prone to abuse by whoever is in charge at the time, and wouldn’t use this new power as a political weapon. I mean, we already have Republicans constantly whining about Lina Khan’s somewhat rogue leadership and case selection at today’s FTC.
And, then, if Trump were re-elected, does anyone actually think he wouldn’t install some culture war MAGA crony to run the FTC and use it to hammer “big tech” with lawsuits? I mean, of course, he’d use KOSA — pushed by Democrats like Blumenthal — to force companies to remove pro-LGBTQ content as “harmful to kids.” How is that even in question?
Remember, this is the same Trump who tried to get the FCC to do his bidding in removing social media company’s right to moderate. That only failed when the clock ran out on his administration.
So, no, handing authority over to the FTC (or any federal agency) won’t fix the problems of KOSA. The problems of KOSA are inherent to the bill. They’re inherent to Blumenthal’s near complete ignorance of how the internet actually works, and what happens when you create these types of laws.
There are ways the government could help make the internet safer for kids. But it involves the boring, less flashy (but actually effective) things that Blumenthal will never look to do, because they don’t get him headlines or big attention-grabbing hearings.
Filed Under: ftc, kosa, richard blumenthal, state ags


Comments on “Blumenthal Thinks If Only The FTC Can Enforce KOSA It Won’t Be Abused; He’s Wrong”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
And this is why, even if he were convicted and imprisoned, Trump will have my vote.
It truly stuns that this blog continues to so openly argue for the indoctrination of children into degenerate LGBTQ+ movements like radical gender identity ideology.
I will never again vote for a Democrat unless they explicitly denounce “queer” evilness, like the for-profit campaign to mutilate and sterilize vulnerable children and young people [aka “gender-affirming care”].
Re:
🥱
Re: Re: as if
Re: “….just how clueless many of our elected officials are about the internet.”
Many among us in this wondrous new age of aquarius (cough cough internet age) hold a naive belief that the ancient art of governing people has now somehow inextricably transformed into something new and different from what it was before. They believe now they have internet plumbing that their shit don’t stink. They really wish the word “internet” should be all it takes to put an old school politician like Blumenthal in their place. What’s ironic is that’s exactly why old school politicians got tax payers to provide them with the plumbing in the first place, everyone deserves a platform for their crap, even libertarians.
Re: Re: Re:
The Internet has made the art of governing more difficult, as many more people can yell at them.
Re:
found the Nazi
Re:
Oh look, here is another child sex offender, and guess what, he’s not a member of the LGBTQ+ community.
But he is a police officer, so when are you going to explicitly denounce “police” evilness?
Link 👇👇👇
https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/gallery/san-antonio-police-officer-arrested-for-child-pornography-after-16-years-on-the-force-crime-people-minors-children-bexar-county?photo=3
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: LGBTQ is harmful
LGBTQ ideology is harmful, we know this because there are health statistics about what happens to them, that is even before you get to the hormone treatments, and the reproductive success when they reach adulthood.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/children-with-conservative-parents-more-likely-to-have-better-mental-health-study/ar-AA1loAWG
Re: Re: Re:
I bet Nazis had better mental health than European Jews in the 1930s and 1940s too.
That study doesn’t say what you want to pretend it says.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Weren’t they also the ones who were pioneering sexologists and homosexual behaviors?? Ignoring of course that jews have a genetic predisposition to schitzophrenia, and unironically believe in the following:
Magic sky daddy,
Magic sky daddy told them to commit genocide against idol worshipers (christians)
Magic sky daddy told their ancestors to mutilate their penises, in lieu of sacrificing them on an altar.
Magic sky daddy told their ancestors (in the form of a burning bush), that they should wander the desert for 40 years.
Magic sky daddy made one of their prophets get swallowed by a whale (but somehow he didn’t drown).
etc,etc
I think the assertion that jews are mentally ill, is beyond dispute.
Re: Re: Re:3
Wow, you’re a convicted revenge porn enthusiast and an antisemite. That’s a big fuckin’ double whammy.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
I was raised Orthodox Jewish, and my step father has been transracial for 30 years, so I know a little more about these topics than you do.
Also, I will note that Ashkenazi jews are not semetic, according to their own Torah, Ashkenaz is not a descendant of Shem, but a descendant of Japheth.
Re: Re: Re:5
So you’re a convicted revenge porn enthusiast, an antisemite, and a self-hating Jew. That’s a huge fuckin’ triple whammy.
Also:
ahahahahaha fuck off with that Rachel Dolezal bullshit, you convicted sex pest
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
Well said! Everyone knows that straightness and theism is a mask for the truly degenerate. We can only be truly progressive if men fucked men and women fucked women.
Re: Re: Re:7
You came so close to distracting from your genocide enthusiasm.
But not this tone, Bucko. I see you.
Re: Re: Re:7
s/tone/time/
You don’t get to distract from your genocide enthusiasm this time.
Re: Re: Re:
Makes sense. Liberals are bothered by injustice. Conservatives revel in it.
Re: Re: Re:
You keep using this word, but it does not mean what you think it means.
Re: Re: Re:
Wait a minute! You’re the revenge porn guy!
What are the stats on the mental health of people who engage in revenge porn?
Re:
We’re going to keep telling your kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay, no matter how much you try to beat it out of them.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
My comment has nothing to do with sexual orientation. Rather, it references the deranged and maniacal campaign to convince children that they have been “born in the wrong bodies” and need to pay ghoulish doctors to physically mutilate and chemically sterilize them (turning them into lucrative, life-long medical/pharma patients).
Re: Re: Re:
Trans people have been around as long as the concept of gender has been around. We’re going to keep trying to help them, no matter how hard you work to get them to kill themselves.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Translation: mentally-ill people have always existed.
I don’t believe you. For “help[ing]” them would mean getting them the conversion/psychotherapy needed to help them come to terms with their biological sex–not shoving them into a for-profit mutilation/sterilization pipeline that turns them into very profitable lifelong medical patients.
Re: Re: Re:3
“Conversion therapy” is literally just torturing them until they say they’re not queer.
If you want them to get psychotherapy, I’ve got good news. That’s already part of the process.
The educated professionals you expect to carry out your genocide already know it’s the wrong thing to do.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
This is false, “conversion therapy” is what you do when you give kids hormones, and tell them that they will be happy as non heterosexuals.
The former president of the APA Nicholas Andrew Cummings has described in several interviews, how the LGBTQ political lobby put political pressure on his organization, because they didn’t like what the science was showing, and how he personally in his practiced helped homosexuals lead normal heterosexual lives.
Re: Re: Re:5
…literally the torture of queer people—psychological, if not physical—to convince them that they’re not queer. Any survivor of that “therapy”, no matter what it’s called these days, will tell you as much. The practice is discredited by most major medical associations and anyone with a working sense of empathy for their fellow man.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
There is no such thing as a gay gene, there are people who have sex addictions or obsessive personalities (e.g. the people who must flip the light switch 7 times), and those people should be taught how to control their personality disorders, such that they can lead a normal healthy heterosexual life with children and a family.
Have you ever seen what happens to old gay people? it’s more unpleasant than whatever harm you think the conversion therapy is. Had the APA been a scientific organization, it could setup a control and do a proper scientific analysis of the treatment, rather than anecdotes of the mentally ill objecting to treatment.
You know who else complains about their therapy being “torture” schitzophrenics.
Re: Re: Re:7
Y’know, at this point, you can say you want to eradicate queer people. I mean, you’re right on the edge of saying it anyway, and I promise that no one is going to think any less of you (than they already do) if you simply say what’s on your mind instead of dancing around your beliefs like they’re not there.
Re: Re: Re:7
While I agree¹, that doesn’t mean that there are not gay people.
If those disorders do not actively cause harm to others, the choice is that person’s (or their guardian’s, if they are incompetent or a minor). Not yours. Not “society’s”.
You haven’t been following the literature, have you? Here’s a link so you can see for yourself how well the approach you are advocating for works in practice.
Goodnight, Felicia.
¹Based on current science.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:8
Being gay cuts your lifetime by 9 years, and reduces your fertility rate, which is an objective statement on population statistics, rather than some methodological bias.
As Dr. Cummings has explained in interviews, there are recently no studies on the pro
reparative therapyside, because of the political hot potato. However he reports in his interviews that conversion therapy works quite well when he was running his facility.Re: Re: Re:9
…“conversion ‘therapy’ ” isn’t actually therapy, doesn’t actually work, and won’t ever be studied by credible medical organizations because they recognize that “conversion ‘therapy’ ” is effectively “the torture of queer people to make them believe they’re not queer any more”. Any studies that say otherwise are likely sponsored by anti-queer organizations (most likely religious in nature) and are wholly unethical besides.
Also: Did you have to undergo therapy after your conviction, Mr. Revenge Porn?
Re: Re: Re:9
Which can easily be attributed to minority stress. Minorities tend to die younger due to them having to deal with bigots, among other things. This would be true of any minority demographic, even if the exact number of years may vary.
So does being celibate. Shockingly, not engaging in sex that has a chance of causing fertilization tends to reduce the likelihood of you getting someone pregnant.
That said, some research has suggested that, while there is no “gay gene”, there is a gene that, when found in men, is correlated with being gay, but when that same gene is found in women, it actually increases fertility.
At any rate, the point is moot. The behavior is not causing people who wish to engage in procreative sex and procreate to be less likely to successfully procreate per procreative sex act; the behavior simply doesn’t include engaging in procreation in the first place. That doesn’t make it unhealthy or evil, at least no more than celibacy is on those counts. Who cares what being gay does to one’s fertility when they aren’t going to be using that fertility?
The guy who made money doing conversion therapy is whining about people not doing conversion therapy. If you don’t see the obvious bias in play, I don’t know what to tell you.
In reality, conversion therapy has never worked well; it only ever appeared to “work” in that it got people to mask their homosexuality, which was shown to be unhealthy behavior. It was also found to be inhumane and unethical, which is why we don’t do studies into it anymore. We don’t do studies into a lot of things that doctors used to try until we decided they were unethical.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:10
Yeah! Like lobotomies!! (Which “gender affirming care” is the new version of, btw)
Re: Re: Re:11
troll is that all you got?
Re: Re: Re:11
Gender affirming care is incredibly broad, and includes treatments for cis men making them more masculine, cis women making them more feminine, calling someone by their preferred name and/or pronouns (or variants of “they”), letting them dress according to the gender they identify as, etc. It doesn’t necessarily involve hormones, puberty blockers, or surgery.
There are also no studies that show that it is in any way harmful, and I’ve yet to see how it’s inherently unethical from the perspective of the doctor or the patient. There are side effects from hormone treatments, puberty blockers, and surgery (with puberty blockers having the least, even having a decent chance of being reversible, and surgery having the most), but GAC covers more than that (and the other stuff doesn’t have any known side effects), and unlike lobotomies, they are fairly well understood, made explicit to the patient, and are generally less serious in the long-term. (That doesn’t mean that they aren’t serious; it’s just relative.)
The two things you are comparing are completely different, and none of the studies we currently have indicate that GAC will ever be seen as comparably unethical to lobotomies even if it is later determined to be unethical.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:10
Exactly.
If gays die faster it’s because straights are at fault.
If gays like us are to be supported, I’m sorry (not sorry), but straights have to die faster.
Re: Re: Re:5
..,Hallucinated nobpdy mentally competent, ever.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
https://uakron.edu/chp/about-us/historical%20review.pdf
Re: Re: Re:7
And that makes “conversion ‘therapy’ ” less of a barbaric and torturous practice…how, exactly?
Re: Re: Re:3
They’re called “transphobes.”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Of course there have been birth defects since the beginning of time, but you have to ask yourself why the sudden explosion in numbers, along with the precipitous decline in birth rates.
All that is required to connect the dots is to look at studies showing that there are large numbers of endocrine disruptors in the food supply. We have class action lawsuits against big tobacco, but the idea that we should have a class action against plastic producers, for the adverse environmental impact of their products on human sexuality, seems to be too much of a political hot potato.
Re: Re: Re:3
Generally when society looks like it might be more accepting of something, more people are willing to demonstrate how they actually feel, though I know that accepting minorities is a foreign concept to you.
It’s not precipitous; the US birth rate has been trending downward for decades.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
No it isn’t my transracial irish-catholic to mexican-jewish step-father raised me as “Benjamin Cortez” in my childhood, he also thinks he killed 300 people in Vietnam, and a slew of other things that literally never happened.
I think your idea of timescales is a bit misplaced, and it also coincides with the introduction of plastics, why don’t you compare a few decades to the timescale of the nation or perhaps civilization?
Re: Re: Re:5
hahahahahahahaha you are not a serious person
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
https://i.imgur.com/RwYDuhc.png
There’s my childhood photo
Re: Re: Re:7
now post your mugshot from your arrest on revenge porn charges, you sex pest
Re: Re: Re:
The legislation your ilk are consistently submitting and passing says otherwise.
Fucking liar.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Address your concerns to your state or congressional representative. I am not a legislator.
Re: Re: Re:3
If they wander over to this board to push propaganda, I surely will do that.
Re: Re: Re:3
They’re not here telling lies. You’re the one doing that.
Re: Re: Re:
We’re going to keep telling your kids there’s nothing wrong with being queer in any way, no matter how much you try to beat it out of them.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
Stone, I know you yourself are profoundly ill, so I’ll try not to be cruel: everything is “wrong” with “being queer” (except that, thankfully, most don’t end up reproducing).
Re: Re: Re:3
Oh. Someone’s upset enough to be reduced to namecalling. Did the faucet run out on your gish gallop?
Re: Re: Re:3
Look at that! Can’t even bother to pretend you’re not a Nazi anymore!
Re: Re: Re:3
You got anything less boring that calling me names and being a right-wing edgelord, or is “genocide anyone who doesn’t look like me” the best material you have? 🥱
Re: Re: Re:4
I’m never quite sure how they picture it going, tbh. I think they’ve convinced themselves that we’re a bunch of unarmed pansies who are going to cower in a corner waiting for them to come get us. It doesn’t occur to them for even a second that we’re all living in America with the Second Amendment.
Re: Re: Re:3
[Projects facts contrary to extensive evidence]
Re: Re: Re:3
You’re going to feel really stupid when you realise that 100% of gay people were born from heterosexual breeding.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
Hence why I favor an Iranian style policy that would re-criminalize homosexuality and punish it with imprisonment, flogging, and (preferably) death.
Re: Re: Re:5
Sounds like something a totally sane and rational person would say.
Re:
Okay boomer.
Re:
You and your allies are why pride exists, because what you say about them is imaginative, as in not based on reality, but rather being justification for a baseless hatred.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Are you suggesting that mentally-ill people should take pride in paying to be grievously harmed by Mengele-like doctors?
Re: Re: Re:
Funny coming from someone with a plan for more of them to die.
Re: Re: Re:
You, personally, should have zero pride for anything about who you are or what you do.
Re:
Can you point to where anyone on this blog has argued for “indoctrinating children” into anything? The only thing I’ve seen is promoting basic free speech rights, and concerns about GOP-led censorship of content.
Also, what the fuck, no one “indoctrinates” you into a gender. How fucking stupid are you? Who “indoctrinated” you into being straight?
Re: Re:
“Ideology” is just the latest buzzword they’re using incorrectly to try to sound like they’re making a real point instead of just grasping at straws to justify genocide.
Re: Re:
They don’t actually know what “indoctrination” is. If they did, they would literally die from hypocrisy as soon as they used the word.
Re: Re: Re:
It’s interesting how they latch onto a word they just learned thinking it is some kind of spell they can use to vanquish their illusionary foe by repeating it over and over again. A toddler learning a new word and using it ad nauseum has at least the excuse of actually being a toddler, a grown man doing the same is just sad.
Re: Re: Re:2
See also: “virtue signaling”, “woke”, “cancel culture”, and literally any other term they steal from left-wing movements
Re: Re: Re:3
“Woke” is a little different from the others. That one’s a dogwhistle they use in place of slurs for various minorities.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
What would you call it if a bunch of Christians’ wanted to dress up in their liturgical dress, and read books to your children at their school library?
Also, I would like to note, that’s only one aspect to it, the other aspect is the endocrine distruptors caused by pollution of the water and food supply such as Biphismol A
Re: Re: Re:
Sunday School. But more to the point: Telling someone that queer people exist is not indoctrination into a religious or political ideology. And further to the point: A drag queen reading a book to a child will not make that child queer any more than a child watching any of the thousands of hours of cishet-centric media will make a kid straight. I mean, shit, gay people still turn out gay despite growing up in a world where most of the media they’ll experience in their lifetime focuses on cishet relationships. Do you really believe a single book has the power to make a cishet child queer when thousands upon thousands of books, movies, and TV shows can’t make a queer kid cishet?
Re: Re: Re:2
Naw. He’s afraid that that single book will give the child the courage to come out of the closet.
Because if it isn’t where he can see it, it doesn’t exist. A willful failure of Object Permanence.
Re: Re: Re:3
The sexual predator is afraid a book might teach children to recognize when they’re being groomed for sexual assault.
Republicans can’t allow power to their victims, now can they?
Re: Re: Re:4
Hey now, no need to paint all sexual predators as Republicans.
I’m sure some of them are Libertarians.
Re: Re: Re:
Drag reading is not occurring in school libraries in the first place. A better example would be if it was happening in a public library, which is where drag reading actually happens.
And—frankly—I don’t think anyone would have a real problem with having Christians in liturgical dress read children’s books to children in a public library the same way that drag queens are currently doing. Heck, depending on the books chosen (drag reading often involves books that have nothing to do with crossdressing, gender identity, or being gay at all), I might not even have a problem with them doing so at a public school. I really couldn’t care less about how they dress. It wouldn’t be indoctrination.
And apparently you’re unfamiliar with the fact that many children do get read religious texts by Christians—often in liturgical dress—every week in Sunday School.
The idea of being indoctrinated into a gender or sexuality? That’s not actually a thing, so it’s an aspect that doesn’t exist.
Biphismol A doesn’t appear to exist at all; it doesn’t turn up any results when I do a Google search. I believe you may mean Bisphenol A, which is used to make plastics and epoxy resins and is an endocrine disruptor.
Notably, its effects on humans are incredibly weak, the levels one normally encounters is well below the levels currently associated with health risks, it doesn’t bioaccumulate, and studies into long-term exposure have been inconclusive at best. It has also been phased out of many products.
Currently, the problems with it as a pollutant are solely towards wildlife, not humans. It has minimal relevance to the current topic. It’s certainly not being done for the purpose of changing anyone’s gender.
Re: Re: Re:2
We’re working on that. Sweden’s at least progressive enough to get boys to play with Barbie dolls. They should be moving on to getting them to play “doctor” with each other, and kissing on the cheek. You graduate when you kiss each other on the mouth.
Re: Re:
Yes, the right Nazis and supremacists who are indoctrinating all children into being just as bigoted as they are. That is why they want any book that that supports a different way of life or acceptance of others banned from all libraries.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
What you call bigotry, some might consider (rightly) to be upholding family values and opposing disgusting, neo-Marxist degeneracy…
Re: Re: Re:2
And those people can be rightfully ignored as bigots and supremacists who think their preferred way of life should override everyone else’s morals, ethics, civil rights, and possibly even their lives.
Re: Re: Re:2
…said no moral human being, ever.
Re: Re: Re:2
You can live you life according to your moral codes so long as you are not doing direct harm to others. When you refuse to let others live their life according to their moral code, so long as they do no direct harm to others, then you are harming others, and have become a bigot. Support the use of force to make other follow your vision of society and you are no longer moral, but rather an authoritarian ideologue who , as they gain more power, will do more harm to society.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
will do more harm to society. How do you not yet understand that we don’t want a society in which degeneracy is tolerated. We do not consider degenerates and communists to be worthy of inclusion in our Great Society.
Re: Re: Re:4 "A society in which degeneracy is tolerated"
A society in which degeneracy is tolerated is the foundation of liberty, the right to do what you will, without state intervention.
AC, You’re having a sweet summer child moment, in failing to realize degeneracy that is regarded as sin or crime expands to justify extending persecution and even you yourself will eventually be regarded as degenerate by moral guardians and law enforcement. As eager as you are to load the cattle trains, ultimately you too will be loaded on, until only the top fifty Facebook friends of Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerberg remain free in society.
You may not be at the top of the list, but you absolutely are on the list.
And that is why we have to be skeptical every time there’s a moral panic over the next big thing, because history has shown us we’re always scared of what’s new or what is still fringe.
Before the new wave of hate against LGBT+ it was black thugs and before that radicalized Arab Islamists. Before that, street gangs. Before that, organized crime.
Heck, Rock-&-Roll, Dungeons & Dragons, boobs in R-rated cinema, violent video games…all these took their turn in the barrel. Go back far enough, it’s tandem bicycles, women reading and writing. Our moral guardians made the same accusations of trashy romance novels as they did violent first-person shooters.
You’re totally being manipulated to be afraid. And maybe you should be asking yourself how it serves your insect overlords to keep you afraid.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:5
All that you mention should be marked for death, especially Sicilian organized criminals.
Re: Re: Re:6
your getting boring to me hyman
Re: Re: Re:4
Oh, we understand that that’s what you want just fine. We are just saying that that is far more harmful than the “degeneracy” you object to.
Most people in the US do not want your “Great Society”. What you want is bigoted, disgusting, immoral, impractical, harmful to society, antiscientific, antithetical to the concept of liberty, democracy, and free speech, and unprincipled. The idea that someone must prove themself “worthy of inclusion” in our society is terrible and not how society works at all.
No, Bluthmenthal. This is not better.
I actually think I know why Bluthmenthal has been so skittish about changing KOSA: he needs Republican votes for this bill to work. If he actually does make an amendment that explicitly states that it can’t be used against the LGBT, then it will be DOA on the senate floor. House Floor if we’re being optimistic.
Even if this little amendment is marginally better, that doesn’t mean that KOSA is automatically now salvageable. All it does is just delay the possible abuses for another, ideologically different administration to use further down the line.
Re:
“Further down the line” in this case being “this time next year.”
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re:
what part of “shall pass no law” in the constitution is so hard for you to understand?
Re: Re:
How’s that revenge porn conviction been workin’ out for ya, Benji?
Re: Re:
I know why you’re afraid of the gays.
The concept of another man treating you the way that you treat women is terrifying to you.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:
Riddle me this:
who supports the gays who don’t have children and nuclear families?
TAXPAYERS
and if we use reductio ad absurdum for a moment, and assume that everyone chose to be gay, how could such a system be sustainable?
Re: Re: Re:2
Who supports straight people who don’t have children and nuclear families? TAXPAYERS.
Who supports people who can’t afford food? TAXPAYERS.
Who supports people in general? TAXPAYERS.
But God forbid we have a society with a strong social safety net, huh.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:3
So maybe the government should be trying to assist Incels as much as they try to assist the LGBT, if not more. At least Incels are willing to have children.
That’s right, maybe we shouldn’t be letting more people who cant afford to feed themselves into the country.
You seem to not be getting the ponzi scheme nature of this. An insurance system (or social insurance system), relies on the good faith of people to pay in, in exchange for hedging their risk.
When an insurance policy either does not require people to “pay in” (illegal immigrants), or allows people to file claims for their own intentional acts (such as arson), the premiums that people pay for hedging their own risks become financially untenable.
Now if you look at the rise in prices of assets over time, the increase is around 7%, whereas the official CPI is around 3%, and the extra 4% of inflation is money being bled from the economy, which prevents people wanting to invest, in addition to the already high national debt, and other financial burdens.
These financial burdens become so high, that people feel financial insecurity and dont have children, and those children are the ones who are expected to pay off the trillions of dollars of debt, until either the government tries to find new people to dupe into the ponzi scheme (immigrants), who also require infrastructure, expenses, and who pay in less than they take out, or the financial system collapses.
Re: Re: Re:4
That’s a long-ass way of saying “I think queer people should be left to die if they can’t afford to take care of themselves”, but whatever, sex pest.
Re: Re: Re:4
The funny thing is that they do – equality seems to have broken the less evolved, but letting gay people have the same rights didn’t remove anything from you.
Gay couples aren’t opposed to having kids, they just don’t wish to live a lie in order to fit in any longer. I’m sorry that nobody wants to breed with you, but that’s probably for the best.
It’s a tragedy that you’ve been fooled into blaming immigrants and gays for your lack of breeding stock, but I’m guessing a lot of women are better off for it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
What do you think the “assist” in “assisted suicide” stands for?
We’re working on it, have some patience. Your time will come.
Re: Re: Re:2
Lol. I pay more taxes than you do.
Re: Re: Re:2
Who has to pay for the absurd bullshit Republican politicians do? TAXPAYERS.
Who has to foot the bill for police bullshit? TAXPAYERS.
Who has to pay for the all the poor nuclear families who can’t afford to feed their children because they voted for the asshat who took away their foodstamps? TAXPAYERS. Specifically, from the states that actually have a POSITIVE GDP.
And who are part of the TAXPAYERS? Turns out, LGBT+ folk are also TAXPAYERS.
And they’re such a tiny minority of the populace, too.
Re: Re: Re:2
That’s not a reductio ad absurdum, at least not for the argument being made by the person you’re responding to. Their position has essentially nothing to do with the number of gays or to whether being gay is a choice or not, and your added assumption would
1) be contrary to their most likely position on those issues (nobody chooses to be gay, and gays are a minority), and
2) not actually change their argument.
A reductio ad absurdum would involve taking their argument and extending it to show how it implies an absurd result. There is no connective tissue between the argument you’re responding to and your “reductio ad absurdum”.
I’m also not sure what your point is. Gays who don’t have children and nuclear families are also taxpayers, and anyone who fits the same criteria (except that they aren’t gay) gets the exact same support from taxpayers. This isn’t something that makes gay people unusual in any way. Change every mention of “gay” that you make to “people”, and it would be just as true and valid. And since being gay doesn’t actually change anything here, it wouldn’t matter if everyone was gay; the system would be just as sustainable or unsustainable either way.
I could go on and on about how nonsensical, not even wrong, and fractally wrong your comment is, but I think I’ve done more than enough here already.
Re:
Thing is if they change the enforcement mechanism and it passed the Senate floor, could the House pass a amendment to reverse the changes?
Re: Re:
If the senate passes a bill, it goes to the house. If the house changes it (and then passes it), it goes back to the senate for another vote. … and so on, until it has passed both bodies in the same form. link
And in state-level news, now it’s Florida that wants to make it legal to sue fediverse instances for letting teenagers use them. Of course, the bill text includes a bunch of cut-outs based on the service’s “predominant or exclusive function” (and who decides what’s “predominant” again?). The exception for “Shared document collaboration” suggests all sorts of lovely work-arounds… Who’s up for founding the Young Person’s Encyclopedia of Florida?
Re:
Florida is gone. It’s American Hungary now.
Re: Re:
Now, now. Don’t be declaring Florida as Orban Hungary like that.
You’ll make Texas and Ohio feel bad about their own efforts.
Re: Re: Re:
Texas is already Russia. Ohio is basically just trying to be Belarus.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Hungary is awesome. It’s an ethnically homogeneous country that encourages and supports traditional family values.
Re: Re: Re:
It’s got an HDI lower than fucking Qatar. “At least people in my shit hole country look like me!”
Brilliant fucking priorities there, Einstein.
Re: Re: Re:
Hey, you admit you value race over freedom, I guess.
Re: Absolutely No One:
Florida: “Today we’re going to ban anyone younger than 60 years from living here. Clearly anyone younger is too dumb to understand.”
Re: Re:
“Okay, okay, wait. People under 60 can live and work here, but you can’t vote.”
Re: Re: Re:
Oh hey, it’s the Republican national platform.
Re: Re: Re:2
They don’t have a national platform. They got rid of it years ago, and it became “whatever Trump says.”
At some point presuming ignorance or stupidity before malice feels contrived.
There’s a certain threshold that I’m sure has been crossed years ago when I just can’t believe these officials like Blumenthal are trying to regulate the internet in good faith, rather are trying to sabotage it as a means by which the common public can have a political voice (or, for that matter, a place to trade porn and cat pics).
They can’t be that daft and that unable to listen to the occasional staffer who actually researches how policy helps or hurts the public. (Though if no such staffers exist, then my point is made even before they enact policy: they’re not interested in doing anything that actually helps.)
At this point, state efforts to limit communications on the internet are a malicious attack on public political discourse, and are intrinsically autocratic in nature. We’re long past the point when we can give bills like these the benefit of the doubt.
Until the US repeals FOSTA, we should trust any Federal bill regarding the internet.
Re:
Sufficiently advanced malice is indistinguishable from ignorance/stupidity.
Re:
I’m still not convinced this wasn’t Elon’s intent with Twitter. Taking a sledge hammer to what had previously been a great tool for people to organize only leads to good things for his designs on being a neo-feudal lord.
Ever played Secret Hitler?
Re: Re:
The thing is, while Twitter had some major influence in things like the Arab Spring, it wasn’t ever the main social media site. There’s an argument that the Saudi investment was to help shut it down, but the evidence seems to suggest that Elon was simply one of the idiots who bought into the idea that moderation of Nazis was political censorship, and his lack of understanding of the industry he bought into did the rest.
Basically, he thought he bought a tech platform and treated it like the startups he bought previously, but it was in reality a mature advertising and data collection site.
A article that would be interesting
Is HOW/Why/Who got the comic books code and the TV Codes passed. esp. the Cartoons being edited to death.
All of these based on a very few groups. Then go find out how Long ‘in god we trust’ has been on our money.
Why so few have changed this country, and not for the better.
A rare case where you can and should take republicans at their word
Republicans have actually been quite upfront about this, publicly saying they support Blumenthal’s KOSA because they want to use it to drive LGBTQ content offline. Senator Marsha Blackburn, Blumenthal’s partner in crime on KOSA, has directly said that KOSA is needed to “protect minor children from the transgender in our culture.”
At this point any democrat supporters of KOSA deserve absolutely zero benefit of the doubt as to why they are supporting a bill that republicans have made crystal clear not only can be but will be used against LGBTQ people and content. If they’re still supporting the bill at this point it’s clearly because it will be used against those people, not in spite of it, and their support should be seen and referred to as such when it comes to covering the bill and their continued support of it.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
KOSA
The alternative to KOSA is tens of thousands of children dying every year. Not to mention how many are abused; with the LGBTQ community children being among the most often abused and the ones who need this protection the most.
Re:
shut the fuck up lowlife sex pest
Re:
flag this right wing troll
Re:
KOSA is the brainchild of stupid people who are afraid of things they don’t understand and will happily burn down the house they are living in.
The whole LGTBQ thing is a laughable excuse concocted by stupid, ignorant and bigoted people who are just one step away from being full throated Nazi’s which needed a convenient group to victimize, in this case LGTBQ.
This stupidity doesn’t rise to the level of Jewish space lasers and Pizza-gate, but the ignorance isn’t far behind because “think of the children” makes certain types of people total idiots. Like you. Censorious asshats that want to disappear people they don’t like or understand.
Re:
…hallucinated nobody mentally competent, ever.
Re:
No. It’s not.
KOSA does nothing to protect actual children. It does a lot to help savior types, like yourself, who want to pretend they’ve done something to feel good, while not understanding the actual problem, and thereby making it worse.
Your “solutions” kill kids.
You should stop.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re:
Mike, just say you’re pro-child predation, for fuck’s sake.
Re: Re: Re:
hows the revenge porn hyman
Re: Re: Re:
flag the ac there hyman rosen a no life right winger
Re: Re: Re:
Mike won’t be you, no matter hard you project at him.
Re: Re: Re: "pro-child-predation"
As someone who watches child welfare issues, such as which states are opting out of the Summer EBT program, it concerns me when people do as you do, and use children’s welfare matters as a political football much the way QAnon accused Democrats of running a child sex abuse ring in the basement of Comet Ping Pong. Remember that?
So when you guys make assertions about child predation, it mostly just distracts away from ways actual children are endangered, such as being left to go hungry by states too concerned about horse-race politics to give half a fuck about impoverished kids in their own state.
It tells me your priorities are about causing harm out of sheer pettiness and spite. And not at all in concern about what actually does good for children in need or children in danger.
But this is also typical among officials like Blumenthal who care more about advancing their political careers then not willfully directing attention away from actual child welfare efforts, who is glad to use protect the kids rhetoric to advance bills that do little to nothing to protect children, especially when contrasted to the harm such bills often cause. (case in point, FOSTA)
Re: Re: Re:2
They are trying to get the crowd to go along with them without thinking, because their accusation make their targets seem like horrible people.
Re: Re: Re:3
It’s called “dehumanization.” It’s the fourth stage of genocide.
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:2
So your real concern is fattening up vulnerable children before slaughter? Just depraved.
Re: Re: Re:3
shut the fuck up nazi low life
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:4
Eat poop and die, communist scum.
Re: Re: Re:5
says the revenge porn freak named jay real funny jay
Re: Re: Re:5
is communist your weakest insult you nazi low life
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:6
To be a communist is the worst Sin a Man can commit.
Re: Re: Re:7
but being a nazi is completely fine ok then hyman Rosen
Re: Re: Re:7
flag this comment
Re: Re: Re:7
also it is not the worse sin sex pest
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:8
Yes it is. Communism is the greatest evil ever.
Re: Re: Re:9
anything else hyman your boring and pathetic
Re: Re: Re:7
say that when the leopards will eat your face you nazi freak
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:8
You seem very hateful, and likely are an animal abuser.
Re: Re: Re:9
says the nazi low life who is trying to put words in my mouth and leopards are the elite dumbass
This comment has been flagged by the community. Click here to show it.
Re: Re: Re:10
What do you have against leopards, man? Unless you mean black leopards (aka “Black Panthers”)??…because then I’d agree with you. Very evil! 🦹🏿♂️
Re: Re: Re:11
are you gonna keep doing this right wing loser cuase no one here is on your side buddy
Re: Re: Re:9
so are you low life
Re: Re: Re:5
you don’t even know what communist means stay mad nazi low life
Re: Re: Re:5
flag this ac
Re: Re: Re:3
That’s otherwording, a strawman, and a non sequitur. It doesn’t follow from anything they said. Come up with better arguments next time.
Re:
KOSA will not reduce those numbers at all, and will likely lead to more harm overall.
And KOSA will not improve that situation.